Enhancing quality of life after acquired brain injury
Submitting Institution
Goldsmiths' CollegeUnit of Assessment
Psychology, Psychiatry and NeuroscienceSummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Neurosciences, Public Health and Health Services
Psychology and Cognitive Sciences: Psychology
Summary of the impact
    Powell's work focuses on outcomes after traumatic brain injury. In 1995
      she established an innovative community-based multidisciplinary
      neurorehabilitation service — the Outreach Team — and evaluated it via a
      randomised controlled trial. The positive findings have informed policy
      and service developments internationally. In parallel, she developed a new
      outcome instrument [the BICRO] to evaluate psychosocial functioning; this
      is now used by clinicians in 10+ countries. The BICRO informed the
      subsequent development and validation of a cross-cultural instrument for
      assessing quality of life after brain injury [the QOLIBRI]; Powell was a
      member of the Steering Group which directed the complex international
      collaborative QOLIBRI project. The QOLIBRI is now available in many
      languages, and has been fully validated in six. There are 400+ registered
      users in over 35 countries, more than 200 being clinical service
      providers; it is a formally recommended tool for public health services in
      Finland and the US; and it is being used as an outcome measure in numerous
      treatment evaluations and prospective studies worldwide.
    Underpinning research
    Traumatic brain injury [TBI] causes long-term disability with adverse
      social, psychological and economic consequences. Rehabilitation seeks to
      optimise independence and social participation in order to reduce
      long-term care needs and enhance quality of life [QoL]. Powell, a clinical
      neuropsychologist, has held a full-time academic post at Goldsmiths since
      1994, progressing from lecturer to professor. Over this time she has
      worked collaboratively with clinicians and TBI patients to develop and
      evaluate treatments and new outcome measures.
    In 1998 she and a neurologist [Greenwood] were awarded competitive Dept
      of Health funding to design and establish a new `model'
      neurorehabilitation programme for TBI patients living in the community.
      Multidisciplinary and psychology-led, the Outreach Team is based
      at Homerton Hospital in North-East London. A comparative economic
      evaluation of the 11 projects funded under this initiative was conducted
      by an independent health economics group at Warwick [Stilwell et al,
      1999]. In parallel, a more focused and robust randomised controlled trial
      [RCT] of the Outreach service was carried out by Powell and Greenwood,
      funded by a 3-year MRC grant [1995-98]. This demonstrated superior
      outcomes in Outreach-treated patients relative to those receiving
      `treatment as usual.' [1] Still the only published RCT
      of community-based provision for TBI, it is widely cited in clinical and
      research literature and in national policy documents including the
      Department of Health's National Service Framework for Long Term Conditions
      (2005) and NICE guidelines for the management of chronic conditions such
      as multiple sclerosis (2005).
    Evaluation of TBI interventions has been constrained by a paucity of
      instruments sensitive to the complex and heterogeneous sequelae of brain
      injury. In the context of the above RCT, Powell and colleagues developed
      and validated the Brain Injury Community Rehabilitation Outcome
        (BICRO-39) scales.[2] This indexes patients'
      independence in personal care, mobility, and self-organisation; the extent
      of their socialising and productive employment; and aspects of
      psychological wellbeing which are particularly affected by TBI. A series
      of studies have demonstrated its good psychometric properties including
      sensitivity to TBI-related problems,[2] to recovery over
      time,[3] and to treatment effects.[1]
    The BICRO was influential in the construction of a new measure for
      assessing quality of life [QoL] after TBI — the QOLIBRI. QoL is
      recognised as a key dimension of outcome against which clinical
      interventions should be evaluated, but existing generic tools such as the
      WHO-QoL lack sensitivity to the very specific problems emanating from
      complex conditions such as TBI. In 2002 Powell was part of a new
      international `workforce', comprising neurologists and neuropsychologists
      from more than ten countries who convened to develop a cross-cultural
      TBI-specific instrument which would be sensitive to the cognitive,
      affective and behavioural impairments (e.g., memory problems, personality
      changes) often characterising TBI. She was elected to the Steering Group
      which directed the ensuing 10-year project to construct and validate the
      new cross-cultural measure, and she and Greenwood were awarded an NHS
      R&D grant to gather data for the UK sample.
    The QOLIBRI drew some items from existing outcome measures, including the
      BICRO, and was developed in six European languages concurrently, prior to
      being validated by teams based in over ten countries. [4, 5]
      It requires respondents to rate (a) their `satisfaction' with their
      cognition, sense of `self', daily life/autonomy, and social relationships,
      and (b) how much they are `bothered' by emotional/physical problems, and
      can be completed even by severely impaired patients.
    It has subsequently been translated and validated in several other
      languages. An initial long version was administered to >1500 patients;
      psychometric analyses yielded shorter (37-item and 6-item) versions that
      were validated in a new sample of 900+ participants. The two current
      versions have similar reliability and sensitivity, suiting them to a range
      of contexts and needs.
    References to the research
    The international quality (2* or higher) of this research is evidenced
      through the publication of key findings in highly selective and rigorously
      peer-reviewed international journals, and the high citation rates of
      several of the articles.
    
