Autonomy and the Assessment of Mental Capacity
Submitting Institution
University of EssexUnit of Assessment
PhilosophySummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Summary of the impact
In 2008 the Philosophy Department decided to organise its impact strategy
around the research activities of the Essex Autonomy Project (EAP). EAP
research has been conducted in two distinct strands with different
research outputs and impacts. This case study summarises the impact of our
interdisciplinary research on the legal/psychiatric concept of `mental
capacity.' Through the EAP practitioner network, Summer School, and
on-site workforce training programme, that research is now informing and
changing the assessment of capacity undertaken by frontline medical
professionals and social workers acting under the 2005 Mental Capacity
Act.
Underpinning research
Mental health law distinguishes between those possessed of `mental
capacity' and those who are lacking in such capacity. Adults who have the
capacity to decide for themselves (e.g. whether to accept or refuse
medical treatment) generally have a right to do so. But those who lack
capacity for a particular decision lose that right. This raises
theoretical, ethical and practical problems about the meaning of `mental
capacity': what is involved in `deciding for oneself'? and how should we
assess the ability of individuals to do so?
The Essex Autonomy Project (EAP) has made critical research contributions
in this area. EAP research on mental capacity and its assessment began
with collaborative work with the Institute of Psychiatry at the Maudsley,
part of the South London and Maudsley NHS Trust. Working with Dr Gareth
Owen (psychiatrist at the Maudsley), EAP researchers conducted a series of
qualitative studies of decision-making among psychiatric patients. This
collaboration led to a series of grants to develop the EAP. In 2010,
Martin and Freyenhagen were awarded a major AHRC grant to explore ethical,
legal, clinical and historical issues pertaining to the ideal of
self-determination in human affairs, with special attention to the
so-called `vocations of care' — health care, social care, eldercare,
childcare, etc. Also in 2010, Martin was appointed to assist on a Wellcome
Trust funded project, awarded to the Maudsley to use phenomenological
methods in clinical research into decision-making in three classes of
psychiatric patients.
In 2012, Martin was appointed to a second Wellcome Trust funded Maudsley
project, a longitudinal study of decision-making in patients with
fluctuating capacity. A third Wellcome Trust grant was awarded in 2012 to
Dr Penny Brown (Maudsley IoP and Broadmoor Hospital) to fund a
collaborative project with Martin that extends the EAP research paradigm
to criminal contexts involving Fitness to Plead. This research will run
from October 2013 to September 2017. To date the EAP has secured funding
of over £460,000.
This research has produced a series of theoretical insights into the
phenomenon of mental capacity and its assessment. These insights have in
turn informed the EAP's collaborations with, and training of, front-line
practitioners. Among those theoretical insights are:
- Distributed Capacity and Decision Communities: Although traditional
methods of capacity assessment tend to focus on individual cognitive
capacity, decision-making capacity in vulnerable populations is often
distributed across relationships [2].
- Temporal Capacity: The capacity to make decisions can be undermined by
forms of mental disorder that inhibit the patient's ability to project
themselves into significantly different futures. Although this temporal
capacity is not enumerated in the standard `four abilities' model for
mental capacity, it is a key variable in determining capacity, and a
factor to which assessors should be attentive [4].
- Second-Person Phenomenology: A strategic combination of
phenomenological, hermeneutic, and psychiatric strategies can be used to
systematically explore and articulate the experience of `others' — in
particular the experiences of mentally disordered patients in navigating
decision-situations [4].
- Transparency instead of Neutrality: Rather than risking uneven
practice and arbitrary value-imposition behind the smokescreen of
neutrality, the contested values at play in capacity assessments should
be made transparent and submitted to democratic oversight. Training
should become value-based and equip assessors to navigate the challenges
of value pluralism [3].
Essex Autonomy Project `Mental Capacity' researchers: Dr. Fabian
Freyenhagen (Lecturer in Philosophy from 2009, Reader from March 2012, EAP
Co-Director 2010 - present); Prof. Wayne Martin (Professor in Philosophy
from 2009, EAP Director 2010 - present); Vivienne Ashley (EAP
Post-Graduate Research Assistant 2010 - present).
