Guiding national policy on the regulation of health ethics
Submitting Institution
University of SouthamptonUnit of Assessment
LawSummary Impact Type
PoliticalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Law and Legal Studies: Law
Philosophy and Religious Studies: Applied Ethics
Summary of the impact
Research in Southampton Law School's Health Ethics and Law (HEAL) network
has made a significant contribution to improving the way in which ethical
issues in health are addressed in the UK and further afield. HEAL members'
specialist research has informed several Department of Health policy
documents and policy makers, as well as the strategies of organisations
governing bioethics. Their recommendations have influenced professional
guidelines for clinicians and lawyers, defining and underpinning good
practice so as to protect and benefit service users. Increased
understanding of ethical issues in health among the wider public has been
promoted through high-profile media coverage.
Underpinning research
The Health Ethics and Law (HEAL) Network comprises both researchers and
practitioners. Established by Jonathan Montgomery (1984-) and Caroline
Jones (2003-) in 2005, it collaborates to improve the way in which ethical
and legal issues concerning health are addressed in the UK.
The underlying principles were outlined in Montgomery's textbook Health
Care Law [3.1], which for the first time examined how the law in England
and Wales governed the full spectrum of health care, not merely medical
ethics. It contended that sociological and political factors need to be
considered alongside ethical arguments, arguing that health care law is an
area in which analysis of the institutional context and governance
structures is as important as substantive bioethical questions. This work
was described by the Journal of Medical Ethics as `some of the most
important and interesting legal analysis of medical law as a discipline'.
The notion that closer attention should be paid to how ethical issues are
regulated by legal and other softer normative structures underpinned
subsequent research led by Montgomery, Jones and Hazel Biggs, appointed at
Southampton in 2009. Montgomery continued to develop his ideas around
governance, including of ethical debates over assisted suicide and organ
donation, publishing 7 book chapters and 8 journal papers between 2002 and
2013. His Reflections on the nature of public ethics, published in 2013
[3.2], reflected on his own experience as a member of the Organ Donation
Taskforce, after it chose not to propose a `presumed consent' model for
organ donation, as well as other bodies and committees governing bioethics
in the UK. He identified four areas for future consideration in the
exploration of public ethics, including the need to take into account
contemporary policy debates and to assess how positions will be
represented in the media.
Adopting a similar approach, Jones' research in 2005 centred on donor
insemination and its implications for family law. A study of British
lesbian families using licensed donor insemination explored the
construction of implied bio-genetic links between donor-conceived children
and co-mothers, and to co-mother's extended families. In her 2007 book she
concluded that donor insemination requires developments in family law and
new definitions of parenthood [3.3]. The research [3.4] widened to an
analysis of the routes by which parliamentary bodies move from
consultation to formulating public policy on the issue of assisted
conception, revealing how the connection between consultation and policy
is less objective than is often claimed. It also teased out the
complexities and ambiguities of the legal provisions that resulted [3.5].
Biggs' 2009 research [3.6] explored the relationship between law and
ethics in the context of medical research in order to provide a practical
guide for members of research ethics committees, which review around 6,000
research applications each year for the Health Research Authority. Later
research [3.7] studied the implications of new guidelines published by the
Director of Public Prosecutions for cases of encouraging or assisting
suicide and suggested that a permissive change in the law would provide
better safeguards for those who seek assisted dying. Montgomery also
examined the implications of this development for constitutional theory
[3.8]
References to the research
[3.2] Montgomery, Jonathan (2013) `The Nature of Public Health Ethics'
22(1) Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9-21.
[3.5] Jones, Caroline (2011) The (im)possible parents in law. In, Lind,
Craig, Keating, Heather and Bridgeman, Jo (eds.) Taking Responsibility:
Law and the Changing Family. Aldershot, GB, Ashgate, 201-220.
[3.6] Biggs, Hazel (2009) Healthcare
research ethics and law: regulation, review and responsibility,
Abingdon, UK, New York, US, Canada, CA, Routledge-Cavendish, 206pp.
