Measuring the Power of Emotion in Advertising
Submitting Institution
University of BathUnit of Assessment
Business and Management StudiesSummary Impact Type
CulturalResearch Subject Area(s)
Economics: Applied Economics
Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services: Marketing
Summary of the impact
Research at the University of Bath demonstrating that emotion exerts a
powerful influence on brand choice has benefited advertising practice
through the development of a market research tool known as the Cognitive
Emotive Power Test. Major multinationals (for example: Wal-Mart, General
Motors, Ford Europe, Nestle, Kraft, Procter & Gamble, Disney,
Starbucks) have used this system to pre-test advertisements and to select
from among competing ads those that score highest on the emotional
response scale. Since 2011 Ipsos ASI, the largest advertising pre-testing
company in the world has licensed CEP®Test to support up to 10,000
advertising tests annually, resulting in greater brand marketing
effectiveness. As a result of the research, companies can improve the
ability of their advertising to build a strong brand.
Underpinning research
The research was conducted at the University of Bath Centre for Research
in Advertising and Consumption (CRiAC) by a small team led by Dr. Robert
Heath (Lecturer, then Senior Lecturer, at Bath since 2003) with Dr. Agnes
Nairn (Lecturer, then Senior Lecturer, at Bath 1997 - 2006). The research
was designed to address a gap in the academic understanding of emotion in
advertising and to develop a tool that could be used by companies to
effectively measure emotional responses to advertisements. The academic
contribution of this research was related to a shift from reliance on
recall-based metrics, towards an understanding of the `hidden power' that
enables advertising to work without attention or recall.
The conceptual groundwork on this shift was first published in a research
monograph (reference 1) followed by further empirical evidence published
in 2005 (reference 3) and 2009 (reference 4). The 2005 paper (reference 3)
demonstrated the shortcomings of recall-based methods of measurement and
the team proposed instead the need to measure the amount of
emotive content in advertisements. The notion of `amount' here refers to
an assessment made by the consumer of the extent to which they perceive
emotion in the advertising. The underlying research done at Bath showed
that the emotive content of advertising is a primary driver of brand
relationships (references 2 and 3). The significance of this research is
that it has challenged traditional thinking about how consumers interact
with and process brand communications.
The research demonstrates that the mechanism of low attention processing
turns out to be an especially effective way of getting through to
consumers. Marketers once relied on rational communication to build their
brands. Now, skilful use of emotion is the key to creating strong
relationships and enduring brands. By identifying low involvement
processing and demonstrating that emotive content influences intuitive
decision-making (a major factor in brand favourability) this research has
altered how advertisers are able to influence consumers.
A further study published in 2009 (reference 4) established precisely the
level of attention given to various advertising examples. The study,
conducted in a carefully disguised environment, used highly sophisticated
equipment to measure the speed of eye fixation. Results confirmed that
advertising with higher emotive content tended to receive less,
not more, attention than advertising with low emotive content. The search
for an explanation for this anomaly led to the recognition that the
brain's capacity to absorb certain types of brand information is far
greater than previously imagined, explaining why emotion is able to be
processed instantaneously and regardless of the level of attention being
paid. The research team found that emotion plays a significant part in the
decisions we make, especially those based on intuition.
This led the team to hypothesise that emotive content, rather than
facilitating information processing, might have a direct beneficial
influence on the relationship we have with brands, and that by
operating at low levels of attention, it would be hard to resist by
rational counter-argument. Proving this hypothesis required a system to
measure the power of emotion in advertising. The Bath team developed
scales to measure both the perceived power of emotion in advertising
(emotive power), and the perceived power of explicit messages (cognitive
power). Eliciting the help of OTX, a Californian-based market research
company, an experiment was conducted to test the relationship between
brand favourability and the emotive power and cognitive power in
advertising. A total of 43 TV ads (23 in USA, 20 in UK) were tested in two
parallel studies. The results showed a highly significant correlation
between emotive power and brand favourability, but no significant
relationship at all between cognitive power and brand favourability
(reference 2).
Based on the success of the tests, the emotive power scales were
incorporated into an advertising research system known as Cognitive
Emotive Power Test (CEP®Test), which was licenced by OTX. This research
system was then marketed specifically as a means of measuring
advertising's ability to build strong brand relationships. The CEP®Test is
a distinctive tool that has developed from innovative research. It is used
in conjunction with other tests as part of companies' overall evaluation
of advertising, but it is the only tool available to companies that
measures the overall communication of emotion on the consumer.
The research has generated international interest, shown in a recent
overview of the research (reference 5), which has been translated into
Polish, Russian, Bulgarian and Chinese.
References to the research
1. Heath, R. G. (2001) The Hidden Power of Advertising (Monograph
7), Henley-on-Thames, UK: Admap Publications. (ISBN 1-84226-093-8).
