Modelling economic impact for national governments
Submitting Institution
Bournemouth UniversityUnit of Assessment
Sport and Exercise Sciences, Leisure and TourismSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Economics: Applied Economics, Econometrics
Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services: Tourism
Summary of the impact
Bournemouth University (BU) researchers have developed economic modelling
techniques that more accurately predict the outcome of events, policies or
other major economic decisions. This type of modelling allows governments
and organisations to effectively plan for the positive and negative
impacts arising from decisions. The technique was used to inform estimates
of the value of the 2012 Olympic Games and subsequent tourism legacy; to
provide the evidence base for VisitScotland naming 2013 the `Year of
Natural Scotland'; to inform a Parliamentary debate on music tourism and
establish greater representation of music in VisitBritain marketing
material; and to inform the Government of Gibraltar of the impact of
changes, such as the benefits of cross-border activity.
Underpinning research
The underpinning research undertaken by Fletcher (BU 1996 to present) and
Blake (BU 2008 to present) is represented by a number of publications and
research awards. These have pioneered application of new approaches to
estimating the economic impacts of tourism activities.
Economic impact research has evolved since the 1970s with the use of
input-output models. These typically estimate static economic impacts that
are limited in their applicability. Building on these earlier models, more
recent research, in which Fletcher and Blake have been instrumental, has
extended and enhanced economic impact modelling in the following ways:
- The incorporation of the role of displacement, by which tourism
activity displaces other forms of activity through developments of
computable general equilibrium (CGE) models. P1 used a CGE model to
estimate the impacts of tourism showing that displacement caused by
tourism expenditure leads to reductions in manufacturing sectors. This in
part reduces the benefits tourism brings to some sections of the economy
and could lead to the overall impact of tourism on some groups being
negative (P2).
- The use of dynamic models to allow impacts of future events to be
seen before they take place (P3-P6). P3 is the first example of such
a dynamic model being used to estimate the economic impacts of tourism. It
showed that an event such as the Olympics can have impacts on economic
activity years in advance. This is due to anticipation that the event will
take place at a definite time in the future, and expectation of tourism
expenditures at that event. This methodology also enables the estimation
of expenditures in host cities as compared to the host country (P4-P6).
- The incorporation of forecasting functions and environmental impact
modules in user-friendly interfaces (G1 & G2) and web interfaces
(G6). This allows the impact models that have been developed to have
a greater application, with users and policy makers able to generate new
sets of results to answer immediate questions. In the case of G6, this has
included a web-based questionnaire through which businesses in tourism
destinations input data regarding their firm's activity over a period of
time. These data sets are gathered through an online database to allow the
same firms to then access indicators that not only demonstrate their
economic and environmental impacts in their destination but also to
consider the performance of their business relative to the sector average,
minimum and maximum for each variable incorporated. For instance, a hotel
can see what contribution it makes to the local economy, what the
environmental consequences are and how well it is performing in terms of
energy usage, what its revenue per available room is compared with the
sector and even the proportion of its marketing costs in relation to its
sector.
References to the research
Publications
P1. Blake, A., Arbache, J.S., Sinclair, M.T. and Teles, V. (2008).
Tourism and poverty relief. Annals of Tourism Research 35(1),
107-126. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2007.06.013
P2. Blake, A. (2008). Tourism and income distribution in East
Africa. International Journal of Tourism Research, 10(6), 511-524.
DOI: 10.1002/jtr.702
P3. Blake, A. (2009). The dynamics of tourism's economic impact. Tourism
Economics, 15(3), 615-628. DOI: 10.5367/000000009789036576
P4. Li, S., Blake, A. and Cooper, C. (2011). Modelling the
economic impact of international tourism on the Chinese economy: a CGE
analysis of the Beijing 2008 Olympics. Tourism Economics, 17(2),
279-303. DOI: 10.5367/te.2011.0025
P5. Li, S., Blake, A. and Cooper, C. (2010). China's tourism in a
global financial crisis: A Computable General Equilibrium Approach. Current
Issues in Tourism, 13(5), 435-453. DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2010.491899
P6. Li, S., Blake, A. and Thomas, R. (2013). Modelling the
economic impact of sports events: the case of the Beijing Olympics. Economic
Modelling, 30, 235-244. DOI:
10.1016/j.econmod.2012.09.013
Research awards
G1. Blake, A. (2008). Study to Evaluate the Economic
Performance and Contribution of Irish Tourism. Report for Failte
Ireland (with Indecon International Economic Consultants). £17,000.
