Reducing CO2 emissions and saving drivers’ fuel costs from the Ford fleet of vehicles
Submitting Institution
University of BathUnit of Assessment
Aeronautical, Mechanical, Chemical and Manufacturing EngineeringSummary Impact Type
TechnologicalResearch Subject Area(s)
Mathematical Sciences: Applied Mathematics
Engineering: Mechanical Engineering, Interdisciplinary Engineering
Summary of the impact
Impact on the environment
- The adoption of cost effective CO2 reduction technologies
across a range of Ford vehicles reduced CO2 emissions by an
estimated 40,000 tonnes in 2012. This reduction applies pro rata for
2013 and becomes cumulative year on year.
Economic impact
- Improvements to vehicle engines have saved over €25M in fuel costs to
the owners of Ford vehicles in 2012.
- Research has led to improvements that have been made to Ford products
and processes; these improvements have been used to address upcoming
legislation on CO2 in a cost effective manner. Future
penalties of up to €0.5bn have been avoided by these improved products
and processes.
Impact on practitioners
- Improved monitoring processes, reducing variability in measurement of
CO2 from vehicles within Ford by 50%, facilitating the
adoption of a range of new fuel saving technologies, which helped to
justify a $50M investment in the Ford UK facilities.
Underpinning research
Key researchers
Members of the Powertrain and Vehicle Research Centre (PVRC): Dr S
Akehurst (Research Officer 2000-2004, EPSRC Advanced Fellow 2005-2010,
Lecturer since 2010); Dr CJ Brace (Research Officer 1992-2000, Lecturer
2000-2006, Senior Lecturer 2006-2012, Reader since 2012); Professor JG
Hawley (Lecturer 1995-1997, Senior Lecturer 1997-2001, Reader 2002-2004,
Professor since 2004); and Dr RD Burke (Postgraduate 2008-2011, Research
Officer 2011-2012, Prize Research Fellow since 2012).
The underpinning research was focused on reducing engine parasitic
losses, thereby making the engine more efficient and reducing the CO2
emitted. In order to achieve this, a greater understanding of the factors
limiting precision in the measurement of CO2 produced by
vehicles was required. This also gave a greater precision in determining
fuel consumption as it is calculated from the CO2 measurement.
Research aimed at improving measurement precision was funded by Ford from
2001, initially to assess the instantaneous vehicle emissions on a second
by second basis and to understand how errors in measurement would affect
the final result over a standard driving cycle [1]. This work was carried
out on the newly commissioned, state-of-the-art chassis dynamometer
facility at Bath. The expertise gained from this research led to a
collaborative project with BP in 2004-2005 to undertake a fundamental
study of the effect of experimental disturbances on the precision of CO2
measurements [2, 3]. The key insight arising from this research was that
techniques developed for controlling manufacturing processes of mass
produced components could be used in an experimental environment. The work
quantified for the first time the influence of changes in experimental
conditions on measurement precision; this allowed the effects on fuel
efficiency due to incremental improvements in technology to be measured
reliably.
These experimental techniques were critical to the success of the
research into parasitic loss reduction. This experimentally intensive
research was carried out on a Ford production engine using an advanced
engine test research platform. A formal systematic method was developed to
characterise and robustly model the complex interactions between the
engine systems, i.e. heat exchange mechanisms, hydraulic systems,
mechanical and electrical subsystems, control strategies and combustion
processes. Among the technologies investigated by Bath were variable flow
oil pumping, an improved engine cooling system and improved lubricant
specifications, first through a joint project led by Ford and BP (DTI
project TP/2/5/10036, 2005-2007) and followed by a project adding Mahle
Powertrain to the existing consortium (TSB project TP/9/LCV/6/I/S0052K,
2008-2011). The research demonstrated that, with the right control
strategy, variable flow oil pumps are able to deliver precisely the right
amount of oil needed to protect the engine at any particular time thereby
saving energy, fuel and reducing CO2 [4]. Improving the cooling
system allows faster warm up of the engine, again reducing fuel use [5].
The improved lubricant blends demonstrated similar improvements by
reducing friction and pumping work within the engine [6].
Key findings from this research demonstrated that:
1. A novel design of an engine cooling and lubrication system, including
a variable displacement oil pump, provided a 4% fuel economy benefit [4,
5].
