An effective national strategy for the prevention of tooth decay
Submitting Institution
University of AberdeenUnit of Assessment
Public Health, Health Services and Primary CareSummary Impact Type
PoliticalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Dentistry, Public Health and Health Services
Summary of the impact
    University of Aberdeen research directly led to a change in the Scottish
      Dental Contract which has
      doubled the number of children receiving fissure sealants. The University
      of Aberdeen's Health
      Services Research Unit (HSRU) conducted a randomised trial looking at the
      effectiveness of a
      strategy to improve adoption of fissure sealants — known to reduce decay
      in children's teeth but
      which were rarely administered. The trial examined a fee-for-service
      intervention in primary dental
      care where each dentist received £6.80 per tooth sealed. It demonstrated
      that fee payment was
      associated with an increase in fissure sealant placement in dental primary
      care. This led to a
      change in the Scottish Dental Contract which now includes a
      fee-for-service for the placement in
      fissure sealants in children over 11 years old. From 2008, guidance
      documents from the NHS
      Department of Health and the Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness
      Programme have
      recommended placement of fissure sealants on children above 11-years-old.
      These guidance
      documents are provided to some 10,000 dentists throughout the UK. Since
      the introduction of the
      fee, over 37,000 children per year in Scotland have received fissure
      sealants. This is double the
      number of children receiving sealants compared to before the policy change
      and equates to some
      150,000 children receiving the sealants since January 2008.
    The claimed impact, as defined by REF guidance, is therefore on public
        policy and services;
      practitioners and professional services; society and economically.
    Underpinning research
    In the 1990s, a key focus of research at the University of Aberdeen's
      HSRU was the development
      of strategies to improve the implementation of research findings. Through
      its Aberdeen Centre for
      Implementation Research it provided international guidance on which
      strategies were most
      effective for improving implementation of research findings [1]. It also
      undertook research into
      specific trial methodology (especially cluster randomised trials) and
      methods for designing and
      conducting innovative national evaluations [2]. With this strong
      reputation for innovation, clinical
      collaborators routinely approached HSRU with possible clinical questions
      and HSRU led the
      translation into robust study designs. This trial related to dental
      fissure sealants placement is one
      such example of this practice.
    Dental decay is very common in childhood. By age 15, 50% of UK children
      have experienced
      decay in their first permanent molars. Dental decay is closely linked to
      social deprivation and, in
      Scotland, 69% of five year olds in the least affluent areas have caries.
      Methods of prevention are
      well-known and placement of fissure sealants has been shown to reduce
      decay in children's teeth
      by up to 86% at 12 months. Adoption in Scotland was poor, however, with
      only 15% of 11-year-olds
      having any first molars sealed prior to 2005.
    Reasons suggested for the poor adoption of the sealant method by dentists
      included lack of
      financial reimbursement for placing sealants on children over 11-years-old
      and dentists' lack of
      knowledge of the evidence base for the treatments in older children. To
      address this adoption
      problem, methodologists at the University of Aberdeen's HSRU worked with
      clinical colleagues at
      the University of Dundee, to design a national cluster randomised trial
      (the ERUPT trial) to test
      these implementation strategies. Aberdeen researchers led on the design
      and implementation of
      the trial interventions (HSRU researchers were the recognised
      international experts in
      implementation research interventions and had developed the evidence base
      [1]) and on the
      design and analysis of the trial (HSRU researchers were also the
      international experts in cluster
      trial methodology [2]).
    University of Aberdeen researchers engaged directly in the ERUPT trial
      were:
    
      - Craig Ramsay, Senior Statistician, Aberdeen Centre for Implementation
        Research
 
      - Jeremy Grimshaw, Director, Aberdeen Centre for Implementation Research
 
      - Graeme MacLennan, Statistician, HSRU,
        together with clinical input from Jan Clarkson and Nigel Pitts, Dental
        Health Services Research
        Unit, Dundee. 
    
