Coach development and education
Submitting Institution
University of Abertay DundeeUnit of Assessment
Sport and Exercise Sciences, Leisure and TourismSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services: Business and Management
Psychology and Cognitive Sciences: Psychology
Summary of the impact
This case study examines the impact of a series of research articles on
coach-athlete interactions. This research has been used in the development
of training courses/educational materials, for example the FUNdamentals
courses ran by the Mountaineering Council of Scotland, and for bespoke
training sessions such as the Scottish Institute of Sport's Coaching
Matters series. Additionally, it has been disseminated to larger coaching
groups as lay summaries/guidelines published in sport specific magazines
such as Athletics Weekly and Cycle Coach. The case is made that this
research has been widely disseminated and has had discernible impact on
sports coaching practices.
Underpinning research
Sport coaching in the UK is becoming increasingly professionalised. This
has been driven by recent policy documents including the `UK Coaching
Framework' (SportsCoachUK, 2007) and `Coaching Scotland 2011-2015: A
framework for sports coaching in Scotland' (sportScotland, 2011).
These documents have called for an increased emphasis on
professionalisation and a need for research investigating factors related
to coach education and effective coaching behaviours. The research
findings underpinning the impact discussed in this case study are part of
a body of work carried out by Lorimer, a Lecturer at Abertay University.
This body of work examined the empathic accuracy of coaches and athletes,
a key factor in social intelligence that influences the effectiveness of
coach-athlete interactions. This in turn promotes more effective training,
increased performance, and coach/athlete personal satisfaction.
This research developed an innovative video-based methodology for
assessing empathic accuracy in coach-athlete interaction as near to `in
situ' as possible, in contrast to the limited questionnaire designs
previously used. This video-based approach has also been shown to be
useful for promoting reflective practice in coaches, an essential skill,
and part of the assessment requirements of obtaining the higher levels of
the UK Coaching Certificate.
Key findings include a general lack of accurate understanding of
moment-to-moment thoughts and feelings, between coaches and athletes of
all levels and across all the sports examined. This is important in
relation to two approaches to coaching that have seen increased emphasis
in the research literature/coaching materials over the past 5-years. These
are `athlete-centred coaching' and the `personal side of coaching'. Each
of these approaches focus on the importance of coaches being trained to
understand the individual needs of athletes in order to promote self-ownership, self-regulation, and self-actualisation.
This body of research has highlighted a series of potential factors that
influence the level of understanding displayed by coaches and athletes.
Some factors, such as sport-type, cannot be altered but are flagged to
inform coaches, coach educators, and sport psychologists. Other factors,
such as relationship duration and group size, can be influenced and this
information can play an important role coach planning a potentially
important role in policy choices such as which model of athlete and coach
progression (e.g. dual development or coaching pathways) to use in the
management of a sport and in individual performance enhancement.
As well as having a theoretical (e.g. inclusion of interpersonal
perception in models of the coach-athlete relationship) and
methodological impact (e.g., the ability to measure moment-to-moment
cognitive processes in sports coaching), this research has also been
published as applied guidelines for coach-athlete interaction. These
guidelines focus on increased emphasis on the athlete, improved
interpersonal interaction, and intrapersonal awareness. This has wider
ramifications for coach education and coach development particular in
regards to emphasising a need to change coach education from a focus on
content/declarative knowledge of a sport to procedural/conditional
knowledge of coaching (i.e. how to coach rather than what to coach).
References to the research
i. Lorimer, R. (2012). The development of empathic accuracy in
sports coaches. Journal of Sports Psychology in Action, 4, 1-8,
DOI:10.1080/21520704.2012.706696.
ii. Lorimer, R., & Jowett, S. (2011). Empathic accuracy,
shared cognitive focus, and the assumptions of similarity made by coaches
and athletes. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 42, 40-54
(listed REF2).
iii. Lorimer, R., & Jowett, S. (2010). The influence of role
and gender in the empathic accuracy of coaches and athletes. Psychology
of Sport and Exercise, 11, 206-211,
doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.12.001.
iv. Lorimer, R., & Jowett, S. (2010). Feedback of information
in the empathic accuracy of sport coaches. Psychology of Sport and
Exercise, 11, 12-17 (listed REF2).
v. Lorimer, R., & Jowett, S. (2009). Empathic accuracy,
meta-perspective, and satisfaction in the coach-athlete relationship. Journal
of Applied Sport Psychology, 21, 201-212 (listed REF2).
vi. Lorimer, R., & Jowett, S. (2009). Empathic accuracy in
coach-athlete dyads who participate in team and individual sports. Psychology
of Sport and Exercise, 10, 152-158 (listed REF2).