2. Novel engine and transmission lubricant formulations each demonstrated
a 1% fuel economy saving [6].
References to the research
(* references that best indicate quality)
1. JG Hawley, CD Bannister, CJ Brace, A Cox, D Ketcher and R Stark.
Vehicle modal emissions measurement - techniques and issues, 2004,
Proceedings IMechE, Part D, Journal of Automobile Engineering, 218,
859-873. DOI: 10.1243/0954407041581057
2*. CJ Brace, RD Burke and J Moffa. Increasing accuracy and repeatability
of fuel consumption measurement in chassis dynamometer testing, 2009,
Proceedings IMechE, Part D, Journal of Automobile Engineering, 223,
1163-1177. DOI: 10.1243/09544070JAUTO1084
3. E Chappell, CJ Brace and C Ritchie. The control of chassis dynamometer
fuel consumption testing noise factors and the use of response modelling
for validation of test repeatability, 2013, Proceedings IMechE, Part D,
Journal of Automobile Engineering, 227, 853-865. DOI:
10.1177/0954407012469557 [Ref 2]
4*. RD Burke, AJG Lewis, S Akehurst, CJ Brace, I Pegg and R Stark.
Systems optimisation of an active thermal management system during engine
warm-up, 2012, Proceedings IMechE, Part D, Journal of Automobile
Engineering, 226,1365-1379. DOI: 10.1177/0954407012441883
5. CJ Brace, JG Hawley, S Akehurst, M Piddock and I Pegg. Cooling system
improvements - assessing the effects on emissions and fuel economy, 2008,
Proceedings IMechE, Part D, Journal of Automobile Engineering, 222,
579-591. DOI: 10.1243/09544070JAUTO685 [Ref 2]
6*. JG Hawley, CD Bannister, CJ Brace, S Akehurst, I Pegg, and MR Avery.
The effect of engine and transmission oil viscometrics on vehicle fuel
consumption, 2010, Proceedings IMechE, Part D, Journal of Automobile
Engineering, 224, 1213-1228. DOI: 10.1243/09544070JAUTO1534 [Ref
2]
Details of the impact
The Ford Motor Company sold 1.4 million cars in Europe in 2012. It builds
the 1st and 3rd best selling cars in the UK. The
upcoming EU fleet average CO2 emissions legislation will impose
a levy of €95 per gCO2/km above a fleet average of 95gCO2/km
by 2020. This challenging requirement would cost a company the size of
Ford €5.3bn if no improvement were evident from 2011 fleet average
emissions levels. Clearly this is commercially untenable hence every car
manufacturer has had to put into place a process to develop technologies
and enhancements to meet these requirements by improving fuel efficiency
incrementally each year. Crucially, though, these technologies must be
commercially affordable if car manufacturers are to be in a position to
maintain profitability.
The technological and commercial needs have resulted in a powerful
research imperative to develop and assess cost effective technologies that
can effect measurable reductions in CO2. The need for improved
products is self-evident. The need for improved processes arises because
the level of CO2 saving offered by individual enhancements is
typically small and often masked by the measurement imprecision typical of
industrial laboratories. Improved precision is needed if product
enhancements are to be demonstrated to be cost effective. The research at
Bath has been uniquely able to contribute to improvements in both product
and process. It was conducted in partnership with the Ford Technical
Collaborations Group, which commissions and manages research on behalf of
engineering teams within the whole Ford structure. The findings of the
research are then passed directly to those groups and feed into current
practice and future model development programmes.
Improving the precision of CO2 measurements
A project in partnership with Ford and co-funded by the Bath KTA
(2010-2012) developed and extended the techniques demonstrated by the
research at Bath [3] in such a way that they could be adopted in the
commercial setting of the Ford vehicle emissions laboratories at the
Dunton Technical Centre. Ford engineers, assisted by Bath researchers,
incorporated the findings of the high precision CO2 measurement
research into everyday practice for the benefit of fuel consumption
evaluation. The target was to double the level of precision, thereby
allowing engineers to rapidly establish the benefits of increasingly small
design changes to the vehicles. This target has been successfully achieved
and has been instrumental in the development of the Transit and the
Econetic range of vehicles. The Econetic range sold 550,000 vehicles in
Europe in 2012, representing nearly half of Ford's European sales [A].
