Influencing the practice and policy of collaborative working of leaders across the not-for-profit and local government sector
Submitting Institution
Edge Hill UniversityUnit of Assessment
Social Work and Social PolicySummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration, Sociology
Summary of the impact
Diamond's research paper (Diamond 2001) on the management of change
within major urban regeneration programmes directly led to him working
with Voluntary and Community Sector organisations in South London (2003 -
08); regional VCS networks in the North West (2008 — present); the
Leadership and Development group of VCS leaders in the North West (2010 —
present) and national VCS organisations (2005 — present). The impact (as
set out below) can be seen in terms of the number of key leaders and
activists supported and facilitated by Diamond to reflect upon their work,
their learning and, as a consequence, their strategic goals.
Underpinning research
The research underpinning this case study is based on Diamond (who joined
Edge Hill in 1990 and is currently Professor of Urban Policy Studies).
Diamond's original work, which was a critical examination of the claims
that multi-agency working and collaborative working could both improve the
quality of public services delivered to vulnerable groups, began in the
mid-1980s and was based in Manchester. The idea that the
`decentralisation' of services plus `cross boundary' working by
practitioners and professionals would lead to the `democratisation' of
services was contested by Diamond in field work in Manchester in the late
1980s (Diamond 2001). From 2001 he set out his critique of such approaches
and the case for change and innovation in professional education and
training (Diamond 2007). In subsequent primary research (Diamond 2012), he
has examined models of leadership and leadership education present within
the VCS. This empirical work was influenced by his extensive experience of
undertaking funded evaluations of regeneration initiatives and the setting
up of the Community Empowerment Networks from 2002 onwards. His
involvement as an external, independent and critical friend to a number of
local, regional and national networks is evidence of his reputation and
the importance he attaches to personal and professional education and
learning (local networks, regional ones — Voluntary Sector North West,
North West Regional Youth Work Unit — and national ones such as the
National Coalition for Independent Action, Voluntary Sector Studies
Network). Through these different networks he has worked with over 800
practitioners / activists from the VCS and public agencies.
Diamond's work explored the ways in which public policy initiatives were
often seen as attempts to develop `joined-up' working at the planning
stage but became discrete or competing projects at the implementation
phase. He has argued that public policy initiatives failed to take account
of:
- The skills and knowledge gap of professionals (Diamond 2007)
- The power imbalances in terms of status and authority between
different professional groups and between service users and residents
(Diamond 2007; 2010)
- The need for investment in the professional and personal development
of professionals and practitioners — and, in particular, the need for
support in terms of developing their capacity for critical reflection
(Diamond 2012)
- The local political context within which initiatives are situated and
the impact this has for professionals and practitioners (Diamond and
Pearce 2010)
- The short term cycle of decision making by political elites (Diamond
2007; Diamond and Pearce 2010; Liddle and Diamond 2014)
These developments and the recommendations that informed his analysis
were situated in policy terms during New Labour's period in office.
Diamond's work contains within it a critique of New Labour's model of
social democracy shaped by neo-liberalism. In particular, he was very
critical of the New Labour model of `partnership' and the incorporation of
the VCS into the role or place of state funded agencies (Diamond 2010 and
Diamond and Pearce 2010). This critique and its ability to connect with
the diverse audiences that he works with illustrates his ability to work
successfully and with credibility with different interest groups (these
include chief officers, senior managers, leaders from Third Sector
organisations, front line staff, community activists and national
voluntary sector organisations).
References to the research
All the work cited below are peer reviewed and several appear in
prestigious Routledge book series. All outputs available on request.
1 - Journal Article: Diamond, J. (2001) Managing Change or Coping
with Conflict Local Economy 16.3 (pp 272 - 285) doi:
10.1080/02690940110078274 (47 citations) Awarded Sam Aaronovitch Prize for
Best Paper 2001
3 - Chapter in Book: Diamond, J. and Pearce, J. (2010) Manchester:
Between the grassroots and City Hall: participation in the global city in
Pearce, J. (ed.) Participation and Democracy in the Twenty-First
Century City Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan (pp 154 - 199) This
is an edited collection in the Non-Government Public Action series
published by Palgrave and for which the primary research was funded
through the ESRC (PI: Jenny Pearce; Title: Municipal Innovations in
Non-Governmental Public Participation: UK/Latin America £253,821;
01.01.2006-30.06.2008)
4 - Chapter in Book: Diamond, J. (2010) Context to globalisation
and regeneration management in Diamond, J., Liddle, J., Southern, A., and
Osei, P. (eds) Urban Regeneration Management: International
Perspectives London: Routledge Advances in Management and Business
Studies (pp 13 - 30)
5 - Chapter in Book: Diamond, J. (2012) Learning about Leadership
in the Third Sector: From Activist Grassroots to Managerial Conformity in
Sotarauta, M. et al Leadership and Change in Sustainable Regional
Development London: Routledge (pp 80 - 102)
6 - Chapter in Book: Liddle, J and Diamond, J. (2014) Partnership
Across Boundaries in England in O'Flynn, J., Blackman, D. and Halligan, J.
