Teenagers in chronic pain - Innovation in assessment and treatment
Submitting Institution
University of BathUnit of Assessment
Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and PharmacySummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Clinical Sciences, Public Health and Health Services
Summary of the impact
Adolescents (and their families) in the UK and around the world are now
better able to cope with chronic pain because of the unique work carried
out at the University of Bath Centre for Pain Research (BCPR), directed by
Professor Christopher Eccleston.
The BCPR produced the first multidimensional `one-stop' tool to assess
the impact of pain on children's lives, which has now been adopted in at
least 12 countries. Pioneering treatments from Bath have influenced
therapeutic approaches worldwide.
The Bath team also manage the evidence base for chronic pain, giving
access through the Cochrane Library, advising internationally on clinical
service development and improvement.
Underpinning research
Chronic pain causes significant problems in the lives of many
adolescents, negatively affecting their physical, psychological and social
functioning. Prevalence studies of persistent chronic pain in childhood
demonstrate that 12% of adolescents have a severe episode of pain and 2%
have persistent stubborn pain. Descriptive data show that 20% of adults
with chronic pain reported untreated pain in adolescence. The assessment
of the impact of chronic pain and its subsequent treatment is therefore an
essential clinical task.
The BCPR team (Eccleston (1994-) Keogh (2004-) and ~55 PhD students,
postdoctoral research fellows, and clinical collaborators) established a
specific research programme on the assessment and treatment of adolescent
chronic pain. Foundational research was absent: the evidence for
psychological interventions was unknown, and little assessment and
treatment technology existed.
Assessment. This work involved systematic reviews of the existing
measurement tools used to assess the impact of untreated pain on
adolescents, and on their parents. This showed that no specific
multidimensional tools existed. The team won two research grants, one from
the BUPA foundation and one from the PPP Healthcare Medical Trust, to
create optimal assessment technology, and published these tools as the
Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire (BAPQ) [1] and the Bath Adolescent Pain
— Parent Impact Questionnaire (BAP-PIQ) [2]. They also developed a version
of the BAPQ for non-communicating children. The BAPQ offers a
comprehensive way of assessing the widespread deleterious impact of
adolescent chronic pain in both a research and clinical setting. The tools
are available at: http://www.bath.ac.uk/pain/assessment-tools/.
Evidence. In 2002, the BCPR undertook the first systematic review
with the Cochrane Collaboration. This analysed the world's existing data
on treatment effectiveness. The results were widely disseminated and
extensively commented upon. The review was updated in 2009 and again in
2012 [3]. The team also undertook a companion Cochrane Collaboration
systematic review of the evidence for parent-focused treatments produced
in 2012 [4]. The BCPR has published extensively, including a BMJ editorial
[5] on the need for evidence in paediatric chronic pain, and consulted
widely on the optimal methods of trial design.
Treatment. In 2003, the team developed the first multidisciplinary
intensive rehabilitation programme for adolescents in association with its
principal clinical stakeholder, the Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic
Diseases in Bath: a three-week, residential treatment for the severely
disabled. More recently, the team has developed computerised versions of
treatments (EPSRC EP/F001916) and is exploring how to use the internet to
improve access to treatments. With colleagues in the USA, the BCPR is also
developing a parent-only treatment (funded by NIH 5-R21-HD065180), a
randomized controlled trial of a problem solving treatment for parents
versus wait list control.
Mechanisms. The BCPR has a strong research programme aimed at
discovering the mechanisms of disability in chronic adolescent pain, in
particular, the role of anxiety processes in driving maladaptive
behavioural responses. This research stream provides the basis for the
development and targeting of treatment.
Advocacy and influence. The existence of adolescent chronic pain
still surprises people. Part of the BCPR's role is to serve as an
advocate, and in particular to educate scientists, policymakers,
governments and health-care professionals. This included the first and
only cost of illness study of adolescent chronic pain [6].
References to the research
1. Eccleston C, Jordan A, McCracken L, Sleed, M, Connell, H, Clinch, J.
(2005) The Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire (BAPQ): Development and
preliminary psychometric evaluation of an instrument to assess the impact
of chronic pain on adolescents. Pain, 118, 263-270. DOI:
10.1016/j.pain.2005.08.025
2. Eccleston C, McCracken L M, Jordan, A, Sleed, M. (2007) Development
and preliminary psychometric evaluation of the parent report version of
the Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire (BAPQ-P): a multidimensional parent
report instrument to assess the impact of chronic pain on adolescents. Pain,
131; 48-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.12.010
3. Eccleston C, Palermo TM, Williams AC de C, Lewandowski A, Morley S,
Fisher E, Law E. (2012). Psychological therapies for the management of
chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents. Cochrane
Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 12. Art.No.: CD003968. DOI:
10.1002/14651858.CD003968.pub3.
