The impact of lighting research into provision of user control and alternative daylight sources
Submitting Institution
University of LiverpoolUnit of Assessment
Architecture, Built Environment and PlanningSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Information and Computing Sciences: Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing
Engineering: Materials Engineering
Built Environment and Design: Architecture
Summary of the impact
The Lighting Group has been involved in the formulation of national and
international design guidance, with impacts on the practices of the UK and
international lighting industry.
This guidance offers designers the tools to create optimum visual
conditions in energy efficient buildings while reducing electric lighting
usage. This involves three areas:
- The development of lighting design in interiors to take account of
room contents;
- Involvement of the occupant in the control of light levels and
electricity usage; and
- The replacement of electric lighting with guided daylight systems.
The main impact of the work is its influence on the body of professional
practice relating to interior lighting design. This guidance advocates the
creation of user friendly visual conditions, low electricity usage and
natural light in areas remote from windows.
Underpinning research
The Lighting Group, led by Dr David Carter, focuses on the study of
lighting as part of the building system. The approach has been to use
field measurement and computer simulation to investigate the effect of
innovative concepts and devices on interior lighting. In addition, a range
of post- occupancy evaluation techniques have been developed to establish
human reaction to these innovations. A combination of the two approaches
has enabled design guidances to be framed, which have been trialled by
cooperating industrial partners, before forming national and international
design guidance documents, now used worldwide.
The first theme investigated is lighting design in complex and obstructed
spaces (1993 - 2002). Conventional calculation methods assume an empty
room as the main condition, but in real interiors, illuminance is affected
by room contents such as furniture and machinery. The research has yielded
generalised predictions of losses in real interiors such as offices. This
was extended into design guidance on selection and positioning of
luminaires for minimum light loss and hence minimum electric usage. Key
outputs include 1 and 2 cited in the next section.
The second theme (1998 - 2008) is the manner in which employees use
individual lighting control systems to create a satisfactory visual
environment in offices. The research demonstrated that users with
individual control select lower light levels than those specified in codes
and the resulting lower electricity usage is beneficial for the
environment. A parallel study of user reaction to the systems led to
design guidance, to take advantage of the large energy savings obtained by
the use of this technique. Key outputs include 3 cited in the next
section.
The third theme is remote source lighting, where source and output
devices are separated by a guidance system. This has three strands. The
initial research on electric source guidance developed both methods of
analysis of photometric performance and methods of extraction and
redirection of delivered light. This was followed by research on daylight
source systems (1997 - 2001). Research on the influence of system
configuration on illuminance and visual quality of passive tubular
daylight guidance systems was undertaken by a combination of field
measurement and assessment of human response, and the integration of the
passive light output devices with conventional interior electric lighting
was also addressed (2001- 2012).
The third theme, on remote source systems, concerns hybrid systems (2006
-2012), which simultaneously deliver daylight and electric light. The
research examines light delivery and potential energy savings for
commercial buildings. The results established usage patterns (the
proportions of daylight, electric and hybrid lighting) for combinations of
building configuration, geographic location and types of daylight delivery
system. The significant variation in performance with system type,
geographic location, and building geometry, has confirmed that choice of
appropriate light guidance system is strongly influenced by building
location. Key outputs include 4, 5, 6 and 7 cited in the next section.
Key researchers:
Academic Staff Dr D J Carter (1980 - present)
Research Staff: Dr Q Ning (1996), Dr T Moore (1997-2001), Dr M Hadwan
(1998-2005), Dr M Mayhoub ( 2007-2011)
References to the research
Key outputs from the research
1. A S M Leung, M J Lupton and D J Carter (1994) Standard obstructions
for lighting calculations, Lighting Research and Technology, 26 (3),
161-165
2. D J Carter (2005) Lighting design for obstructed interiors, Technical
Report CIE161:2004, Commission International de l'Eclairage, Vienna 35p
ISBN 3 901 906 32 0
3. T A Moore, D J Carter and A I Slater (2003), Long-term patterns of use
of occupant controlled office lighting, Lighting Research and Technology,
35 (1) 43-59
Awarded the Society of Light and Lighting Leon-Gastner Medal
for this paper.
4. D J Carter and M Al Marwaee (2009), User attitudes toward tubular
daylight guidance systems, Lighting Research and Technology, 41 (1) 71-88
5. D J Carter (2006) Tubular daylight guidance systems, Technical Report
CIE173:2006, Commission International de l'Eclairage, Vienna 64p ISBN 3
901 906 49 5
6. M S Mayhoub and D J Carter (2011), The costs and benefits of using
daylight guidance to light office buildings, Building and Environment, 46
(3) 698-710
7. M S Mayhoub and D J Carter (2012), A feasibility study for hybrid
lighting systems, Building and Environment, 53 (1) 83-94
Key research grants
1. 1992 - 1995 "Design of electric lighting for obstructed spaces"
Science and Engineering Research Council. £77,610
2. 1992 - 1995 "Modelling of light losses in real interiors" Toshiba
Lighting and Technology Corporation. 4 Million Japanese Yen
(£21,000)
3. 1992 - 1995 "Remote source artificial lighting systems" Science and
Engineering Research Council CASE/Simplex Lighting Ltd £21,450
4. 1996 - 1999 "Lighting quality and quantity in offices with variable
control systems"
EMC 96-52, Building Research Establishment, Department of
the Environment £66,727
5. 1998 - 2000 "Design of passive solar light pipes" Monodraught Ltd.