The Director of Vehicle Evaluation & Verification at Ford commented
[B]:
`The [Bath research] project has accelerated the improvements
to reduce variability in test measurements of fuel consumption and
emissions. As consumption and emissions fall, any benefits become
increasingly difficult to measure, which is why this project has been so
useful. By making our test procedures more discriminating, it allows our
development engineers to make best use of our facilities. Some of these
improvements have been carried over to other labs, particularly in
Germany and the United States.'
In 2012 Ford committed to a multi-million $ investment in the vehicle
emissions laboratories at its Dunton Technical Centre. The findings of the
Bath research on improving CO2 measurement precision were used
to justify this investment [D].
Product improvement
The research findings from the parasitic losses research gave Ford the
information needed to utilise variable flow oil pump technology, giving a
3% reduction in CO2, in a production engine for the first time.
This engine, the 1.0L EcoBoost, was launched in 2012 and was the winner of
both the 2012 and 2013 International Engine of the Year award [C], judged
by an international panel of automotive journalists. In addition, the high
precision measurements made possible by Bath research were able to
demonstrate that a custom oil formulation further improved the efficiency
of this engine, giving an additional 1% improvement in efficiency [6].
The 1.0L EcoBoost engine achieved sales of over 100,000 in 2012, its
first year of production, with an increasing sales trajectory. This engine
is fitted to most of the Ford range from the Fiesta to the C-Max and will
go into the Mondeo in 2013. The Fiesta and Focus achieved UK sales that
made them the first (109,665 cars) and third (83,115 cars) best selling
cars in 2012 [A].
Describing the mechanism by which the impact has been generated, the
Director of Vehicle Evaluation & Verification at Ford commented in
January 2013 [B]:
`Over the last ten years the relationship between Ford Motor Company
and the University has grown into one that is of significant benefit to
Ford...With the help of the EPSRC and the TSB, we have been able to
develop powertrain technologies and processes that are now influencing
our products. Work at [the University of Bath] gave us a head start in
developing a specific engine oil for our 1.0L EcoBoost engine which is
now "International Engine of the Year".'
The 2.2L Duratorq diesel engine, fitted to the Ranger and the Transit,
which was the International Van of the Year 2013, also benefitted from
improvements demonstrated in the research at Bath. The improved thermal
management techniques and designs aimed at reducing friction have
contributed to the creation of this engine. Transit sales alone totalled
129,200 in Europe in 2012 and sales of this engine will soon reach 300,000
per year. These engines are built at the Ford plant in Dagenham.
In summary, the impact of these improvements on the emissions generated
and the fuel economy seen by the vehicle owners is substantial. The 4%
improvement in fuel economy due to the variable flow oil pump and new
engine oil formulation reduced CO2 emissions by approximately
40,000 tonnes in 2012 based on 30,000 km per annum for trucks and 20,000
km for passenger cars. Based on €1.70 per litre, the reduction in fuel
used saved the owners nearly €25M across Europe with further savings due
to the vehicle classification into lower tax brackets [A].
Returning to the primary motivation for the research programme, the fact
that research at Bath has allowed Ford to implement cost effective changes
to its production vehicles reducing CO2 emissions by 4% has
significant commercial impact for Ford. The improvement in fleet average
CO2 performance is a key factor to the strategic imperative of
achieving the EU set target of 95 gCO2/km. The savings achieved
by implementing the findings of the Bath research allow Ford to make
progress towards avoiding an EU CO2 penalty. The value of this
contribution may be estimated by considering the number of vehicles
affected (estimated to be at least 600,000); the grams of CO2/km
saved by the measures described (4% of current fleet average represents a
saving of approximately 5 gCO2/km); the levy per gCO2/km
over the 95 gCO2/km threshold (€95/gCO2/km). This
results in a contribution valued at approximately €0.29bn per year in
avoided penalties.
Sources to corroborate the impact
A. Corroborative statement from Director of ADS Collaborations Ltd, 3
October 2013.
B. Corroborative statement from Director - Global Vehicle Evaluation
& Verification, Ford Europe, 7 January 2013.
C. International Engine of the Year 2013 (http://www.ukipme.com/engineoftheyear/ieoty.php).
D. Corroborative statement Supervisor - Advanced and Emissions
Engineering, Ford UK, 30 October 2013.