Details of the impact
The HEAL network at Southampton has over 70 members, comprising one third
healthcare and law practitioners. Using research expertise developed by
Montgomery, Jones and Biggs, HEAL has made a substantive impact on
policymaking and professional guidance in the UK.
HEAL's responses to public consultations are often quoted. The Department
of Health highlighted HEAL's conclusion that a relevant governance
structure for prescribing was already in place in Summary of Public
Consultation on Proposals to Introduce Independent Prescribing by
Physiotherapists [5.1]. The equivalent report for podiatrists cited HEAL's
view that proposals provided "good opportunities to ensure and enhance
responsiveness to patient need" [5.2]. Liberating the NHS (2010 para 4.79)
[5.3], quoted HEAL to support its policy that "consortia should have a key
role in helping improve quality of GP services". The Nuffield Council on
Bioethics cited HEAL's response in Human Bodies (2010 p.88) [5.4], noting
"the demand for female egg donation is potentially limitless". Jones was a
lead reviewer for the legal aspects of the NCoB's report Novel Techniques
for the Prevention of Mitochondrial DNA Disorders (2012) [5.5].
Montgomery's research on bioethics governance (2002 ch 21; 2013) has
informed the strategic plans of three key bodies that he has chaired,
appointed in open national competition: the Human Genetics Commission
(2009-12), Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2012-) and Health Research
Authority (2012-) [5.6]. His work with the latter was commended by Lord
Turnberg in the second reading of the Care Bill 2013 [5.7]. Montgomery has
shared best practice with organisations overseas. Representing the NCoB,
he spoke about the UK's approach to public ethics at a WHO meeting in
Tunisia and to the Italian National Bioethics Commission [5.8].
HEAL hosted Robert Francis QC, within a month of his report on NHS
failures in Mid-Staffordshire being published (in conjunction with law
firm Hickman Rose and the Centre for Law, Ethics And Globalisation). This
brought Southampton researchers and students together with senior NHS
regional leaders to discuss the issues with Francis, and was used by
Montgomery to provide a confidential briefing on what had been learned to
senior civil servants and legal advisors supporting the formulation of the
Government's response [5.9].
Montgomery's research on NHS law (2002 chs 3-5) and board-level
experience in NHS organisations led to invitations to discuss legislative
reform; including a keynote presentation to 250 opinion formers at Age
Concern Hampshire's AGM, regular briefings to the Hampshire Senate on how
changes would impact locally and participation in a "health leaders'
roundtable", organised by Beachcroft Solicitors and Health Investor
Magazine [5.10].
Southampton's research has informed professional guidelines. Biggs drew
on her research to work with the General Medical Council on its Treatment
and care towards the end of life (2010) [5.11], the most significant UK
guidance on this area. Montgomery drafted the legal sections of the
revised British Society for Human Genetics guidance Genetic Testing of
Children (2010) [5.12] based upon his research into parents' and
children's rights. This guidance is accepted as good practice and was the
basis for the court's decision in X CC v Y & Z [2013] EWHC 953 (Fam)
[5.13].
Biggs and Montgomery have researched when `broad consent' might be
legally effective. This led to Montgomery (with Professor Lucassen, HEAL
member from Medicine) presenting proposals to the HGC in 2010, the
Government's Human Genomics Strategy Group in 2011 [5.14], drafting
chapter 8 (Developing the legal and ethical framework) of the latter's
report, Building on our inheritance: genomic technology in healthcare
[5.15] (2012) and participating in the group advising the Chief Medical
Officer on ethical and legal issues of the 100,000 genome project
(announced by the Prime Minister in December 2012) [5.16]. Biggs is Ethics
Advisor to the Wales Cancer Bank Advisory Board [5.17].
Part of HEAL's impact strategy is to promote rigorous and informed public
debate. The HEAL blog and Twitter feed [5.18] cover current issues,
drawing on the members' research. Its 130-plus followers include the Daily
Telegraph medical editor and sixth form students at a Leicestershire
academy. The blog is designed to attract media enquiries. During the REF
period, HEAL members have given interviews to Radio 4's Today programme,
Radio Five Live, Sky and BBC News, as well as local television and radio.
