Development and Testing of Self Compacting Concrete
Submitting Institution
University of the West of ScotlandUnit of Assessment
General EngineeringSummary Impact Type
TechnologicalResearch Subject Area(s)
Mathematical Sciences: Statistics
Engineering: Civil Engineering, Materials Engineering
Summary of the impact
The Advanced Concrete and Masonry Centre (ACMC) at UWS was among the
pioneers in
development of practical self-compacting concrete (SCC) in Europe. As a
lead partner, the group
contributed to two large EU projects on SCC, which underpinned the
European standards on SCC
test methods.
The group's research has contributed to the steadily increasing use of
SCC in general
construction, which has brought many benefits, such as enhanced
durability, improved productivity,
reduced overall cost, improved working environment and sustainability.
Given the massive
quantities of concrete being used (>14 billion tonnes/year globally),
the increased use of SCC has
had important economic, societal and environmental impacts.
Underpinning research
The research on underwater concrete mixes undertaken by Professor Bartos
and Dr Zhu in the
early 1990s achieved similar characteristics to that of the original
proprietary Japanese SCC mix
(first demonstrated at the University of Tokyo in 1988, but with very
little information in the public
domain). During 1997 to 2000, the ACMC group (with Professor Bartos as the
Director) was a lead
partner for the first EU funded research project on SCC — `Rational
Production and Improved
Working Environment through using Self-compacting Concrete' (1997-2000)
[G1], led by industry.
In this R&D project, where various SCC mixes were developed and their
properties studied in
comparison with those of conventional concrete mixes, the ACMC group was
responsible for
studying properties of various hardened SCCs. The research on SCC
published in leading
international journals included: Uniformity of in-situ properties [3.1],
Durability/Permeation property
[3.2], Bond to reinforcement and interfacial properties [3.3], and these
papers were among the first
published in the field which provided essential information on the
performance of various hardened
SCCs.
Due to its success and the benefits realised, the SCC project was one of
the ten finalists
considered for the EU Descartes Prize in 2002. However, the absence of
suitable test methods to
identify its key fresh properties hindered the increased use of SCC
because it was difficult to
validate mix designs except by full-scale trials (feasible in special
projects only) and confidence in
the material was therefore undermined. To overcome such a critical
obstacle and to facilitate the
adoption of SCC technology in general construction, ACMC led the second EU
research project -
Testing-SCC (2001-2004, 12 partners) [G2]. 15 test methods (and/or
combinations) were
evaluated both in the laboratory and on site. The project culminated in a
systematic and rigorous
pan-European inter-laboratory `round-robin' evaluation, in which 23 major
companies, research
institutes and universities from 12 countries participated. Results of
selected test methods on
repeatability and reproducibility, and their sensitivity to detect
meaningful changes in the key
characteristics of a wide range of SCC `test' and commercial mixes during
construction were
obtained and published [3.6], which formed the basis for the new European
standards for SCC [5.1
- 5.5].
In addition, there is often a requirement for increased powder content in
SCC mixes, which is
usually met by the use of more cement. However, an increase in cement
content leads to a
significant rise in material cost, and has negative impact on the
environment and some concrete
properties (e.g. increased thermal stress and shrinkage). Significant
research was thus carried out
at UWS to study the use of low cost and waste `dusts' (e.g. fly ash,
limestone/chalk powders and
quarry fines) in practical SCC mixes [3.4 - 3.5, G3 - G5]. These studies
facilitate the inclusion of
such 'dusts' in SCC mixes, which leads to more competitive SCCs in
practice and also brings
additional environmental benefits.
Key Researchers of ACMC:
Prof Peter JM Bartos, Director of ACMC, retired and became an Emeritus
Professor in 11/2004.
Mr John Gibbs, Deputy Director of ACMC, left in 04/2005.
Dr Wenzhong Zhu, Lecturer.
Dr Mohammed Sonebi, Lecturer, left in 03/2004.
References to the research
3.1 Zhu, W, Gibbs, JC and Bartos, PJM, 'Uniformity of in-situ properties
of self-compacting
concrete in full-scale structural elements', Cement and Concrete
Composites, 2001, 23 (1),
pp.57-64.
3.2 Zhu, W and Bartos, PJM, `Permeation properties of self-compacting
concrete', Cement and
Concrete Research, 33 (6), 2003, pp.921-926.