1. Powell J, Heslin J, Greenwood R (2002) Community-based
      rehabilitation after TBI: A randomised controlled trial. J Neurol
        Neurosurg Psychiat, 72, 193-202. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.72.2.193 [journal
        article; 137 citations].
     
2. Powell J, Beckers K, Greenwood R (1998) Measuring progress and
      outcome in community rehabilitation after brain injury with a new
      assessment measure: the BICRO-39 scales. Arch Phys Med Rehabil,
      79, 1213-1225. DOI:10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90265-9
      [journal article; 75 citations].
     
3. Powell J, Kitchen N, Heslin J, Greenwood R (2004).
      Psychosocial outcomes at 18 months after good neurological recovery from
      aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr,
      75(8): 1119-1124. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2002.000414
      [journal article; 68 citations].
     
4. von Steinbuechel, Wilson, Gibbons, Hawthorne, Höfer, Schmidt,
      Bullinger, Maas, Neugebauer, Powell, von Wild, Zitnay, Bakx,
      Christensen, Koskinen, Formisano, Saarajuri, Sasse, Truelle (2010) Quality
      of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) — Scale Development and Metric
      Properties. J Neurotrauma, 27,1167-85. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2009.1076
      [journal article; 36 citations].
     
5. von Steinbuechel, Wilson, Gibbons, Muehlan, Schmidt, Schmidt, Sasse,
      Koskinen, Sarajuuri, Höfer, Bullinger, Maas, Neugebauer, Powell,
      von Wild, Zitnay, Bakx, Christensen, Formisano, Hawthorne, Truelle (2013).
      QOLIBRI Overall Scale: A brief index of health-related quality of life
      after traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat, 83(11):
      1041-7. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-302361 [journal article].
     
Details of the impact
    A. The Outreach Team: The RCT of this community-based
      rehabilitation programme, showing positive effects, continues to influence
      policy and service provision internationally. It remains a key point of
      reference in relation to publicly and privately funded
      healthcare/rehabilitation — for example:
    
