Reforming BBC News and Current Affairs’ coverage of the UK’s nations
Submitting Institution
University of EssexUnit of Assessment
Politics and International StudiesSummary Impact Type
PoliticalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration, Political Science
Law and Legal Studies: Law
Summary of the impact
Essex research on the causes and consequences of devolution substantially
changed the way
BBC News and Current Affairs reports on the nations of the United Kingdom.
Professor Anthony
King's research on devolution underpinned a 2008 report that he was
commissioned to prepare for
the BBC Trust. The report examined BBC News and Current Affairs' coverage
of the UK's nations
and made recommendations as to how this coverage could be improved. The
BBC Trust and BBC
management accepted the bulk of King's recommendations. The result, still
in evidence, has been
a transformation in the quality and quantity of the BBC's relevant
television, radio and online
output, including a seven-fold increase in references to devolved
institutions in subsequent years'
broadcasts.
Underpinning research
Between 2003 and 2007 King worked on a synoptic book, The British
Constitution, which dealt at
length with the causes and consequences of the devolution of substantial
powers to the Scottish
Parliament and the Welsh National Assembly. Research for the book
involved—in addition to
extensive reading in government documents, parliamentary debates,
newspapers and the
secondary literature—conversations and interviews with political
practitioners and journalists.
Among King's principal conclusions were: (i) that the current
constitutional `settlement' was in fact
inherently unsettled; (ii) that the four nations' party and governmental
systems were likely to
diverge increasingly; (iii) that the four were also increasingly likely to
go their own way in policy
terms; (iv) that political communications within each of the four nations
were also increasingly likely
to diverge; and (v) that, for all those reasons, mutual ignorance across
the four nations was likely
to increase. In short, not only were Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland
now devolved from
England, but England was devolved from them — without most English people
seeming to realise it.
Aware of King's work on the constitution, the BBC Trust commissioned him
in the autumn of 2007
to prepare a report on the adequacy or inadequacy of BBC News and Current
Affairs' coverage of
the devolved nations. The BBC Trust, in appointing King to write his
report, made specific public
reference in their press release (19.11.2007) to his book on the
constitution, and King drew heavily
on the research he had conducted for that book in carrying out his
additional research for the BBC
Trust. Among other things, it enabled him to conduct well-informed
interviews with senior figures in
Edinburgh, Cardiff and Belfast as well as in London. His report, published
in June 2008, reflects at
almost every point the author's knowledge of the devolved institutions and
their political
ramifications derived from his research for The British Constitution.
Much of Chapter 1 of his report, for example, is devoted to spelling out
how devolution has resulted
not merely in institutional change but in rapidly diverging party systems
and patterns of social
policy. It predicted that devolution, seen as a process rather than an
outcome, would lead both to
greater divergence and to Scotland and Wales, in particular, acquiring
greater devolved powers.
Almost every substantive chapter of his report contains explicit
comparisons between the facts of
devolution and the way in which those facts were reflected—or very
commonly not reflected—in
the BBC network's coverage; for example, the bogusness, not adequately
reflected in the BBC's
coverage, of Gordon Brown's 2007 pledge to train `British workers for
British jobs' when education
and training are matters wholly devolved to Scotland, Wales and Northern
Ireland (King, 2008, p.
38), and the BBC network's frequent failure to make it clear, when
reporting matters relating to the
police and the criminal justice system, that these are matters strictly
for the Scottish Executive
north of the border (see King, 2008, p. 41).
References to the research
King, A. (2007) The British constitution. Oxford: Oxford
University Press. ISBN 019957698X
Details of the impact
King's report recommended a number of ways in which the BBC's performance
could be improved,
including more thorough monitoring of the network's output, a system of
individual rewards and
penalties for succeeding or failing to report adequately and accurately
`the new UK', improved UK-related
training and career management, enhanced networking within the
BBC, and putting in
place one or more `enforcers' (see Ch. 9) [corroborating source 1].
However, much of the report
focused on consciousness-raising and the need to change the BBC's
corporate mind-set.
In welcoming King's report, the BBC Trust said it was "concerned at
Professor King's assessment
that the BBC is not reporting the changing UK with the range that might be
expected" and that it
was also "concerned at the finding by Professor King that there is
insufficient precision and clarity
in the BBC's network coverage" (p. 7) [corroborating source 1]. The Trust
charged BBC
management with first producing a plan for improving the BBC's performance
and then with
actually improving it. The Action Plan, published in July 2008, made
explicit efforts not only to
change the content of its broadcasting, but sought to change its
practices: "In line with the
suggestion by Professor King's report, a senior individual will be given
the task of driving through
the day-to-day implementation of the action plan, reporting to the
Director of News. We will appoint
a `devolution champion' to fulfil this role" (p. 2) [corroborating source
2].
In September 2009 the BBC Trust published a progress report on its
response to King's findings.