G2. Blake, A. (2008). Updating & Improving the Moffat
Model. Research award by VisitScotland. £18,000.
G3. Blake, A., Curtin, S., Richards, S., Vaughan, R., Fletcher, J.
and Brackstone, J. (2009). The Economic Impact of Wildlife Tourism in
Scotland. Report for the Scottish Government. £59,000.
G4. Fletcher, J. (2009). An economic impact study and analysis
of the economies of Gibraltar and Campo del Gibraltar. Report for
the Gibraltar Chambers of Commerce. £25,000.
G5. Blake, A., Richards, S. and Jackson, C. (2010). Music
Tourism. Report for UK Music. £16,000.
G6. Fletcher, J. (2010). Sustainable tourism investment in
coastal areas. Report and model for UN Environment Program (UNEP)
and the Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF). £45,000.
G7. Fletcher, J. (2011). An economic assessment of the Boscombe
Artificial Surf Reef, Crown Estate's Marine Stewardship Programme.
£78,000.
G8. Blake, A. (2012). Tourism Sector VAT Analysis: CGE
Modelling Results, Report for Tourism Respect. £11,000.
Details of the impact
The models and modelling approaches developed by Fletcher and Blake have
fed into the development of tourism-related and general economic policies
by a number of international organisations, national governments and
public authorities of various ranks. This is evidenced through a series of
examples.
Blake's work on dynamic modelling of tourism demand during the Olympics
(P3) developed new methodologies for estimating the impact of future
events. This accounts for the fact that businesses and other actors in the
economy anticipate these events and make changes to their activity many
years in advance. The model developed by Blake was used to estimate the
value of the London 2012 Olympics to the UK. It also showed the value of
the post-Olympic tourism legacy and economic gains that would be made by
London partly at the expense of the rest of the UK. These findings
contributed to the evidence base that led to policy changes, such as
promoting the need for destination image building during the Games and of
spreading the tourism benefits around the UK. This was delivered through
the work of the Nations and Regions Group, which identified opportunities
for tourism outside of London.
In 2010, Blake led a research project commissioned by the Scottish
Government (R1) to estimate the size and economic contribution of wildlife
tourism in Scotland (G3). This involved the estimation of net impacts of
tourism, taking account of displacement (P1 & P2). This project
estimated that wildlife tourists spent £276 million in Scotland during
2009, which contributed £65 million to Scotland's gross domestic product
(GDP) and 2,763 full-time equivalent jobs. This provided the evidence base
that led to VisitScotland naming 2013 the `Year of Natural Scotland' (R2
& R3).
In 2010-11, Blake led a research project commissioned by UK Music — the
umbrella organisation for different elements of the UK music industry
(G5). The resulting publication Destination: Music (R4)
demonstrated that 7.7 million tourists travel to or within the UK to
attend music festivals or concerts. They spend £1.4 billion during the
course of their trips, contributing £864 million to the UK economy and
providing the equivalent of almost 20,000 full-time jobs. This project
took displacement into account in estimating the economic contribution of
this activity (P1 & P2). This report was discussed in Parliament on 22
November 2011 (R5), and has led to the formation of a UK live music group
with representation by CEOs from music and events companies (R6). The
evidence base contained in this report also provided the basis for
increased lobbying by the industry for a greater representation of music
in VisitBritain's marketing, which has since included iconic music images
in its `Great Britain' campaign (R7).
In 2012, Blake conducted research for Tourism Respect to estimate the
economic impacts of implementing a reduced rate of VAT for accommodation
and visitor attractions (G8). This involved the construction of a CGE
model to estimate the net impact of displacement. This was in a dynamic
setting to show how activity changes in advance of any tax-change taking
place (P3). The results from this research demonstrate that such a policy
would boost GDP by between £3 billion and £4 billion per year while being
broadly revenue neutral. These results were presented to HM Treasury
officials in September 2012 (R8) who have used them in a briefing note to
ministers for possible consideration in future budgets. It has also been
used as the basis for industry lobbying (R9 & R10) and is a key source
in the current debate on the levels of VAT in these sectors.
