Sustainable livelihoods and wellbeing
Submitting Institution
University of BathUnit of Assessment
Social Work and Social PolicySummary Impact Type
PoliticalResearch Subject Area(s)
Economics: Applied Economics
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration
Summary of the impact
In Bangladesh, 50 million people live in poverty and around 28 million
live in extreme poverty. To date, development agencies have focussed
almost exclusively on the needs of the poor and ignored those of the
extreme poor. Building on years of poverty research in Bangladesh,
researchers at the University of Bath have played a key role designing and
then developing a £65 million programme, which is the country's first
national scale initiative focusing exclusively on extreme poverty. Impacts
from the programme include improving the livelihoods of one million
extreme poor people; helping NGOs design innovative programmes for the
extreme poor; and embedding the discourse around extreme poverty in the
polity.
Underpinning research
The University of Bath has a strong reputation for its research into
poverty in Bangladesh, evidenced in research grants, publications and
engagements with policy makers over many years. One of the innovative
features of our research has been the focus on the social, political and
cultural dimensions of poverty which cannot be separated from their more
quantifiable and material aspects. Key contributions include work by Wood
and Gough (until their retirement) on welfare regimes in developing
countries [3.5]; and by McGregor, White and Devine (since 1987),
incorporating subjective indicators into more conventional poverty
analysis [3.4; 3.3], through an ESRC £3.5 million research programme.
Devine and White subsequently won an ESRC/DFID grant of £240K to develop a
wellbeing assessment tool, and advance an understanding of wellbeing and
poverty in which religion, as an expression of culture, plays a key role
[3.3]. Through our research, we have been able to make significant and
unique contributions to the understanding of poverty dynamics in
Bangladesh, help shape policy agendas around poverty, and support
organisations implementing development projects.
In 2007, DFID announced it would establish a national level programme in
Bangladesh which would focus exclusively on the needs of the extreme poor.
This was to be a flagship programme for DFID, in that it signalled a
deliberate policy shift in favour of the extreme poor, who had been
generally overlooked by conventional development programmes. In response
to DFID's open call for proposals, Devine from the University of Bath
co-authored and co-designed a £65 million challenge fund programme, which
was selected after an international peer reviewed and competitive process.
The programme, entitled the Economic Empowerment of the Poorest
(EEP), runs from 2008 till 2015. It consists predominantly of direct
livelihoods interventions carried out by NGOs in Bangladesh, but also
supports research, lesson learning and advocacy activities. The overall
aim of the programme is to help one million people lift themselves out of
extreme poverty.
Bath's engagement with the EEP programme has had two related phases.
Between 2008 and 2009, Devine and Wood helped select partner NGOs, design
projects appropriate for the extreme poor, and develop systems to monitor
and evaluate lessons from the interventions. From 2010, Devine and Wood
led on the development of the EPP programme's research, lesson learning
and advocacy activities. The core of Bath's contribution to these
activities consists of a) a socio-economic and anthropometric survey; b)
an innovative life-history method which tracks households along six
wellbeing categories; and c) participatory case studies. The EEP programme
now has the largest single dataset, with national coverage, on extreme
poverty in Bangladesh. This allows for comparative and longitudinal
analysis, and also incorporates a highly innovative `real-time' tool
allowing self-assessment of change (http://www.shiree.org/extreme-poverty-monitor/).
The EEP programme significantly advances the poverty reduction agenda in
Bangladesh, and makes a distinctive contribution to knowledge and policy
development around extreme poverty. Here we highlight its headline
lessons. First, the experience of extreme poverty is qualitatively
distinct from other forms of poverty [3.2] and is characterised by chronic
insecurity [3.5; 3.6], intergenerational transmissions of disadvantage
[3.1], and hostile political economy conditions [3.1; 3.4]. Second, given
that extreme poverty is a qualitatively distinct experience, it requires
distinct policy responses from Government as well as NGOs and donors
[3.1]. Third, the programme demonstrates that it is possible to design and
deliver programmes which can significantly improve the livelihoods of the
extreme poor [3.1; 3.2]. However, sustaining these improvements in a
hostile political economy is a formidable challenge. This is evidenced in
research supported by Devine and Wood, and published as a series of
working papers (http://www.shiree.org/research/working-papers/#.UQsD121yV1g).
To address the needs of the extreme poor will require, over time, a
fundamental shift and re-ordering of the wider political economy. [3.1;
3.6]
References to the research
3.1 Devine, J and Wood, GD. (2009) Extreme Poverty in Bangladesh and
the Need for a New Political Settlement, Paper presented to
Conference `Extreme Poverty Eradication Day: Making the Invisible
Visible', Bangabandhu International Convention Centre, Dhaka, Bangladesh,
18 October 2009. Sponsors: DFID Bangladesh, Bangladesh All Party
Parliamentary Group, National Parliament of Bangladesh, and Shiree (http://www.shiree.org/extreme-poverty-day-2009/).
