Enhancing taxi transport policy and practice in the UK and internationally
Submitting Institution
Edinburgh Napier UniversityUnit of Assessment
Civil and Construction EngineeringSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Economics: Applied Economics
Summary of the impact
The Transport Research Institute at Edinburgh Napier University (TRI)
recognises the importance of taxi research, developing a series of models
since 2002. Parallel pressures within the regulation of the mode, and
disruptive forms of access, necessitate measurable and repeatable
analysis. Beneficiaries include the travelling public, as regulations are
developed and applied, regulators, informing policy direction; operators
and drivers as the market for services changes.
TRI models provide detailed analysis of the market. The market-model,
with its economic, cost and operational sub-models, has developed to
support live issues, and is applied in the UK, EU and North America.
Underpinning research
Taxis as a mode of transport fall between mass transit on the one hand
and private car use on the other and have received comparatively little
attention from transport researchers. Taxi fleets make a significant
contribution to the regional economy with taxis representing the largest
single-use vehicle in many cities. A changing market for taxis, resulting
from modal split evolution, and the emergence of mobile phone `apps' for
accessing taxis, points to the need for fit-for-purpose regulatory
structures and research into these in order to reflect and catch up with
these marketplace changes. Creating a robust research base is a first step
to underpinning policy development, as has already happened for other
transport modes.
TRI has undertaken taxi research, led by Cooper, since 2002. Recognising
the lack of a rigorous basis for analysis, initial work focused on
regulation in medium-sized UK cities and presented a new approach to taxi
modeling, which was subsequently extended to many North American and other
developed world cities. Existing taxi models both as applied to quantity
regulation and cost modeling approaches have provided an effective method
of determining supply and tariff in isolation. This does not however
account for the presence of links between the individual modeling
elements. The identification and consideration of impacts in other
regulatory domains on the operation of the cost model is significant, as
it permits calculation of effects of external impacts with a direct impact
on operational cost. The development of taxi models, as with the wider use
of models in transportation, can be significant in determining the most
appropriate forms of supply and in informing policies applied to the mode.
In collaboration with the International Association of Transport
Regulators, the Transportation Research Board, the Taxi, Limousine and
Paratransit Association and the International Road Union and others, new
applications have been developed to overcome: 1) incomplete or
unverifiable data, not accounting for new sources; and 2) concentration on
single issues in isolation created misleading analysis. Research has
focused on the enhancement of this base, its refinement reflecting
socio-economic and spatial features of cities, and increased availability
of data and processing power. Examples of model application include:
- Glasgow (from 2003): use of cross-market indicators in demand analysis
allowing localised demand testing.
- UK Department for Transport (2005): temporal differences in market
responses, use of taxis in the night-time economy, with spatial,
temporal and full market analysis subsequently applied to Atlanta,
Nashville, Boston.
- Aberdeen (2011): geographical Information System interface developed
to include physical taxi stand locations, also applied in Perth,
Belfast, Dublin (and 7 Irish cities/towns).
- Seattle (2013): `app' development with the model enhanced to include
rideshare and new modes.
- Boston (2013), San Diego (2013), Chicago (2013): cost model
developments to reflect specific issues arising from disputes over
driver income, and a common fare policy.
References to the research
• Cooper, J., R. Mundy and J. Nelson (2010) Taxi! Urban Economies and the
Social and Transport Impacts of the Taxicab. Ashgate Publishing. [REF1/2
Cooper output #2]
• Cooper J (2005) Policy and planning for city centre evening nighttime
and weekend economies, entertainment and transport needs, DfT London
• Cooper, J. and R. Darbera (2012) The APPeal of technologies:
opportunities and threats. Presentation to the International Road Union
Meeting, Cologne, Germany
• Cooper, J., and Yuchen Erin YAN (2012) Can Taxi Models actually benefit
the measurement and delivery of taxi services? A comparison, development
and proposal for integrated rate and license modelling. Presentation to
International Association of Transportation Regulators, Washington DC
• Cooper, J., S. Farrell, and P. Simpson (2010) Identifying demand and
optimal location for Taxi Ranks in a liberalised market. Presentation to
the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC
• Cooper, J. M., Claywell, R., McCleery, A., Carreno, M., and McKay, S.
(2004) Taxicab, specialized mode or the key to integrated transit? In
Traffic and Transportation Studies (4) pp28-35 The Science Press
Key research contracts
• Metropolitan Transport System (2013) San Diego, Economic Impact
analysis, taxi fare reform. Contract value $100,000. August 2013 - March
2014. Taxi Research Partners, TRI & Nelson Nygaard
• City of Chicago, Economic impact analysis, taxi fare review. Contract
value $60,000. February 2013 - November 2013, Taxi Research Partners, TRI
& Nelson Nygaard
• City of Boston, Taxi Market Reform Review. Contract value $90,000.
March 2013 - October 2013, Taxi Research Partners, TRI & Nelson
Nygaard
• City of Seattle, WA (2013) Taxi market analysis review. Contract Value
US$95,000, January 2013 - September 2013. Taxi Research Partners, TRI
& TTLF
• City of Toronto (2013) Taxi Supply Analysis, Market Model Application,
contract value: $65,000. November 2012 - October 2013. Taxi Research
Partners, TRP Ontario and TRI
• City of Atlanta (2012) Econometric Modelling and market model
application, contract value $250,000. Nelson Nygaard associates and TRI
• Metro Nashville (2011) Taxi modelling review, contract value $180,000.
