The Rotterdam Rules: modernising the global container trade
Submitting Institution
University of SouthamptonUnit of Assessment
LawSummary Impact Type
PoliticalResearch Subject Area(s)
Economics: Applied Economics
Law and Legal Studies: Law
Summary of the impact
The University of Southampton's Institute of Maritime Law (IML) has
played a significant role in the
development of a new international convention which, if it comes into
force, may govern the $18
trillion global containerized trade. Southampton researchers contributed
substantially to the debate
underpinning the new global liability regime devised to replace a system
which has struggled to
keep up with the pace of technological change. The new international legal
regime — the so-called
Rotterdam Rules — has dramatically altered the scope of regulatory
intervention in the sector and
affected the rights and liabilities of shippers, carriers, receivers and
insurers across maritime and
multimodal transport worldwide. A global provider of CPD training, the IML
continues to play an
important part in explaining the new Rules to industry players and
advising on how best to cope
with the impact of future change.
Underpinning research
The last two decades have witnessed explosive growth in the global
container trade. Since the
containers are designed for multi-modal carriage, that is they can be
transhipped from one means
of transport to another (ships, trucks, trains) without unpacking their
contents, they have had a
huge impact in reducing carriage costs of goods while increasing speed,
volume and efficiency. In
2012 the World Trade Organisation estimated that more than 90 per cent of
global trade, worth
some $18 trillion, was carried in containers, almost all using more than
one mode of transport.
However, international regulation has failed to keep up with the pace of
change and, since the
1970s, the lack of a global or even regional regime setting out the duties
and liabilities of multi-
modal transport operators has been identified as an obstacle to world
trade both by the United
Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) and by the European
Union.
The European Commission asked the IML to undertake research in 1998-99
and 2005-06. The
work was funded by consultancy contracts between the IML and the
Commission. The researchers
examined some of the fundamental assumptions made in the past by
reformers, notably whether a
uniform liability system was preferable to the traditional network
approach adopted by the most
common standard form contracts in use. A critical aim was to reconcile the
positions of carriers and
shippers/receivers, that is those providing transport services and those
paying for such services,
with all the complications arising from issues such as liability for items
lost or damaged, and the
related insurance issues. It was felt by some that technological
advancement required a revision of
the existing international regulatory framework, the so-called Hague and
Hague-Visby Rules,
dating back to 1924. One key driver of change was the impact of electronic
commerce; how could
bills of lading and other transport documents be translated into
instruments of trade suitable for the
age of the internet?
Dr Regina Asariotis, who left the IML in 2002, was the principal
investigator for the 1998-99
research (3.1, 3.4, 3.5) and led the consultations it involved with
industry players. Together with
Mikis Tsimplis, Professor of Law and Ocean Sciences, her work focused on
American resistance to
international uniformity. Their conclusions were critical of the US draft
statute, the Carriage of
Goods by Sea Act (COGSA) 1999, which set out to define unilaterally the
balance of rights and
responsibilities between shippers of cargo and ship-owners involved in
transport to and from the
US. Filippo Lorenzon, who joined the IML in 2002 and is its current
director, led the 2005-06
research (3.2, 3.3, 3.6), which also included industry consultations and
international academic
exchanges. Other researchers were Yvonne Baatz, Professor of Maritime Law,
who joined
Southampton in 1991, Charles Debattista, who joined in 1982 and was
Professor of Commercial
Law until 2011, Professor Hilton Staniland, who joined in 2008, Dr Andrew
Serdy, a Reader in law
who joined in 2005, and John Dunt, a Senior Visiting Research fellow who
joined in 2008.
Published in 2009, The Rotterdam Rules: a practical annotation,
is the fruit of cooperative research
within the IML, and has lead to a number of subsequent articles on the
topic. The work is
frequently cited in academic research and the criticisms made in these
publications are implicitly
addressed in policy papers worldwide.
References to the research
3.1 Asariotis R., Tsimplis, M.N., The proposed US Carriage of Goods by
Sea Act [1999] LMCLQ
126-164; a response to which was published as Sturley, M., Proposed
amendments to the US
Carriage of Goods by Sea Act: a response to English criticisms [1999]
LMCLQ 519-529; this led to
a further reply: Asariotis R., Tsimplis, M.N., Proposed amendments to the
US Carriage of Goods
by Sea Act: a reply to Professor Sturley's response [1999] Lloyd's
Maritime and Commercial Law
Quarterly 530-535
3.2 Asariotis, R., UNCITRAL (draft) convention on contracts for the
international carriage of goods
wholly or partly by sea: mandatory rules and freedom of contract. In
Competition and regulation in
shipping and shipping related industries. Antapassis, A., L.I. Athanassiou
and E. Røsaeg, eds.
