Measuring human rights performance and assessing the quality of democracy
Submitting Institution
University of EssexUnit of Assessment
Politics and International StudiesSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Political Science
Law and Legal Studies: Law
Summary of the impact
Essex research on developing quantitative indicators for assessing
countries' performance on human rights and democracy has informed the work
of a number of international organisations. Professor Todd Landman's
research has been used by the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human
Rights in its provision of assessment frameworks and by the UN Development
Programme in its work on democratic governance and sustainable
development. Landman's research on democracy underpins the main resources
employed by the inter-governmental organisation, International Institute
for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA), based in Sweden. These
resources have been translated into four languages and are used to assess
the quality of democracy throughout the world. He also provides training
for International IDEA's 150 members of staff on the measurement and
assessment of democratic performance.
Underpinning research
Since joining Essex in 1993 as part of an ESRC project on citizenship
rights and social movements, Landman has developed a research programme
focused on measuring and assessing human rights and democracy. He has
subsequently held the positions of Lecturer, Senior Lecturer, Reader and
Professor of Government.
Landman's work initially concentrated on so-called `standards-based'
measures of democracy and human rights, but he soon developed an interest
in events-based and survey-based measures, as well as the use of
socio-economic and administrative statistics (the full statement of which
appears in Landman and Carvalho, 2009). His work shows that triangulating
sources of data on government performance with respect to democracy and
human rights is critical for sustaining empirical inferences and for
providing high-quality evidence-based policy inputs of the kind
increasingly demanded by inter-governmental and governmental agencies. His
human rights research developed an original way to code a country's treaty
ratification that takes into account both its ratification of the treaty
and the form of reservations it files at time of ratification. This coding
scheme more accurately reflects de jure country commitment to
human rights and has been used to analyse the relationship between the
international law of human rights and the actual protection of human
rights across the world (see Landman, 2005a).
Landman's subsequent research in the field of human rights has developed
a combined factor score of human rights protection that was published in International
Studies Quarterly (Landman and Larizza, 2009). He has researched
means of reflecting country-level human rights performance in ways
appropriate for empirical studies and policy inputs. This continued work
on refining human rights measurement features in his 2012 article in The
Journal of Human Rights, which `relativises' human rights
performance by taking into account underlying social, economic and
political conditions and ranking countries in absolute and relative
performance. He was awarded an ESRC grant for £99,944 to construct a human
rights atlas, which was launched on 3 December 2012 and provides a
user-friendly web interface for visualising human rights and other country
performance data (see www.humanrightsatlas.org).
He is currently embarking on a project with Professor Tom Scotto at Essex
that combines survey data and experimental data on how human rights
problems are framed and perceived in an effort to enhance existing
measures of human rights performance.
Landman's research has been of interest to policy makers and
practitioners in the fields of development assistance, democracy support,
and the monitoring and implementation of human rights — as detailed in
Section 4.
References to the research
Landman, T. (2004) Measuring human rights: Principle, practice, and
policy. Human Rights Quarterly, 26: 906-31. DOI:
10.1353/hrq.2004.0049
Landman, T. (2005a) Protecting human rights: A comparative study.
Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. ISBN 1589010639
Landman, T. (2005b) The political science of human rights. British
Journal of Political Science, 33: 549-72. DOI:
10.1017/S0007123405000293
Landman, T. and E. Carvalho (2009) Measuring human rights,
London: Routledge. ISBN 0415446503
Landman, T. and M. Larizza (2009) Inequality and human rights: Who
controls what when and how. International Studies Quarterly, 53:
715-36. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00553.x
Landman, T., D. Kernohan and A. Gohdes (2012) Relativizing human rights.
Journal of Human Rights, 11: 460-485.
DOI:10.1080/14754835.2012.730917
Research funding
Grants awarded to Todd Landman:
Mapping the initiatives to measure democracy, good governance, and
human rights. Eurostat, 01.12.01 to 31.05.03, €85,027.
Mongolia state of democracy project. United Nations Development
Programme, 01.08.05 to 31.07.06, £32,456.
Human Rights Atlas. ESRC (ES/J000728/1), 01.10.11 to 30.09.12,
£99,944.
Details of the impact
Landman's research insights have been employed in various international
contexts. He has informed the United Nations' work on measuring human
rights performance, provided resources and training on democracy
assessment for International IDEA, and been directly involved with
projects assessing the quality of democracy in Mongolia and Ukraine.
Informing the work of the United Nations
Landman's work on measuring human rights performance has fed into
international efforts spearheaded by the United Nations Office of the High
Commissioner for Human Rights to provide assessment frameworks for state
party reporting to UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies. Landman's background
papers and participation in a series of high-level meetings in Geneva has
fed directly into UN documentation [see corroborating sources 1 and 2].
These documents include references to Landman and Häusermann (2003) and
Landman and Carvalho (2010). He worked on additional commissions with the
UK Department for International Development and the Canadian International
Development Agency (CIDA) on assessing human rights [corroborating source
3], as well as the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands,
Minority Rights Group International, and the International Centre for
Transitional Justice on human rights impact assessment and information
systems management.
In October 2011 Landman was a keynote speaker in the parallel session of
the UNDP's Oslo Governance Forum on mainstreaming human rights measures
into nationally-based governance assessments [4]. In September 2012 he
gave a keynote speech on the prospects for EU democracy promotion in the
Arab Spring countries at the Representation of Rhine-Westphalia in
Brussels, organised by the German Development Institute [5]. On these
occasions, Landman was delivering core commentary and analysis for leading
global and European policy makers: the UNDP event attracted 270 delegates
from around the world; the Arab Spring event attracted 130 delegates
working on issues relating to EU democracy promotion in Brussels. The UNDP
appearance led to further briefings in the New York office and a
commissioned study (£25,000) on the relationship between democratic
governance and sustainable human development (2012- 2013) [6].