      - 
USA: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) is
        mandated by Congress to carry out Clinical Effectiveness Reviews [CERs]
        which "inform health plans, providers, purchasers, government
          programs, and the health care system as a whole". This RCT is one
        of a handful of studies judged sufficiently strong to feature in an
        on-going CER of postacute TBI rehabilitation.[1]
        Health insurers now fund cognitive rehabilitation after TBI, but not
        after other conditions, on the basis of the evidence base of which this
        RCT is a key part; the study is explicitly cited in the official 2013
        Medical Policy documents of United Healthcare and Anthem Healthcare.[2]
        The latter for instance states that "...published data provides the
          most support for effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation in
          individuals with TBI. For example, Powell and colleagues (2002)..."
- 
Canada: A 2011 government-mandated evidence-based review
        informing national healthcare policy cites Powell's study as the only
        Level 1 evidence that "structured multidisciplinary rehabilitation
          in community settings can improve social functioning."[3]
- 
New Zealand: The Accident Compensation Corporation, which
        provides universal comprehensive personal injury cover, cites the RCT in
        its 2011 Pragmatic Based Review which concludes that "a
          multidisciplinary rehabilitation program appears to be the most
          effective approach to help people with TBI reintegrate into the
          community." [4]
B. The BICRO scale: Over 40 hospitals, treatment centres and
      clinicians from across the world including the UK, USA, Canada, Australia,
      New Zealand, Japan, Israel, France and Germany have requested use of the
      BICRO. It is free to download,
      subject to registration, and is being used extensively to evaluate
      outcomes at individual and service level.[5]
    One of the UK's leading private providers of medico legal reports and
      rehabilitation funded through compensation awards, Rehab Without Walls
      [RWW], uses the instrument routinely to assess and report on progress: "BICROs
        are done on formally taking on a new case, and at formal reviews (e.g. 6
        monthly) thereafter ...This is a vital part of our quality assurance,
        and demonstrates our commitment to measure our effectiveness ...When I'm
        reviewing progress, BICRO scores give a very good anchor point against
        which to judge both current clinical status and proposals for further
        input." (Director of RWW [6]). RWW has approached
      Powell seeking the development of a paediatric version; preliminary work
      on this, collaboratively between RWW and Goldsmiths, has commenced.
    C. The QOLIBRI: In the public domain for less than two years, the
      QOLIBRI is in heavy demand and available for free
        download. Since its original validation in English, French, German,
      Dutch, Italian and Finnish it has been translated into numerous additional
      languages including Arabic, Chinese, Czech, Danish, Indonesian, Japanese,
      Malay, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Spanish, and Russian. It has been
      separately validated in Australia [Hawthorne et al., 2011]; other
      validations are on-going.
    On the 31/07/13 there were over 400 registered users in 35 countries
      across all continents. Of these, 34% were university-based, 60%
      clinically-based, c. 2% in voluntary support organisations such as
      Headway, and c. 3.5% in military rehabilitation facilities. It has also
      been downloaded by individual clinicians and TBI survivors. Registration
      information provided in order to access the instrument and reported in the
      database[7] evidences well over 200 rehabilitation
      centres, health authorities, and healthcare providers using it to inform
      treatment and/or evaluate outcomes. Examples of its diverse clinical and
      policy applications include:
    
      - 
Belgium, DenAchtKanter: "Every client has a personal
          support plan and we would like to have an idea in what measure their
          TBI influences their QoL. Once we have a better view, we hopefully
          will be able to make better objectives."
- 
England, Chase Park Rehabilitation Centre: "To produce an
          outcomes document for commissioners of services, people with BI and
          their families."
- 
New Zealand, Abano Rehabilitation: "To determine whether
          our clients are satisfied with their lives in our facilities and, if
          not, what we can do about it."
- 
Norway, Suunass Rehabilitation Hospital: "To use pre, post
          and at follow-up to study whether improved executive functioning is
          related to improved mental health and QoL."
- 
Pakistan, Aga Khan University Hospital: "To measure health
          care and personal costs of head injuries in motorcycle riders ... so
          that we can make a case for helmet regulation."
- 
Scotland, NHS Greater Glasgow: "To compare QoL of young
          [TBI] adults living in nursing homes with [those] living in community
          and [with the] general population."
- 
USA, Krempels Centre: "To determine if we are meeting our
          mission of improving the lives of people living with BI [brain
          injury]."
It is now recommended for national use by the Finnish public health and
      social care network (TOIMIA) [8] and by a US
      Government/National Institutes of Health interagency group,[9]
      and has been incorporated into numerous prospective or comparative
      clinical investigations. In the US the NIH Clinical Trials website [10]
      shows it being utilised in three treatment evaluations; and the qolibrinet
      database indicates its use in over 80prospective studies or randomised
      controlled treatment trials [RCTs] with projected samples of >200.
      Examples of studies going on across the world using it as a key outcome
      measure include:
    
