Treatment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma not responding to conventional dose therapy
Submitting Institution
University College LondonUnit of Assessment
Clinical MedicineSummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Clinical Sciences, Immunology, Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Summary of the impact
Clinical research from UCL established `salvage therapy' and autologous
transplantation protocols for use in relapsed and resistant Hodgkin
lymphoma and demonstrated the efficacy of such approaches. These
treatments are now widely used standards of care. A reduced intensity
transplant (RIT) regimen, incorporating alemtuzumab to reduce
graft-versus-host disease, was also developed and a potent
graft-versus-tumour effect was demonstrated. RIT treatments are now
increasingly used in patients failing an autologous transplant and in
those patients deemed to have a high risk of autograft failure, as
determined by pre-transplant CT/PET scanning. We estimate that 5,000
patients have been cured in the REF period as a result of our research.
Underpinning research
Each year in the UK, around 1,600 people are diagnosed with Hodgkin
lymphoma. Treatment is usually very successful, and most people can be
cured, or the lymphoma can be controlled for many years. However for
around a quarter of patients, this is not the case. Our research has
developed new treatment strategies for those patients for whom
conventional therapy had failed.
The regime we invented consists of two parts: initially high dose
chemotherapy to ablate the bone marrow using the `BEAM' regimen (a
combination of carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan) followed
by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT; using stem cells harvested
previously from the patients blood). In a randomised trial designed and
managed by researchers at UCL, this strategy was compared with the same
drugs at lower non-marrow-ablative doses, without ASCT (mini-BEAM). The
trial proved the efficacy of BEAM plus ASCT and established it as the
global standard treatment for all patients failing conventional
chemo/radiotherapy [1].
In the mid-1990s, the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor
(G-CSF) became standard practice because of its effect to stimulate the
bone marrow to produce stem cells, which could then be harvested from the
blood. Our research established the factors that were predictive of
successful stem cell harvests, including the dose of stem cells to be
administered for successful engraftment. Defining this dose helped to
ensure that engraftment of the infused stem cells would occur in the
minimal time with the maximum chances of success. This reduced the time
needed to support the patient during the period when their bone marrow was
non-functional, so reducing the risk of serious infection and bleeding [2].
Despite these major advances the use of BEAM plus ASCT only `rescued'
about 45% of patients. The remainder relapsed following autologous
transplantation and had a dismal prognosis. Allogeneic transplantation
(where the stem cells are from a donor rather than the patient's own) had
demonstrated improved anti-lymphoma activity, an effect of the foreign
stem cells that were infused to repopulate the bone marrow. However this
procedure was too toxic in HL, with high mortality rates directly related
to procedural toxicity. In addition, the donor stem cells mounted an
immune response against not only the lymphoma, but other healthy tissues,
so-called graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) which ranged from 45 to 60%. We
introduced reduced intensity transplants (RITs) incorporating depletion of
the harmful GvHD-inducing immune cells with alemtuzumab [3] but
preserving those that had anti-lymphoma effects. This greatly reduced the
toxicity and mortality associated with allogeneic transplantation. With
safer transplants we were able to demonstrate the potential benefit of the
allogeneic graft-versus-tumour effect in HL [4].
Relapse of the patients' lymphoma became the primary cause for treatment
failure. Researchers at UCL then pioneered the development of infusion of
incrementally increasing doses of immune cells from the donor (donor
lymphocyte infusions, DLIs) at later time points following allogenic
transplantation (when the risk of induction of GvHD is lower) as a means
to reduce or treat disease relapse in HL [5]. These were combined
with a novel strategy for monitoring patients for early signs of relapse
following transplantation utilising positron emission tomography (PET)
scanning [6], enabling earlier delivery of DLIs. This combined
approach delivered results that were significantly better than those seen
in other countries, and has become standard practice throughout the UK.
This difference has been widely ascribed to the novel strategy developed
by UCL, relating both to the incorporation of T-cell depletion using the
alemtuzumab antibody, and the strategy of post-transplant DLIs. Other
countries are now evaluating similar strategies based on the research from
UCL.
References to the research
[1] Linch DC, Winfield D, Goldstone AH, Moir D, Hancock B, McMillan A,
Chopra R, Milligan D, Hudson GV. Dose intensification with autologous
bone-marrow transplantation in relapsed and resistant Hodgkin's disease:
results of a BNLI randomised trial. Lancet. 1993 Apr 24;341(8852):1051-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(93)92411-L
[2] Watts MJ, Sullivan AM, Jamieson E, Pearce R, Fielding A, Devereux S,
Goldstone AH, Linch DC. Progenitor-cell mobilization after low-dose
cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: an analysis of
progenitor-cell quantity and quality and factors predicting for these
parameters in 101 pretreated patients with malignant lymphoma. J Clin
Oncol. (1997 Feb;15(2):535-46.
http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/15/2/535.long
[3] Kottaridis PD, Milligan DW, Chopra R, Chakraverty RK, Chakrabarti S,
Robinson S, Peggs K, Verfuerth S, Pettengell R, Marsh JC, Schey S,
Mahendra P, Morgan GJ, Hale G, Waldmann H, de Elvira MC, Williams CD,
Devereux S,Linch DC, Goldstone AH, Mackinnon S. In vivo CAMPATH-1H
prevents graft-versus-host disease following nonmyeloablative stem cell
transplantation. Blood. 2000 Oct 1;96(7):2419-25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/146532401753174025
[4] Peggs KS, Hunter A, Chopra R, Parker A, Mahendra P, Milligan D,
Craddock C, Pettengell R, Dogan A, Thomson KJ, Morris EC, Hale G, Waldmann
H, Goldstone AH, Linch DC, Mackinnon S. Clinical evidence of a
graft-versus-Hodgkin's-lymphoma effect after reduced-intensity allogeneic
transplantation. Lancet. 2005 Jun 4-10;365(9475):1934-41.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66659-7
[5] Peggs KS, Thomson K, Hart DP, Geary J, Morris EC, Yong K, Goldstone
AH, Linch DC. Dose-escalated donor lymphocyte infusions following reduced
intensity transplantation: toxicity, chimerism, and disease responses.
