Influencing policy and practice in mental health services for children and young people.
Submitting Institution
Edge Hill UniversityUnit of Assessment
Social Work and Social PolicySummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration
Summary of the impact
Coppock's original research has impacted upon children's workforce
development strategy and child/adolescent mental health services in
England - specifically in workforce up-skilling to provide inclusive,
child-centred mental health services. Coppock's research provided
intellectual and empirical underpinning for a highly successful training
programme 'Mad, Bad or Misunderstood? Interactive Multimedia Training
for Professionals Working with Children and Young People' (MBM
Training). MBM Training has been delivered to over 4,000 participants
including: teachers/social workers/health workers/police
officers/residential care staff/parents/carers/foster carers and
volunteers and is recognised by the Child and Maternal Health Observatory
(ChiMat) as an important tool in mental health promotion and tackling
stigma.
Underpinning research
Between 1994 and 1996 Coppock (Reader in Social Sciences, from 4.11.91 to
present) was funded by Edge Hill University to undertake a research
project investigating contemporary theory, policy and professional
practice in child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) in
England, from a children's rights perspective.
In her previous career as a psychiatric social worker in CAMHS and
through her ongoing involvement with a wide range of children and young
people's agencies and services, Coppock had observed significant
weaknesses in the theoretical models and conceptual tools that shaped
professional understanding of, and interventions in, the lives of children
and young people presenting to children's services as `disturbed' or
`disturbing'.
The aim of the research was to investigate, identify, critically analyse
and raise awareness of these potential structural weaknesses in theory,
policy and practice with the objective of developing new insights in order
to positively influence how practitioners interpret and respond to mental
distress in children and young people in the future.
The research involved a meta-analysis of existing research data in the
field alongside documentary analysis of law, policy, reports and other
practice-based documentation.
The research findings:
- Identified and problematised the dominance of the medical model in
child and adolescent mental health theory, policy and practice and
exposed limitations in terms of its reliability and validity as a
framework for understanding and responding to mental distress amongst
children and young people
- Identified arbitrary and inconsistent conceptual framings of
`disturbed' and `disturbing' behaviour in children and young people
amongst adults/practitioners, resulting in inconsistent institutional
responses and pathways to service provision which, in turn, had
differential consequences for children and young people's rights
- Identified the significant trend towards increasing numbers of
children and young people receiving and being treated for mental health
diagnoses and highlighted the actual and potential negative consequences
of such practices for children and young people in distress
- Identified how professionally-led responses to children and young
people in mental distress were characterised by a deep-rooted
paternalism that was inconsistent with the core principles and spirit of
the UNCRC, 1989, The Children Act, 1989 and the Code of Practice to the
Mental Health Act, 1983.
- Provided examples of emerging, innovative approaches to service
provision from the voluntary sector, grounded in child-centred
methodologies; premised on dialogue with children and young people and
their perspectives on what they want from mental health services
- Evidenced the potential benefits of mainstreaming these child and
young person-centred understandings of mental distress as a basis for
future CAMHS policy and practice.
The research findings were initially published in the peer reviewed
journal article `Mad, Bad or Misunderstood? A Critical Analysis of
State Responses to Children and Young People Who are Defined as
`Disturbed' or `Disturbing' (Coppock, 1996) and the analysis was
developed further in subsequent publications (Coppock, 1997; 2005 - full
references provided in section 3 below).
References to the research
All items available on request.
Chapter in Book: Coppock V (2005) `Mad, Bad or Misunderstood?' in
H Hendrick (ed) Child Welfare and Social Policy: An essential reader,
London: The Policy Press, pp285-300
[This was a revised and updated version of the Youth & Policy,
Summer (53), 1996 article. The edited collection was reviewed: "This
groundbreaking selection of seminal writings puts the subject of children
and social policy in 21st-century Britain firmly on the map. Immense value
is added by Harry Hendrick's introduction and trenchant critique, which
locates every contribution within its specific policy context. This book
is bound to become required reading for any under- and postgraduate social
science student in the UK." Eva Lloyd, Senior Lecturer in Early
Childhood Studies, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol - See more at: http://www.policypress.co.uk/display.asp?K=9781861345677&sf1=keyword&st1=hendrick&m=1&dc=4#sthash.HNeKSnlS.dpuf
Chapter in Book: Coppock V (1997) `Mad, Bad or Misunderstood?' in P
Scraton (ed) `Childhood' in `Crisis', London: UCL Press, pp146-162
Journal Article: Coppock V (1996) Mad, Bad or Misunderstood? A Critical
Analysis of State Responses to Children and Young People Who are Defined
as `Disturbed' or `Disturbing' Youth and Policy, No 53, Summer,
pp53-65.