4. Eccleston C, Palermo TM, Fisher E, Law E. (2012) Psychological
interventions for parents of children and adolescents with chronic
illness. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 8. Art.
No.: CD009660. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009660.pub2.
5. Eccleston, C & Malleson, P M. (2003) Management of chronic pain in
children and adolescents (Editorial). British Medical Journal,
326, 1408-1409. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1408
6. Sleed M, Eccleston, C, Beecham J, Knapp M, Jordan, A. (2005) The
economic impact of chronic pain in adolescence: Methodological
considerations and a preliminary costs of illness study. Pain,
119, 183-190. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.09.028
Details of the impact
Assessment. A challenge for pain clinicians is to determine the
aspect of a complex clinical presentation for treatment targeting. The
BAPQ, BAPQ-P (parent-completed version for non-communicating adolescents)
and BAPQ-PIQ (parent impact version) provided the first tools designed and
validated with the patients (and families) to enable that targeting. They
have been translated into French, Spanish, Dutch and Thai, and have been,
and continue to be, used in the USA, Canada, Europe and Australia [1].
Affirmation of the value of these tools may be illustrated by comments
from the Director of Psychology Services in Pain Medicine at Boston's
Children Hospital (Harvard Medical School) [2]: "... the Bath Centre
for Pain Research has also been the leading center in the development
and dissemination of focused outcome assessment tools to inform our
understanding of the impact of pediatric pain on the child and family.
The Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire (BAPQ) and its companion BAPQ
Parental Impact Questionnaire (PIQ) are the first well validated tools
specifically focused on providing a broad based assessment of the
functional impact of pediatric pain, encompassing physical, emotional
and social domains in both children with pain and their parents."
Similarly, a Professor of Pediatrics at the Connecticut Children's
Medical Center (CCMC) attests [3], "... we are expanding our program
and resources for treating chronic pediatric pain and currently utilize
a multidisciplinary assessment process that includes standardized
questionnaires. As we continue to refine our assessment process and
services at CCMC, I take comfort in knowing that we can rely on [the
BCPR's] validated assessment tools and treatment program as a model."
Further examples of the reach and significance of the assessment tools
come from (a) the Director of the German Paediatric Pain Centre, who said
[1], "The BCPR measures are carefully developed, scientifically sound
and essential for good clinical practice. In addition they deliver
important data for the understanding and treatment of paediatric chronic
pain... We constantly follow the output of the Bath research group,
given the high scientific standard and the clinical importance of their
research", and (b) from the Seattle Children's Hospital (with which
Bath is collaborating on a U.S. NIH funded grant to evaluate the
feasibility and acceptability of problem-solving skills training as an
intervention in parent caregivers of youth with chronic pain, and to
conduct a preliminary efficacy trial in parents of youth with chronic
pain) [1]: "The BCPR tools provide unique information regarding the
impact of pain on child and parent emotional and physical functioning."
Treatment. The treatment developed in Bath has proven highly
effective in spreading best practice, and has led to foundational research
on the patterns and predictors of disability in adolescents, and to new
service provision in chronic pain for adolescents, all over the world. It
continues to attract a great deal of attention — for example,
approximately five international visitors a year observe at least a week
of the treatment programme.
Professor Eccleston has lectured internationally on treatment content,
development and effectiveness, and his award of the Pfizer Visiting
Fellowship in Paediatric Pain in 2007 to visit New England and Connecticut
as the guest of the CMCC [4] led to their implementation of the BCPR
assessment tools and treatment developments during the REF period.
Significantly, the programme has been replicated, inter alia, at
the Institute for Rehabilitation in Chicago [1], in the Pediatric Complex
Pain Service of Dalhousie University (Canada) [1], at the CCMC [3], and at
Harvard Medical School [2], where the Director of Psychology Services in
Pain Medicine at Boston's Children Hospital states, "Unequivocally,
the Bath Centre for Pain Research and its clinical partners set and
continue to represent the gold standard for intensive inter-disciplinary
treatment programs in the field of pediatric pain management. The [BCPR]
was the first successful program developed for children and adolescents
with complex, intractable chronic pain conditions. In the past decade,
numerous top academic medical institutions in both Europe and North
America have sought to create programs following the model of care
established at the [BCPR]. As a co-creator of our own such program here
at Boston Children's Hospital, the Mayo Family Pediatric Pain
Rehabilitation Center (opened in 2008), I can attest that our program is
closely based upon this model. The [BCPR's] clinical program has become
the model to emulate in the field due to their highly successful
outcomes and international reputation for providing excellent clinical
care."