    Additional University of Aberdeen researchers who were integral to the
      development of the
      evidence base and the cluster trial methodology underpinning the ERUPT
      trial were:
    
      - Ruth Thomas, Research Assistant, HSRU (implementation evidence base)
 
      - Liz Shirran, Research Assistant, HSRU (implementation evidence base)
 
      - Marion Campbell, Senior Statistician, HSRU (methodology of cluster
        trials for implementation
        research)
 
      - Jill Mollison, Statistician, Department of Public Health (methodology
        of cluster trials for
        implementation research)
 
    
    The ERUPT trial [3] was completed in 2005 and continues to be the largest
      randomised trial
      internationally of a fee-for-service intervention in primary dental care.
      Some 140 dentists and 2833
      high risk of caries children were randomised for the dentists to receive
      either a fee for fissure
      sealant placement (each dentist received £6.80 per tooth sealed) or
      training in evidence-based
      practice. The trial demonstrated that placement of fissure sealants
      increased by 10% (when a
      small fee-for-service was offered). There was no effect of the education
      intervention. The
      economic evaluation conducted as part of the study clearly demonstrated
      that the fee-for-service
      was a cost-effective intervention.
    At the completion of the trial in 2005, a dissemination conference was
      organised by the trial team
      to which service providers, national decision makers (such as the British
      Dental Association) and
      policy-makers including the Deputy Chief Dental Officer who was
      responsible for recommending
      any changes to the Scottish Dental Contract were invited. After the
      conference, the Deputy Chief
      Dental Officer recommended a change to the contract informed by the
      findings of the trial. The
      Scottish Dental Contract was amended in Nov 2005 to include a
      fee-for-service for the placement
      of fissure sealants in children over 11-years-old.
    From 2008, guidance documents from the NHS Department of Health (England)
      and the Scottish
      Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme have recommended placement of
      fissure sealants on
      children above 11-years-old. These guidance documents are provided to some
      10,000 dentists
      throughout the UK.
    References to the research
    Research outputs
    
[1] Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan GS, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L,
      Whitty P, Eccles
      MP, Matowe L, Shirran L, Wensing M, Dijkstra R, Donaldson C. (2004).
      Effectiveness and
      efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health
        Technol Assess
      8(6):1-72.
      This research, led from the University of Aberdeen's HSRU was, and
        continues to be, the
        most comprehensive review of guideline dissemination and implementation
        strategies ever
        undertaken and has been cited 1743 times, Google Scholar at 12/8/13. It
        underpinned the
        choice of implementation strategy for the ERUPT trial.
     
[2] Campbell MK, Mollison JM, Grimshaw JM (2001). Cluster trials in
      implementation research:
      estimation of intracluster correlation coefficients and sample size. Statistics
        in Medicine
      2001; 20: 391-399.
      This paper is an example of the methodological advances being developed
        by HSRU
        researchers at the time in the field of implementation research, around
        the development of
        cluster trial methods in the field. The developments in this paper
        informed the design of the
        ERUPT trial discussed in this case study.
     
[3] Clarkson JE, Turner S, Grimshaw JM, Ramsay CR, Johnston M, Scott A,
      Bonetti D, Tilley
      CJ, Maclennan G, Ibbetson R, MacPherson L, Pitts NB. (2008). Changing
      clinicians'
      behavior: a randomized controlled trial of fees and education. J Dent
        Res; 87(7):640-4.
      This paper reports the ERUPT trial referred to in this case study. It
        continues to be the
        largest trial ever undertaken of a fee-for-service intervention in
        primary dental care.
     