Details of the impact
Coppock's original research has directly impacted children's workforce
development strategy in England, providing the intellectual and empirical
underpinning for the development of a one-day training course for
practitioners - Mad, Bad or Misunderstood? Interactive Multimedia
Training for Professionals Working with Children and Young People in
Liverpool (MBM Training). The impact began in Liverpool 2005,
extended to the North West region in 2008, nationally in England from
2009, and is ongoing.
In 2005, Coppock was approached by Corroborator 3 for permission to use
her original research `Mad, Bad or Misunderstood?' as the basis of
a collaborative project to develop mental health awareness training for
children and young people's practitioners in Liverpool. The intention was
to mainstream the core messages from her original research into the
practice arena - specifically, the need to challenge stereotyping and
pathologising practices with children and young people; to understand
children and young people's behaviours as a form of communicating their
distress; and to develop new skills of listening and responding to
children and young people in distress (Corroborator 3).
Coppock acted as a Consultant/Adviser for the project (along with
personnel from Liverpool Mental Health Awareness and Liverpool
CAMHS/Children's Services Partnership). MBM Training launched in May 2006,
training 1,000 participants in its first year (Corroborator 1) and was
profiled in The Guardian (Tickle, 2007) and Young People Now
(Lloyd, 2007) featuring interviews with Coppock in 2007 on the challenges
of Every Child Matters vis-à-vis children's workforce development
needs. Both features highlighted the development of MBM Training as an
exemplar of good practice.
MBM Training draws directly on the theoretical framework, analysis and
practical insights from Coppock's original research (outlined in 2 above:
Corroborator 1). Specifically, it encourages practitioners to develop
child-centred understandings of mental distress and place the needs of
children and young people at the centre of their service. In particular,
they are asked to consider the popular assumptions that lead to
pathologising the challenging behaviour of children and young people as
`mad' or `bad'. The training manual is available at: http://www.chimat.org.uk/tacklingstigma/liverpool
Facilitated workshops offer:
- a holistic model of mental health, integrating sociological and
psychological perspectives
- an understanding of children and young people's behaviour as a means
of communicating about deeper issues
- an opportunity to develop strategies with children and young people to
achieve greater emotional literacy and resilience, self-esteem,
empowerment and life opportunities
- the skills to develop a child-centred perspective, within the
framework of the Five Outcomes of Every Child Matters and the UN
Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Between January 2008 and July 2013, MBM Training has been co-ordinated
and managed through the Mental Health Promotion Project of Merseyside
Youth Association (MYA) (www.mya.org.uk/index.php?p=205).
The training is now commissioned by Liverpool Commissioning Group
(formerly Primary Care Trust) and forms a central strand of its workforce
development and early intervention in its mental health and emotional
wellbeing strategy (Corroborator 1).
MYA estimates that MBM Training has reached 4,000 practitioners since
2008 (Corroborator 3). MYA Annual Reports (which include only programmes
delivered directly by MYA) indicate:
650 professionals trained in 2008-09
(http://www.mya.org.uk/userfiles/file/mya_annual_report_0809.pdf
Page 7)
659 professionals trained in 2009-10
(http://www.mya.org.uk/userfiles/file/mya_annual_report_0910.pdf
Page 13)
508 professionals trained in 2010-11
(http://www.mya.org.uk/userfiles/file/mya_annual_report_1011.pdf
Page 26)
388 professionals trained in 2011-12 (MYA Annual Report, 2011-12. (Page
17)
A core philosophy and aim of MBM is that all those who work with children
and young people should have access to mental health awareness training.
This is rooted in Coppock's research finding that, when asked, children
and young people say they prefer to seek and receive support in the
ordinary, everyday contexts of their lives. MBM's reach to professionals
and volunteers across a wide range of contexts is testament to its success
in meeting that core aim. For example, the 317 professionals who completed
MBM Training via 18 courses delivered by MYA between 1 April 2012 and 31
March 2013 included social workers from both children's and adult
services, teachers and allied education practitioners (primary, secondary
and special needs), child health practitioners, CAMHS workers, Connexions
workers, youth workers, Children's Centre practitioners, housing officers,
volunteers and community football coaches (Corroborator 2).