Since the 1980s, the UK Government and the Government of Gibraltar have
used the economic models developed by Fletcher to determine the impact of
various changes. These include the closure of HMS Dockyard, the closure of
the Royal Naval Hospital, the development of Gibraltar Ship Repair, the
opening of the frontier with Spain, the appeal against EU judgements on
regional selectivity with respect to Corporation Tax Rates, the operation
of off-shore economic activities, and the management of its online gaming
industry (G4).
In a letter to BU's Vice-Chancellor, the Chief Minister for Gibraltar
says the research by Fletcher has "provided invaluable policy insights,
enabling appropriate planning and negotiating approaches to be made"
(R11).
He continues: "Specifically since 2008, Professor John Fletcher's
input-output model, suitably updated, has provided robust evidence for the
EU to support Gibraltar's offshore business, its right to determine its
own corporate tax rates and the current issues with respect to the online
gaming tax changes proposed by the UK. Furthermore, Professor Fletcher's
research into the economic impact of Gibraltar on the Campo de Gibraltar,
provided invaluable insights into the relationship between the two
economies and were welcomed by both sides of the frontier" (R11).
To summarise, the economic modelling techniques developed by Blake and
Fletcher more accurately predict the outcome of events, policy changes or
other major economic decisions. The technique has been used in a range of
applications including informing estimates of the value of the 2012
Olympic Games and subsequent tourism legacy; providing the evidence base
for VisitScotland naming 2013 the `Year of Natural Scotland'; informing a
Parliamentary debate on music tourism and establishing greater
representation of music in VisitBritain marketing material; and informing
the Government of Gibraltar of the impact of changes.
Sources to corroborate the impact
R1. Bryden, D.M., Westbrook, S.R., Burns, B., Taylor, W.A. and
Anderson, S. (2010). Assessing the economic impacts of nature based
tourism in Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report
No. 398. Available from: http://www.snh.gov.uk/docs/B726802.pdf
[accessed 20 November 2013].
R2. VisitScotland (2012). Year of Natural Scotland Toolkit.
Toolkit and website. Available from:
http://www.visitscotland.org/business_support/advice_materials/toolkits/year_of_natural_scotland_2013.aspx [accessed 20 November 2013].
R3. Tourism Intelligence Scotland (2012). Wildlife Tourism in
Scotland. Opportunities for Growth Guide. Available from: http://www.tourism-intelligence.co.uk/Assets/~/media/TIS/Documents/Intelligence%20and%20insights/Wildlife%20Tourism%20Guide%20for%20web.ashx [accessed 20 November 2013].
R4. UK Music (2011). Destination: Music. Available from:
http://www.ukmusic.org/assets/media/UK%20Music%20-Music%20Tourism.pdf
[accessed 20 November 2013].
R5. UK Parliament (2011). Music and the Economy,
parliamentary debate, 22 November 2011. Available from: http://www.theyworkforyou.com/whall/?id=2011-11-22a.65.0
[accessed 20 November 2013].
R6. UK Live Music Group. Available from: http://www.ukmusic.org/about-us/our-members1/uklivemusicgroup
[accessed 20 November 2013].
R7. VisitBritain (2012). Music is GREAT Britain, marketing
campaign including print media, video advertising and other media.
Available from: http://www.visitbritain.tv/celebrity/music-is-great-competition-winners.html
[accessed 20 November 2013].
R8. Campaign for Reduced Tourism VAT (2012). Cut Tourism VAT.
Available from:
http://www.cuttourismvat.co.uk
[accessed 20 November 2013].
R9. E-petition (2012). Reduce rate of VAT for UK's tourism
industry. Available from:
http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/31432
[accessed 20 November 2013].
R10. British Hospitality Association (2012). Open Letter to
the Chancellor. Available from:
http://www.bha.org.uk/2012/12/10/the-cut-vat-campaign-is-firing-on-all-cylinders/
[accessed 20 November 2013].
R11. Letter from Chief Minister, Government of Gibraltar, 21
October 2013 (available on request).