Joint Venture: Working in partnership to develop a unique hip replacement treatment
Submitting Institution
University of SouthamptonUnit of Assessment
General EngineeringSummary Impact Type
TechnologicalResearch Subject Area(s)
Engineering: Biomedical Engineering
Medical and Health Sciences: Clinical Sciences
Summary of the impact
The University of Southampton's world-leading record in bioengineering
continues to deliver significant benefits, resulting from recent research
crucial to the development, pre-clinical verification and CE-marking of a
revolutionary hip-resurfacing implant. In the wake of growing concerns
over some previous implant designs, this work has positively impacted on a
wide range of audiences: over 9800 patients have received the new implants
with excellent early clinical results at two years' follow-up. Within 4
years UK PLC benefited with considerable additional turnover [exact figure
removed for publication], a majority from abroad, and the technology
attracted three years of investment for a start-up company at Southampton
Science Park. This award-winning knowledge transferring research has been
widely acknowledged as an example of best practice, and has increased
appreciation of science and technology further through outreach.
Underpinning research
Reflecting a history of research on implant assessment dating back to the
mid-1990s, the University of Southampton's (UoS) Bioengineering Group has
gained a global reputation in the application of novel biomaterials [3.1],
pre-clinical testing and computer simulation [3.2] of orthopaedic
implants. We have particular expertise in hip resurfacing, working
regularly with consultant surgeons throughout Europe and as far away as
Australia, and our work has been awarded prizes at international academic
conferences. In a Technology Strategy Board Knowledge Transfer Partnership
(KTP) (11/06-11/09) with Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd, a world-leading
hip-resurfacing technology company, UoS researchers helped develop a
revolutionary hip-replacement implant that is transforming the lives of
young patients with osteoarthritis. This research was conducted between
2006 and 2010 by Professor Martin Browne, (then Reader in the
Bioengineering Science Research Group, and P.I.), and Dr Alex Dickinson
(then Knowledge Transfer Associate / PhD Researcher), under the KTP and
Dickinson's PhD studentship.
Compared to a total hip replacement (THR), a resurfacing hip replacement
(RHR) is of particular benefit to younger patients. It requires the
removal of considerably less bone and presents a lower risk of
dislocation, offering a greater chance to return to an active lifestyle.
The resurfacing procedure involves a large metal ball (or `head')
replacing the bearing surface of the femur, articulating against a thin
metal socket (or `cup') in the pelvis. By 2006 RHR was a common procedure.
However, there were increasing worries about the rate of early
post-operative failures and possible sensitivity reactions to released
metal ions, particularly in female patients. Many surgeons stopped
performing RHR after metal sensitivity concerns were catastrophically
realised in one particular resurfacing design. These failed replacements
have come at considerable socioeconomic cost, with adverse tissue
reactions seen in nearly 1000 revision surgery patients in 2011, and
revision surgery costing on average £12k (NJR 9th Annual
Report, and Vanhegan et al 2012 JBJS 94-B(5) p619-623). This
reinforced the need for new, more biocompatible implants to be developed,
especially for young females.
Research at Southampton in collaboration with Finsbury sought to develop
and verify a novel hip-resurfacing implant with improved longevity and
biocompatibility, exploiting inert ceramic biomaterials that circumvent
the possibility of metal sensitivity reactions. This involved the
development of a large-diameter, thin-walled, ceramic socket [3.3]
and a thin-shell ceramic resurfacing ball [3.4]. State-of-the-art
technologies in resurfacing, material screening testing and implant design
were reviewed, and rigorous pre-clinical tests and computer simulations
were developed to verify the design prior to clinical use.
The University's novel computational analysis techniques enabled the
biomechanics of new hip-resurfacing implant designs to be predicted [3.5],
while physical testing techniques were developed to verify the implant's
strength under loads generated by everyday activity and traumatic events [3.6].
These techniques were essential to turn the company's concepts into
validated products. Simulations were previously insufficiently accurate to
match clinical observations, and established ISO/British Standard methods
are applicable only to conventional implants, so dedicated test methods were
required.
The research ultimately led to the development and verification of a set
of prototype ceramic resurfacing head and cup implants. These implants,
produced from a highly biocompatible material, have predicted improvements
in biomechanics through developments in implant fixation and geometry. The
verification data generated consequently supported regulatory approval of
the implants, resulting in CE-marking.
This project has stimulated additional research projects. UoS and Aurora
co-wrote an EU `Research for the Benefit of SMEs' proposal which funded a
10-partner industrial and academic consortium including Fraunhofer IPA
Stuttgart and Gothenburg University (EU FP7, €1.47m total, 2009-2011).
