Apaziquone (EO9) as a new therapy for treating non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
Submitting Institution
University of BradfordUnit of Assessment
Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and PharmacySummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Summary of the impact
Bladder cancer is the fifth most common form of cancer, with over 70% of
cases presenting as non-muscle invasive bladder carcinomas (NMIBC).
Research in the Institute of Cancer Therapeutics at the University of
Bradford led to the evaluation of Apaziquone (EO9) in phase II clinical
trials against high risk NMIBC in The Netherlands, and two multi-centre
phase III clinical trials involving 106 centres across the USA, Canada and
Europe. A total of 1,746 patients with low or high risk NMIBC received EO9
and significant reductions in the rates of recurrence at two years have
been reported. Our research has impacted upon the health and welfare of
patients with NMIBC.
Underpinning research
The underpinning research was conducted at the Institute of Cancer
Therapeutics (ICT) at the University of Bradford by a team of over 20
researchers. The research was led by Dr Roger Phillips (Lecturer
1996-2000, Senior Lecturer 2000-2003, Reader 2003-present) with notable
contributions from John Double (Professor 1979-2003), Dr Paul Loadman
(Lecturer 1996-2002, Senior Lecturer 2002-present), and a Consultant
Urologist at Bradford Royal Infirmary.
In the mid 1990's Apaziquone (EO9) underwent clinical evaluation. The
drug was administered intravenously but despite reports of three partial
responses in the phase I study by Schellens et al. (Journal of
the National Cancer Institute, 1994), neither partial nor complete
responses were observed in phase II studies involving 130 patients with
advanced breast, gastric, pancreatic, colorectal cancer and non-small cell
lung cancer (Dirix et al., European Journal of Cancer,
1996; Pavlidis et al., Annals of Oncology, 1996). The lack
of efficacy led investigators to conclude that EO9 was clinically inactive
and it was abandoned.
Research conducted at the ICT identified the reason why intravenously
administered Apaziquone failed and championed further research which
resulted in substantial investment in clinical studies. Rapid
pharmacokinetic elimination in conjunction with poor penetration through
avascular tumour tissue suggested that delivery of Apaziquone to tumours
was impaired (1). This result was fundamental as it demonstrated that the
failure of Apaziquone was due to poor drug delivery (1,2). Direct
intra-tumoural injection of Apaziquone into human tumour xenografts
confirmed that significant tumour shrinkage occurred when Apaziquone was
delivered directly to the tumour (3). The challenge therefore was to find
a way to deliver Apaziquone.
The Bradford team reasoned that in bladder cancer, the `negative
properties' of Apaziquone could paradoxically be advantageous. Bladder
cancer is a common disease and 70% of patients present with non-muscle
invasive bladder carcinomas (NMIBC). Treatment is by surgery followed by a
dose of chemotherapy administered directly into the bladder (intravesical
administration). Intravesical administration of Apaziquone would
circumvent the drug delivery problem and if any drug reached the blood
supply, it would be rapidly eliminated (4). Apaziquone is enzymatically
converted to cytotoxic metabolites and following the demonstration that
human bladder cancers possess these enzymes (4), a phase I/II clinical
pilot study was designed and conducted in Bradford, (2001 to 2006). Twelve
patients with low grade NMIBC were treated with 6 doses of Apaziquone
administered intravesically once per week. A total of 8 patients had
complete histological responses to Apaziquone at doses that were well
tolerated (5). A further phase II study using a multiple dose regimen was
conducted independently in The Netherlands and 30 of the 46 patients
treated had complete responses (van der Heijden et al., Journal of
Urology, 2006).
Our research therefore provided the scientific rationale for conducting a
further trial against NMIBC and demonstrated for the first time that
Apaziquone was clinically active against NMIBC in humans at doses that
were well tolerated. This underpinning research directly led to the
impacts described in section 4.
References to the research
1. Phillips RM, Loadman PM, Cronin B. (1998) Evaluation of a novel in
vitro assay for assessing drug penetration into avascular regions of
tumours. British Journal of Cancer 77(12): 2112-2119.
2. Phillips RM. (1998) Prospects for Bioreductive Drug Development. Expert
Opinion on Investigational Drugs 7(6): 905-928.
3. Choudry GA, Hamilton Stewart P, Brown JE, Double JA, Krul MRL, Naylor
B, Phillips RM. (2001) A novel strategy for NQO1 (NAD(P)H:Quinone
oxidoreductase, EC 1.6.99.2) mediated therapy of bladder cancer based on
the pharmacological properties of EO9. British Journal of Cancer
85(8): 1137-1146.
