Expanding the donor pool for kidney transplantation
Submitting Institution
University of SunderlandUnit of Assessment
Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and PharmacySummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Clinical Sciences, Immunology
Summary of the impact
Research undertaken with the Newcastle Hospitals Transplant Unit led to
the approval of two new transplant processes and resulted in the expansion
of the kidney donor pool.
- A new device, assisting with efficient peritoneal cooling, was created
and adopted for the retrieval of human kidneys for transplant from
Category II donors; it improved the functional quality of these kidneys
post-transplant for recipient patients at Sunderland Royal Hospital
between 2007 and 2010. The research has informed EU policy through its
inclusion in the recent draft of `ESOT recommendations for DCD kidney
transplantation'.
- Since 2012, kidneys removed due to small renal tumours are available
for transplant into new recipients after their ex vivo
resection, resulting in clinical intervention and a new procedure
adopted. Previously, these excised kidneys were not available for
transplant.
Underpinning research
There are around 7000 patients on the organ donor waiting list, while
there are about 2000 organs available for transplant, with an obvious
mismatch in supply and demand. Those who do not receive a transplanted
organ either remain on the waiting list, or become too ill to receive an
organ, resulting in many deaths. Research since 2004 at the University of
Sunderland, led by Dr Noel Carter and Dr Anne Cunningham (until 2011, now
at Universiti Brunei Darussalam), developed technologies that have been
utilised to expand the human donor pool. [1] Two different aspects of this
research resulted in positive impacts on kidney transplant patients.
Initial work focused on increasing the success of Category II organ
retrieval. Under the Maastricht criteria, unsuccessful resuscitation of
cardiac patients leads to Category II donors; next-of-kin consent is
required for the resultant donations, listed as `Uncontrolled' Donation
after Cardiac Death. During the period when consent is sought, the
restricted blood flow to organs causes a shortage of oxygen and glucose
required for cellular metabolism, resulting in ischaemic injury and
decreased function after transplantation. Research carried out by several
clinical and doctoral students, in collaboration with Professor David
Talbot (Consultant Transplant Surgeon, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon
Tyne, and Visiting Professor at the University of Sunderland), led to the
design and development of a new device for in situ cooling of the
peritoneal cavity, in collaboration with regional company, Acrol.
Insertion of dialysis fluid into the peritoneal cavity and its flow
through a cooling unit using a peristaltic pump before returning it to the
peritoneal cavity resulted in an improved method for the retrieval of
functional kidneys from Category II donors.
Animal studies demonstrated that, together, in situ perfusion and
the newly developed peritoneal cooling offered a more rapid and
substantial decrease of renal temperature and slower build-up of renal
lactate levels compared to in situ perfusion alone. [1,2,3] The
method was translated into a full scale human clinical retrieval procedure
by Prof Talbot and the device achieved ethical approval for local use in
2007. During 2007-2010, several transplant procedures were carried out
using the device; it was retired from service when the UKT funding for
Newcastle Category II organ transplants ended in 2010, although it remains
a viable option for this class of donor.
Subsequently, research has focused on the use of kidneys with small
tumours, which were previously discarded after removal. Excision of the
tumours and ex vivo resection of the kidneys allows transplant
into new recipients, e.g. those with a high risk of mortality due to the
lack of potential donor kidneys. Sunderland's focus has been on the role
of immunosuppressant drugs and the post-transplant treatment strategy.
Issues can arise from any undetected carcinoma in the renal tissue, as the
standard procedure of immunosuppressant therapy with cyclosporin inhibits
the natural suppression of carcinoma regrowth by the immune system. The
research investigated the immunosuppressant strategy required to suppress
tumour growth following transplantation of a carcinoma-bearing kidney into
an animal model system. It was found that the use of an immunosuppressant
with antineoplastic activity, such as sirolimus, maintained the health of
the transplanted kidney, while suppressing carcinoma regrowth. [4] It was
also noted that in sirolimus-treated animals, there was significantly less
tumour growth when a poorly matched donor kidney was used, which
encouraged the natural immune regulation of neoplastic growth.
The impact of this research has wider applicability than to renal
transplantation alone and is being used to inform to liver and heart
transplantation procedures. [5] Complementary research evaluated the
attitudes of young British adults to organ transplant donation and
identified policy implications for enhancing the donor pool. [6]
Under the guidance of Dr Carter and Prof Talbot, six PhD students
contributed to this research; in particular, Dr Alex Navarro (2006 - 2010)
was largely responsible for the studies on peritoneal cooling and Muhammad
Khurram (2012 — ongoing) is carrying out the current work on renal cell
tumours. Others who have contributed to this research area are: Dr Mettu
Reddy (2006 - 2010); Dr Soroush Sohrabi (2006 - 2010); Dr Aimee Kibondo
(2006 - 2011); and, Chris Ray (2009 - 2013, submitted).