3.3 Zhu, W, Sonebi, M and Bartos, PJM, `Bond strength and its interfacial
transition zone with
reinforcement in self compacting concrete', Materials and Structures,
37(271), 2004,
pp.442-448.
3.4 Zhu, W and Gibbs, JC, `Use of different limestone and chalk powders
in self-compacting
concrete', Cement and Concrete Research, 35 (8) 2005,
pp.1457-1462.
3.5 Sonebi, M, "Medium strength self-compacting concrete containing fly
ash: modelling using
factorial experimental plans", Cement and Concrete Research, 34
(7) 2004, pp. 1199-1208.
Evidence of the Quality: According to the Google Citation report
at 10/10/2013, the 5 peer-
reviewed journal papers 3.1 - 3.5 have been cited 369 times. Paper 3.4 was
on the top of the most
downloaded articles list for that journal for two consecutive periods
(Jul.-Dec. 2005).
Relevant grants and contracts:
G1. 1997-2000, ~ €3M, EU, "Rational Production and Improved
Working Environment through
Using Self-Compacting Concrete", Brite EuRam project BR-PR-CT96-0366, NCC
AB,
Sweden (co-ordinator), GTM Construction, Betongindustri AB, LCPC,
University of Paisley
(now UWS), CBI Sweden, Lulea Technical University, NV Bekeart, Sika Spain.
G2. 2001-2004, ~ €936k, EU FP5 GRD2-2000-30024 "Measurement of
Properties of Fresh
Self-Compacting Concrete (Testing - SCC)", University of Paisley (now UWS)
as the co-
ordinator, with eleven European partners from Sweden, France, Belgium,
Germany,
Netherlands, Denmark, Iceland and UK.
G3. 2001, £7k, to J Gibbs, from Omya UK, "Use of Limestone and
Chalk Powders in Self-
Compacting Concrete".
G4. 2002-2003, £59k, to Dr M Sonebi, from EPSRC, "Optimization of
mix-design for medium
strength self-compacting concrete".
G5. 2008, £5k, to Dr W Zhu, from Scottish Government KTTBE
project (SEEKIT programme),
"Self compacting concrete for use in an existing precast concrete plant —
a feasibility study".
Details of the impact
Concrete is the most widely consumed material in the world after water.
The need to fully compact
fresh concrete to remove the entrapped air and produce a dense homogeneous
mass with the
required strength, durability and finish has long been recognised.
Compaction by vibration,
however, is slow, noisy, dangerous and often difficult to carry out and
supervise. Due to its high
filling ability, passing ability and resistance to segregation, SCC flows
freely into the pre-formed
moulds/formwork and achieves full compaction under its own weight, thus
eliminating the need for
mechanical vibration. This saves time, improves quality of the hardened
concrete, reduces labour
needs, cuts energy demands, facilitates automation, and particularly,
removes the health/safety
risks associated with vibration (e.g. deafness, "white fingers", and
noise-led stress). As a result,
SCC is widely considered as the most significant innovation in concrete
construction for the last 50
years.
Research carried out at UWS has made several important contributions to
the development and
increased use of SCC. The study on hardened properties of different SCCs
(G1, 3.1 - 3.3)
provided essential performance data for using SCCs, which led to more
confidence in the industry
in using such materials. The work on SCC test methods by UWS and the
partners of the EU
Testing-SCC project (G2, 3.7) has resulted in new European standards for
testing this concrete
[5.1 - 5.5], and thus removed a critical obstacle for the widespread
adoption of SCC technology in
general construction. Research results and findings of the ACMC
researchers and from the EU
projects were widely disseminated, through invited lectures/presentations
in international
conferences and to industrial companies in Europe, USA, Mid East, China
and New Zealand, etc.
UWS researchers also achieved impact through their leadership and
participation in various
national and multi-national interest groups/technical committees. For
example, Professor Bartos
chaired the SCC Working Party of the UK Concrete Society (with Mr Gibbs as
the Secretary),
which together with the Building Research Establishment, produced a
comprehensive review
report on SCC [5.7] in addition to other related documents. Through
working with RILEM technical
committee TC - 205 DSC "Durability of Self-Compacting Concrete" (by Drs
Zhu and Sonebi),
ACMC made a significant contribution to the RILEM State-of-the-Art reports
on `Durability of Self-
Compacting Concrete' [5.8]. Through active links with industry and CEN,
the results and findings
were also used by the European industry to produce the widely-accepted
`Guidelines for SCC:
Specification, Production and Use' in 2002 and 2005 [5.6], and in the new
European standards for
testing SCC. In a letter of support provided by ERMCO (the industry
organisation representing
most concrete producers in Europe), it stated that UWS has been one of the
principal actors in
SCC development, and UWS's role in the above development has been pivotal
[5.10].