This project conducted further hip implant development in which UoS took
the research lead, and culminated in cadaver trial surgeries of two
further, metal-free prototype implant designs. Following on from this
project, UoS is also now leading international research collaboration with
IIT-Kharagpur (India) on biomechanical assessment of Hip and Knee
Replacements (UKIERI, 2012-14). This has supported three visiting
researchers to UoS, generated three joint journal papers, and led to
discussions with the Director of Education and Society at the British
Council in New Delhi on actions to improve manufacturing of affordable hip
and knee implants in India. Finally, these project have seeded internship
and postgraduate studentship funding from two industrial partners, Aurora
Medical Ltd. (UK TSB KTP, 2012 onwards) and Invibio Biomaterial Solutions
(2010 onwards) [Exact values removed for publication].
References to the research
Background research examples:
* Asterisks indicate the three references that best indicate the quality
of the underpinning research.
[3.1] Taylor, A., Roques, A., Browne, M. and New, A.
(2005) Evaluation of initial stability of a novel composite stem. TransOrthResSoc
30, p1381 (http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/23431/)
Owing to commercial confidentiality, the papers relating specifically
to the new implants were published following clinical release:
[3.3] A Dickinson, M Browne, J Jeffers, A Taylor, (2008)
Pre-Clinical Analysis of an Acetabular Cup with Improved in-vivo
Stability and Integrity, Key Engineering Materials, 369-398,
p31-34, (http://www.scientific.net/KEM.396-398.31)
[3.4] A.Dickinson, A.Taylor, J.Jeffers, M.Browne (2010):
Performance of the resurfaced hip. Part 2: The influence of prosthesis
stem design on remodelling and fracture of the femoral neck, JEngMedicine
224, p841-851, (http://pih.sagepub.com/content/224/7/841.abstract)
[3.6]* A.Dickinson, M.Browne, K.Wilson, J.Jeffers,
A.Taylor (2011): Pre-clinical evaluation of ceramic femoral head
resurfacing prostheses using computational models and mechanical testing,
JEngMedicine 225, 866-876, (http://pih.sagepub.com/content/225/9/866.abstract)
Details of the impact
Southampton's research in collaboration with Finsbury Orthopaedics led to
the production of two CE-marked orthopaedic implants `DeltaMotion®'
and `DeltaSurf®', and a portfolio of simulation and test
verification data. Southampton's contribution to the collaboration, built
upon their internationally leading implant testing and analysis
reputation, was the development of dedicated new test methods and
computational techniques to evaluate the implants' strength and
biomechanics. These techniques were adopted by the company and generated
pre-clinical verification evidence, allowing the implants to achieve
regulatory approval throughout Europe, in Asia and Australia, and to
commence clinical use. Health and socioeconomic impact has followed,
described below, with a variety of beneficiaries including patients,
healthcare providers, UK PLC and more widely in several UK and EU
small/medium enterprises.
Finsbury collaborated solely with the Bioengineering Science Research
Group at UoS in this development, and their then-technical director Dr
Andy Taylor [5.7] stated that Prof. Browne and Dr Dickinson's work
"produced a technology base which allowed us to realise the innovative
design concepts produced at the company, and exploit them commercially.
The analysis and testing methods which they developed enabled us to
transform concepts into products at the backbone of a multi-million
pound business, which were a primary stimulus for the company's
purchase."
Health Impact: The new hip replacement implant system, developed
and demonstrated by Southampton's analysis methods, is still unique in the
market [5.1] and has benefited young patients with degenerative
joint conditions. The first implant, DeltaMotion®, has been in clinical
use since November 2008, with over 9800 cups implanted globally, primarily
in the EU, Australia and India. The second product, the DeltaSurf® ceramic
head, has been successfully trialled in cadavers. Mr Jeremy Latham,
orthopaedic surgeon on the DeltaSurf development panel, and user of the
DeltaMotion system, provides a continuing surgical link with Prof Browne
and Dr Dickinson, and lists DeltaSurf as `one to watch' [5.6].
The initial DeltaMotion surgeon users published clinical results of 100%
cup survival at two years [5.2]. National orthopaedic implant
registry data reports good initial clinical results amongst the wider
surgeon population (99.1% implant survival at one year [5.3]), an
improvement upon the most popular existing total hip replacement implants
(97.7-98.8%), in a more demanding group of young, active patients. The
design is particularly effective in restoring natural movement in younger
patients, as attested to by one of the first UK patients in an email to
her surgeon: "It has made a huge difference to my life. I am now able
to do things that I had not been able to do for years. I am back to
going to the gym... and I am able to walk for miles, which is something
I had not been able to do for some time without being in a lot of pain."
These initial clinical trends suggest that the advances made possible by
the research may lower the rate of early post-operative failures for metal
sensitivity reactions. If this trend continues, the likelihood of revision
surgery — and with it the associated pain, trauma and psychological burden
for patients — will be reduced, as will the cost of such procedures for
healthcare providers, estimated at over £100 million/year in the UK.
