ENV02 - Creation of the world’s first network of high seas marine protected areas
Submitting Institution
University of YorkUnit of Assessment
Earth Systems and Environmental SciencesSummary Impact Type
EnvironmentalResearch Subject Area(s)
Environmental Sciences: Environmental Science and Management
Biological Sciences: Ecology
Summary of the impact
History was made in late September 2010 when the world's first network of
high seas marine protected areas (MPAs) was declared in the North
Atlantic. Environment Ministers from 15 nations within the OSPAR region
created six MPAs in international waters covering half a million square
kilometres, twice the size of the UK. Proposals for these MPAs were
researched and drafted by a group led by Professor Callum Roberts of the
Environment Department. The work involved a 3-year international
collaboration among the scientific team and the political delegations of
OSPAR member states, particularly Germany and the Netherlands, as well as
the London-based OSPAR Secretariat.
Underpinning research
The German delegation to OSPAR led the process of establishing OSPAR's
MPAs. They approached Professor Roberts in 2008 based on his extensive
track record of research at York on the design and function of MPAs
(particularly Roberts et al. 2001, and 2003 a,b, see Section 3, below, for
all cited references). Roberts et al. (2001) provided the world's first
demonstration that marine protected areas can enhance surrounding
fisheries. Roberts et al. (2003a,b) set out criteria for design of marine
protected area networks, adaptations of which have since been widely
adopted, e.g. Convention on Biological Diversity criteria for high seas
MPAs, and OSPAR criteria for MPAs. Roberts was also approached to do the
work because of his seminal work on high seas conservation and MPA
establishment (Roberts 2002, Roberts et al. 2006), the latter work
showcased in 2006 by Roberts in a plenary presentation to the 8th
Conference of Parties to the United Nations Convention on Biological
Diversity in Brazil, which was attended by all of the parties to OSPAR,
including Germany. Roberts was asked by Henning von Nordheim of the German
delegation to assemble and lead an international team of experts on the
high seas and deep sea in the North Atlantic, to identify and draft
proposals for areas worthy of protection. The great majority of the
scientific analysis was done at York by Roberts (at York 1995-present,
Lecturer then Professor) and a team of three post-graduate students (Beth
O'Leary (at York 2008-12), Rachel Brown (at York 2008-13) and Melanie
O'Rourke (at York 2008-9). Two external scientific collaborators
contributed to two of the eight MPA proposals.
Between 2008 and 2010, this research network of academics,
non-governmental organisations and political partners worked closely to
identify sites worthy of protection, producing its first report on
candidate sites in 2008. The study identified eight potential MPA sites by
reviewing scientific literature on the all aspects of the physical and
biological features of the high seas in the North Atlantic, mapping the
distribution of significant and vulnerable marine habitats, consulting
with scientists familiar with the region to establish their views on where
the greatest threats to wildlife were, and prioritising areas currently
within reach of serious impact based on bathymetry and human uses such as
fishing. The sites chosen were spread over a range of habitats and
geographical zones to maximise representation of biodiversity. The
resulting network emphasises protection of rugged seamount habitats. They
are the richest in threatened species, are the target of intensive
fisheries and have the greatest level of historical impacts.
Assembling the scientific case was made difficult by lack of data due to
the high seas' remoteness. Nonetheless, robust cases for protection were
made based on a wide range of information, from bathymetry and geophysical
data to old whaling records and fishery investigations. Navigating the
politics was complex and often frustrating, and members of the York team
and network attended a series of international meetings to nurture the
proposals through. In the end, six of the original eight candidate sites
successfully made it through to designation.
References to the research
Among the numerous papers produced by the York research group during the
REF period that led to their selection to lead this project, the most
important were:
Roberts, C.M, J.A. Bohnsack, F.R. Gell, J.P. Hawkins and R. Goodridge.
2001. Effects of marine reserves on adjacent fisheries. Science, 294:
1920-1923. DOI: 10.1126/science.294.5548.1920. Cited 736 times to June
2013, Google Scholar. This is Roberts' most important and widely known
publication on marine protected areas and was published in one of the
world's foremost scientific journals.
Roberts, C.M. (2002) Deep impact: the rising toll of fishing in the deep
sea. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 242-245. DOI:
10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02492-8. 190 citations to June 2013, Google Scholar.
This paper reviewed the impacts of fishing in the deep sea, and was the
first to propose an outright ban on deep sea fishing.
Roberts, C. M., S. Andelman, G. Branch, R. Bustamente, J.C. Castilla, J.
Dugan, B. Halpern, K. Lafferty, H. Leslie, J. Lubchenco, D. McArdle, H.
Possingham, M. Ruckelshaus, and R. Warner. (2003a) Ecological criteria for
evaluating candidate sites for marine reserves. Ecological Applications 13
(Supplement): S199-S214. DOI:
10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0199:ECFECS]2.0.CO;2. 303 citations to June
2013, Google Scholar. This and the following paper set out guidelines for
the design of marine protected area networks, cementing
Roberts' reputation as a leader in this field. Roberts, C.M., G. Branch,
R. Bustamente, J.C. Castilla, J. Dugan, B. Halpern, K. Lafferty, H.
Leslie, J. Lubchenco, D. McArdle, M. Ruckelshaus, and R. Warner. (2003b)
Application of ecological criteria in selecting marine reserves and
developing reserve networks. Ecological Applications 13 (Supplement):
S215-S228. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0215:AOECIS]2.0.CO;2. 212
citations to June 2013, Google Scholar.