As a result of the above developments (led by UWS researchers) and
contributions made by many
others, the application of SCC in general construction has been steadily
increasing in many
European countries, e.g. SCC has achieved around 30% of the total concrete
market share in
Denmark, around 10-15% in Sweden and the Netherlands, and many precast
concrete
manufacturers now use 100% SCC. In fact, Europe is the world leader in
this innovative
construction technique (SCC is used more widely in Europe than in Japan
and USA). It has been
predicted that SCC is likely to replace most of the conventional concrete
in the future [5.9 - 5.10].
These authoritative reviews/reports, guidelines and standards, though
produced in Europe, have
also had a global impact, as they formed the basis for
Reviews/Guidelines/Specification/Test
methods for SCC which were adopted by many other countries. The research,
particularly the work
associated with testing SCC standards, prevented each country or company
adopting different test
methods, and thus facilitated increased confidence in the materials and a
more rapid acceptance
of SCC in general construction. With the application of SCC in general
construction, the
construction industry has benefited from improved productivity and reduced
overall costs (due to
faster production process, lower labour & equipment demand and less
repaired work). The
superior level of finish and durability achieved through the use of SCC
benefits the users and
owners of the structure/building. The elimination of vibrating equipment
improves the environment
on and near construction and precast sites where concrete is being placed,
reducing the exposure
of workers and the public to noise and vibration. Furthermore, UWS's
research on using low cost
and waste `dusts' in practical SCC mixes [G3, G4, 3.4, 3.5] has also
impacted on the increasing
use of industrial by-products/wastes in SCCs, and contributes to a vital
drive for better environment
and sustainability.
Considering the scale of construction industry (e.g. representing 11% of
GDP and 7% of workers in
Europe) and the massive quantities of concrete being used (>2
tonnes/person/year), the increased
use of SCC has had and will continue to have a major economical, societal
and environmental
impact.
Sources to corroborate the impact
The claims presented here can be validated through the published
papers/reports referenced
above, and through the review papers/reports, guidelines and European
standards listed below.
5.1 BS EN 12350-8: 2010, Testing fresh concrete — Part 8: Self-compacting
concrete — Slump-
flow test
5.2 BS EN 12350-9: 2010, Testing fresh concrete — Part 9: Self-compacting
concrete — V-funnel
test
5.3 BS EN 12350-10: 2010, Testing fresh concrete — Part 10:
Self-compacting concrete — L box
test
5.4 BS EN 12350-11: 2010, Testing fresh concrete — Part 11:
Self-compacting concrete — Sieve
segregation test
5.5 BS EN 12350-12: 2010, Testing fresh concrete — Part 12:
Self-compacting concrete — J-ring
test
5.6 BIBM, CEMBUREAU, ERMCO, EFCA and EFNARC, 2005, The European
Guidelines for
Self-Compacting Concrete: Specification, Production and Use, 68pp,
available at:
http://www.europeanconcrete.eu/images/stories/publications/en_guidelines.pdf?phpMyAdmin=16bbb563ca43adfed14bd78eb7d8cd8a.
5.7 Concrete Society/Building Research Establishment (BRE) (2005),
Self-compacting
Concrete: a Review, Report of a Joint Working Group. The Concrete Society
and BRE,
Camberley, Surrey, UK, Technical Report No. 62.
5.8 State-of-the-Art Report of RILEM Committee TC - 205 DSC "Durability
of Self-Compacting
Concrete", RILEM Report 38, RILEM Publications, Paris, Sept. 2007, 185 pp.
ISBN- 978-2-
35158-048-6.
5.9 De Schutter, G, Bartos, PJM, Demone, P and Gibbs, J, Self Compacting
Concrete, 288pp,
Whittles Publishing (2 April 2008), ISBN-10: 1904445306, ISBN-13:
978-1904445302.
5.10 European Ready-Mixed Concrete Organisation (ERMCO), Statement
of support for the
University of the West of Scotland's submission for REF 2014, November
2013. Available
on request.