Developing Policy and Practice Capacity for Nudging Behaviour Change in Citizens
Submitting Institution
University of SouthamptonUnit of Assessment
Politics and International StudiesSummary Impact Type
PoliticalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration, Sociology
Summary of the impact
The Centre for Citizenship, Globalisation and Governance (C2G2) at the
University of Southampton is at the forefront of increasingly important
policy and practice considerations about how to enhance civic behaviour
using forms of intervention beyond legislation and taxation. Its research
in this field has influenced the UK government's approach to the concept
of the Big Society and has helped shape the broader debate on how nudging
behaviour change can reshape public service delivery. Through media
exposure and engagement in high-level interactions with policymakers, the
researchers at Southampton have framed the thinking of governments at all
levels, think-tanks and voluntary associations both in the UK and
internationally.
Underpinning research
The major underpinning research for this impact case study was an
extensive programme of experimental research, Rediscovering the Civic
and Achieving Better Outcomes in Public Policy, conducted by Gerry
Stoker (Professor of Politics and Governance) and Graham Smith (Professor
of Politics, 1999-2012) and from 2007 to 2010 with Peter John [G1].
It built on an earlier programme of research, funded by the Home Office,
which grew out of discussions between Stoker and then Home Secretary David
Blunkett [3.1].
The 2007-2010 study received ESRC Venture funding, with additional
funding from the Department of Communities and Local Government (CLG) and
the North West Innovation Network (£850,000 in total). Both Stoker and
Smith were at Southampton during the whole of the study. The programme
considered different ideas to promote civic behaviour, including `nudge'
concepts (focusing on social cues and signals, introducing small
incentives and harnessing peer pressure) and `think' strategies (asking
people to reflect on, discuss and deliberate over information provided).
As a result, the research drew on research on both behavioural economics
and democratic innovations. Experimental methods were applied to provide
robust evaluations of different interventions used to increase a range of
types of civic behaviour such as recycling, petitioning, voting and
volunteering. More specifically, randomised controlled trials and
qualitative design experiments demonstrated how different techniques work
in practice and how that practice is made more effective. These
field-based, large-scale experiments involved working in partnership with
various organisations, including the NHS (e.g. Blood and Transplant),
local authorities (e.g. Wiltshire County Council) and voluntary
organisations (e.g. EMERGE). The programme of research was influential in
the further exploitation of field and design experiments within political
science [3.2] and public policy [3.3].
The key findings were captured in a book, Nudge, Nudge, Think, Think:
Using Experiments to Change Civic Behaviour (2011) [3.4], as
well as outputs directed at policymakers in the UK [3.5] and
internationally [3.6]. The research demonstrated the importance of
both the type of message the citizen receives, such as canvassing or
giving feedback, and the particular design of the institutional
arrangement, which may allow for debate and the provision of default
options.
This work has led to related funded research. In collaboration with
researchers at Birmingham University, Stoker has conducted a survey-based
investigation into citizen engagement in co-production as part of the AHRC
Connected Communities programme (2011-2012) [G2]. Smith is the PI
on an interdisciplinary (social science/engineering) RCUK-funded project
employing experimental research to investigate the impact of community
interventions aiming to alter domestic energy use (2011-14), which has
involved engagement with the Department of Energy and Climate Change [G3].
Stoker is also CI on an ESRC-funded research project using experimental
methods to analyse co-production which started in 2013 [G4].
Citizen contributions to public goods are regarded as increasingly
important by researchers and policy-makers. This research uses the
randomised controlled trials to test interventions that could encourage
co-production and will be of direct benefit to practitioners and policy
makers connected to public service. The work involves collaboration with
university student volunteering services, the National Trust and a range
of English parish councils.
References to the research
3.1 That research is reported in T. Brannan, P. John and G. Stoker
(ed) Re-energising citizenship. Strategies for Civil Renewal,
Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, pp211
3.2 G. Stoker (2010) `Exploring the promise of experimentation in
political science: micro-foundational insights and policy relevance' Political
Studies, Vol 58, No 2, March, 300-319
3.3 G. Stoker (2010) `Translating experiments into policy' The
Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 628,
March pp47-58
3.5 Gerry Stoker and Alice Moseley (2013) `Motivation, Behaviour
and the Microfoundations of Public Services' in S. Griffiths, H. Kippin
and G. Stoker (eds) ( 2013) Public Services: A New Reform Agenda
London: Bloomsbury Academic
Grants
G1.ESRC: "Rediscovering the Civic and Achieving Better Outcomes in
Public Policy" Smith and Stoker, CIs. Start date: 01 September 2007 End
date: 30 June 2010 Funding: £665,085.21. (PI: Peter John)
G2.Stoker (CI) `Activating the `Big Society': Developing Evidence
on the Underlying Conditions for Individual and Community Co-production'
as part AHRC Connected Communities programme, Jan 2011-April 2012, £40,000
(PI: Tony Bovaird)
G3.Smith (PI) `Community-based initiatives in energy savings',
2011-14, RCUK, £950,000.
G4.Stoker (CI) `Citizen Contribution to Local Public Services:
Field Experiments in Institutions Incorporating Social Information' ESRC,
Jan 2013-June 2015, £495,864 (PI: Peter John)
Details of the impact
Nudge based strategies are an important and proliferating feature of
policy agendas, nationally and internationally, across diverse policy
areas, notably, environment, health and finance. Our research has
supported both the appropriate use of such strategies and a critical
awareness among policy makers of the dilemmas involved in such
interventions. For example, Sue Goss, Principal of the Office for Public
Management acknowledges `the impact that Gerry's research Nudge, Nudge,
Think, Think has had on the work that OPM has published on behaviour
change' noting `his research into the best ways to persuade the
public to change thinking and actions has been invaluable' [5.1].