Providing resources and training for International IDEA
Landman's work on democracy attracted the attention of the International
Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA), a 28-member
inter-governmental organisation based in Sweden. Between 2004 and 2009 he
worked on a variety of democracy assessment projects, which culminated in
the 2008 publication of Assessing the Quality of Democracy: A
Practical Guide (a significantly revised version of the original Handbook
of Democracy Assessment) and Assessing the Quality of Democracy:
An Overview of the International IDEA Framework [7]. These
documents, of which Landman was the lead author, are resources for
assessing the quality of democracy in any country and are used by teams
throughout the world [8]. The `State of Democracy' programme at
International IDEA is one of the main pillars of its activities and the
Landman's Practical Guide and Overview serve as the main
methods of application in the field. The Director of Global Programmes at
International IDEA has stated that this work "continues to be a resource
for teams in different parts of the world who want to assess the quality
of their democracies" [8]. International IDEA has now translated these
publications into Spanish, French, and Arabic (as well as a Thai version
of the Practical Guide, produced by one of International IDEA's
partners), and the most recent applications of them have been in Zambia,
Chile and Ukraine [8].
Landman has been commissioned to provide training for IDEA's 150 staff
for the period 2012-2014 (April and November annually) on issues relating
to the measurement and assessment of democratic performance, as well as to
provide an overview of the assessment framework. The Director of Global
Programmes at IDEA writes:
"Not only has Dr Landman contributed to the content of the Institute's
induction programme for new staff, but he also periodically lectures on
democracy, democracy measurement and assessment to new staff at
International IDEA. As a result of this contribution, more and more
International IDEA regional programmes are prioritising democracy
assessment in their work... Given his deep knowledge and experience of
democracy assessment in general and the state of democracy assessment and
approach in particular, Dr Landman remains an important resource for many
assessment teams applying International IDEA's state of democracy
assessment framework. This has made him the main intellectual partner for
International IDEA's democracy assessment work'' [8].
Assessing the quality of democracy in Mongolia and Ukraine
Landman's most notable direct involvements in democracy assessment have
taken place in Mongolia and Ukraine. In Mongolia he assisted a local team
of academics to develop a series of democratic governance indicators. One
of the main outcomes of the assessment in Mongolia was the formal passage
of a 9th Millennium Development Goal on democracy, human rights
and zero tolerance of corruption in 2006. Mongolians now produce bi-annual
assessments using the framework developed with Landman's assistance and
input [9]. The 2009 `Millennium Development Goal-9 Indicators and the
State of Democracy in Mongolia' report makes direct reference to
assistance from the University of Essex and Landman's research [10].
In Ukraine, Landman is part of an international team of experts funded by
the Westminster Foundation for Democracy assisting People First!—a
Kiev-based NGO—to assess the quality of democracy in Ukraine and develop a
Citizen's Charter for Democracy. He participated in the first training
workshop in November 2012 and continues to be engaged in the project
throughout 2013 [11].
Sources to corroborate the impact
All documents are available from HEI on request.
[1] UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (2009)
Methodological issues of qualitative and quantitative tools for measures
compliance with the right to development; A/HRC/12/WG.2/TF/CRP.7/Add.1: 18
June 2009. See pp.19-20.
www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/development/right/docs/A.HRC.12.WG.2.TF.CRP.7.Add.1.pdf
[2] UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (2012) Human
rights indicators: A guide to measurement and implementation. See p. 51,
note 7; p. 68, note 46.
http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Indicators/Pages/HRIndicatorsIndex.aspx
[3] Berne Declaration, Canadian Council for International Co-operation
and Misereor (2010) Human rights impact assessment for trade and
investment agreements. Report of the Expert Seminar, June 23-24, 2010,
Geneva, Switzerland. See p. 39, notes 13 and 18. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/food/docs/report_hria-seminar_2010.pdf
[4] Oslo Governance Forum — list of speakers, with slides:
http://www.oslogovernanceforum.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=210&Itemid=236
[5] Keynote speech on the prospects for EU democracy promotion in the
Arab Spring countries at the Representation of Rhine-Westphalia in
Brussels:
http://www.die-gdi.de/CMS-Homepage/openwebcms3_e.nsf/(ynDK_contentByKey)/MRUR-8VFE43
[6] Landman, T., A. Quiroz-Flores and D. Farquhar (2012) Democratic
governance and sustainable human development. New York and Oslo:
United Nations Development Programme.
[7] Beetham, D., E. Carvalho, T. Landman and S. Weir (eds.) (2008) Assessing
the quality of democracy: A practical guide. Stockholm:
International IDEA.
http://www.idea.int/publications/aqd/loader.cfm?csModule=security/getfile&pageid=28399
Landman, T. (ed.) (2008) Assessing the quality of democracy: An
overview of the International IDEA Framework. Stockholm:
International IDEA.
[8] Director of Global Programmes, International IDEA.
[9] Details of project to support Mongolia in meeting 9th
Millennium Development Goal:
http://gaportal.org/undp-supported/mongolia
[10] Institute of Philosophy, Sociology, and Law of the Mongolian Academy
of Sciences & United Nations Development Program (2009) Millennium
Development Goal-9 Indicators and the State of Democracy in Mongolia. See
especially pp. 17, 19, 24.
http://gaportal.org/sites/default/files/mdg9_report_mongolia10.pdf
[11] Details of training workshop for People First!:
https://peoplefirst.org.ua/en/about-foundation/news-and-events/state-of-democracy-assessment-in-ukraine