This report further demonstrates the operational changes that King
inspired in the BBC, including
senior editors attending workshops on matters relating to devolution, the
creation of an online
module on Reporting the UK by The College of Journalism, and senior
network editors improving
their understanding of devolution by taking part in a programme of
placements around the UK. In
addition to this, the progress report also highlighted the ways in which
the BBC was improving the
accuracy and diversity of its news coverage of the UK as a whole [3].
Since 2008 the Trust has monitored at intervals the extent to which BBC
News and Current Affairs
has improved its performance in this regard. Its verdict, while not
unqualified, has been positive. At
the time Professor King was appointed, in 2007, the Trust commissioned
detailed content-analysis
research from Cardiff University — the findings of which had pinpointed
serious failings in the
content and accuracy of the BBC's coverage [4]. The Trust commissioned
similar research from
the same source in late 2009 (published in March 2010) and that research
reported substantial
improvements in almost every regard [5]. The most dramatic increase was in
the number of explicit
or implicit references made to devolved powers, which increased from 71 to
480 across the BBC,
meaning every one in eight news items carried a reference to devolved
powers, as opposed to the
previous figure of one in fifty. Other findings showed an increased
awareness of devolution,
including a rise from 7.8% to 14.2% in news items on BBC TV about
Scotland, Wales, or Northern
Ireland. Coverage of matters explicitly to do with devolution also
increased across all BBC
platforms, most notably online (from 1.7% of news items to 3.5%) and also
on TV (0.7% to 1.2%)
(see pp. 4-6) [5]. Responding to the Cardiff group's findings, the BBC
Executive said it welcomed
"the recognition in the new study of the work done since the King report
to improve the BBC's
journalism", adding that it recognised "that the momentum needs to be kept
up" (p. 6) [6].
The figures from the Cardiff study demonstrate that King's report had a
significant effect on news
coverage of the devolved nations on the BBC. However, a critic may suggest
that this could have
been due to there being more relevant issues to cover or that the BBC is
simply catching up with
other broadcasters. This is shown not to be the case, as the Cardiff
findings compare the BBC's
TV coverage to that of Sky, ITV, and Channel Four. For instance, whereas
BBC TV increased its
coverage about devolved issues from 0.7% to 1.2% of news items, for the
other broadcasters
taken as a whole the figure fell from 0.6% to 0.3%. While a reference to
devolved powers was
found in one in every eight BBC news items, this figure was only one in
thirty for other
broadcasters — admittedly an improvement from these broadcasters' 2007
figure of one in ninety
(see pp. 4-6) [5].
Further evidence of the specific effect of King's report comes from
senior figures at the BBC who
have informed King of the impact of his work. For instance, BBC Scotland's
Political Editor, in an
email to King on an unrelated matter in October 2008, remarked, "En
passant, I should say that
your report continues to cause a substantial (and I mean substantial)
reaction in the Beeb. I think
it's bringing about real change" [7]. More recently, the Chairman of the
BBC Trust went out of his
way to tell King how important his report had been and how much impact it
had had. Indeed, a
number of senior figures at the BBC have agreed to corroborate the claims
made in this case
study.
Sources to corroborate the impact
All documents are available from HEI on request.
[1] BBC Trust (2008) The BBC Trust impartiality report: BBC Network News
and Current Affairs
coverage of the four UK nations, including an independent assessment by
Professor Anthony King
and research from Cardiff University and BMRB, June 2008.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/review_report_research/impartiality/uk_nations_impartiality.pdf
[2] BBC Executive (2008) Management response to Trust Review of Network
news coverage of
Nations and Regions: Action plan, 16 July 2008.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/review_report_research/impartiality/actionplan.pdf
[3] BBC Trust (2009) BBC Trust Review of BBC News and Current Affairs
coverage of the four
nations of the UK: Progress Report from BBC Management.
http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/our_work/network_news/management_report.pdf
[4] Lewis, J., S. Cushion, C. Groves, L. Bennett, S. Reardon, E. Wilkins
and R. Williams (2008)
Four Nations Impartiality Review: An analysis of reporting devolution.
Cardiff School of Journalism,
Media and Cultural Studies, Cardiff University. Published as an appendix
to BBC Trust (2008).
http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/review_report_research/impartiality/appendix_a_cardiff_u_analysis.pdf
[5] Cushion, S., J. Lewis and G. N. Ramsay (2010) Four Nations
Impartiality Review follow-up: An
analysis of reporting of devolution. Cardiff School of Journalism, Media
Studies and Cultural
Studies, Cardiff University, March 2010.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/review_report_research/impartiality/2010/nations_impartiality_analysis.pdf
[6] BBC Trust (2010) BBC Network News coverage of the four UK Nations:
Follow-up.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/review_report_research/impartiality/2010/nations_impartiality.pdf
[7] Email from BBC Scotland's Political Editor.