Influencing national and international breastfeeding
Submitting Institution
University of AberdeenUnit of Assessment
Public Health, Health Services and Primary CareSummary Impact Type
PoliticalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Nursing, Public Health and Health Services
Summary of the impact
University of Aberdeen research has directly influenced worldwide
guidance for breastfeeding. A programme of research led by University
researchers set out to develop, design and evaluate interventions to
improve breastfeeding rates. Findings from the research directly led to a
change to UNICEF guidance on how to promote breastfeeding care. Hospitals
can apply to be UNICEF "Baby Friendly" accredited if they can demonstrate
implementation of the UNICEF guidance. The National Institute for Health
and Clinical Excellence has also indicated that all UK hospitals must
follow the UNICEF guidance. The research has also directly impacted on the
work of the Baby Café Charitable Trust -a charity which runs accredited
drop-in centres to promote breastfeeding across in the UK and
internationally - with the findings from the Aberdeen research programme
directly influencing the Baby Café "toolkit": the "rule-book" by which all
Baby Café drop-in centres worldwide are run.
The claimed impact, as defined by REF guidance, is therefore on policy
and services; practitioners and professional services; society
and economically.
Underpinning research
Breastfeeding is known to provide considerable health benefits for both
mother and baby, with reduced risk of infections in babies and of breast
and ovarian cancer in mothers. The World Health Organization recommends
exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months of life. However
breastfeeding rates in Scotland and the rest of the UK are amongst the
lowest in the developed world, with only around 40% of babies receiving
any breast milk at 6-8 weeks. Recognising the importance of addressing
this significant health need, researchers in the University of Aberdeen - led by Pat Hoddinott, then Senior Lecturer in Primary Care at the
University - developed an extensive programme of research into the
barriers and facilitators to breastfeeding as well as a rigorous
evaluation of interventions to improve breast feeding rates. This research
programme included three substantive elements:
-
The evaluation of peer-support groups to promote breastfeeding
in rural areas with below average rates of breastfeeding
[1,2]. This study evaluated the effectiveness of peer support for new
mothers. Peer support was provided through midwife/health visitor
facilitated groups where actively breastfeeding mothers supported or
"coached" other new mothers to breastfeed. One-to-one coaching could
also be provided. The study, which followed the feeding outcomes of
around 600 babies, showed that breastfeeding rates at two weeks in the
intervention area rose significantly by 34.3% to 41.1%. Breastfeeding
rates increased at all time points until 8 months. Groups were reported
to be more popular than one-to-one coaching.
-
A large-scale, pan-Scotland evaluation of a policy to routinely
establish breastfeeding groups for new mothers [3,4].
Insights from the peer-support study above, which showed that
peer support groups looked to be effective in rural areas, led to the
development a large-scale, pan-Scotland evaluation of a policy to
routinely establish breastfeeding groups for new mothers. This large
scale cluster randomised trial - called the "BIG" (Breastfeeding in
Groups) Trial - involved primary care organisations across Scotland
being randomised to either set up new breastfeeding support groups or to
not change their existing breastfeeding support provision. This trial,
which followed more than 18,000 babies, showed no significant change in
breastfeeding rates at 8 weeks after birth. In-depth qualitative data,
collected while the trial was ongoing, allowed a model to be developed
which highlighted the circumstances under which peer support groups
worked best - strong leadership, evidence of multidisciplinary working
etc. The report of this study was nominated for the Royal College
General Practitioners Research Paper of the Year Award.
-
In-depth qualitative investigation of factors to improve
breastfeeding in disadvantaged area [5]. Following the
publication of the BIG trial, NHS Health Scotland commissioned the
University of Aberdeen group to design and undertake an in-depth
interview study with families from more disadvantaged areas. The aim was
to inform the design of future interventions to improve breastfeeding in
this population, not particularly likely to breastfeed. This rigorous
qualitative study, following families over time, showed a need to move
away from "breastfeeding-centred" care towards a mother, baby and family
centred approach.
Led by Pat Hoddinott, the University of Aberdeen team also included:
- Dave Godden (Director, Centre for Rural Health, University of
Aberdeen),
- Jane Britten (Research Fellow, Public Health Nutrition Group,
University of Aberdeen),
- Jill Mollison (Senior Lecturer, Department of Public Health,
University of Aberdeen),
- Amanda Lee (Reader, Department of Primary Care, University of
Aberdeen),
- Gordon Prescott (Senior Lecturer, Department of Public Health,
University of Aberdeen); and
- Anne Ludbrook (Senior Research Fellow, Health Economics Research Unit,
University of Aberdeen)
References to the research
Research outputs:
[1] Hoddinott P, Chalmers M, Pill R. One-to-one or group based peer
support for breastfeeding? Women's perceptions of a breastfeeding peer
coaching intervention. Birth. 2006;33(2):139-146. (cited 26 times,
Google Scholar at 12/8/13)
[2] Hoddinott P, Lee AJ, Pill R. Effectiveness of a breastfeeding peer
coaching intervention on breastfeeding rates in rural Scotland. Birth.