References to the research
1. Freyenhagen, F. (2009) Personal Autonomy and Mental Capacity, Psychiatry,
8(12), 465-467 [invited contribution]. DOI: 10.1016/j.mppsy.2009.09.005
2. Martin, W., and R. Hickerson (2013) Mental Capacity and the Applied
Phenomenology of Judgement, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences,
195-214 [peer-reviewed journal article]. DOI: 10.1007/s11097-011-9242-y
3. Freyenhagen, F. and T. O'Shea (2013) Hidden Substance: Mental Disorder
as a Challenge to Normatively Neutral Accounts of Autonomy, International
Journal of Law in Context, 9(1), 53-70 [peer-reviewed journal
article]. DOI: 10.1017/S1744552312000481
4. Owen, G., F. Freyenhagen, M. Hotopf, and W. Martin (2013) Temporal
Inabilities and Decision- Making Capacity in Depression, Phenomenology
and Cognitive Science [peer-reviewed journal article]. DOI:
10.1007/s11097-013-9327-x
Research Funding
Wayne Martin (PI) and Fabian Freyenhagen (Co-I); Deciding for
Oneself: Autonomous Judgement in History, Theory and Practice; Arts
and Humanities Research Council; April, 2010 - March, 2013; £392,930.
Wayne Martin (Consultant) with Gareth Owen (Lead Investigator), A
Phenomenological Study of Decision Making in Three Classes of
Psychiatric Patient; The Wellcome Trust; October, 2009 - September,
2012; £239,139 (Essex Portion: £24,962).
Wayne Martin (Consultant) with Gareth Owen (Lead Investigator); Time
and Decision-Making; The Wellcome Trust, December, 2012 - December,
2017; £709,163 (Essex Portion: £28,649).
Wayne Martin (Consultant) with Penny Brown (Lead Investigator); Fitness
to Plead: A Conceptual and Empirical Study; The Wellcome Trust;
October, 2013 - September, 2016; £428,437 (Essex Portion: £22,375).
Details of the impact
EAP research into mental capacity has had significant impact on the
conduct of capacity assessments in England and Wales. This has been
achieved by collaborating with NHS psychiatrists from the outset of the
project, building a network of partners who conduct capacity assessments,
and establishing a workforce training programme and Summer School,
supported by the EAP website and Virtual Learning Environment. This
training has been particularly effective at communicating the research
results concerning capacity assessments to police officers, social
workers, and health-care practitioners who conduct such assessments.
EAP's collaboration with practitioners began with a group of
psychiatrists in the NHS working on the implementation of the Mental
Capacity Act: Martin began research presentations at Maudsley
Hospital in 2007; both Martin and Freyenhagen were named Honorary
Researchers at the Maudsley in 2010; and from 2010 both Martin and
Freyenhagen have regularly participated in clinical interviews with
patients facing treatment decisions [corroborating source 1]. National
media coverage of EAP research (including the `Today' programme and
`Inside the Ethics Committee' on BBC Radio 4, `The World Today' on BBC
World Service, and The Guardian [corroborating source 2]) helped
the EAP further develop their network of practitioner contacts, bringing
their work to the attention of frontline professionals engaged in capacity
assessment. Examples include West Midlands Police trainers for the
assessment of mental capacity in police activities, and Brighton and Hove
Council trainers for social workers assessing the capacity of vulnerable
persons. Over the following months this range of contacts expanded
considerably to include Dr. John Adlam, who works with anorexia inpatients
at the Avalon Ward in London; John Leighton of Cambridgeshire County
Council, who was affiliated with the Social Care Institute of Excellence;
and solicitors and barristers at 39 Essex Street Chambers, who specialise
in mental health law.
Since 2010 this practitioner network has allowed the EAP to build a
training programme for professionals in psychiatry, social work, and
health care on issues pertaining to mental capacity. The training
programme communicates the main research findings to trainees for
practical application. This programme includes the Autonomy Summer School,
an annual three-day training course that equips frontline practitioners
with an understanding of the philosophical ideal of autonomy and provides
a forum for the discussion of the dilemmas surrounding its implementation.
