Improving Make-To-Order Manufacturing Planning: The Lancaster 'Workload Control' Approach.
Submitting Institution
Lancaster UniversityUnit of Assessment
Business and Management StudiesSummary Impact Type
EconomicResearch Subject Area(s)
Information and Computing Sciences: Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing, Information Systems
Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services: Business and Management
Summary of the impact
Over 25 years, research by Hendry and Stevenson has explored the specific
challenges faced by Make-to-Order (MTO) manufacturing companies and
developed a novel Workload Control (WLC) approach, which has been most
notably implemented in PDS Engineering. This led to significant increases
in successful bids and reductions in lead times for PDS, with a knock on
effect through their supply chain that includes large aerospace companies
like Rolls-Royce. Publication of this stream of research led to
international collaborations including in the Netherlands and Belgium,
where an EU project involving 10 firms and further consultancy work has
also led to reductions in lead times, typically of over 50%. The WLC
approach is now ready for commercialisation in the UK.
Underpinning research
WLC enables customised MTO manufacturers to operate lean manufacturing
principles, providing a novel means of reducing work-in-progress inventory
when methods used in standardised production do not apply. Better control
of this inventory along with capacities enables companies to set more
realistic, yet competitive, delivery dates and therefore bid more
successfully for new orders. The WLC approach was developed through a
combination of: theoretical analysis and simulation; prototyping of
software based on simulation results; implementation and testing of
software in manufacturing firms; and conceptual and software refinement
towards commercialisation of the software. Each of these stages was
conducted in close collaboration with industrial partners. In addition,
there have been joint research initiatives with Dutch and Portuguese
universities, and knowledge transfer meetings with consultants and
software companies.
Development of the WLC approach:
The WLC approach has its origins in research conducted by Lancaster's
Professor Brian Kingsman (Lancaster employee until 2003) in the late 1980s
(e.g. Kingsman et al., 1989). It included the doctoral research
(1985-1989) of Linda Hendry (e.g. Hendry & Kingsman, 1993). The focus
of the research was on the specific challenges faced by the MTO sector,
e.g. coping with variable production specifications, capacity needs and
set-up requirements. Such low-volume/high-variety, customised
manufacturing is increasingly important in developed economies, as more
standardised, high-volume manufacturing is being sourced from developing
countries. Given that customised products cannot be supplied from stock,
this research demonstrated the importance of gaining control of workloads
from the moment a new customer enquiry is received.
Developing a software prototype and enhancing WLC theory:
Early research focused on theoretical aspects of WLC and on developing a
software prototype with an industrial collaborator. The research findings
revealed potential but also shortcomings in the theory underpinning the
software, which were later addressed through computerised simulation
modelling in collaboration with, and using data from, industrial
collaborators (most notably Pilkington Optronics). This externally-funded
[by the ACME Directorate of SERC, as was] work was conducted with support
from two research assistants, Worden and Wilson, and developed the
approach by improving coordination between manufacturing planning and the
firms' salespeople (e.g. Kingsman et al., 1993 & 1996). This
manufacturing-marketing link is a distinctive feature of the Lancaster WLC
approach, and was shaped by the marketing-related work of Lancaster's
Emeritus Professor Alan Mercer (e.g. Kingsman & Mercer, 1998).
Engaged research with industry:
Exploration of the organisational context was continued by the case- and
action-research-oriented doctoral work of Mark Stevenson (2002-2006) and
Yuan Huang (2006-2010). The emphasis in recent years — with Stevenson and
Hendry now both members of staff — has been to continue with an engaged
research approach and to develop an increasingly sophisticated
understanding of the context-specific requirements for the successful
implementation of WLC in MTO companies (e.g. Stevenson et al.,
2011). This has led to the development of an implementation strategy for
WLC.
The work in Lancaster has directly informed and shaped further
theoretical and empirical research, most notably in Portugal and the
Netherlands, and case study research has been conducted in collaboration
with these research teams (e.g. Hendry et al., 2008; Stevenson
& Silva, 2008). More recently, considerable further collaboration has
involved academics around the world, including Fredendall (Clemson
University, USA), Melnyk (Michigan State University, USA), Huang
(University of Hong Kong), and Land (University of Groningen, the
Netherlands). International collaboration is epitomised by the doctoral
research of Thürer (2008-2011), based at the University of Coimbra,
Portugal, but co-supervised by Stevenson. The research investigated the
performance of WLC approaches through simulation and explored how a number
of implementation challenges identified in Hendry et al. (2008)
and Stevenson & Silva (2008) could be accommodated through a redesign
of the approach (e.g. Thürer et al., 2010, 2011). This
collaborative work demonstrated that considerable performance improvements
can be achieved in MTO companies specifically through Lancaster's WLC
approach, providing benefits akin to lean manufacturing (Thürer et al.,
2012).