Roberts, C.M., L.C. Mason and J.P. Hawkins. (2006) Roadmap to Recovery: A
Global Network of Marine Reserves. Greenpeace International.
http://www.greenpeace.org/france/PageFiles/266559/roadmap-to-recovery.pdf
Although not a peer reviewed publication, this document describes the
results of the first attempt to design a network of marine protected areas
for the high seas. It was featured in Plenary at the 8th Conference of
Parties to the UN in Brazil in 2006.
O'Leary, B.C., R.L. Brown, D.E. Johnson, H. von Nordheim, J. Ardron, T.
Packeiser, and C.M. Roberts (2012) The first network of marine protected
areas (MPAs) in the high seas: The process, the challenges and where next.
Marine Policy 36: 598-605. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.11.003 This paper
describes in detail the research undertaken and the process leading to the
establishment of the protected areas.
Details of the impact
The research of the York-led research group has led directly to the
establishment of the world's first network of high seas marine protected
areas (MPAs) in the north Atlantic. On the basis of the York work, in 2009
OSPAR accepted 'in principle' the scientific case and conservation
objectives for seven of the eight potential MPAs, six of which were then
created in 2010 (Figure 1). As the oceans are under increasing pressure,
the establishment of this network will provide protection from
exploitation and other damaging activities, so helping to rebuild depleted
populations of commercially important fish, as well as protecting other
wildlife and habitats like dolphins and birds.
This MPA network is groundbreaking on both scientific and political
grounds. Prior to its establishment, there were only two other high seas
MPAs, one in Antarctica and one in the Mediterranean. The high seas lie
beyond the 200 nautical mile limits of national sovereignty at sea and are
governed under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea which
came into effect in 1992. They constitute 45% of the area of the planet
but remain virtually unprotected, a place where overfishing and pirate
fishing is rife and few restrictions apply on what can be taken. There
have been widespread and steep declines in fish stocks as a result,
together with heavy collateral mortality of turtles, dolphins, birds and
other megafauna (as detailed in Roberts et al. 2006).
The Law of the Sea was drafted in the 1970s and assumes full exploitation
of fishery and other resources. There is no provision for protected areas
within it and therefore no mechanism exists to establish them in the high
seas. This means that OSPAR, as a regional seas governance body, had to go
it alone, navigating a new legal pathway to MPA establishment while
undertaking delicate political negotiations to set up the network proposed
by Roberts and his team. Such negotiations expanded to include a regional
fisheries management body, the North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission,
the International Seabed Authority and the International Maritime
Organisation. Roberts and other members of the York team took part in
several of these meetings, bringing the concept of marine protected areas
into their serious consideration. For this reason, the impact of the work
is two-fold. Not only has a network of six high seas MPAs been established
for the benefit of wildlife and people, but a mechanism has been
established to create more, both under the auspices of OSPAR, but also by
other regional seas bodies. Given that pressures on high seas living
resources are escalating, the need for many more MPAs is now obvious and
there have been urgent calls to create them from the 2002 World Summit on
International Development, the UN Convention on Biological Diversity, and
the UN General Assembly.
To make it easier for others to follow OSPAR's lead, York team members
and members of the German delegation and OSPAR secretariat published a
paper (O'Leary et al. 2012, Section 5, below) describing the scientific
and political processes followed and how they intertwined. They distil
from the experience words of advice to others to help them avoid the
pitfalls encountered and smooth the path to a much bigger global network
of high seas MPAs in the future.
It is too soon to say how well these MPAs are working since the high seas
are remote and monitoring difficult and expensive. As of 2013, some
management measures are still being negotiated with competent authorities.
However, three years on, the network is still unique. Because of his key
role in the creation of this network, Professor Roberts was invited to the
United Nations in May 2013 to address the first meeting of a UN body
tasked with amending the Law of the Sea to provide a new legal tool to
create marine protected areas. The OSPAR network was repeatedly referred
to at this meeting as a path breaking example of how protection can be
given to the high seas.
Sources to corroborate the impact
OSPAR reports and minutes, including the following that describe the
scientific case for each of the protected areas established:
http://www.ospar.org/documents/dbase/publications/p00551_bd_josephine.pdf
http://www.ospar.org/documents/dbase/publications/p00552_bd_mid-atltantic%20ridge.pdf
http://www.ospar.org/documents/dbase/publications/p00550_bd_antialtair.pdf
http://www.ospar.org/documents/dbase/publications/p00549_bd_altair.pdf
http://www.ospar.org/documents/dbase/publications/p00524_bd_milne_seamount_complex.pdf
http://www.ospar.org/documents/dbase/publications/p00523_background%20document_charlie%20gibbs.pdf
Email from the Secretary of OSPAR dated 8th October 2010:
OSPAR Press Release:
http://www.ospar.org/content/news_detail.asp?menu=00600725000000_000013_000000
A publication in press that describes the process and the scientific and
political challenges that were experienced
O'Leary, B.C., R.L. Brown, D.E. Johnson, H. von Nordheim, J. Ardron, T.
Packeiser, and C.M. Roberts (2012) The first network of marine protected
areas (MPAs) in the high seas: The process, the challenges and where next.
Marine Policy 36: 598-605.