Leiden, The Netherlands, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009. p. 347-365
[peer reviewed on
publication];
3.3 Baatz, Y., Jurisdiction and arbitration under the Rotterdam Rules, in
The United Nations
Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or
Partly by Sea (the
Rotterdam Rules). Journal of international maritime law (Witney, U.K.)
2008, at 608-624 [peer
reviewed on publication];
3.4 Debattista, C., The CMI/UNCITRAL cargo liability regime: regulation
for the 21st century?
LMCLQ (London), 2002, 304;
3.5 Asariotis, R., Allocation of liability and burden of proof in the
Draft Instrument on Transport
Law. LMCLQ (London), 2002, at 382 [peer reviewed on publication];
3.6 Lorenzon, F. and others, Integrated services in the intermodal chain
(ISIC) (Brussels, 2006)
[Assessed by the Commission of the EU at application stage, intermediate
stage and publication
stage]; also IML, Integrated services in the multimodal chain (London,
2006). [Assessed by the
Commission of the EU at application stage, intermediate stage and
publication stage]. Available
on-line at
http://folk.uio.no/erikro/WWW/cog/Intermodal%20liability%20and%20documentation.pdf
Grant "Integrated services in the intermodal chain", funded by the EU
Commission (DG-TREN),
June-December 2005 (30,000 Euros).
Details of the impact
The IML's research has had a continuing impact on analysis and assessment
of the development
of a new international liability regime for maritime and multi-modal
transport operators. Formally
titled the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International
Carriage of Goods Wholly or
Partly by Sea, the Rotterdam Rules were approved by the UN General
Assembly on 11 December
2008, with a signing ceremony held in Rotterdam on 23 September 2009.
Despite initial fears that
the United States was preparing instead to act unilaterally, by updating
their own regulatory
regime, the US did take part in the drafting of the Rotterdam Rules and
signed them, as did eight
European nations involved in maritime transport. In all, signatures were
obtained from 25 countries
making up 25% of world trade volume. The Rules will come into force when
they are ratified by 20
countries. Seen by some as a vital step in modernising the system upon
which world trade
depends, the new Rules represent a possible international solution to the
many problems and
limitations of the existing regimes, which fail to address important
issues such as door-to-door
transport and electronic transport documents. The new Rules also
facilitate e-commerce, are more
detailed on shippers' obligations to make cargo ready for carriage, and
contain very specific
provisions on carriers' delivery obligations, while providing them with
the right to limit liability for all
breaches of their obligations under the Rules. At the same time, the Rules
support the principle of
freedom of contract between the parties and adopt a limited network
liability system which ensures,
to some degree, the absence of conflict with other unimodal carriage
compulsory regimes.
The new Rules were influenced by the IML's research for the EU
Commission, in particular the two
reports proposing a new uniform liability regime: Intermodal
Transportation and Carrier Liability
(1999), and Implementation of the Freight Integrator Action Plan (2006).
Numerous references to
these reports can be found in EU Commission working papers and policy
statements (5.1, 5.2, 5.3,
5.4). The possibility of the EU developing its own, separate regulatory
system was instrumental in
pushing other players to agree a new worldwide system, and references to
the IML's research can
also be found in policy documents of the United Nations Commission for
Trade and Development,
UNCTAD (5.5, 5.6, 5.7). The 2006 Action Plan, and the lengthy industry
consultation that followed,
steered the UN towards shifting the focus of the Rotterdam Rules from
maritime transport only to
what is now known as a "maritime plus" approach.
The IML has been involved in drafting key industry documents to help
inform and prepare legal
practitioners for the impact of the new Rules. The IML's John Dunt was a
member of the drafting
group which produced the 2009 Institute Cargo Clauses (ICC), the current
industry standard for
cargo insurance. Professor Charles Debattista chaired the Incoterms 2010
International Drafting
Group, drawing up internationally accepted definitions and interpretations
for most common
commercial terms involved in the delivery of goods from sellers to buyers.
These rules, published
by the International Chamber of Commerce, are widely used in commercial
transactions. Filippo
Lorenzon of the IML formulated the UK submissions to this Group.