(eds) Crossing Boundaries in Public Management and Policy: The
International Experience London: Routledge Critical Studies in
Public Management (pp 263 - 279) (NB: published 18 July 2013)
Details of the impact
The impact and regional / national reputation of Diamond's work can be
seen in a number of ways in addition to published work: for example,
conference presentations, invitations to present and being asked to act as
external advisor or critical friend/mentor. The following illustrate his
standing with peers, practitioners and policy makers:
- 2009 - 2010 one of four HEI chairs acting as members of Expert Panel
for the National Audit Office's evaluation of the Coalfields
Regeneration Initiative
- 2009 - 2010 adviser to the Community Sector Coalition's Leadership
Training Programme
- 2010 — major contributor to CLPS blog on the VCS/Big Society and now
invited to contribute to other VCS led blogs (estimated traffic to the
blog between 2010 - 2012 over 10,000 visits (Other Source (OS) 1).
- 2010 — present: facilitator to the North West VCS senior leadership
group (invitation only)
- 2010 — present: facilitator / critical friend to North West Regional
Youth Work Unit
- 2011 — appointed co-editor Teaching Public Administration
(Sage)
- 2012 — present: external facilitator for VCS Leadership and Learning
Development Programme in Lancashire supported through the Transforming
Local Infrastructure initiative
- 2013 — present: commissioned by an urban metropolitan authority to
provide leadership and professional development for over 40 community
residents as part of a deliberate strategy to involve local people
working with public services and to work with senior managers and
leaders to reflect on the practice implications of such innovation
- 2013 — invited to facilitate the VSSN Annual Research Day (Manchester,
28 November).
Impact 1a: Influencing the actions of key VCS regional leaders in
times of austerity 2008 — present
Diamond was asked by the North West Regional Lead for the VCS to act as a
facilitator for a series of themed (invitation only) discussion groups
after the 2010 General Election. Over 45 people participated during which
a number of key strategic and policy questions and options for the Sector
were examined. These included: the consequences of the Comprehensive
Spending Review in the autumn of 2010; the implications of the Big Society
initiative; the closures within the sector and the political options as
the preparation for the 2015 General Election were underway. Diamond's use
of a participatory approach to the process during the negotiations for the
event provided a clear and systematic framework for a critical reflection
by the participants on the changing political context and its implications
for them professionally and personally.
Specifically, the impact of his work on local, regional and national
civil society agencies and leaders can be evidenced in the following ways:
the regional lead for the VCS in the North West describes Diamond's work
thus: "This collaboration (between VSNW and Diamond) is, perhaps, better
illustrated in a series of invitation-only round table events VSNW and the
University have convened since 2010. The economic crisis, the outcome of
the General Election and the impact of the spending cuts on the sector led
us to think about organising a series of structured events in which
leading members of the sector could meet to reflect on what the scale of
the changes were...These roundtable events have played an important part
in my (and our) critical reflection on the strategic objectives of the
sector in a real time of change and where we have been able to draw on the
skills of someone who...understands our needs." (FS 1; additional material
FS 4).
Impact 2: Setting up, organising, convening and leading a Leadership
and Development Group for managers in the VCS across the North West
(2010 — present)
Diamond seeks to make connections between his research and his analysis
of the nature of how professional power is constructed and enacted in
practice and the experiential learning and analysis undertaken by
professionals and practitioners themselves. These relationships are,
often, contested and demonstrate sites of conflict within professional
agencies and between different professional agencies. His work in setting
up a Leadership Group in 2012, funded partly through the TLI, with
managers and practitioners in Lancashire and from across the North West
provided an opportunity for personal and professional learning and
development. His approach was, also, to place their work in the context of
their organisations so that there were explicit attempts to link their
personal learning with the changing needs of their agencies. The agencies
included county-wide infrastructure organisations, domestic violence
services, equality & diversity agencies, networks to support social
enterprises, trustees and management committee members (FS 1).
Impact 3: Impact on the development of services for children and young
people
In 2011 and 2012 Diamond was asked by the North West Regional Youth Work
Unit (NWRYWU) to facilitate a day's reflection for senior managers
following the Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR) and to participate in
the NWRRYWU's regional parliament for young people on the theme of the
cuts and austerity. An indicator of his reputation and credibility is
reflected in his being asked to provide a summing up of the day for
participants. These invitations followed his involvement in 2006 with the
writing of "Words Matter: A Glossary for Practitioners" which he undertook
in cooperation with a group of senior practitioners from across the North
West. These relationships, which led to publications referenced above and
informed practice, were only possible because of the levels of trust and
confidence he had established with these professional networks. The NWRYWU
noted "(we) drew on John's experience and understanding of what it meant
to work `in partnership' with different professional bodies who had little
or no understanding of the needs of young people. It is difficult,
perhaps, to recognise the dramatic changes in the way services for
children and young people were being organised nearly a decade ago....In
our work with John we were able to develop a clearer sense of how to frame
our conversations with other key agencies and there is no doubt that
members of our network gained from their involvement too." (FS 2).