2006;33(1):27-36. (cited 24 times, Google Scholar at 12/8/13)
These two papers describe the peer-support intervention study in rural
areas which concluded that group support for breastfeeding was likely to
be more acceptable to women than individual coaching. This study was
designed and led by Hoddinott from the University of Aberdeen. Lee is
also from the University of Aberdeen and led on the statistical
analysis.
[3] Hoddinott P, Britten J, Prescott G, Tappin D, Ludbrook A, Godden D.
Effectiveness of a policy to provide breastfeeding groups (BIG) for
pregnant and breastfeeding mothers in primary care. Brit Med J
2009;338:a3026. (cited 34 times, Google Scholar at 12/8/13)
This is the report of the breastfeeding groups trial (the BIG trial),
published in the British Medical Journal. It was the first and largest
cluster randomised trial in the field and was designed and led from the
University of Aberdeen (Hoddinott, Prescott, Ludbrook and Godden were
all University of Aberdeen researchers).
[4] Hoddinott P, Britten J, Pill R. Why do interventions work in some
places and not others: a breastfeeding support group trial. Social
Science and Medicine. 2010;70(5):769-778. (cited 13 times, Google
Scholar at 12/8/13)
This paper reports the qualitative process evaluation undertaken within
the BIG trial which explained why outcomes were favourable in some
locations but others weren't. This was led by Hoddinott from the
University of Aberdeen.
[5] Hoddinott P, Craig L, Britten J, McInnes R. A serial qualitative
study of infant feeding experiences: idealism meets realism. BMJ Open
2012;2:e000504. (cited 18 times, Google Scholar at 12/8/13)
This is the report of the serial qualitative interview study with
families recruited from more disadvantaged areas. It showed that the
need to move away from "breastfeeding-centred" care towards a mother,
baby and family centred approach. The study was led and designed by
Hoddinott with input from Craig from the University's Public Health
Nutrition Group.
Research Grants:
All the research grants supporting these projects were led from the
University of Aberdeen with Hoddinott as Chief Investigator. All
University of Aberdeen grantholders are identified in bold.
• Hoddinott P, Britten J, Mollison J, Ludbrook
A, McInnes R, Tappin D, Godden D. The BIG (Breastfeeding in
Groups) trial: a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and
cost-effectiveness of breastfeeding peer support groups in improving
breastfeeding initiation, duration and satisfaction. Chief Scientist's
Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorate. Ref: CZH/4/156:
final report graded excellent. £209,603. 01/10/04 - 30/09/07.
• Hoddinott P. How can breastfeeding initiation, duration and
maternal satisfaction with breastfeeding experience be improved in
Scotland? Chief Scientist's Office of the Scottish Government Health
Directorate. Primary Care Research Career Award. CZP/4/4. £294,225.
01/10/03 - 30/09/08.
• Hoddinott P. An action research project to implement and
evaluate a breastfeeding coaching project in Banff and Buchan. Chief
Scientist's Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorate. Research
Practice Scheme. £46,500. 01/10/00 - 30/09/03.
• Hoddinott P, Craig L, McInnes R. A prospective study
exploring the early infant feeding experiences of parents and their
significant others during the first 6 months of life. NHS Health Scotland
Research Grant. Ref: RE031. £95,501. 01/03/09-31/07/10.
All research outputs and research grants underwent rigorous independent
external peer review.
Details of the impact
This University of Aberdeen research programme has had direct impact on
breastfeeding care worldwide.
In 1992 the children's charity UNICEF and the World Health Organization
(WHO) launched their worldwide Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative
[a]. The Initiative provided a framework for the implementation of
best practice by hospitals, other health-care facilities and higher
education institutions, with the aim of ensuring that all parents make
informed decisions about feeding their babies. Until 2012, best practice
was represented by UNICEFs evidence-based "Ten Steps to Successful
Breastfeeding". New standards were introduced in December 2012 which
adopt a more mother and parent centred approach. Hospitals can apply to be
a UNICEF "Baby Friendly" accredited hospital if they can show they
are implementing UNICEF guidance. Research has shown that implementation
of the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative has led to increases in
breastfeeding rates and subsequent child health.