Other examples of the IML's continued involvement in policy formulation
and implementation
include being asked in 2010 by the UK government to help draw up the
British Maritime Law
Association's position on the Rotterdam Rules, and provide expert advice
on their ratification for
the UK Department for Business, Innovation and Services. Filippo Lorenzon
has become Senior
Legal Advisor to the World Bank and has been asked to draft Egypt's law on
multi-modal transport.
His contribution to the World Bank has drawn praise from Periklis
Saragiotis (5.8), a Private Sector
Development Specialist for the Bank's Trade Logistics division, who said:
"Lorenzon's expertise in
multimodal transport law and his deep understanding of the connections
between the law and
practice of multimodal carriage and its socio-economic implications have
been crucial for the
success of our broader Trade Logistics project in Egypt and specifically
for its Multimodal
Component. In this context, Lorenzon's expertise will be essential for the
improvement of Egypt's
multimodal legislative and regulatory framework and its alignment to
regional and international best
practices."
The IML runs regular Continuing Professional Development courses on the
legal impact of the
Rotterdam Rules, and held two workshops in London in 2009 on the practical
implications for
transport and insurance practitioners. Professor Yvonne Baatz helped the
British Maritime Law
Association organise a similar workshop designed to raise awareness among
the legal profession.
The President of the British Maritime Law Association, Mr Andrew Taylor,
thanking the speakers,
including Professor Baatz, for their work on the seminar said: "I judge it
to have been a very
successful event. It was well attended indeed. More importantly your
contributions were of the
highest quality. This is what I wanted the BMLA to put on: a high level
analysis. In turn it generated
a stimulating debate with the audience." The IML has also published the
first complete commentary
on the new Rules (5.9), a work which has been extensively cited by legal
experts leading the
international debate on the subject. For example, key industry handbooks
such as Carver on bills
of lading by Guenter Treitel and F. M. B. Reynolds (3rd edition),
London 2012, and The Rotterdam
Rules: The U.N. Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage
of Goods Wholly or Partly
by Sea, by Michael Sturley, Tomotaka Fujita and Gertjan van der
Ziel, London 2010, contain
numerous references to the research work of the IML.
Sources to corroborate the impact
5.1 Commission of the EC, Communication from the Commission to the
Council, the European
Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee
of the Regions on
Freight Transport Logistics in Europe — the key to sustainable mobility,
COM (2006) 336 final, at 9;
5.2 Commission of the EC, Staff Working Document accompanying the
Communication from the
Commission: Freight Transport Logistics Action Plan COM(2007) 607 final,
SEC(2007) 1320;
5.3 Commission of the EC, Staff Working Document accompanying the
Proposal for a directive of
the European Parliament and the Council on reporting formalities for ships
arriving in or departing
from ports of the Member States of the Community and repealing directive
2002/6/EC: Report on
impact assessment of different options to simplify/reduce/eliminate
administrative procedures for
Short Sea Shipping and implementing a European Maritime Transport Space
without Barriers,
SEC(2009) 46;
5.4 Commission of the EC, Staff Working Document: Impact Assessment
Communication from the
Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic
and Social
Committee and the Committee of the Regions Mid-Term Review of the
Programme for the
Promotion of Short Sea Shipping (COM(2003) 155 final), COM(2006) 380
final.
5.5 UNCTAD, Implementation of multimodal transport rules,
UNCTAD/SDTE/TLB/2, (2001) at 8;
5.6 UNCTAD, Multimodal transport: the feasibility of an international
legal instrument,
UNCTAD/SDTE/TLB/2003/1, (2003) at 31;
5.7 UNCTAD, Review of maritime transport 2003, UNCTAD/RMT/2003, (2003) at
119;
5.8 Corroborating statement: Periklis Saragiotis, Private Sector
Development (PSD) Specialist,
Trade Logistics, International Trade and Investment, Investment Climate,
World Bank | MIGA
5.9 IML, The Rotterdam Rules: a practical annotation (London, 2009);
Lorenzon, F., The
Rotterdam Rules' transport document: still a good key to the gold's
chest?, paper delivered at
Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, 2009;
5.10 Lorenzon, F., Transport documents through the bankers' sieve:
Rotterdam Rules v UCP 600,
Paper at the 3rd Arab Conference for Commercial and Maritime Law,
Alexandria, Egypt, 2009.