Details of the impact
As well as being recognised and cited within academic literature this
research has also had a verifiable real world impact. It has influenced
coach development at several levels ranging from being provided as
information/professional guidance to directly impacting on the design of
coach education courses such as those delivered by the Mountaineering
Council of Scotland.
The research carried out in the period since 2009 began to have a
measurable impact throughout 2011 when the findings/applied
recommendations were first made available outside of academic sources via
a series of invited lay articles published in the magazines Athletics
Weekly (1, readership of 14,000+), Climb Magazine (2, readership of
50,000+), and Cycle Coach (3, readership of 1000+), reaching a readership
of coaches, athletes and interested parties. These articles stated the
case for a more individualised approach to coaching and provided practical
guidelines for implanting this approach and improving relationships
between athletes and coaches.
These articles attracted a volume of feedback (mostly via email) from the
readership, in the form of comments and observations. Comments came from a
range of individuals including athletes and individual coaches, but also
from those involved at a higher level and in coach education. An example
of this was the Director of the Burton Track and Field Academy (4), a UK
Athletics Coach Tutor, who is now incorporating the findings of this
research into his own coaching style and in the way he approaches the
education of other UK Athletics coaches. This research has influenced the
Director to begin his own series of research investigating coach-athlete
communication, with consultation from the first author of this body of
research, and the Director has also written a related article for
Athletics Weekly in 2012. The Director stated, "I've been using your work
at the academy... my article was published in AW two weeks ago and you
were cited in it... I would be interested in taking this work to the next
level with you as part of a more formal joint bid for the Frank Horwill
scholarship administered by the BMC".
Dissemination through magazines and via coaches has raised awareness of
this research which in turn has led to more direct links with coach
educators. The findings from this research have been embedded into a core
coach education text published in 2013 (5) as well as professional
practice recommendations that are being used as essential guidance reading
on the California State Mandated Coaching Certification delivered by
California State University in 2012/2013 (6).
The Cycle Coach (3) article was made available to Scottish Cycling (7)
who distributed an electronic copy of the Cycle Coach (3) article to their
sport development team (3 x development/education officers, 5 x regional
development officers) and high performance team (6 x talent/discipline
head coaches). This led the first author of this body of research being
requested to present his findings, links to other research, and
practical/applied guidance to Scottish Cycling and Scottish Triathlon high
performance coaches as part of sportScotland's 2012 Coaching
Matters series of Workshops at the EICA in Edinburgh (7, attendance of
c.15). The expertise demonstrated in the findings of this research, in
relation to coach-athlete relationships, has also led to Scottish Cycling
wanting to participate in a research project, investigating coaches' role
in preventing doping behaviours and their educational needs for improving
their ability to carry out this role (7).
Copies of lay articles and supplementary notes have also been requested
in 2012 by the Mountaineering Council of Scotland (8) for their coach
education resources. This has attracted further feedback and interest from
two Scottish national coaches and also the winner of the British Youth
Climbing Series. Dissemination of the findings/applied recommendations of
this research also directly led to the main researcher (Lorimer) being
requested to consult with the Mountaineering Council of Scotland (8, 9)
throughout 2011 and 2012 in the development of their new range of
`FUNdamental' coach education courses, including consultation with the
British and Irish mountaineering councils. This then led to further
consultation in 2012 with the Scottish Interest Group of the Mountain
Training Association in the development of the content of their coaching
badges as part of the new Coaching Certification (9). Lorimer has now been
appointed Sport Science Officer of the Mountaineering Council of Scotland
(8) and Chairs their Coach Development Group responsible for the
development of all coaching/instructor training materials, which will
continue to be influenced by his ongoing research.
Sources to corroborate the impact
- Lorimer, R. (2011). On the same level. Athletics Weekly, August,
34-35
- Lorimer, R. (2011). Partners in power. Climb Magazine, 82,
64-67.
- Lorimer, R. (2011). Developing independent athletes in cycling: The
need for empathy. Journal of Cycle Coaching, 3, 8-11.
- Director of the Burton Track and Field Academy, UK Athletics Tutor
- Lorimer, R. & Jowett, S. (2013). Empathic understanding and
accuracy in the coach-athlete relationship. In P. Potrac, J. Denison,
& W. Gilbert (Eds.). The Routledge handbook of sports coaching.
London, UK: Routledge
- California State Mandated Coaching Certification delivered (via
Department of Kinesiology, California State University)
- Coach Education and Training Officer, Scottish Cycling
- Development Officer, Mountaineering Council of Scotland
- Mountaineering Council of Scotland (http://www.mcofs.org.uk/annualreport2010-11.asp)