Improving Educational Effectiveness and Quality
Submitting Institution
University of SouthamptonUnit of Assessment
EducationSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Education: Curriculum and Pedagogy, Specialist Studies In Education
Summary of the impact
Educational effectiveness and improvement research by the University of
Southampton School of Education has contributed significantly to the
design and implementation of educational policy and practice at both
national and international levels. Impact has been predominantly in the
area of policy, but the School's ground-breaking research has also shown
the effects of (and practice within) `good' schools and has pioneered
novel approaches to school improvement, school organisation and the use of
data in schools. The Educational Effectiveness and Improvement Group has
helped establish the International Congress for School Effectiveness and
Improvement (ICSEI) and given it a global reach; its research has directly
informed policy implementation through academy chains, schools and local
authorities in the UK generally and in Wales in particular, and
internationally in the US, China, Sweden, Cyprus and Chile. The School's
worldwide reach is among the most widespread in Education.
Underpinning research
Context: In the last two decades, the school effectiveness and
improvement movement, organised internationally through ICSEI (co-founded
by Reynolds and upon whose board Muijs and Downey
serve) and in the US by American Education Research Association (AERA)'s
School Effectiveness & School Improvement Special Interest Group
(chaired by Muijs) has successfully argued for and demonstrated
the importance of schools in determining children's educational and social
achievement. In that period, David Reynolds, Daniel Muijs, Anthony
Kelly and Chris Downey have together generated some of the
best known and highly regarded research in this area.
Reynolds's work in the period 1993-2013 on the characteristics of
effective schools and added value, and on effective ways of helping
schools improve, has produced in the period 2008-2013 clear blueprints for
school leadership, school culture and school expectations, and how these
can be affected by external improvement programmes.
Muijs's work in the period 1993-2013 has focused on the
(historically neglected) area of effective teachers and their behaviours,
attributes and structures, moving later into the design and evaluation of
professional development programmes based directly on his research
findings. His work also focuses on networking and collaboration between
schools, Federations, Best Practice Networks, Schools Facing Challenging
Circumstances, and Extended Schools.
Kelly and Downey's work in this period has analysed how
pupil performance data can be utilised to improve schools by making school
management more `intelligent' about the functioning of classrooms. Their
research has improved the professional use of data in schools and led to
more improvement-oriented practitioners at the level of both school and
Local Authority. It has also been used in the area of equity.
The appointment of Reynolds and Muijs in 2010 to join Kelly
(appointed 2001) and Downey (appointed RA in 2006 and lecturer in
2008) represented a major investment by the University of Southampton in
expanding research and building impact in educational effectiveness and
improvement; specifically, to promote the dissemination to practitioners
and policy-makers of the research conducted by the Educational
Effectiveness and Improvement Group, and to improve `policy and practice
reach' and impact on children's life-chances nationally and
internationally.
Research funding for Reynolds, Muijs, Kelly and Downey in
the period 1993-2013 has totalled approx. £6m in grants (Reynolds —
£2m; Muijs — £2.5m; Kelly & Downey — £1.5m) and has
been widely disseminated in books and through peer-reviewed journals
papers in, for example, British Educational Research Journal, School
Effectiveness and School Improvement, the Oxford Review of
Education, Educational Research, and the Journal of
Education Policy.
The underpinning research: In the last three years alone, the
group's innovative research programme in this field has included: Kelly
and Downey's projects with local authorities on the use of
pupil-level data to inform the practice of educational planning, and a
national survey (funded by CfBT) of teachers' attitudes to the use of
attainment and progress data, which has been cited in government policy
documents [3.1]; Downey, Muijs and Kelly's (2010-11)
project (funded by Fischer Family Trust) on trends in pupil attainment /
pupil progress observed in the National Pupil Database, and on the take-up
of the EBacc qualification [3.2]; Kelly's work for the
States of Jersey (2012-13) on school effectiveness using innovative
`capability' approaches and new metrics for gauging equity to guide
schooling policy on the island [3.3]; Reynolds's project
(2010-12) on High Reliability Schools and Within School Variation [3.4],
using novel, high-effectiveness methods of school improvement modelled on
`failure-free' organisations; Muijs's project (2008-10), on the
impact of the government's `TeachFirst' initiative (funded by Goldman
Sachs) focusing in an innovative way on the impact of pedagogy in schools
in challenging circumstances [3.5], and his work on modelling
collaborative improvement and school-to-school partnerships in Hampshire
schools [3.6]; and Reynolds and Kelly's (2013) research for
the Royal Society's `Vision Initiative' on accountability and its effect
on STEM subjects. Clearly, the Educational Effectiveness and Improvement
Group's research, coming as a result of close collaborations between the 4
colleagues and supported by some 6 research assistants at any given time,
represents arguably the most intensive and successful `education
effectiveness' research grouping in the UK.