Nelson Nygaard associates and TRI
• Department of the Environment Northern Ireland (2011) Review of taxi
fares & taxi fare structure, contract value £60,000. PA Consulting and
TRI
• Department of the Environment Northern Ireland (2011) Review of taxi
ranks and the introduction of rank exclusion zones, contract value
£35,000. TRI
• National Transport Authority Republic of Ireland (2009 - 2013) Research
Framework, taxi rank market analysis, contract value EUR450,000. Waterman
Boreham and TRI
Details of the impact
Taxi models enhance the quality of information to guide regulatory policy
decision-making. Direct impacts include service enhancement,
infrastructure improvement and economic control, examples of which are
described below.
Impact may be controversial when a regulator intervenes in a market to
restrain numbers of licenses issued. The development of the market model
provides a more thorough test of the impacts than had been in place
previously, creating a stronger justification for policy decisions. The
TRI model is widely applied in the UK, such as Glasgow, Perth, Aberdeen,
West Dunbartonshire and Stirling, and internationally, particularly in the
USA and Canada. The Toronto model was developed with a specific view to
identify impacts of introducing accessible vehicles to the taxi fleet, a
relatively rare occurrence in North America. The Toronto model developed
an enhanced cost model to identify driver cost impacts, and demand model
reflecting changes in the market. The City's Taxicab Industry Review made
use of the model outputs to support a reform of the licensing law to
include accessibility, set out on the city's website. As a result
disability access compliant vehicles are available within the standard
`on-demand' taxi fleet, enhancing quality of life for mobility-impaired
clients. The model identified impacts of growth scenarios and led to the
City committing in 2013 to double the number of accessible vehicles in
time for the Para-Pan-American games being held in 2015. Furthermore a
long-term requirement for full accessibility was identified by the TRI
model based on predicted annual costs to the trade and benefits to the
public.
The Seattle study was commissioned following the launch of mobile phone
apps providing access to taxi market services. The city and its hinterland
had been concerned with the declining levels of taxi services, which was
confirmed by TRI investigation research. Outcomes of the work included
defining a new market equilibrium to increase the taxi service levels to
meet changing urban and rural demand. The integration, within the TRI taxi
model, of quantity, quality and economic analysis also allowed for
enhanced service levels using a combination of measures. The initial
outcomes of Seattle indicated a need to combine quantity and quality
controls.
By contrast with Seattle, a focus on economic controls and combinations
of economic and quantity regulations were required by Boston, Chicago, and
San Diego. The San Diego project is ongoing and is expected to provide a
standardized fare allowing reduction in the number of excess fares being
charged, a practice known locally as fare gouging. The Boston analysis
focused on the measurement of driver income, a contentious issue in the
city, with a number of claims being put forward in the Boston Globe
newspaper suggesting that drivers were receiving third world
wages. The TRI research identified a measure of driver income
and economic rent charged in the industry, contributing to the Boston
Police Department's review of market controls. Other similar benefits
arise in the application of the model in Chicago, identifying actual
driver income as an element in determining fare policy, and are repeated
in San Diego. Finally, meter rate structures that encourage use, and are
achieved without resulting in excess costs, impacts beneficially on the
taxi-using public.
Stand location models developed for Northern Ireland, the Republic of
Ireland, Aberdeen and Perth allow the location of taxi-stands to be
determined by actual demand, rather than historic decisions. On-the-ground
issues included the location of stands that are difficult of access,
physically inappropriate to wheelchair users, or not served by the trade.
While incorporation of information about stand location contributes
directly to the wider demand model it is also appropriate in fine- tuning
infrastructure. The stand location model, which particularly benefits
wheelchair users, has been applied in Glasgow, in relation to traffic
signal timings at the Central Station taxi stand, across the cities of
Belfast and other Irish cities, Aberdeen and Perth, and is in development
for San Diego. The model benefits wheelchair users, and the wider public.
Sources to corroborate the impact
[5.1] Market model application city reviews:
http://www1.toronto.ca/wps/portal/contentonly?vgnext
oid=2a277729050f0410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD
[5.2] Framework for change report citing TRI model: http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ls/b
grd/backgroundfile-59689.pdf
[5.3] Evidence to City Council: http://www.seattlechannel.org/videos/watchVideos.asp?program=T
axi
[5.4] Application of model outputs to taxi rank development:
http://committees.aberdeencity.gov.uk/documents/s28367/Final%20Report%20Taxi%20Demand%20Survey%20-%20Rank%20Specific%20Recommendations.pdf
[5.5] Aberdeen city council summary: http://committees.aberdeencity.gov.uk/mgConvert2PDF.aspx?ID=17071
and http://committees.aberdeencity.gov.uk/mgConvert2PDF.aspx?ID=19762
[5.6] Cooper, City of Boston Taxi Study (Contact: Principal,
Nelson Nygaard Consulting Associates)
[5.7] Cooper, City of Seattle (Contact: Principal, Tennessee
Transportation and Logistics Foundation)
[5.8] Cooper, City of Toronto (Contact: Project Manager Taxi
Review, City of Toronto, Municipal Licensing & Standards)
[5.9] Cooper, City of Aberdeen (Contact: Legal Manager, City of
Aberdeen, Legal and Democratic Services, Corporate Governance, Aberdeen
City Council)