After his most recent appearance on the Today programme (3 May
2013) where Stoker used this research to raise concerns about how future
development of Nudge strategies would have to recognise the need to
combine with other approaches and tackle ethical concerns about
interventions, he was invited to meet with Owain Service, Deputy Director
of the Behavioural Insights Team (UK Cabinet Office) to discuss how the
BIT should best meet these challenges [5.2].
The 2009 Political Quarterly article `Nudge, Nudge, Think, Think'
was immediately picked up by the Chief Executive of the RSA, Matthew
Taylor, who referred to it on his blog as a "brilliant paper". The monthly
statistics for Taylor's blog are 13,000 views and 3,698 hits. The blog is
widely influential with governments, think tanks and consultancies [5.3].
The importance of the research was recognised by the then Minister for
Decentralisation, Greg Clark, who chose to make his first public speech on
the Big Society at the launch of the final report of research findings for
the Rediscovering the Civic project on 23 June 2010. In the
accompanying press release he praised the research for "[showing] that
citizens together can create the Big Society" [5.4]. In a
subsequent letter to Stoker (dated 1 July 2010), the Minister added: "I
have taken away with me clear views... in particular about what we
should be doing differently here at the Centre in order to generate the
trust and support we need to deliver the Big Society. It has given me
even greater appetite to understand more about the behaviour and
motivations of our citizens... I look forward to a continuing dialogue
with you all as we develop and realise our vision for the Big Society"
[5.5]. Clark then wrote the foreword to Nudge, Nudge, Think,
Think (2011), describing the book as "both timely and welcome" (5.6).
(The book itself has been downloaded over 5000 times by the end of 2012.)
The dialogue between Clark and Stoker continued in 2012 as they shared a
platform at the British Academy discussing the connection between localism
and Nudge [5.7].
Stoker has taken the work out to senior policy makers in Australia and
New Zealand, through the Australian and New Zealand School of Government
(ANZSOG), where behaviour change policy has become a feature of state
level government in New South Wales and Victoria. Monica Pfeiffer,
Director Applied Learning at ANZSOG comments: `Gerry's presentations
and publications resulted in a better understanding of the relative
merits of different approaches to behaviour change so that governments
are more confident about what is worth doing and how; and equally
significantly what not to do' [5.8]. Notably Helen Wyn, the
Director of the Policy Advisory Group of the Department of Prime Minister
and Cabinet in New Zealand (after a presentation by Stoker in Wellington,
on 13 September 2012) commented that the Nudge, Nudge, Think, Think
book was valuable because it took a critical and empirical stance to the
new ideas of behavioural change. She describes the work `as poking a
stick at it, asking questions about what is really going to work'.
She praises in particular the innovative introduction of the `useful
concept of think' alongside the established work on nudge and concludes: `your
work helps to raise awareness about applications and their limitations'
[5.9].
Media interest in the research has increased public awareness of civic
behaviour as well as related concepts such as the Big Society. Stoker was
interviewed, for example, about Nudge by Radio 4's Today programme
on 23 August 2010, 8 June 2011 and 3 May 2013. He also participated in a
BBC South documentary, broadcast in Autumn 2011, about the prospects for
the Big Society. In addition, Stoker and Smith have made numerous
presentations of the research to practitioner audiences and the take up of
the work by consultancies has increased its impact at an operational level
[5.10].
Sources to corroborate the impact
5.1 For corroboration, contact Manager, Office of Public
Management, a London-based consultancy company. See also Judith Smyth
(2013) , Achieving and demonstrating impact: a case study of
Southampton University's C2G2 (Centre for Citizenship, Globalisation
and Governance) p9 ( Available at C2G2 Website
http://www.southampton.ac.uk/C2G2/documents/Achieving%20and%20demonstrating%20impact%20FINAL.pdf)
5.2 Email sent by Deputy Director, Behavioural Insights Team, 3
May 2013 (available upon request)
5.3 http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com
Figures confirmed in email from Barbara Corbett at the RSA on 1 August
2012. See Judith Smyth (2013) , Achieving and demonstrating impact: a case
study of Southampton University's C2G2
5.4 http://www.communities.gov.uk/newsstories/newsroom/1621887
5.5 Letter from Greg Clark, Minister for Decentralisation, 1 Jul
2010 (available upon request)
5.6 Greg Clark `Foreword' in Peter John et al (2011) Nudge,
nudge, think, think : using experiments to change civic behaviour
London: Bloomsbury Academic
5.7 http://www.britac.ac.uk/policy/Nudging-citizens-towards-localism.cfm
5.8 Collaborating contact: Director Applied Learning at ANZSOG.
See also Smyth (2013) (reference 1) p10
5.9 For a recording of the comments consult: http://www.anzsog.edu.au/events/events-calendar/2012/09/16/ssc-new-zealand-partnership-program-event/363/professor-gerry-stoker-nudge-nudge-think-think-experiments-in-the-small-statebig-society-wellington( see 43.00 mins to 47.00 mins in the recording)
5.10 In addition see comments from practitioners in Judith Smyth
Report, p9 and also one example of a practitioner report accessed at http://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Capital-Ambition-Guide-to-Behaviour-Change-May-2010.pdf