ENV03 - Development of risk assessment methods for the impacts of ground level ozone (O3) on ecosystems to inform European atmospheric emission reduction strategies
Submitting Institution
University of YorkUnit of Assessment
Earth Systems and Environmental SciencesSummary Impact Type
EnvironmentalResearch Subject Area(s)
Mathematical Sciences: Statistics
Environmental Sciences: Environmental Science and Management
Biological Sciences: Plant Biology
Summary of the impact
Research by Lisa Emberson has led to tighter controls on air pollutant
precursor emissions of
ozone (O3) across Europe benefiting crop and forest
productivity, and grassland species
composition. Emberson's research led to new risk assessment methods, based
on knowledge of
atmospheric exchange processes and plant eco-physiology, which assess O3
uptake and related
damage using novel flux-based `Critical Levels'. These new methods are
being used to optimise
emission reduction policy by 26 parties (member states) who have signed
and ratified the United
Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Gothenburg Protocol
established under the
Convention on Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP).
Underpinning research
By the early 1990s a large body of experimental data existed describing
the adverse impact of O3
on crops, forests and grassland ecosystems. In Europe, efforts were made
to compile data from
standardised experiments to develop concentration based exposure-response
relationships. These
were used to establish `Critical Levels' (CLs) providing a policy tool for
use in the `effects based'
approach adopted by the UNECE LRTAP to optimise emission control across
the region. However,
these concentration-based risk assessments were compromised in their
policy use since they were
not suitable for quantification of ecosystem damage and therefore could
not be used to estimate
the benefits of emission reduction methods. This was due to their only
being able to provide an
assessment of potential impacts since they did not incorporate modifying
factors (dependent upon
species traits and prevailing environmental conditions) considered to
affect plants sensitivity to O3.
Emberson's research centred on the development and application of a novel
flux-based risk
assessment method. This method applied knowledge of plant ecophysiological
processes to
estimate relative potential O3 uptake or stomatal O3
flux (O3 uptake via the leaf pores) and showed
that the geographical distribution of relative risk differed substantially
when using flux vs.
concentration based methods (Emberson et al., 2000). This flux-based
method was parameterised
for important European vegetation types forming the core of what was later
to become known as
the DO3SE (Deposition of Ozone and Stomatal Exchange) model
(Emberson et al., 2007). This
York developed model is the single model upon which the flux modelling
methods now used by the
LRTAP Convention are based.
To enhance the practical application of this flux-based method Emberson
worked with colleagues
from the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) in Norway who
assess
European air quality for the LRTAP Convention. These colleagues use a
chemical transport model
(CTM) to provide estimates of atmospheric O3 concentration.
Incorporation of equations based on
standard micrometeorological theory into the DO3SE model
allowed estimates of the O3 transfer
from the CTM output height to the vegetated surface. The original leaf
level stomatal O3 flux model
was also developed for an entire canopy adding non-stomatal O3
deposition processes (Emberson
et al., 2001). This allowed DO3SE to provide the estimate of
total O3 deposition in the EMEP CTM
integrating the assessment of O3 loss to the vegetated surface
layer as well as O3 ecosystem
damage. Evaluation against European observational data showed the model
performed well for a
range of vegetation types and climatic conditions (Tuovinen et al., 2004).
The DO3SE stomatal flux model was used in collaboration with
experimentalists from across
Europe; to derive novel flux-response relationships for a number of crop
(Pleijel et al. 2007); forest
(Karlsson et al., 2004; Karlsson et al., 2007) and semi-natural grassland
(Emberson et al., in prep)
species. These flux-response relationships have been used to establish new
flux-based CLs (Mills
et al., 2011a); as such they provide tools to ensure ecosystem protection
and allow cost-benefit
analysis of emission reductions to improve food security, carbon
sequestration and biodiversity.
The validity of the flux-based approach was tested through collaboration
with colleagues who host
one of the LRTAP Task Forces which assesses air quality damage to
vegetation (Integrated Co-operative
Programme on Vegetation). These colleagues collate observational and
standardised
experimental data describing O3 effects on vegetation across
Europe; comparisons of the
concentration and flux-based methods clearly showed that flux provided a
far more realistic
indication of the geographical distribution of O3 damage across
Europe (Mills et al. 2011b).
This research has been conducted since 1999 at the Stockholm Environment
Institute (SEI), part of
the Environment Dept. of the University of York where Emberson was first
employed as a research
associate and is now the Centre Director of the SEI York centre; as well
as a senior lecturer in the
Environment Dept.