£21,000
All above grants were exclusively held at Liverpool. The PI in all
cases was Dr D J Carter
Details of the impact
Research by the Liverpool School of Architecture Lighting Group has made
a significant and active contribution to the formulation of national and
international design guidance, and hence on the design practice of the UK
and international lighting industry. In addition the methods developed
during the research were taken up in the R&D test protocols for the
lighting industry.
The development of lighting design for interiors to take account of
room contents
Research on lighting of building interiors, which are obstructed by room
contents, commenced in 1983 and early work on light loss assessment and
luminaire layouts led to the effects of obstruction being included in
lighting design for the first time, with results from the research being
incorporated into the 2009 and subsequent Society of Light and Lighting
Code for Interior Lighting. The significance of this is that internal
obstructions account for approximately 10% light loss. Although lighting
designers know of this effect they traditionally over-design the system in
compensation, with resultant unnecessary energy use and costs. The
research permits that over-design to be eliminated. Active collaboration
with Thorn Lighting in the UK and Toshiba Lighting and Technology
Corporation, Japan, extended the design methods to take account of a wide
range of building types and lighting equipment. Both companies used the
results to inform their lighting design procedures.
The report Lighting design for obstructed interiors from the
Commission International de l'Eclairage (CIE) Technical Committee TC 3-31,
Chaired by Carter, drew heavily on the Liverpool work and the report
continues to act as specialist reference for national and international
design codes.
Of particular significance to this case study is the related research on
obstructed interiors, which has led to the development of methods used for
field measurement of task and planar illuminance in occupied interiors.
This work is incorporated into the current (2012) Society of Light and
Lighting Code for Interior Lighting (used in the UK), and also into the
CIE/ISO Interior Code (Lighting of work places Part 1: Indoor 2001) which
remains the main code world-wide.
Involvement of the occupant in the control of light levels and
electricity usage
The research on lighting control investigated the manner in which people
use individual systems to create a satisfactory visual environment. The
research demonstrated that users with individual control select lower
light levels than those specified in codes and the resulting lower
electricity usage is beneficial for the environment. This research was
funded by, and in collaboration with, the Building Research Establishment
and supported by ECS Lighting Control and the results were incorporated
into the lighting control element of the current revision (2010) of Part L
of the UK Building Regulations.
The replacement of electric lighting with guided daylight systems
The initial Liverpool research on electric source guidance was supported
by Simplex Lighting, a manufacturer of luminaires for industrial
applications. It developed both methods of analysis of the photometric
performance of these devices and methods of extraction and redirection of
delivered light, both of which were applied to the development of the
Conductalite luminaire, marketed by Simplex. This research was the basis
for a study of tubular daylight guidance systems - devices which collect,
transport and distribute daylight deep into buildings - undertaken with
the two UK market leaders, Monodraught and Solatube. The impact of the
work has been threefold:
- The results formed the scientific basis both for understanding the
photometry of the devices and their relationship with the building they
light, and for the design procedures used by the manufacturers and
installers.
- Dr Carter was appointed Chair of Commission International de
l'Eclairage Technical Committee TC 3-38, concerned with tubular daylight
guidance systems.
- Dr Carter was co-author of the present UK guidance document on fibre
optic and remote source lighting, produced jointly by the Institution of
Lighting Engineers and the Society of Light & Lighting.
In addition, current research on hybrid lighting systems, undertaken in
cooperation with two companies, Parans Solar Lighting and Limitless,
continues to inform the design procedures for hybrid systems of both
companies.
Sources to corroborate the impact
- The Research Officer at the National Research Council Canada can be
contacted to corroborate all claims, particularly those relating to
obstructed interiors and lighting control.
- This source is a consultant at Aston: Lighting & Control, after
retiring from Philips Lighting Ltd. He is an acknowledged authority on
lighting control systems and can be contacted to corroborate claims made
here about the Liverpool contribution to the use of individual lighting
control systems in offices.
- The Managing Director of Parans Solar Lighting (Sweden) can be
contacted to corroborate claims made relating to hybrid daylight
guidance systems. This company is the worldwide market leader in the
manufacture and development of hybrid daylight guidance and could be
expected to comment on the Liverpool contribution to the understanding
of their integration into buildings technology.
- The Managing Director of Solatube UK Ltd. can be contacted to
corroborate claims made about tubular daylight guidance systems in
buildings. Solatube is one of the worldwide market leaders in the
manufacture and development of tubular daylight guidance technology.
- This source from Lighting Research & Technology has a worldwide
reputation as a lighting researcher and author. He is the Technical
Editor of Lighting Research and Technology which is recognised as the
world's premier refereed journal in this field. He can be contacted to
corroborate the claims on obstructed interiors and lighting control.