The results of the BIG trial directly influenced a change to Step 10 of
the UNICEF UK's Ten Step guidance. The 10 steps were the standard guidance
until December 2012, when new standards incorporating, updating and
expanding the 10 steps were published. Prior to the BIG trial results
being published, Step 10 read "Step 10: Foster
the establishment of breastfeeding support groups and refer mothers to
them on discharge from the hospital or clinic." with the expectation
that hospitals routinely promote the establishment of breast feeding
support groups. Following publication of the BIG trial in 2009 which
showed no evidence that these peer-support groups improved breastfeeding
rates, Step 10 was reworded, after consultation with the trial team, to: "Step
10 - Identify sources of national and local support for
breastfeeding and ensure that mothers know how to access these prior to
discharge from hospital" thus removing the expectation that
hospitals should be routinely establishing these groups [b]. Clearly this
results in savings to national health services, as these groups are no
longer being routinely set up.
In the UK, the Baby Friendly Initiative also accredits maternity
and community facilities that adopt the UNICEF internationally recognised
standards. Hospitals undergo a structured assessment to attain the award
and achieve "Baby Friendly" accreditation if successful. The National
Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has, through its
guidance on standards of postnatal care in the UK, recommended that the Baby
Friendly Accreditation be the minimum standard for the care of all
mothers and babies [c]. Thus this research from the University of Aberdeen
has directly influenced the care of all new mothers and babies across the
UK.
In November 2011, the UNICEF UK Baby Friendly quality standards were
further revised both in the language used and their content (to reflect
more recent changes in evidence). Again, this revision drew directly on
the findings of this University of Aberdeen programme of research (in
particular, the in-depth qualitative study of disadvantaged families),
recommending a move away from a breastfeeding-centred towards a more
realistic woman, baby and family centred approach to feeding care [d]. In
particular, Standard 3 recommends a more mother and parent-centred
approach to discussing infant feeding antenatally, and references
Aberdeen's work as supporting evidence.
The Aberdeen research on coaching has also been integral to the policies
developed by the Baby Café Charitable Trust. The Baby Café Charitable
Trust is an independent charity dedicated to providing free, top-quality
support to breastfeeding mothers and runs a network of drop-in centres in
the UK and worldwide. There are currently 111 Baby Cafe centres in the UK
and a further 27 overseas (source: babycafe.org). Baby Café drop-ins are
run by health professionals such as midwives, health visitors, or
lactation consultants and they also run so-called "Baby Café Local"
drop-ins which are run by healthcare practitioners (e.g. maternity support
worker) or breastfeeding counsellors from voluntary breastfeeding
organisations. Help is available on all aspects of breastfeeding. Anyone
wishing to set up a Baby Café drop-in centre must apply to be licensed by
the Charitable Trust and agree to run their drop-in centre according to
pre-specified procedures. These procedures are outlined in the Baby Café
"toolkit". The Baby Café Charitable Trust have sought to ensure that their
"toolkit" is evidence-based and have drawn on research to inform their
best practice. They explicitly reference the findings from the coaching
intervention and the BIG trial in their toolkit as providing evidence to
inform their procedures [e].
The claimed impact, as defined by REF guidance, is therefore on policy
and services; practitioners and professional services; society
and economically.
Sources to corroborate the impact
[a] http://www.unicef.org/nutrition/index_24806.html
This is UNICEFs website which describes the Baby Friendly Hospital
Initiative and the number of Baby Friendly accredited facilities there
are worldwide.
[b] Entwistle FM. The evidence and rationale for the UNICEF Baby Friendly
Initiative standards, UNICEF UK, 2013.
This document describes the latest version of the Baby Friendly
Initiative standards and extensively references our research as
underpinning evidence.
[c] NICE. Clinical Guidance (CG037): Postnatal Care.
http://www.nice.org.uk/cg037
This is the current NICE guidance document which outlines the UNICEF
Baby Friendly Initiative as the minimum standard for breastfeeding in
the UK.
[d]http://www.unicef.org.uk/BabyFriendly/News-and-Research/Research/Support-for-breastfeeding/Feeding-support-needs-to-be-more-woman-centred/
This is UNICEF'S commentary on the serial qualitative study. UNICEF
indicated that the research had raised important issues and they
recognised that whilst their Baby Friendly Initiative had gone some way
to addressing women-centredness, they required to promote this further.
This led to the changes in Standard 3 in the newly issued (2012) Baby
Friendly guidance.
[e] Pardoe C & Williams J. Baby Café Toolkit: all you need to know
about running a Baby Café Drop in Centre. Baby Café Charitable Trust,
2011.
This toolkit, which is issued to all registered Baby Café licence
holders, outlines the guidance and standards of care which must be
followed under the Baby Café licence. It explicitly references the
research on coaching and the process evaluation of the BIG trial as
evidence informing its guidance and standards.