Mackinnon S. Blood. 2004 Feb 15;103(4):1548-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2003-05-1513
[6] Lambert JR, Bomanji JB, Peggs KS, Thomson KJ, Chakraverty RK,
Fielding AK, Kottaridis PD, Roughton M, Morris EC, Goldstone AH, Linch DC,
Ell PJ, Mackinnon S. Prognostic role of PET scanning before and after
reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation for lymphoma.
Blood. 2010 Apr 8;115(14):2763-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-11-255182
Details of the impact
Our research since 1993 has developed new treatments for HL and has
improved outcomes for patients who do not respond to conventional therapy.
Firstly, we demonstrated the advantages of autologous stem cell
transplantation, then refined this technique by establishing the correct
dose range for the infused stem cells. Secondly, for the subset of these
patients who subsequently relapsed after autologous stem cell
transplantation, we pioneered allogenic stem cell transplantation to
exploit the graft versus tumour effect of foreign stem cells. In
particular, we developed reduced intensity allogenic transplants (RITs),
which are less toxic than standard allogenic transplants, and which could
be boosted by additional infusion of donor cells once the graft was
established.
High dose therapy and autologous transplantation, as developed at UCL,
are currently the standard treatment for relapsed and resistant HL. This
recommendation was confirmed in 2012 in the updated clinical practice
guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (USA) [a],
and remains the standard throughout Europe [b]. Peggs recently
chaired the expert panel on behalf of British Committee for Standards in
Haematology for the development of guidelines in relapsed and resistant
HL, which confirmed this position in the UK [c].
In the last five years approximately 880 patients with relapsed and
resistant HL have been treated in the UK with ASCT [d] and we
estimate that 400 patients have been cured. In Europe 9,500 patients with
relapsed and resistant HL underwent ASCT 2006-10, most using the BEAM
regimen [e], with an estimated 4,300 cured.
Following the successful results published from UCL, the number of RITs
in relapsed and resistant HL has steadily risen in the UK, from 14 per
annum in 2003/4, to 38-44 by 2006/7, and 62-64 by 2010/11, a rise of over
300% [d]. This has also been the basis for the development of a
prospective study in the UK (PAIReD), badged by both the NIHR Cancer
Research Network (NCRN) and the British Society for Blood and Marrow
Transplantation Clinical Trials Committee (BSBMT-CTC). Based on the
outcomes achieved at our centre, we can predict that approximately 30-35
patients are cured per year in the UK as a result of the allogeneic RIT
strategy (equivalent to 150-175 over a five-year period), and that this
number will increase with earlier application in the treatment pathway.
As a result of the work at UCL, Peggs was asked to chair the BSBMT
`indications' panel for lymphomas. The indications-tables are used as a
template for commissioning transplant services in the UK. Allogeneic
transplantation is now designated a `standard' therapy in patients with HL
who have relapsed following ASCT, and as a `clinical option' in those with
primary resistant or relapsed disease who remain chemo-sensitive [f].
This ensures funding and equitable access to such therapies for all
patients who might benefit from them across the UK.
Sources to corroborate the impact
[a] Morgan CH, et al. Hodgkin Lymphoma, Version 2.2012 Featured Updates
to the NCCN Guidelines. JNCCN (2012) 10, 589-597. The NCCN guideline
confirms ASCT as the current standard therapy in chemo-sensitive
relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma in North America. (Copy
available on request.)
[b] Sureda A. ESH/EBMT Handbook on Haematopoietic Stem Cell
Transplantation: Ed. Apperley J, Carreras E, Gluckman E, Masszi T. Chapter
30 - HSCT for Hodgkin's lymphoma in adults. (2012). The EBMT handbook
also confirms ASCT as the current standard therapy in chemo-sensitive
relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma in Europe.
http://www.ebmt.org/Contents/Resources/Library/EBMTESHhandbook/Pages/EBMT-ESH-handbook.aspx
[c]
http://www.bcshguidelines.com/documents/classical_hodgkin_lymphoma_relapsed_combined.pdf.
The British Committee for Standards in Haematology (BCSH) 2013
guidelines confirm ASCT as the current standard therapy in
chemo-sensitive relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma in the UK.
[d] http://bsbmt.org/about-the-registry/
Annual transplant activity figures are reported to the British Society
for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and confirm the increased
application of allogeneic transplantation.
[e] Passweg JR, Baldomero H, Gratwohl A, Bregni M, Cesaro S, Dreger P, de
Witte T, Farge-Bancel D, Gaspar B, Marsh J, Mohty M, Peters C, Tichelli A,
Velardi A, de Elvira CR, Falkenburg F, Sureda A, Madrigal A; European
Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). The EBMT activity
survey: 1990-2010. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012 Jul;47(7):906-23 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.66.
Annual transplant activity figures are also reported to the European
Bone Marrow Transplantation group, and reported according to disease and
country.
[f]
http://bsbmt.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Indications-Table-Updated-Feb-2012-Word-Version.pdf
The British Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation provides
guidance on indications for transplantation, which help to inform the
commissioning process, and the most recent update (September 2013)
confirms allogeneic transplantation is now considered a standard therapy
in those with relapse following ASCT.