References to the research
The key publications in relation to this work are as follows:
1. A.P. Navarro, S. Sohrabi, M. Reddy, N. Carter, A. Ahmed, and D.
Talbot. (2008) Dual transplantation of marginal kidneys from
non-heart beating donors selected using machine perfusion viability
criteria. Journal of Urology, 179(6): 2305; discussion
2309. The combined long-term function of dual transplant organs
considered sub-optimal at transplantation was found to be comparable to
the function of a single renal graft with good function at
transplantation. Dr Carter provided the crucial molecular biology
scientific input that evaluated and assured the viability of the kidneys
for transplant. It has been cited in publications from Belgium, Poland
and the USA, demonstrating its global relevance.
2. A.P. Navarro, J. Ashera, S. Sohrabia, M. Reddy, S. Stamp, N.
Carter, and D. Talbot. (2009) Peritoneal Cooling May Provide
Improved Protection for Uncontrolled Donors After Cardiac Death: An
Exploratory Porcine Study. American Journal of Transplantation, 9:
1317. In this paper, evidence was presented that supported the
use of peritoneal cooling to reduce damage to the organs of Uncontrolled
Donors after cardiac death through the study of organ performance after
transplantation into pigs. Dr Carter provided the molecular biology
expertise to quantify the protection offered by this method. The
citations in publications from the UK and Netherlands (including a
review of methods from Maastricht for preserving kidneys from cardiac
death donors) demonstrate its international significance.
3. C. H. Wilson, H. Wyrley-Birch, D. Vijayanand, A. Lee, N. Carter,
M. Haswell, A. Cunningham, and D. Talbot. (2012) The Influence of
Perfusion Solution on Renal Graft Viability Assessment. Transplantation
Research, 1: 18. Research evidence is presented that
intraperitoneal cooling and the use of HTK preservation fluid reduce
ischemic injury and that the choice of a kidney for donation should take
into account its preservation method since donor death. Dr Carter
provided the molecular biology evidence for this project. A Netherlands
publication on the donation of other organs cited this work,
demonstrating its reach to alternative applications.
4. M.A. Khurram, D. Rix, D. Talbot, and N. Soomro. (2011)
Transplantation with kidneys removed electively for renal cell carcinomas.
Transplant International, 24(S1: Suppl 2): 55. This
abstract summarises the rationale for using tumour-bearing kidneys for
transplant into different recipients; it was delivered as an short oral
presentation at the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) in
Glasgow in 2011 and followed by a full oral presentation at ESOT in
Vienna in September 2013, during which the evidence for a sirolimus
post-treatment strategy was presented. Dr Carter was a co-author of the
2nd presentation.
5. M.A. Khurram, A.O. Sanni, D. Rix, and D. Talbot. (2011) Renal
Transplantation with Kidneys Affected by Tumours. International
Journal of Nephrology, Volume 2010, Article ID 529080. This
review brings together the evidence from various international studies
showing that the use of tumour-bearing kidneys for transplantation can
be hugely successful and offers an additional pool of potential donor
organs for high risk patients on kidney dialysis. It informed our
subsequent research on post-transplant treatment to identify the optimal
strategy for success.
6. L. Coad, N. Carter, and J. Ling. (2013) Attitudes of Young
Adults from the UK Towards Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation.
Transplantation Research, 2: 9. To ensure that the
research remains relevant and acceptable to patients, a
questionnaire-based investigation examined the attitudes of young adults
to donation and transplantation. Although young adults are generally in
favour of transplant, few are registered for organ donation.
Implications for policy to enlarge the future donor pool are discussed.
Dr Carter contributed scientific expertise in organ and tissue
transplantation. The findings have international applicability across
the range of donor organs for transplantation.
The research leading to the impact outlined here has been funded by a
variety of sources and receives continued funding for future impact aims.
Funding of £69,225 has been awarded to Dr Carter from industrial, charity
and government sources (2007-current) and Dr Cunningham received £17,138
from NHS and charitable sources (2003-2010) while at the University of
Sunderland.
Details of the impact
The research carried out at the University of Sunderland has resulted in
the following impacts:
- the adoption of two new processes through device and method
development;
- a clinical intervention leading to much improved outcomes for two
groups of patients;
- the informing of clinical guidelines for solid organ donation;
- an increase in public awareness of method development in solid organ
transplantation;
- the career development of highly skilled researcher/practitioners for
specialised medical roles.
The research resulted in the design and development of a device for rapid
peritoneal cooling, which was implemented alongside the standard in
situ perfusion method for clinical transplant procedures for
Category II donors. The clinical use of this device allowed a larger pool
of potential donors to be accessed than with traditional methods. The
process was approved by the Sunderland Hospitals Ethics Committee in 2007
and subsequently adopted into practice. The research findings had
immediate impact on 10 retrieval procedures from Category II donors, as a
result of which 20 transplants were made during 2007-2010. The retrieval
surgical work was carried out at Sunderland Royal Hospital by Prof Talbot
of the Liver, Renal and Pancreatic Transplant Unit at the Freeman Hospital
in Newcastle upon Tyne. The outcome for the patients is enormous, besides
their improved quality of life, their survival has been made possible, as
it is unlikely that these patients would have received transplants if this
procedure had not been made available at that time.