4. Loadman PM, Bibby MC, Phillips RM. (2002) Pharmacological approach
towards the development of indolequinone bioreductive drugs based on the
clinically inactive agent EO9. British Journal of Pharmacology
137(5): 701-709.
5. Puri R, Palit V, Loadman PM, Flannigan M, Shah T, Choudry GA, Basu S,
Double JA, Lenaz G, Chawla S, Beer M, van Kalken C, de Boer R, Beijnen JH,
Twelves CJ, Phillips RM. (2006) Phase I/II pilot study of intravesical
Eoquin (EO9) against superficial bladder cancer. Journal of Urology
176(4): 1344-1348.
Evidence of quality:
The papers are published in either multidisciplinary journals (two
publications in British Journal of Cancer Impact factor 5.082,
ranked 35 out of 196 in the Oncology category, one in British Journal
of Pharmacology Impact factor 5.067, ranked 21 out of 260 in the
Pharmacology and Pharmacy category and one in Expert Opinion on
Investigative Drugs, Impact factor 4.744, ranked 25 out of 260 in
the Pharmacology and Pharmacy category) or a specialist Urology journal (Journal
of Urology Impact factor 3.69, ranked 10 out of 75 in the Urology
category). Indices of quality were obtained from the Journal Citation
Reports database.
Sources of funding:
All the pre-clinical studies were funded by core support from the charity
Bradford's War on Cancer and Cancer Research UK (Program grant C459/A2579)
awarded to Double, 2000 to 2005, £1.9m.
The phase I/II clinical pilot study was funded by Spectrum
Pharmaceuticals (Irvine, California, http://www.sppirx.com).
The grant (£81,850) funded the phase I/II clinical trial work conducted
between 2001 and 2006 and the lead investigators were Puri (Bradford Royal
Infirmary) and Phillips (Bradford University).
Details of the impact
Bladder cancer is a common disease with an estimated 12 cases per 100,000
people in the UK. Despite surgery and chemotherapy, 80% of patients with
NMIBC will have recurrent disease within 5 years. This high rate of
recurrence illustrates the need to develop novel treatments for NMIBC. Our
underpinning research led to investment in further phase II trials in high
risk NMIBC, safety studies of Apaziquone administered directly after
surgery and Phase III clinical trials in low risk NMIBC where recurrence
rate was the primary endpoint.
Recurrence rates from follow-up of patients in the pilot phase I/II and
phase II studies were published in 2009 (a,b). Both studies reported that
early recurrence was rare (a,b) and that recurrence rates after two years
of follow up was 49.5% (b). In a systematic review of 23 studies of
treatment of low grade NMIBC involving 6 different cytotoxics and 6 immune
response modifiers, the highest complete response rate was obtained with
Apaziquone (c). Furthermore, 49.5% of complete responders were recurrence
free two years after the start of treatment (b,c). Only ThioTEPA gave a
higher recurrence free period but this was achieved at the expense of
significant systemic toxicity (leukopenia, (c)). In summary, phase I/II
studies using a multiple dosing regimen demonstrated that Apaziquone is
clinically active against low risk NMIBC, had a favourable toxicity
profile and in those patients that experienced a complete response, the
disease free interval increased (a,b,c). In July 2009, Apaziquone was
awarded `fast track' status by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in
the USA, a process designed to facilitate the development and approval of
drugs used to treat serious diseases and fill an unmet medical need (d).
Two additional phase II clinical studies were conducted in The
Netherlands (e,f). In the first of these studies (NCT00141531, started in
August 2005 and completed in December 2009 (e)), 53 patients with high
risk NMIBC were treated with multiple doses of Apaziquone administered
intravesically. The recurrence rate after 12 months was 34.7% and these
results were considered encouraging compared to the 61% probability of
recurrence calculated by the EORTC for high risk NMIBC (e). In the second
study (NCT01475266, started November 2011 and completed in 2012), a single
dose of Apaziquone was administered within 6 hours of surgery (f), a
protocol that is widely used in the treatment of low risk NMIBC. Twenty
patients were treated using this protocol and the results demonstrated
that Apaziquone was again well tolerated with minimal local side effects
and no systemic side effects, a result that is consistent with the absence
of detectable levels of Apaziquone in the peripheral blood of patients
(f).