The Professor of Pediatrics at the Connecticut Children's Medical Center
(CCMC) is equally enthusiastic [3]: "[The BCPR's] ground-breaking work
to assess, understand and effectively treat these most complex pediatric
patients with chronic pain has been a steadfast beacon of light in the
often murky trenches that make up the day to day work of intensive
rehabilitation treatment programs for pediatric pain... I have found
your program's emphasis on addressing psychological wellbeing, in
balance with goals for improved physical functioning, to resonate widely
across treatment settings specializing in pediatric chronic pain."
Policy and advocacy. The BCPR authored and maintain the two key
Cochrane Library Systematic Reviews (see Section 2 and references in
Section 3), one on parent treatments, the other on those for adolescents.
Both are updated biannually and provide the evidence for policy and
clinical development. Although the international workforce in paediatric
pain is small, it has been able to significantly increase its impact and
scope through a special interest group of the International Association
for the Study of Pain. In 2010, Professor Eccleston was chair of the
scientific programme committee for the International Symposium on
Paediatric Pain, which attracted 550 of the world's top scientists and
lead clinicians in the field [5].
In addition, Bath supported a grant to develop Pain in Child Health
(PICH) [6], an international programme, which has to-date produced a
community of more than 40 postgraduates with formal and informal training
in the assessment and treatment of paediatric pain. PICH operates on a
policy level to influence paediatric pain practice worldwide, and the Bath
group are the only behavioural science group in the UK to be involved in,
and have impact on, the training of new paediatric pain researchers.
The BCPR has contributed to a number of policy initiatives, including (a)
supporting the UK Chronic Pain Policy Coalition, (b) co-chairing the
expert group writing the American Pain Society Guidelines on the treatment
and assessment of chronic pain [7], and (c) agreeing the consensus
statement on core outcome domains and measures for all new randomized
controlled trials in pain [8] (which include the Bath instruments).
In the last two years, the UK has moved to specialized national
commissioning of services for patients with severe and disabling
conditions like chronic pain, and the Bath Service is included, as are the
use of specific measures (BAPQ and BAPQ-PIQ) [9]. The move to specialized
services is a major advance and is the culmination of much work to promote
the needs of young people. The BCPR is now in discussion with NICE on
planned guidance in pain related topics, specifically in how to inform new
guidance, including that planned on children and young people in pain
[10].
Sources to corroborate the impact
- Examples of responses to recent requests from the BCPR for information
about how the assessment tools are used, received from: Director of the
UCLA Paediatric Pain Program, USA; Professor of Anaesthesiology &
Pain Medicine, Seattle Children's Research Institute, USA; Professor and
Canada Research Chair, Centre for Paediatric Pain, Research, Dalhousie
University, Canada; Director, German Paediatric Pain Centre, Datteln,
Germany; Professor of Experimental, Clinical and Health Psychology,
Ghent University, Belgium; Professor of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine,
Sydney Children's Hospital, Australia.
- Letter from the Director of Psychology Services in Pain Medicine,
Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
- Letter from a Pediatric Psychologist and Clinical Investigator,
Division of Pain & Palliative Medicine, Connecticut Children's
Medical Center, Hartford, USA.
- http://www.bath.ac.uk/news/2007/9/26/ecclestonpfizer.html
-
http://childpain.org/. Hosting
arrangements for this important committee are also being managed by the
Bath Team (see invitation to host http://childpain.org/ispp.shtml).
For information about the MayDay Fund, which supports Bath graduate
students, see
http://www.maydayfund.org/.
- http://paininchildhealth.dal.ca
- http://www.americanpainsociety.org/uploads/pdfs/aps12-pcp.pdf
-
http://www.immpact.org/static/publications/McGrath%20et%20al.,%202008.pdf
McGrath PJ, Walco G, Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Brown MT, Davidson K,
Eccleston C, Finley AG, Goldschneider K, Haverkos L, Hertz SH, Ljungman
G, Palermo T, Rappaport BA, Rhodes T, Schechter N, Scott, J, Sethna N,
Svensson OK, Stinson J, von Baeyer C, Walker L, Weisman S, White RE,
Zajicek A, Zeltzer L. (2008). Core outcome domains and measures for
pediatric acute and chronic/recurrent pain clinical trials: PedIMMPACT
recommendations. Journal of Pain, 9: 771-783. DOI:
10.1016/j.jpain.2008.04.007
-
http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/e02-paedi-surg-chronic-pain.pdf
(see page 9).
- Email correspondence demonstrating the involvement of the BCPR (via
its Director, Prof. C. Eccleston) in the development of NICE's 5-year
work plan to develop a number of guidances (involving, self-evidently,
one on children and young people in pain).