      - 
Australia: The Royal Perth Hospital is studying the prevalence
        and severity of symptoms and QoL after road traffic related TBI (n=450).
- 
Finland: An EU-funded project at Turku University Hospital is
        developing individual evidence-based diagnostics and treatment solutions
        to match treatments to clinical features [n=1000].
- 
Spain: Barcelona's Valld'Hebron University Hospital is
        evaluating a core dataset, including the QOLIBRI, for assessing outcome
        after moderate and severe TBI [n = 200+].
- 
UK: Two on-going projects in Cambridge include a prospective
        study of outcomes after mild TBI (n=1000); and an RCT of surgical
        interventions for acute subdural haematoma.
- 
USA: Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Centers [North
        Carolina, Washington State, Pennsylvania]: (a) a prospective evaluation
        of outcomes in 750 active duty members after concussion; (b)
        investigation of the chronic consequences of mild TBI in recent
        returnees of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars (n = 515); (c) development by
        the Office of Rehabilitation Services of a VA TBI-Toolbox with
        instruments for use by its polytrauma rehabilitation providers.
- 
USA: Tulane Institute of Sports Medicine: Effects of treatment
        for head trauma in >200 professional football players.
In 2011 the Eli Lilly pharmaceutical company awarded the QOLIBRI its
      annual Quality of Life prize, which recognises outstanding research
      achievements contributing to improving patients' QoL [11].
    The QOLIBRI Society has been established to promote dissemination and
      research into factors affecting QoL after TBI; Powell is on the Board, and
      on 11/06/13 she organised and hosted (at Goldsmiths) a symposium/workshop
      directed principally at clinicians, and delivered by international
      speakers from the QOLIBRI taskforce. It was sponsored by the prominent law
      firm, Leigh Day, which believes that the QOLIBRI will be valuable in the
      medicolegal context, helping to quantify the effects of TBI and thus to
      inform the courts in relation to compensation payments [12].
      The event, for which there was a registration fee, was attended by over 60
      clinicians and service providers; the revenue is being used by the Society
      to facilitate future dissemination and training events. Many of the
      attendees have subsequently become members of the Society, and have
      registered their interest in contributing data from their services to a
      collaborative database to be used for normative and comparison purposes.
      The workshop will be replicated in Germany next year.
    Sources to corroborate the impact 
    All material below is also available in hard form on request to
        Goldsmiths Research Office.
    
      - USA Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality (2012): Draft
          Comparative Effectiveness Review.
- USA health insurers — 2013 Medical Policy documents available on
        request from the Research Office or at United
            Healthcare and Anthem
            Healthcare: Anthem Medical Policies.
- Ontario, Canada (2011) Evidence-based review of moderate to severe
        acquired brain injury "to improve the quantity of ABI rehabilitation
          in Ontario by synthesizing the current literature into a format
          utilizable by front-line clinicians and laying the foundation for
          effective knowledge transfer to improve programs and services." Abiebr
          Executive Summary.
- New Zealand — Accident Compensation Corporation report
        (2011).
- BICRO registration database/emails available on request from
        Goldsmiths Research Office.
- The Director of RWW can be contacted for corroboration [contact
          details provided separately].
- QOLIBRI registration data/database available on request from
        Goldsmiths Research Office.
- TOIMIA, the Finnish public health and social care network: The
        recommended toolkit is explained at Tervetuloa
          Toumia-Toetokantaan; its recommendation of the QOLIBRI Is shown here [available
          in English from Goldsmiths Research Office].
- Wilde E. et al. (2010) `Recommendations for the Use of Common Outcome
        Measures in Traumatic Brain Injury Research', Arch Phys Med Rehabil,
        91(11), DOI 1650-1660.e17.
- NIH clinical trials website: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov[enter
          QOLIBRI as search term]
- Eli Lilly prize
          for QoL research (2011).
- A partner at Leigh Day can be contacted for oral corroboration [contact
          details provided separately].
The consultant neurologist at Homerton Hospital can also be contacted to
      corroborate all aspects of the impact [details provided separately].