References to the research
Emberson, L.D., Ashmore, M.R., Cambridge, H.M., Simpson,
D., Tuovinen, J.-P. (2000)
Modelling stomatal ozone flux across Europe. Environmental Pollution 109:
403-413 DOI:
10.1016/S0269-7491(00)00043-9 This paper has been cited 237 times in
Scopus as of 13/11/2013
Emberson, L.D. Simpson, D., Tuovinen, J.-P., Ashmore, M.R., and
Cambridge, H.M. (2001)
Modelling and Mapping ozone deposition in Europe. Water, Air and Soil
Pollution 130, 577-582
DOI: 10.1023/A:1013851116524 This paper has been cited 46 times in Scopus
as of 13/11/2013
Emberson, L.D., Buker, P., Ashmore, M.R. (2007) Assessing the risk
caused by ground level
ozone to European forest trees: A case study in pine, beech and oak across
different climate
regions. Environmental Pollution 147 (3): 454-466 DOI:
10.1016/j.envpol.2006.10.026
This paper has been cited 37 times in Scopus as of 13/11/2013
Pleijel H, Danielsson H, Emberson L, Mills, G. and Ashmore,
M.R. (2007) Ozone risk assessment
for agricultural crops in Europe: Further development of stomatal flux and
flux-response
relationships for European wheat and potato Atmospheric Environment 41
(14): 3022-3040 DOI:
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.12.002 This paper has been cited 67 times in
Scopus as of 13/11/2013
Karlsson, P.E., Braun, S., Broadmeadow, M., Elvira, S., Emberson, L.,
Gimeno, B.S., Le Thiec,
D., Novak, K. , Oksanen, E. , Schaub, M., Uddling, J., Wilkinson, M.
(2007) Risk assessments for
forest trees: The performance of the ozone flux versus the AOT concepts.
Environmental Pollution
146 (3): 608-616 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.06.012 This paper has been
cited 47 times in Scopus
as of 13/11/2013
Mills, G., Hayes, F., Simpson, D., Emberson, L., Norris, D., Bueker,
P. (2011b) Evidence of
widespread effects of ozone on crops and (semi-)natural vegetation in
Europe (1990-2006) in
relation to AOT40- and flux-based risk maps Global Change Biology 17 (1):
592-613 DOI:
10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02217.x This paper is published in a high impact
factor journal (6.91)
and has been cited 38 times in Scopus as of 13/11/2013
Details of the impact
The UNECE LRTAP Convention oversees the assessment of scientific evidence
that form the
basis of their effects based approach to identifying air pollution
emission control options across
Europe; detailed in their `multi-pollutant, multi-effect Gothenburg
Protocol on Acidification,
Eutrophication and Ground Level O3'. This Protocol has been the
driving force for the
establishment of European legislation (EU Directives) on air quality
policy as well as global,
European and national air quality targets. Emberson's research was
instrumental in revising CLs
for O3 which have been used by the Gothenburg Protocol (Mills
et al., 2011a). The revision of the
Protocol was conducted in May 2012. The following outlines the different
aspects of Emberson's
research that led to the revision of these O3 air quality
guidelines hence changing European
emission control policy.
Development of the UNECEs LRTAP Chemical Transfer Model (CTM).
Development of the new DO3SE O3 deposition model
for use in the EMEP CTM (Emberson et al.,
2000b) allowed the flux-based methods to be applied across Europe for risk
assessment and
policy formulation. Peer review of the DO3SE deposition
methodology at a UNECE ad hoc
workshop hosted by Emberson and Ashmore (also a York staff member) in
Harrogate, 2002
allowed DO3SE to become part of the `Unified EMEP model', the
official model of the LRTAP
Convention for use in European modelling of emission control scenarios for
O3 (Simpson et al.,
2003). This model provides input to the LRTAP Conventions Integrated
Assessment Modelling
effort that applies cost-benefit methods to identify emission reduction
options to guide European air
quality policy.
Development of UNECEs LRTAP critical levels (CLs) for air quality risk
assessment
The series of LRTAP Convention endorsed scientific workshops concluded
that flux-based risk
assessments performed using DO3SE offered an improved
geographical representation of risk to
the existing concentration based methods and should be recommended for
adoption by the LRTAP
Convention. This led to revisions of the LRTAP Conventions Mapping Manual
which documents
the procedures and parameters to be used by member states of the LRTAP
Convention in
calculating and mapping CLs of air pollutants. The revised chapter
described the DO3SE stomatal
flux algorithm, procedures for applying this across Europe, and the
associated CLs and flux-response
relationships from which they are derived; Fig 1 provides a comparison of
the
exceedance of CLs estimated using both concentration- and flux-based
methods. The use of the
flux-based method increases the geographical extent-, but alters the
magnitude-of risk of the forest
area across Europe (with increases in risk in more Northerly locations and
reductions in risk in
Mediterranean regions).