During this original research there were several national and local news
reports on the improvements to transplant success using this procedure
(detailed in Section 5), which have improved public awareness of
transplantation and have also augmented recognition of Dr Carter's
contribution to transplant research.
Further research conducted by Dr Carter in Sunderland, in collaboration
with renal transplant specialist Prof Talbot, examined the post-transplant
regrowth of renal carcinoma tissue in an animal model and identified a
suitable treatment to suppress its growth, while also suppressing
rejection of the renal graft. The dual action of sirolimus in this context
offers an improved outcome for the use of kidneys with carcinoma tissue
and enhances the possible donor pool for kidney transplant patients;
additionally, it has application to the transplant of other organs and the
related donor pools, which is of international relevance. Dr Carter's
research also showed a better suppression of carcinoma regrowth alongside
the suppression of graft rejection was achieved when less well-matched
kidneys were used for transplant. This interesting observation further
enhances the potential donor pool, by increasing the number of `matching'
kidneys for transplant.
These new results have already informed clinical intervention with four
cases of transplantation during 2013. In three of these cases, small renal
carcinomas were confirmed in the donors' kidney following radical
nephrectomy; in the fourth case, the tumour was found to be benign after ex
vivo inspection. After ex vivo resection, all four kidneys
were transplanted into four high-risk patients, who were either unlikely
to be placed on the waiting list due to other co-morbidities (and hence
unlikely to be given another opportunity for a transplant organ), or were
more likely to respond slower to organ transplant from a living donor.
These procedures were carried out at the Freeman Hospital in Newcastle by
Prof Talbot; three were reported to be good functional grafts, signalling
an improvement in the outcome for these patients. This approach is being
adopted into practice at the Freeman Hospital in Newcastle and is being
promoted internationally at conferences.
The research carried out here will have a lasting impact on future
transplant procedures and clinical guidelines. Already, the peritoneal
cooling procedure has informed EU policy through its inclusion in the
European guidelines for Donation after Circulatory Death (DCD) `ESOT
recommendations for DCD kidney transplantation', which were developed in
March 2013. These guidelines are used to inform the UK guidelines; hence,
the work will also inform the latest HTA Code of Practice 2: Donation of
Solid Organs for Transplantation, for which Parliamentary approval will be
sought in early 2014. It has also supported the career development of
highly skilled researchers who have gone on to take specialist roles. One
PhD graduate is now employed by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
as a trainee consultant surgeon in the field of organ transplant and
another secured a post as a trainee consultant surgeon in the transplant
unit within the London Postgraduate School of Surgery.
Sources to corroborate the impact
- The research described here was carried out in collaboration with a
renal transplant expert from the Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne
(also Visiting Professor at the University of Sunderland). Supporting
statements include `The work......with the University of Sunderland
has addressed donors after cardiac death and kidneys that were
affected by tumours,' and Therefore the cooperation between
University of Sunderland and the Newcastle Transplant programme has
been beneficial for transplant patients for the North East and through
National and International presentations and publications to the
Transplant community as a whole'.
- Other endorsements of the adopted processes and patient outcomes have
been provided by the Directorate Manager for the Institute of
Transplantation, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust. Feedback was
sought from the donors and recipients; one statement received from the
coordinator read `The recipient has subsequently written to the donor
— an experience the donor relates as "moving and emotional".'
- The 2013 draft European guidelines for Donation after Circulatory
Death (DCD) `ESOT recommendations for DCD kidney transplantation'
highlighted the inclusion of peritoneal cooling: `In an animal study,
the renal temperature was significantly lower with ISP [in situ perfusion]
in addition to normal cold intravascular flush.' The document
refers to Navarro et al., 2009. [ref 2 above]
- Approval of the initial animal model research was granted by the
Newcastle and North Tyneside Research Ethics Committees, stating `ethical
approval is now granted in respect of this research study application',
and approval for the peritoneal cooling device was awarded by the
Sunderland Hospitals Ethics Committee for use in the local area. The
local coroner also stated `I have no concerns about the procedure you
have mentioned'.
- Two news stories highlighted the transplant success stories at the
University of Sunderland. The first relates to the in situ
peritoneal cooling of kidneys, while the second shows that the
technology is applicable to other organs.
a. 12 Jul 2010: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/07/100709083749.htm
[accessed 17thNov 2013];
b. 10 July 2013:
http://www.itv.com/news/tyne-tees/2013-07-10/new-machine-could-double-number-of-heart-transplants/
[accessed 17th Nov 2013].