The Summer School has been running since 2011 [the inaugural session
covered by The Guardian; see corroborating source 3] and has
attracted over £15,000 in fees in the last two years. Previously
subsidised by AHRC funding, the Summer School is now a self-funding
project [corroborating source 4].
Feedback shows that trainees were influenced by what they learnt from the
Summer School, and that as a result their practice has been informed by
EAP research. Over 90% of delegates in 2012 rated the Summer School `very
useful' [corroborating source 4]; using a scale of 1 to 6, delegates'
levels of understanding before and after the training raised by an average
of 2.2 in 2013 [corroborating source 5]; and feedback comments have
included `your expertise is highly valuable to frontline practice', `some
new material presented here that I can integrate into practice' and `very
useful to think about for my practice' [corroborating source 5].
Since 2011 EAP has also offered a series on-site workforce training
modules for health and social care practitioners. These modules were
developed from the Autonomy Summer School syllabus and address the issues
faced by practitioners who conduct capacity assessments. EAP workforce
training sessions have included:
- January 2012: Herefordshire County Council: Training delivered to 20
social workers and NHS staff covering capacity assessments.
- April 2012: University of Essex, a two-day retreat-style workshop on
capacity assessments, bringing together researchers, judges,
psychiatrists and social workers to explore theoretical and practical
challenges associated with capacity assessments.
- November 2012: Maudsley Hospital: one day masterclass on capacity
assessment.
- December 2012: London Borough of Barnet: training course delivered to
20 social care practitioners covering capacity assessments.
- January 2013: Independent Mental Capacity Advocate Study Day: held in
conjunction with Empowerment Matters, a start-up company
offering training to Independent Mental Capacity Advocates. Attended by
20 IMCAs. [corroborating source 4].
Feedback from these events provides evidence that the training has
changed practice. The majority of participants stated in exit surveys that
their knowledge on capacity assessments has increased through the
training; 82% of participants from Herefordshire County Council indicated
that the training had been `very useful' [corroborating source 6]. EAP
practitioner training is supported by a Virtual Learning Environment
hosted on the EAP website and made available to delegates of the Summer
School. The VLE disseminates `Green Paper Reports' on key aspects of
mental capacity assessment. Within the impact period over 30,000 unique
users have made use of the Essex Autonomy Website and associated Virtual
Learning Environment.
Testimonials from research users also show that trainers in the relevant
professional fields have revised their training materials to incorporate
the insights of Essex research on mental capacity. We include one example
of this testimonial evidence below:
The Essex Autonomy Project has been really helpful to me in training... I
train adult `safeguarding leads' in the application of the MCA. I have
revised the materials to raise questions of procedural/ substantive
autonomy, particularly in relation to vulnerability...The green papers are
of consistently high quality and have been useful resources to help
practitioners understand the concepts behind the MCA. We have referred
practitioners to the `inherent jurisdiction' green paper to inform
decisions about whether or not a case is suitable for Court
Mental Capacity Act training manager at Cambridgeshire County Council
and MCA development manager at the Social Care Institute of Excellence
Sources to corroborate the impact
[All sources saved on file with HEI, available on request]
- Clinical Senior Lecturer and Consultant Psychiatrist, Institute of
Psychiatry at the Maudsley
- BBC Radio 4:
`Inside the Ethics Committee', 20 July 2010, http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00t1xsz;
`Today', 21 Aug 2010, http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8933000/8933445.stm;
`The World Today', 14 Feb 2011, http://autonomy.essex.ac.uk/eap-research-on-bbc-radio.
The Guardian: `Mental Disability, state power and the capacity to
decide', 20 Aug 2010
-
The Guardian: `How ancient Greek philosophy could improve
social care today', 28 Sept 2011
- `Contested autonomy in Public Policy and Professional Practice', Essex
Autonomy Project End of Project Report, submitted to AHRC on 31 July
2013
- Feedback report for Autonomy Summer School 2013, produced by EAP
- Feedback data for workplace based training, produced by EAP
- MCA training manager at Cambridgeshire County Council and MCA
development manager at the Social Care Institute of Excellence