References to the research
Over 30 papers have been published in peer-reviewed, international
journals by Lancaster researchers, including with international research
collaborators. For example:
1. Hendry, L.C., Kingsman, B.G. and Cheung, P. (1998) `The effect of
Workload Control (WLC) on performance in make-to-order companies', Journal
of Operations Management, 16: 63-75 (FT listed journal). Simulation
study using data collected from a make-to-order company.
2. Hendry, L.C., Land M.J., Stevenson, M. and Gaalman, G.J. (2008)
`Investigating implementation issues for Workload Control (WLC): A
comparative case study analysis', International Journal of Production
Economics, 112(1): 452-469. Comparative analysis of two
implementations providing research questions later investigated via joint
work with Thürer.
3. Stevenson, M. and Silva, C. (2008), `Theoretical development of a
Workload Control methodology: Evidence from two case studies'. International
Journal of Production Research, 46(11): 3107-3131. Comparative
analysis of two implementations, leading to theoretical developments later
tested through joint work with Thürer.
4. Stevenson, M., Huang, Y., Hendry, L.C., and Soepenberg, G.D. (2011)
`The theory and practice of Workload Control: A research agenda and
implementation strategy', International Journal of Production
Economics, 131(2): 689-700. Interviews with 41 high-variety
manufacturers exploring the steps needed for WLC to be implemented.
5. Thürer, M., Stevenson, M., Silva, C., Land, M.J., and Fredendall, L.
(2012), `Workload Control (WLC) and order release: A lean solution for
make-to-order companies', Production and Operations Management,
21(5): 939-953 (FT listed journal). Simulations showing Lancaster's WLC
approach can provide high-variety companies with benefits akin to a lean
implementation.
6. Hendry L.C., Huang Y., and Stevenson M., (2013), `Workload Control:
Successful implementation taking a contingency-based view of production
planning & control', International Journal of Operations &
Production Management, 33(10): 69-103. Describes the action research
project with PDS Engineering, highlighting its impact and how this was
achieved.
Details of the impact
The central impact achieved by firms adopting the WLC approach is an
increased awareness of, and control over, the flow of work through the
production process from tendering/ bidding onwards. Collaborations with
industry and with international researchers in the USA, Europe and China
have generated successive cycles of problem formulation, theory-building,
research design and problem-solving. As such, management practice has been
influenced in the early stages as well as the later stages of the research
programme.
Specifically, adoption of the WLC approach has had a significant
impact on companies as it makes it much easier for managers and shop-floor
staff to work on the right jobs at the right time, thereby reducing lead
times, and allows the sales/marketing function to confidently quote
delivery lead times for new orders. It also informs decision-making on
where extra capacity is needed as the order mix changes over time. Apart
from improving delivery performance, the approach has been demonstrated to
reduce the amount of reactive `fire-fighting', which in turn means an
organisation can devote more attention to quality improvements and
innovation. This iterative research process has resulted in a WLC software
package that is mature and ready for commercialisation in the UK.
Regional impact — PDS Engineering:
In recent years clear-cut and significant industrial impact has
been made through longitudinal, in-depth collaboration with PDS
Engineering, a small precision engineering company in the North West of
England. PDS produce a wide range of complex, high-specification
components, mostly on a MTO basis, and often to short and changing lead
times.
Implementing Lancaster's WLC system led to increased clarity of
production and capacity planning, giving PDS a much better understanding
of shop-floor priorities, of how and when to adjust capacity, and of what
delivery lead times they can confidently quote to prospective customers.
The Operations Director at PDS has stated that `the LUMS WLC system has
improved our performance at PDS significantly ... therefore contributing
to our profitability'. Specific evidence of the impact on
quantitative performance improvements since 2009, as published in Hendry et
al. (2013), includes:
- 64% increase in order-winning performance (% of tenders converted into
definite orders)
- 50% reduction in manufacturing lead times, due to reduced
work-in-progress
- 11% reduction in delivery lead times (total time from order
confirmation to delivery)
- 27% reduction in the mean tardiness of deliveries to customers
Further information about this case, including evidence from employees is
available in the brochure `Workload
Control at PDS Engineering'.
Impact on PDS supply chain:
In addition to the impact on the competitiveness of PDS Engineering, their
improved performance has had an impact on the supply chain in which they
operate. The impact has been felt by key customers — such as Unison Engine
Components (formerly Smiths Aerospace Components) — and, in turn, by one
of Unison's key customers, Rolls-Royce. An independent supply chain
consultant working for Unison corroborates that Lancaster's WLC system has
made PDS `fit for purpose' to supply leading aerospace companies.