Development of air quality policy: Revision of UNECE LRTAP
Gothenburg Protocol
Emberson and colleagues research to develop new methodologies to assess
vegetation damage
from ground level O3 resulted in formal adoption by the LRTAP
Convention of new CLs to protect
ecosystems into the revised Gothenburg Protocol in May 2012. The current
2012 revised protocol
has been signed and ratified by 31 and 26 countries or regions
respectively across Europe (as well
as the United States of America) and acts to control emissions of
pollutants that will result in
dangerous atmospheric levels of a number of different air pollutants
(including nitrogen oxides and
volatile organic compounds that are the primary local and regional
pre-cursors of ground level O3).
The protocol is legally binding and once implemented should ensure the
exposure of vegetation to
excessive O3 levels will be 44% down on 1990 levels.
Emberson's research has also raised awareness of the damaging effects of
O3 to ecosystems
globally. This led to O3 impacts on agricultural productivity
being considered in an assessment of
cost-benefits in controlling short-lived climate pollutants by a recent
WMO/UNEP Black Carbon and
Ozone report; since publication of this work various national action plans
have been developed to
combat short-lived climate pollutants in countries across the world. This
initiative is led by the
Climate and Clean Air Coalition established by Hilary Clinton of the US
Department of State.
Research showing the significance of O3 effects on staple crops
in South Asia (e.g. Emberson et
al., 2009) also led the Malé Declaration to include O3 effects
on crop productivity as a challenge to
overcome through international negotiation to control and prevent air
pollution in the seven south
Asian Malé Declaration countries. Emberson's research has also helped
identify the threat to
ecosystems from the hemispheric transport of O3 and its
precursor pollutants highlighting the need
for globally coordinated action to control precursor emissions as regions
are increasingly unable to
manage air quality through domestic emission reduction policies (Emberson
& West, 2010).
Sources to corroborate the impact
UNECE Gothenburg Protocol
http://www.unece.org/env/lrtap/multi_h1.html
[see `Consolidated text of the amended protocol'
document; Part III Critical Levels of Ozone ; A. For the Parties with
geographical scope of EMEP;
Part 6. pp 20]
Mills, G., Pleijel, H., Braun, S., Büker, P., Bermejo, V.,
Danielsson, H., Emberson, L., Grünhage,
L., González Fernández, I., Harmens, H., Hayes, F., Karlsson, P.E.,
Simpson, D., (2011a) New
stomatal flux-based critical levels for ozone effects on vegetation Short
communication
UNECE CLRTAP Mapping Manual
http://icpvegetation.ceh.ac.uk/manuals/mapping_manual.html
Chapter 3: Mapping Critical Levels for Vegetation
EMEP Unified model description
Unified EMEP model code version `rv3', released as open source under the
GPL license v3 in
February 2008 http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
.
Simpson, D., Benedictow, Berge, H., Bergstrom, R., Emberson, L.D.,
Fagerli, H., Flechard, C.R.,
Hayman, G.D., Gauss, M., Jonson, J.E., Jenkin, M.E., Nyıri, A., Richter,
C., Semeena, V.S., Tsyro,
S., Tuovinen, J.-P., Valdebenito, A., and Wind, P. (2012) The EMEP MSC-W
chemical transport
model — technical description. Atmospheric, Chemistry and Physics, 12:
7825-7865.
UNEP/WMO Integrated Assessment of Black Carbon and Tropospheric Ozone
http://www.unep.org/dewa/Portals/67/pdf/Black_Carbon.pdf
Malé Declaration on Control and Prevention of Air Pollution and its
likely transboundary
effects for South Asia.
http://www.rrcap.ait.asia/male/
Climate Change And Clean Air Coalition
http://www.unep.org/ccac/
UNECE LRTAP Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution (HTAP) 2010
Assessment
http://www.htap.org/
West, J.J. and Emberson, L. (2010) Chapter 5: Impacts on Health,
Ecosystems and Climate. In:
Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution 2010. Part A. Ozone and Aerosols.
Eds Dentener, F.,
Keating, T., Akimoto, H. Air Pollution Studies No. 17. United Nations,
2010.