Impact 4: Working with one of the London Community Empowerment
Networks (2003-08)
As his work with one of the London Community Empowerment Networks
confirms, working with different professional groups as well as users and
residents requires broad conceptual as well as people-based skills (his
participation in the work in Lewisham directly followed a seminar at South
Bank University where he drew on his 2001 research findings). The CEN lead
has noted that "During his work with us he was asked to run a number of
day events for practitioners across the Authority. These were successful
and in them he focussed on engaging with participants to think about and
to reflect on the values, aims and practice of community work. I would
estimate that about 65 participants from across Lewisham took part in
these sessions [...] We drew on his skills as an academic, a researcher
and someone who was able to cut across the different professional
boundaries between university and practice." (FS 3). The programme was
organised as a way of enhancing the skills and capacities of both
professionals and residents who were involved in some aspects of community
development practice. The same lead observed, "As part of the formal LCN
evaluation he made a number of specific recommendations. These included a
much more explicit approach towards equality and diversity which led,
amongst other things, to the creation of an Equalities Officer post within
the LCN."
Impact 5: Acting as a critical friend to senior policy makers (2012
and on-going)
Since autumn 2012, Diamond supported one of the senior policy leads in
one of the North West's former police authorities. His work here which was
asked for on the basis of reputation confirms his ability to work
sensitively with colleagues in highly politically sensitive roles as well
as his knowledge of and insights into the organisational and political
context to the reforms introduced. He has the ability to develop
confidence in him by those he works with and to work through difficult
(sometimes on a personal basis) professional and organisationally
challenging questions. The officer concerned acknowledges Diamond's role
in "coaching and mentoring to me as a member of the Senior Management Team
on: finding a new coping mechanism for significant change; a sounding
board and reality check...; an exploration of the new operating context;
understanding the change management process including readiness
assessments; communication implication and planning; tackling resistance
to change and confidence building, assertiveness and personal
development." (FS 5).
The opportunities for learning and for professional (and personal)
development in such settings requires skilled and informed facilitation.
Diamond's work with practitioners and professionals in a number of
different contexts (from workshops to day schools) illustrate the level of
confidence in his work by the practitioner communities/networks. His
appointment in 2011 as joint editor of Teaching Public Administration
(TPA) is further evidence of the recognition of his work with
practitioners and professionals.
Impact 6: Improving VCS Leaders and Practitioners' understanding of
the Big Society and its implications of the changing political context
The impact (especially in the North West) of his work can be seen in how
it has enabled leaders and practitioners to make sense of the changed (and
changing) relationships of the VCS to other public sector agencies and
organisations; the changing political context and the restructuring of the
market, state and role of civil society. His contribution is, also, about
how to learn more systematically from these changes and so anticipate
future developments and (where possible) influence the professional and
practice informed discussions and reflections. Through his work with TPA,
the blogs he contributes to, the national and international networks he is
part of and the work he is engaged with to promote a more systematic
approach to learning, Diamond makes connections between the local, the
national and international. The blog Diamond contributed to during 2010 - 2012 was seen as significant by a number of professionals and
practitioners in the VCS. (As one senior officer has noted: "His analysis
of the Cameron concept of the Big Society just after the 2010 Election was
very valuable. There were not that many academics writing about it in the
way he did (critical of the idea but able to explain it to a wide and
diverse audience) and which also spoke to the voluntary sector [...] His
work represents an important resource for us" (FS 4)). In the autumn of
2010 he was one of 28 people invited to an invitation only event of
opinion formers (including national press columnists) hosted by the Joseph
Rowntree Foundation (OS 2). Diamond was the only academic and the
invitation came because of his blog. The purpose of the event was to
provide the JRF's Chief Executive and her senior policy team with an
analysis of the likely impact of the Cameron concept of the Big Society.
JRF were then going to convene a panel of academics for a similar
discussion.
Sources to corroborate the impact
Factual statements (FS):
- Chief Executive Voluntary Sector North West (Impact 1 and 3)
- Chief Executive North West Regional Youth Work Unit (Impact 2)
- Former Chief Executive Community Sector Coalition (Impact 4)
- Policy Officer VSNW and CLES (Impact 1 and 6)
- Member of Senior Management Team in former North West police authority
Crime Commissioner (Impact 5).
Other Sources (OS):
- Statistics for visitors and page views of CLPS website and CLPS blog,
Aug 2010 — Jul 2013
- Attendees at Joseph Rowntree Foundation's Big Society event,
Autumn 2010.