MYA undertakes evaluation exercises for each cohort attending the
programme, providing a rich source of evidence on its positive impact on
the mental health awareness of participants and their attitudes towards
children and young people in distress. Corroborator 2 comments: "Over the
past two years that I have been delivering MBM I have seen first-hand the
enjoyment, skill, knowledge and confidence of its participants grow. It
seems to re-ignite a passion within to support, nurture and care for those
who need it - especially our young people".
Illustrative feedback from MBM participants (Corroborator 2) confirms
this observation. Practitioners commented: "It has enhanced my awareness
that can be used in my job and cascaded down to team members"; "We need to
look at the child in context of their wider environment, not labelling";
"It has given me an understanding of looking at behaviours as a small part
of what may be a bigger problem".
Young people involved in the delivery of MBM commented: "As young people
we spend the majority of our time in school, surely it's there that things
should be recognised and picked up on. MBM highlights this to those taking
part and shows how important it is to listen"; "I would like to think that
doing this means no other young person has the same experiences I had
during college". Beyond Merseyside, MBM Training has received both
regional and national recognition as best practice. For example, the North
West Centre of Excellence rolled out MBM Training throughout the region
via a `Train the Trainers' approach, with a print run of 33,000 MBM
Training Manuals and DVDs disseminated (Corroborators 1 and 3). The
training has also been used in many of the national Department for
Education `Targeted Mental Health in Schools' (TaMHS) Programmes - including primary, secondary and special educational needs schools
(Corroborators 1 and 2)
MBM Training has also achieved national recognition as an important tool
in tackling stigma (Barham & Smith, 2011; www.chimat.org.uk/tacklingstigma/liverpool).
The Child and Maternal Health Observatory (ChiMat) promotes MBM Training -
the manual is available to download directly from its Knowledge Hub
Resources Database
(www.chimat.org.uk/resource/item.aspx?RID=96510)
(795 downloads between January 2009 and 31 July 2013).
Demand for MBM Training continues to be strong and its core content
remains grounded in Coppock's research. It has also influenced the
development of programmes such as: `Inside Out', a `follow-on' Level 4
accredited programme that builds on the themes of MBM Training; the `PEER
schools award', a quality award that begins with staff training based on
MBM with the aim of working towards achieving a whole school approach to
mental health; CAMHS master classes based on the core ideas from MBM
(Corroborator 2).
Sources to corroborate the impact
Personal statements/corroborators (see cross-references in Section
4):
- CAMHS Commissioner, Liverpool PCT, Personal statement, 18 December
2012 - addresses role of research in shaping MBM Training (MBMT);
numbers of staff undergoing MBMT and continued use by Liverpool
Commissioning Group; its roles in approach to workforce development and
strategy for early intervention in mental health and emotional
well-being; regional roll-out of MBM Training; use of MBMT in TaMHS
Programmes.
- Mental Health Promotion Trainer, Merseyside Youth Association (MYA),
Personal statement and report, 31 July 2013 - addresses range and number
of professionals/volunteers undergoing MBM training, impact on trainees;
use in TaHMS programmes; impact on other programmes.
- Principal Development Manager, Merseyside Youth Association (MYA),
Personal statement, 17 June 2013 - addresses use of, and rationale for
using, underpinning research in development of mental health awareness
training for children and young people practitioners. Number of
practitioners undergoing MBM Training since 2008. Regional roll-out of
MBM Training.
Other:
- Barham, J. & Smith, N. (2011) Tackling Stigma Framework Pilot:
Evaluation Update Report. A Report to National CAMHS Support Service.
Birmingham: ECORYS UK Ltd. Available at www.chimat.org.uk/resource/view.aspx?RID=105356
(citation pages 4/5)
- ChiMat (Child and Maternal Health Observatory) Knowledge Hub Resources
Database. Available at www.chimat.org.uk/resource/item.aspx?RID=96510
- ChiMat (Child and Maternal Health Observatory) Tackling Stigma.
Lessons from the Pilot Sites: Liverpool Pilot Site. Available at www.chimat.org.uk/tacklingstigma/liverpool
- Lloyd, T. (2007) `Resources: Workplace - A guide to mental health
needs' Children and Young People Now, 27 April 2007. Available at http://www.cypnow.co.uk/ypn/news/1066280/resources-workplace-a-guide-mental-health
- Tickle, L. (2007) `Child-centred Universities' The Guardian, 3 April
2007. Available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2007/apr/03/highereducation.children