Economic Impact: This research also delivered a range of benefits
for Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd in relation to intellectual property,
increased turnover and import sales and the company's eventual sale [5.4].
In Australia, DeltaMotion® achieved 2.5% market share in its first year [5.3],
against established systems with a decade of clinical heritage. Design
aspects of the implants led to the application for four patents. 9800
implantations are reported in the first four years from clinical release
in November 2008 [5.9], which generated considerable sales [exact
figure removed for publication], of which over 70% came from abroad.
According to Finsbury's MD, Mike Tuke [5.8], DeltaMotion and
DeltaSurf strengthened the company's product portfolio and the supporting
IP played a major role in Finsbury's survival of the economic downturn and
eventual sale, in November 2009, to DePuy International for an undisclosed
sum.
DePuy's press releases emphasise that Finsbury's ceramic hip products and
patent applications were a key stimulus for the company's purchase [5.4],
echoed by Dr Taylor's testimonial [5.7]. The importance of these
implant systems and the remaining products in development also led DePuy
to invest three years' funding in the spin-out of Aurora Medical Ltd from
Finsbury's R&D and design teams. Aurora employs five
full-time-equivalent employees to develop these pipeline products on
Southampton Science Park, a start-up business incubator for the University
of Southampton.
Dr Paul Naylor, KTP Advisor for the TSB [5.10] reports that this
partnership has been widely acknowledged as an example of best practice to
help encourage other KTPs. The partnership has featured as a showcase
example at several KTP seminars and at the 2009 Collaborate2Innovate event
for entrepreneurs, businesses and innovation specialists. The UoS-Aurora
partnership won the Engineering Excellence Award and the Best Partnership
Award (South East Region) at the KTP Awards 2011 [5.5], and was
shortlisted at the 2009 Technology & Innovation Awards (The
Engineer magazine). Professional recognition came with the BIOLOX
Award at the 13th International Symposium for Bioceramics and Alternative
Bearings in Joint Arthroplasty.
Helping to inspire a wider appreciation of science and technology,
researchers have presented the research at 7 school visit days and several
Smallpeice/Dragonfly/HeadStart courses, to over 230 GCSE and A-Level
students (15-18 years), and to younger students (13-14 years) in the `Meet
the Scientist' programme. Students picked out the UoS/Finsbury
presentations as "really informative" and said that the courses "persuaded
me to continue with engineering and look into a career possibly in
biomechanics, but definitely engineering" (2010 Smallpeice Trust
Biomedical Engineering Course Report to IPEM). The project has also
supported four Bioengineering Research Group summer internships for
undergraduate students, who have gone on to postgraduate research and
industrial engineering careers.
Sources to corroborate the impact
Evidence of Health Impact:
[5.1] Product website of DeltaMotion Hip System: system novelty and
uniqueness.
http://www.depuy.com/uk/healthcare-professionals/product-details/deltamotion
[5.2] Clinical Results: Jenabzadeh R. et al 2012, DeltaMotion Hip
System — Two Year Outcomes, 25th Annual ISTA
Congress, Sydney
[5.3] Clinical Results: AOA National Joint Replacement Registry Annual
Report 2012
https://aoanjrr.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/annual-reports-2012
p47, 49, 89 and 90 (highlighted)
Evidence of Economic Impact:
[5.4] News reports and Press Releases on Finsbury Sale: centrality of
ceramic hip implant technologies to motivation for purchase by DePuy
http://www.depuy.com/healthcare-professionals/news/depuy-orthopaedics-inc-acquires-finsbury-orthopaedics-limited-depuy
[5.5] News report on KTP Awards, to University of Southampton and
Aurora Medical Ltd.
http://www.ktponline.org.uk/2011awards/
&
http://www.southampton.ac.uk/business/ktp_showcase/ktp_awards_2011.pdf
p12-13
End-Users and Beneficiaries to Corroborate Impact Claims (contact
details attached):
[5.6] End User: Member of the Orthopaedic Community
Mr Jeremy Latham, consultant surgeon:
http://www.lathamconsultancy.com/blog/tag/resurfacing/
[5.7,5.8] Beneficiaries: Industrial Recipients of the Technology
Developed:
Dr Andy Taylor, then Technical Director at Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd., who
coordinated implantation of the first ~4000 DeltaMotions, now MD of Aurora
Medical Ltd, and Mr Mike Tuke, then MD of Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd., now
director of MatOrtho Ltd.
[5.9] [text removed for publication]
DeltaMotion sales and implantation figures.
[5.10] Referee: Knowledge Transfer Partnership Advisor, UK Technology
Strategy Board
Dr Paul Naylor, KTP advisor, monitored company-university partnership
progress.