2. Heath, R.G., Brandt, D. and Nairn, A.C. 2006. Brand relationships —
strengthened by emotion, weakened by attention. Journal of
Advertising Research, 46(4): 410-419. DOI:
10.2501/S002184990606048X
4. Heath, R.G., Nairn, A.C. and Bottomley, P. 2009. How effective is
creativity? Emotive content in TV advertising does not increase attention.
Journal of Advertising Research, 49(4): 450-463.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2501/S0021849909091077
Details of the impact
Research at the University of Bath demonstrating that emotion exerts a
powerful influence on brand choice has benefited advertising practice
through the development of a new market research tool. The research has
challenged conventional wisdom on the measurement of emotional responses
to advertising. It has delivered benefits to companies through the
development and implementation of a new product and through the
enhancement of professional and corporate practice. The development of
scales that quantify the power of emotive content in advertising, or the
extent to which the emotion in advertising is perceived as being
influential, means that companies are now able to assess advertising's
potential to trigger meaningful brand associations using quantitative
tools. By demonstrating that the emotive content in advertising is the
primary driver of brand relationships and developing robust scales for use
in pre-test advertising, Bath researchers have given marketing
professionals a new and effective tool with which to measure and manage
the emotive content in advertising. Multinational companies have used this
tool to improve the ability of their advertising to build a strong brand.
Two examples of advertisements that were evaluated using the CEP®Test are
included in the sources to corroborate section (source 1).
There have been significant benefits from this research for companies
during the REF period 2008-14:
(1) Distinctiveness and predictive value: Companies now have a
way of measuring the likely effect of emotion on favourability towards
their brand. For example, a company can take two advertisements, identify
which has more effective emotive content, and thereby create an accurate
prediction of favourability and a more informed choice of advertisement.
The Director of the OTX Marketing Insights Team has described the CEP®Test
as `a unique and innovative point of difference that was well received by
many clients' (source 2).
(2) Effectiveness of the measure: The tool that was developed
from this research has improved the ability of companies to build strong
brands. The specific benefit of this is that a marketing company can now
tailor its advertising to the ability to communicate emotion and therefore
to build brand favourability. The Senior Research Manager at Ipsos has
confirmed the importance of the CEP®Test not only as a way `to optimise
our client's advertising, but in some cases was the deciding factor on
which campaigns to move forward with' (source 3).
(3) Strategic importance: The ability to pre-test advertisements
and to select from among competing ads those which score highest on the
emotional response scale has put marketing budgets to more strategic use
as a driver of brand growth and loyalty. The Managing Director of OTX
Europe has confirmed that the implementation of the CEP®Test has
influenced brand strategy, citing T-Mobile as an example (source 4).
(4) Broader impact: The research findings have important
implications for regulators, especially in understanding and monitoring
the influence of advertising in restricted categories such as alcohol,
cigarettes and fast food.
As the benefits of the tool have become apparent, its reach and
significance has developed. The number of companies across the globe now
using the test provides evidence of the reach of the research (source 5).
Following its introduction, two of the world's biggest and most successful
marketing companies, Kraft and Procter & Gamble, made use of the
CEP®Test. Other early clients included Nestlé, Wal-Mart, Tropicana
(PepsiCo), Nokia, Burger King, General Motors, Ford Europe, and Quaker. In
its first year of use (2006), 356 advertisements were tested. The
following year 572 ads were tested with major marketers such as Unilever,
Lee Jeans, Xbox, Microsoft, Kelloggs, and Sarah Lee. In 2008, the number
of ads tested increased to 711, with Diageo, SC Johnson, Safeway, Disney,
Warner Brothers Studios, Campbells, Citibank, T-Mobile, and O2 among the
multinationals that were added to the client list. By this stage the
CEP®Test was being used in 16 countries. In 2009, a total of 954 ads were
tested. New clients included the BBC, Kimberley Clark, HSBC Bank, Del
Monte, Walgreen's Pharmacies, Johnson & Johnson and Starbucks. In
2010, the number of ads tested rose to 1577.
By 2011, 30 Global Fortune 500 Companies were using the CEP®Test and its
Emotive Power measure to test their advertising. In addition, 42% of the
Advertising Age Top 100 Global Marketing Companies were using the test. In
2011 the biggest advertising pre-testing company in the world, Ipsos ASI,
acquired OTX. The CEP®Test and the Emotive Power metric are now
incorporated into some 10,000 advertising tests worldwide each year. A
document of evidence that lists the wide range of international companies
who have used and reused the test during the REF period is provided as
part of this case submission (source 5).
Sources to corroborate the impact
- Example advertisements that were evaluated using the CEP®Test:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wge0-Jb7a4I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0VxwGd3Cbw&feature=player_embedded
- Testimonial letter illustrating the predictive value of the CEP®Test,
from the Director of the OTX Marketing Insights Team.
- Direct communication (email) from the Senior Research Manager at IPSOS
on the value of the CEP®Test
- Testimonial letter on the strategic importance of the CEP®Test for
company brand strategies from the Managing Director, OTX Europe.
- A document of evidence of the wide range of companies who have used/
reused the test during the REF period.