Key grant funding associated with the research
    The project was conducted by a Chief Scientist Office (Scottish
      Government) grant led by Jan
      Clarkson of the University of Dundee as clinical lead with Craig Ramsay
      (HSRU, University of
      Aberdeen) as methodological lead. Details shown below:
    Title: The effect of remuneration and education on the implementation
        of research evidence to
        reduce inequalities in oral health. Chief Scientist Office, Dec 2001
      to Nov 2005, £382,473.
    The research outputs and research grant award underwent rigorous
      independent external peer
      review by the funding bodies.
    Details of the impact
    Initial impact occurred when the randomised trial ended in 2005. The
      study led to a direct change
      in the Scottish Dental Contract in Nov 2005 with a new fee-for-service for
      preventative sealant
      application on child molars introduced. The revised contract stated...
    "5.2 Fissure Sealants
    Lewis Macdonald, Deputy Minister for Health's, letter of 29 November
      advised that, from 1 April
      2006, a new item of service fee would be introduced for the application of
      fissure sealants as a
      primary preventive measure to pits and fissures in each permanent molar
      tooth." [a]
    Since its introduction, over 37,000 children per year in Scotland have
      received fissure sealants.
      This is double the number of children receiving sealants compared to
      before the policy change and
      equates to some 150,000 children receiving the sealants from January 2008
      [b,c]
    From 2008, guidance documents from the NHS Department of Health (England
      and Wales) [d] and
      the Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme [e] have recommended
      placement of fissure
      sealants on children above 11-years-old. These guidance documents are
      provided to some
      10,000 dentists throughout the UK.
    This work was also pivotal to demonstrating that a significant gap exists
      between known evidence-based
      practice and the implementation of that practice in dental primary care.
      In November 2008,
      it led to the setting up of an innovative programmatic approach to
      knowledge translation research
      in Scottish Dentistry (led jointly by Craig Ramsay, HSRU as principal
      investigator for methodology,
      and the Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme) that informs
      some 1000 dental services
      practitioners, policy makers and patients on how best to translate
      national recommendations into
      routine clinical activities. The initial randomised study now provides an
      exemplar for how
      translational research in a dental setting can be performed and forms part
      of the protocol [f] for the
      Translation Research in a Dental Setting (TRiaDS) initiative (http://www.sdpbrn.org.uk/index.aspx?o=2688). As
      well as influencing practitioner services the TRiaDS programme impacts
      on the broader research community through knowledge transfer initiatives
      such as running national
      conferences (http://www.sdpbrn.org.uk/index.aspx?o=3113).
    The claimed impact, as defined by REF guidance, is therefore on public
        policy and services;
      practitioners and professional services; society and economically.
    Sources to corroborate the impact 
    [a] Amendments to the statement of dental remuneration. Scottish
        Executive Health
        Department, 2006.
      http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CCoQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scottishdental.org%2Findex.aspx%3Fo%3D1495&ei=7u9GUs65IKWy7Aa16IC4Aw&usg=AFQjCNH9VwiBWn0e-Ka8cvt31_DjX0q9Ww&bvm=bv.53217764,d.ZGU
      This reference highlights the change in the Dental Contract to account
        for remuneration of fissure
        sealants on child molars.
    [b] National Dental Inspection Programme of Scotland. Scottish Dental
        Epidemiology Co-ordinating
        Committee, 2005.
      http://www.scottishdental.org/index.aspx?o=2153&record=73
      Data on fissure sealant use are collected and reported at a national
        level on an annual basis. This
        report details the level of sealant use prior to 2005.
    [c] National Dental Inspection Programme of Scotland. Scottish Dental
        Epidemiology Co-ordinating
        Committee, 2011.
      http://www.isdscotland.org/Health-Topics/Dental-Care/Publications/2011-11-29/2011-11-29-NDIP-Report.pdf
      As with reference [b] above this report details the increased level of
        fissure sealant use in 2011.
    [d] NHS Department of Health. Delivering Better Oral Health: An
      evidence-based toolkit for
      prevention, April 2009.
      http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CCoQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.oralhealthplatform.eu%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Ffield%2Fdocument%2FNHS_Delivering%2520Better%2520Oral%2520health.pdf&ei=mPFGUvLZHMee7AaPsYGYDw&usg=AFQjCNFOePeTk5uyxKOs84dHBpLyEQ9Enw&bvm=bv.53217764,d.ZGU
      This guidance document demonstrates that fissure sealant replacement in
        11 years olds was being
        recommended as optimal practice for dentists in England and Wales.
    [e] Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme. Prevention and
      management of dental
      caries in children, April 2010.
      http://www.sdcep.org.uk/index.aspx?o=2866
      Similar to reference [d] above, this guidance document demonstrates
        that fissure sealant
        replacement in 11 years olds was being recommended as optimal practice
        for dentists in Scotland.
    [f] Clarkson JE, Ramsay CR, Eccles MP, et al. (2010). The
      translation research in a dental
      setting (TRiaDS) programme protocol. Implementation Science; 5:
      57.
      http://www.implementationscience.com/content/pdf/1748-5908-5-57.pdf
      This paper describes the TRiaDS programme and references the ERUPT
        study as an exemplar of
        a rigorous implementation study in dentistry.
    [g] Testimonial from Postgraduate Dental Dean for Scotland
      Letter from Postgraduate Dental Dean for Scotland (till 2011),
        confirming the ERUPT trial directly
        contributed to the decision to change in remuneration for dentists in
        Scotland in respect of
        placement of preventative fissure sealants and the impact it has had on
        the thousands of children
        who have now benefited from this policy.