References to the research
3.1 Kelly, A. & Downey, C. (2012). Professional attitudes to
the use of pupil performance data in English secondary schools, School
Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(4), 415-37.
3.2 Kelly, C., Downey, C., Muijs, D. & Khambaita, P. (2011) Key
Stage 1 indicators, free school meals and birth variables analysis.
Report for FFT, University of Southampton.
And: The take-up of EBacc Qualification. Report for FFT,
University of Southampton.
3.3 Kelly, A. (2012). Measuring `equity' and `equitability' in
school effectiveness research, British Educational Research Journal,
38(6), 977-1002.
3.4 Stringfield, S., Reynolds, D. & Schaffer, E. C. (2008)
Improving secondary students' academic achievement through a focus on
reform reliability: four and nine years findings from the High Reliability
Schools Project, School Effectiveness and School Improvement,
19(4), 409-428.
3.5 Muijs, D., Chapman, C. & Armstrong, P. (2010) Maximum
Impact Evaluation: the impact of Teach First teachers in schools: Final
Report.
3.6 Muijs, D., West, M. & Ainscow, M. (2010) Why Network?
Theoretical Perspectives on Networking and Collaboration between Schools,
School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(1), 5-27.
Selection of co-ordinated grants awarded (figures rounded)
1. Kelly & Downey, 2006 - 2008, Use of data to inform school
improvement, ESRC, £96,000
2. Kelly (=P.I.) et al., 2007 - 2008, Value for money in schools,
Audit Commission, £20,000
3. Downey & Kelly, 2009 - 2010 Investigating post-16
progression and learner engagement, Dorset Children's Services,
£34,000
4. Kelly & Downey, 2009, Data dictatorship and data
democracy: understanding professional attitudes to the use of pupil
performance data in schools, CfBT Education Trust, £28,000
5. Downey, 2009 - 2011, Evaluation of the Poole Schools Project,
Poole Borough Council & Bournemouth and Poole Primary Care Trust,
£20,000
6. Muijs, 2008 - 2010, Evaluation of the maximum impact programme
for Teach First, Goldman Sachs Foundation, £98,000
7. Reynolds, 2010 - 2011, The Within-School Variation Project, TDA,
£19,500
8. Downey, Muijs & Kelly, 2010 - 2011, Analysis and reporting
of trends in pupil attainment and progress observed in the National Pupil
Database, Fischer Family Trust (FFT), £52,000
9. Muijs, 2011 - 2012, Evaluation of S2S partnerships, Southampton
City Council, £6,000
10. Kelly, 2012 - 2013, Equity in Pupil Attainment on Jersey, States
of Jersey & Jersey Community Relations Trust, £77,000 [incl. RA
salary]
11. Kelly (=P.I.) et al., 2013 - 2015, Engaging university
researchers with secondary school students and teachers, RCUK,
£187,000
12. Reynolds, & Kelly, 2013, Accountability and the meaning
of success in education systems, The Royal Society, £13,500
Details of the impact
Reynolds is one of the world's leading school effectiveness
researchers and is currently (2011-present) the Senior Educational Policy
Adviser to the Welsh Government, responsible for applying his research to
the Welsh (and from Wales to the international) policy-making and
practitioner community with a view to raising Wales's showing in PISA [5.1].
Reynolds is also, through his membership of the Board of E-ACT and
as Chair of its Educational Committee, using his research to impact
directly on 31 schools with 20,000 children and 3,000 staff [5.2].
In the US, his High-Reliability School research, which has been
disseminated in the leading American practitioner journal Phi Delta
Kappan and at multiple practitioner and policy-maker conferences,
has led to the current construction of a US national cadre of
`High-Reliability School Districts' [5.2].
Muijs's research on the effectiveness of `TeachFirst'
significantly and directly influenced the decision to expand that
programme. The DfE document, `The Case for Change', informed the 2010
White Paper and cited his research, as a result of which the government
decided to "more than double the size of TeachFirst and extend it
across the country and into primary schools" [5.3]. Muijs's
research on the impact of collaboration between schools was also incorporated
into, and cited by, the NCSL's `Guide to Federations', produced for
all headteachers in the UK [5.3]. In Europe, he serves on the
committee that advises (and reports directly to) the Education Minister of
the Flemish Government on reforming teacher training [5.4].