3.3 Camfield, L., Choudhury, K., Devine, J. (2009) `Well-being, Happiness
and Why Relationships Matter: Evidence from Bangladesh', Journal of
Happiness Studies. 10, 71-91 DOI: 10.1007/s10902-007-9062-5
3.4 Gough I. and J.A.McGregor (eds) (2007) Wellbeing in Developing
Countries: from Theory to Research, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press (can be supplied by HEI on request)
3.5 Gough, I., Wood, G., with A.Barrientos, P.Bevan, P.Davis, G.Room
(2004). Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin
America: Social Policy in Development Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. (can be supplied by HEI on request)
3.6 Wood, G.D (2003). Staying Secure, Staying Poor: The ``Faustian
Bargain'', World Development,31 (3), 455-471 DOI:
10.1016/S0305-750x(02)00213-9
The underpinning research was supported through several awards including:
• 2002-2007: Wellbeing in Developing Countries, funded by ESRC
(£3.25 million) to a research group at Bath including McGregor (PI),
Copestake, Devine, White, Wood ;
• 2007-2010: Question of values and practices, funded by
DFID/ESRC (214,000), Devine and White as co-Principal Investigators
• 2009 (ongoing): Economic Empowerment of the Poorest, funded by
DFID (£420,000), Devine as Principal Investigator
Details of the impact
We have achieved impact through research dissemination and engagement
with policy makers at governmental and non-governmental levels. Here we
focus on the impacts attributable to our work within EEP.
The first impact is the EEP programme itself. The EEP programme is a
flagship programme for the Governments of Bangladesh and the UK
(represented via DFID, Bangladesh), and represents a major policy shift in
the international development landscape of Bangladesh. Bath's research
expertise was central to the successful proposal which guided the design
of the flagship programme, and has thereby impacted key governmental
policy decisions [5.1].
Second, our research has embedded the discourse of extreme poverty within
the Bangladesh polity and directly influenced the establishment of a new
institutional focus for extreme poverty. In 2009, Devine and Wood authored
an EEP paper which was used as a keynote presentation at an international
conference in Dhaka (see reference 3.1). The conference was widely
reported in the national press and attended by leading academics,
politicians including Ministers and the Speaker of the House of
Parliament. On the basis of this, Devine and Wood were invited to deliver
`expert workshops' on extreme poverty to the country's parliamentarians.
Five workshops were organised and over 150 parliamentarians, again
including Ministers, attended. This led directly to the establishment in
2010 of the country's first All Parliamentary Group on Extreme Poverty.
The formation of the group represents a major institutional change at the
highest levels of government in Bangladesh. According to the Speaker of
the House "the formation of the All Party Parliamentary Group on
Extreme Poverty[...]is a major political development in Bangladesh. Not
only will it foster cross-party support for extreme poverty programmes
but will also promote a wider discussion in society about the need to
care more for those in greatest need. Colleagues at the University of
Bath have played a central role in supporting the formation of the Group
and building the capacity of its members" [5.2]
Third, Bath's research has had a direct impact on the capacity
development of the 35 partner NGOs working in the EEP programme. During
EEP's inception phase (2008-2009), Devine and Wood supported partner NGOs
in devising new projects for extreme poor households, as well as tools for
targeting, monitoring and evaluation. They also influenced the overall
design of projects supported by EEP's innovation fund. For EEP NGO
partners, to work with the extreme poor was a new challenge and required
them to develop more suitable approaches. Commenting on the role of Devine
in this, one NGO leader states: "with the EEP programme, I believe we
have the strongest lesson learning team we have ever had, and the
support and direct supervision you have given to staff has been central
in building up that team. Having greater capacity in lesson learning has
already brought benefits - we carry out our programme better, we have
improved the effectiveness of the organisation and we have attracted the
interest of new potential donors". [5.3]
The fourth impact refers to livelihood improvements among the extreme
poor. The EEP programme has far exceeded its targets in terms of numbers
of direct beneficiary households, with the number recruited exceeding
248,000 against a target of 150,000 [5.4]. Independent baseline survey
analysis [5.5.] verifies that beneficiary households belong to the bottom
2-3% of the country's poor. Given that beneficiaries had no prior
experience of NGO involvement and that NGOs had no experience of working
with the extreme poor, this represents a major and radical achievement in
policy terms. In 2010, Andrew Mitchell, then UK Secretary of State for
International Development, visited the programme and is quoted as saying:
"I've seen credible data that 74% of beneficiaries on one of the Shiree
projects has managed to lift themselves off the bottom, and now have a
chance of a better life ...It's wonderful that British aid is lifting
the poorest of the poor on to the ladder of economic opportunity".