The front page of the Times on November 24, 2009 [5.19] quoted Montgomery
discussing the HGC's report on the forensic DNA database (also covered in
the Guardian). The Daily Mail quoted from Biggs' Today Programme interview
on 12 July 2013 [5.20] In March 2012, Biggs took part in a public debate
on euthanasia at the Brighton Dome, with an audience of over 120 [5.21],
and Montgomery gave a public lecture at Portsmouth Cathedral on how faith
groups could respond to the changing architecture of governance in
bioethics [5.22].
Sources to corroborate the impact
5.1 Department of Health consultation (2012, p.36), Summary of Public
Consultation on Proposals to Introduce Independent Prescribing by
Physiotherapists
http://www.dh.gov.uk/health/files/2012/07/Physiotherapist-Consultation-Summary.pdf
5.2 Department of Health (2011. P. 15), Summary of Public
Consultation on Proposals to Introduce Independent Prescribing by
Podiatrists http://www.dh.gov.uk/health/files/2012/07/Podiatrist-Consultation-Summary.pdf
5.3 Department of Health white paper (2010), Equity and Excellence:
Liberating the NHS
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/liberating-the-nhs-white-paper
5.4 Nuffield Council on Bioethics report (2011), Human Bodies:
donation for medicine and research http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/donation
5.5 Nuffield Council on Bioethics report (2012), Novel techniques for
the prevention of mitochondrial DNA disorders: an ethical review http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/mitochondrial-dna-disorders
5.6 Department of Health, press release (12 June 2012) http://www.dh.gov.uk/health/2012/06/hra-chair/
5.7 Lord Turnberg — Hansard HL, 21 May 2013 : Column 817 —
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201314/ldhansrd/text/130521-0002.htm
5.8 http://www.palazzochigi.it/bioetica/eng/Conference2012.html
5.9 The NHS in crisis? Legal aspects of the Mid-Staffs inquiry into
needless deaths —
summary and webcast of Robert Francis QC in conversation with Professor
Jonathan Montgomery http://www.southampton.ac.uk/law/news/2013/04/07_the_nhs_in_crisis.page
5.10 Health Investor Round Table (March 2011), All change:
Understanding the rules in the new health landscape
5.11 General Medical Council (2010) The development of treatment and
care towards the end of life: good practice in decision making http://www.gmc-uk.org/Story_of_the_EoL_guidance2.pdf_32510823.pdf
5.12 British Society for Human Genetics (2010), Report on the Genetic
Testing of Children
http://www.bsgm.org.uk/media/678741/gtoc_booklet_final_new.pdf
5.13 X CC v Y & Z [2013] EWHC 953 (Fam).
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2013/953.html
5.14 Minutes of Human Genomics Strategy Group (HGSG) (Fourth) meeting
Wednesday 13th June 2011 para 5.9ff
5.15 Human Genomics Strategy Group, Building on our inheritance:
genomic technology in healthcare (2012) chapter 8 (Developing the
legal and ethical framework)
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/genomic-technology-in-healthcare-building-on-our-inheritance
5.16 Downing Street Press Release December (2012) DNA tests to
revolutionise fight against cancer and help 100,000 NHS patients https://www.gov.uk/government/news/dna-tests-to-revolutionise-fight-against-cancer-and-help-100000-nhs-patients
5.17 Wales Cancer Bank Advisory Board http://www.walescancerbank.com/organisation.html
5.18 HEAL blog http://healuos.wordpress.com/
and Twitter feed https://twitter.com/HEALUoS
5.19. The Times (London) 24 November 2009, page 1: "Arrests are being
made `to expand DNA files'"
5.20 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2359972/Organ-donors-jump-transplant-waiting-list-NHS-plans-boost-donations.html.
5.21 Sussex Salon Series programme.
5.22 Public lecture "Whose ethics are bioethics" by Jonathan Montgomery,
given at Portsmouth Cathedral (2012) http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/339932/.