Kelly and Downey's research has made a direct contribution to
changing the practice of professionals by encouraging the use of
data by local authorities and has been regularly cited in policy-making
circles. The research, described by one LA as "invaluable", enabled
Dorset, for example, to develop tools to survey children's well-being,
saving the Authority more than £100,000 in direct costs (based on the
rates that were charged at the time for the Pupil Attitudes to School and
Self (PASS) survey from `W3 Insights') [5.5]. Kelly was
called as an expert witness before the House of Commons Select Committee
on Education (10/11/2010) and also serves on the Parliamentary Group on
School Governance since its inception in 2011, both of which have materially
affected the way schools are governed and inspected in England and
Wales. Kelly's research has also been cited in Parliamentary
Debates (e.g. in January 2013, Lord Clancarty cited Kelly when he opened
the debate in the House of Lords opposing the government's EBacc
Certificate proposals, which Minister Gove subsequently withdrew) [5.6].
Downey, Muijs and Kelly's FFT-funded study developed new
quantitative metrics for optimising data-use by practitioners,
which has had a direct effect on the content of FFT's service to schools
and LAs throughout England and Wales [5.7]. Kelly's recent project
(2012-13) on Jersey has drawn on this theoretical work on equity
measurement, and the marrying of school effectiveness and Sen's (Nobel
prize-winning) `capability' approaches, and is impacting on schooling on
the island.
Findings by Kelly and Downey about the extent to which data can
be used as a driver for reform in schools was cited in the DFE's
`Impact of Research' policy review document by Goldacre and Plant
(2013), the effect of which has been to steer government policy towards
greater reliance on robust longitudinal and RCT-trialled practice [5.8].
The group's extensive programme of dissemination to practitioner and
policy-maker audiences through multiple conference presentations is
exemplified by the influential (`State of the Art') reviews by Muijs
and Reynolds commissioned by ICSEI in 2011 and 2012. ICSEI is one
of the few international organisations in education that links
policy-makers, practitioners and researchers (in Cyprus in 2011, 43% of
the 500+ delegates attending the annual conference were leading
practitioners and high-ranking policy-makers; in Malmo in 2012, the figure
was 46% of 600+ attendees). In 2011, Reynolds presented his
research to 1,250 practitioners at the Chinese National Association for
School Effectiveness and Improvement organised by Shenyang Normal
University; and in 2013, Muijs presented his research to more than
1,500 headteachers in Chile and the Chilean Minister of Education. All
locations show evidence of take-up of `effective schools' practices and
the contribution "had a great impact on teacher training and on the
formation of educational policy". [5.9].
Sources to corroborate the impact
5.1 See letter dated 19 Mar 2013 from Minister for Education and
Skills, Welsh Government.
5.2 See letter from Director General of E-Act and see McRel
Education summit for innovative education at: http://www.mcrel.org/products-and-services
5.3 See Department for Education (2010) The Importance of
Teaching. The Schools White Paper 2010. Available online at: https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/CM-7980.pdf
and see National College for Leadership of Schools and Children's Services
(2010). A National College Guide to Federations. Nottingham: NCSL.
5.4 See clip from TV news in Belgium at:
http://www.deredactie.be/cm/vrtnieuws/videozone/programmas/journaal/2.30294;
and from the two broadsheet newspapers that exist in Flanders:
http://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20131005_00776315;
http://www.demorgen.be/dm/nl/1344/Onderwijs/article/detail/1717443/2013/10/05/Smet-richt-6-beleidsgroepen-voor-lerarenopleidingen-op.dhtml;
and a longer piece from the main news magazine and from the Flemish
equivalent of the TES: http://www.knack.be/nieuws/belgie/strengere-criteria-voor-aspirant-leraars/article-normal-109907.html;
http://www.klasse.be/leraren/38054/lerarenopleiding-krijgt-slecht-rapport/#.UmElPVBwqSo
(all last accessed on 18/10/2013)
5.5 Corroborating contact: Former Head of Learning and School
Improvement, Learning and School Improvement Service, Dorset County
Council.
5.6 For verification, see House of Commons Select Committee on
Education: The role & future of Ofsted, 10/11/10. Available online at:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmeduc/570/10111001.htm
and see Debate on Education: English Baccalaureate Certificate. Opened by
the Earl of Clancarty on 14 January 2013. Available online at:
http://www.parliamentlive.tv/Main/Player.aspx?meetingId=12184
[starts @ 4:50]
5.7 Fischer Family trust (FFT) is an independent, not-for-profit
charity. Currently, all LAs in England and Wales subscribe to FFT, and
virtually all schools in England and Wales access FFT data either online
or using FFT databases.
5.8 For verification, see Goldacre, B. and Plant, R. (2013) Impact
of Research. Department for Education Analytical Review — Executive
Summary (London: DfE) p.2.
5.9 For verification, please contact Professor Kyriakides,
University of Cyprus, School of Education.