The data he refers to comes from the lesson learning/monitoring and
evaluation activities of the programme overseen by Devine and Wood [5.1].
Fifth, EEP research has influenced policy decisions at local levels in
Bangladesh. One of the EEP partners, an NGO called NETZ, carried out
research supervised by Devine and Wood into indigenous community access to
government safety nets. The findings of the research were used to develop
an integrated advocacy campaign which consisted of a) lobbying policy
officers in local areas where indigenous communities resided; b)
organising a national workshop (in which Devine participated as a keynote
speaker) to stimulate a wider debate in society and put pressure on
national policy makers; and c) hosting an international conference in
Berlin and Brussels (in which representatives from the EU parliament, the
UN as well as the German Minister for Economic Cooperation and Development
participated) to secure high-level external support.
The advocacy campaign resulted in notable and tangible benefits for
indigenous communities. Before the research and advocacy, only 2.65% of
NETZ's beneficiaries had access to government safety nets. At the end of
the campaign, this figure had risen to 10%. The NETZ Executive Director
concluded: "Our research was important to help us plot out an advocacy
strategy with local communities and government officials at national and
international levels. Joe's supervision of the original research and his
support in the analysis of the data ensured we had strong and convincing
evidence to lobby policy makers. His participation at the national
workshop was also very important" [5.6]
Sixth, our engagement with the EEP programme has further enhanced our
expertise on poverty dynamics in Bangladesh. Save the Children is one of
the NGO partners in the EEP programme and in 2012, asked Devine and Wood
to help develop a global `signature programme' in Bangladesh. Devine and
Wood prepared concepts notes and facilitated two international workshops
in May 20-12 and December 2012. According to the Regional Food Security
& Livelihoods Advisor for Save the Children, "Both Geof and Joe
had supported our successful EEP programme and we asked them to help us
build on this to develop the signature programme. Joe and Geof brought
invaluable insights, expertise and knowledge of poverty in Bangladesh to
the workshops, and this directly influenced the strategy Save the
Children adopted to achieve the ambitious scale of the signature
programme" [5.7]. Further evidence of enhanced reputation is given
in Devine and Wood's work (2012-2014) for the Dutch Ministry of Foreign
Affairs. Following a peer reviewed international competition. Bath (Devine
as PI) was awarded a 659,000 euros research grant to assess the
effectiveness of the government's framework for development cooperation in
Bangladesh. The successful proposal, authored by Devine, was written
substantially around the expertise gained through our EEP work (5.8).
Finally, the EEP has directly benefited the reputation of the University
of Bath as a centre of excellence in poverty studies. Devine's research in
Bangladesh was selected, following a peer review process, as a showcase
for a Set-Squared Partnership event which sought to highlight "research
programmes that have genuinely changed the world for the better".
Devine's work was one of the 25 highlighted cases from across the
sciences, one of the very few from the social sciences, and is used to
illustrate the contribution university research can make to society [5.9].
Furthermore our research and policy engagement was recognised in the 2011
Diamond Jubilee round of the Queen's Anniversary Prize for Further and
Higher Education [5.10].
Sources to corroborate the impact
5.1 Chairman, Harewelle International Ltd, UK
5.2 Honourable Speaker of the House of Parliament, Government of
Bangladesh (now President of the Republic of Bangladesh)
5.3 Executive Director, Uttaran, Bangladesh
5.4 Shiree Quarterly Report, January-March 2013, available at
http://www.shiree.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/10-SQR-Jan-Mar-2013.pdf
5.5 Ali, Z. (2012). `Poverty Thresholds Analysis: Reassessing and
Revalidating Quantitative Indicators'. Shiree Working Paper 10,
available at
http://www.shiree.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Poverty-Thresholds-Analysis-Zulfiqar-Ali.pdf
5.6 Executive Director, NETZ Bangladesh
5.7 Regional Food Security & Livelihoods Advisor, Save the
Children
5.8http://www.nwo.nl/en/research-and-results/research-projects/08/2300175508.html
5.9 http://www.setsquared.co.uk/impact/society-case-studies
5.10 Queen's Anniversary Prize (2011) for Higher and Further Education:
the University of Bath for "Influential Research into Child Poverty
and Support for Vulnerable People",
www.royalanniversarytrust.org.uk & www.bath.ac.uk/sps/about/queens-award/