In particular, the consultant confirms that WLC has led to improved
on-time delivery performance, and that: `the adoption of the Workload
Control system was fundamental to the improvement seen at PDS
Engineering, and I often use this as an example of best practice in
industry'. Among a set of ten suppliers participating in a supplier
development initiative run by the consultant, PDS were one of only two
firms that continued to make considerable progress in spite of the recent
financial crisis.
Commercialising WLC in the UK:
In order to extend the reach of this approach further, Lancaster
staff have developed a WLC software package that is ready for
commercialisation in the UK. It provides a solution tailored to the needs
of MTO companies that is better aligned with their production environment
than typical, alternative commercial Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
packages. The Operations Director of PDS Engineering, for example,
confirmed that `The alternatives ... were lacking the production and
capacity planning that was so essential to us yet they had lots of other
functions which we wouldn't have used'. The Access Group, a provider
of ERP software to the midmarket in the UK and Ireland, has audited
Lancaster's WLC software and visited PDS Engineering to observe its use.
The Supply Chain Divisional Manager of the Access Group has confirmed that
`there appear to be no other solutions which provide its specific
functionality'. He went on to describe the software as `a unique
solution which has been shown to work well ... and has many other
potential areas of application.'
Adoption of WLC approach in Europe and China:
The reach of the industrial impact has not, however, been
restricted to PDS and its supply chain, nor indeed to the UK. The
combination of the underpinning research and the exemplary impact of its
implementation at PDS have resulted in the uptake of similar projects
internationally.
Europe:
Through an EU-funded project in the Netherlands, ten companies, including
Corus Perfo B.V. and Lapack B.V., have collaborated with researchers from
the University of Groningen to implement WLC. Improvements claimed by
Corus Perfo B.V. include increased transparency, leading to more
predictable lead times. Meanwhile, Lapack B.V. highlighted that WLC
provides `a very simple means to maintain our guarantees for delivery
within 24 hours'. A firm of consultants, Langhout & Cazemier,
provided a piece of production planning and control software known as
Elance® to support the EU project. As is evidenced by researchers at the
University of Groningen, this software incorporates many of Lancaster's
WLC ideas and has since been implemented in a large number of other Dutch
companies. WLC ideas have also been adopted by consultants in Belgium
(Sirris) and by two companies working with the University of Coimbra in
Portugal, including Navarra S.A. Navarra S.A. highlighted improved
production-marketing integration and reduced work-in-progress, cutting
costs and increasing profits, while a representative of Sirris states
that: `By applying the principles of WLC, we have been able to reduce
the lead times at several companies, often by a factor of 50%'. The
representative of Sirris also confirms that meetings with Lancaster staff
inspired this WLC knowledge transfer, stating that the 'work of the
University of Lancaster has been of great importance for our own
thinking' and describing Lancaster's researchers as having `set
themselves apart as a world leading group in the field of WLC'.
China:
After reading papers by Lancaster academics (e.g. Kingsman, 2000;
Stevenson, 2006), researchers from the Guangdong University of Technology,
China have implemented WLC in several mould manufacturing companies,
including Greatoo Inc, with funding from the National Natural Science
Foundation of China. Greatoo Inc benefitted from production-marketing
integration and reduced work-in-process, but also from shorter lead times
due to reduced waiting times prior to final order assembly and a better
matching of workloads to capacities.
Sources to corroborate the impact
Testimonials:
- Operations Director, PDS Engineering — to corroborate the significance
of the impact in PDS Engineering, including its contribution to
increased profitability through reduced manufacturing lead times and
improved order-winning performance.
- Managing Director (and Independent Consultant), UK Supply Chain
Associates Limited — to corroborate reach into PDS's supply
chain and the significance of the impact in PDS.
- Associate Professor of Operations Management, University of Groningen
— to corroborate reach into European firms (including Corus
Perfo B.V. and Lapack B.V.), where benefits include more reliable
delivery dates.
- Senior Researcher and Consultant, Sirris — to corroborate reach
into European firms via consultancy projects, where lead times have been
reduced through WLC implementations.
- Supply Chain Divisional Manager, Access Group UK Ltd — to corroborate
that the Lancaster WLC software provides a unique solution and
has potential for further impact in the future.
Publicly available sources:
- Sirris website — includes reference to Lancaster WLC software and
screen shots.
http://www.sirris.be/newsitem.aspx?id=2070&langtype=2060&lastmod=2008-05-13
- University of Groningen website — includes reference to joint paper
with Stevenson.
http://www.rug.nl/research/publicationofthemonth/land
- Workload Control website maintained by Thürer (former doctoral
student) — includes a Microsoft Excel©-based WLC system that
can be downloaded and implemented by practitioners; a link to the
`Workload Control at PDS' brochure; and a simulation model for
researchers. It is unknown how many practitioners have
downloaded/implemented this software. www.workloadcontrol.com