The successful phase I and II studies paved the way for two large,
multi-centre phase III trials (g). The first, NCT00598806 (started in
September 2007 and completed in December 2009) was conducted across 77
clinical centres in the USA, Canada and Poland with 813 patients and the
second, NCT00461591 (started in April 2007 and completed in December 2009)
across 74 medical centres across the USA with 802 patients enrolled. Both
trials were sponsored by Spectrum Pharmaceuticals in partnership with
Allergan Inc (Irvine California), an investment of more than $41.5m (h),
and involved a single dose of Apaziquone administered intravesically
within 6 hours of surgery. The results were recently reported on public
domain websites (i) and the combined results of both studies reached
significance at both the primary (recurrence rate at 2 years) and
secondary (time to first recurrence) outcome measures (i). Following a
meeting with the FDA (January 2013), Spectrum Pharmaceuticals announced
that they expect to file for a New Drug Application and have also
committed to conduct a further phase III trial (NCT01410565, (j)) using
the multiple dosing schedule that was efficacious in phase II clinical
trials.
To summarise, the original research from Bradford led to investment in
clinical trials of Apaziquone that demonstrated clinical benefit in
patients with low risk NMIBC, a disease for which no new therapies have
been approved for the past twenty years. 1,746 patients have been treated
with Apaziquone in medical centres across the UK, USA, Canada and Europe
and patients who responded well typically experienced longer periods of
remission compared to standard therapies for NMIBC. Furthermore,
Apaziquone was well tolerated with low levels of drug-induced toxicity to
the bladder and no systemic side effects reported. Further clinical trials
are underway and a New Drug Application to the FDA is expected.
Sources to corroborate the impact
a. Jain A, Phillips RM, Scally AJ, Lenaz G, Beer M and Puri R. (2009)
Response of multiple recurrent TaT1 bladder cancer to intravesical
Apaziquone (EO9): Comparative analysis of tumour recurrence rates, Urology
73: 1083-1086.
b. Hendricksen K, van der Heijden AG, Cornel EB, Vergunst H, de Reijke
TM, van Boven E, Smits GAHJ, Puri R, Gruijs S and Witjes JA. (2009) Two
year follow up of the phase II marker lesion study of intravesical
apaziquone for patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. World
Journal of Urology, 27: 337-342.
c. Gofrit ON, Zorn KC, Shikanov S and Steinberg GD. (2010) Marker lesion
experiments in bladder cancer — what have we learned? Journal of
Urology 183: 1678-1685.
d. Details of the meeting between Spectrum and the FDA together with
information about the new phase III clinical trial can be found at these
public domain websites
http://investor.spectrumpharm.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=737020
and
http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01410565
e. Hendricksen K, Cornel EB, de Reike TM, Arentsen HC, Chawla C and
Witjes JA. (2012) Phase 2 study of adjuvant intravesical instillations of
Apaziquone for high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Journal
of Urology 187: 1195-1199. The following website provides details of
the clinical trial that are linked to this publication:
http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00141531?term=NCT00141531&rank=1
f. Hendricksen K, Gleason D, Young JM, Saltzstein D, Gershman A, Lerner S
and Witjes JA. (2008) Safety and side effects of immediate instillation of
Apaziquone following transurethral resection in patients with non-muscle
invasive bladder cancer. Journal of Urology, 180: 116-120 The
following website provides details of the clinical trial that are linked
to this publication:
http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01475266?term=NCT01475266&rank=1
g. Phase III clinical trial documentation provided by ClinicalTrials.gov,
a service of the US National Institute of Health. Details of both clinical
trials can be found at:
http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00461591
and
http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00598806?term=apaziquone&rank=4
h. This public domain website provides some details of the agreement
between Spectrum and Allergan in relation to their plans to progress the
clinical development of Apaziquone:
http://investor.spectrumpharm.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=395363
i. No formal publications of the single dose phase III clinical trials
have been published in peer reviewed journals but the following public
domain websites provide details:
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20120405005360/en/Spectrum-Pharmaceuticals-Announces-Results-Apaziquone-Phase-3
http://www.ukmi.nhs.uk/applications/ndo/record_view_open.asp?newDrugID=4825
http://www.streetinsider.com/Corporate+News/Spectrum+(SPPI)+Pops+Higher+Following+Rea
cquisition+of+Apaziquone+Rights/8047788.html