Literacy and language development: working together to close the attainment gap
Submitting Institution
University College LondonUnit of Assessment
EducationSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Psychology and Cognitive Sciences: Psychology, Cognitive Sciences
Summary of the impact
Literacy and language work reciprocally to support children's learning
and attainment. Professors
Morag Stuart and Julie Dockrell, in complementary and sometimes
co-authored work, have had a
substantial influence on the way children of all abilities and with a
range of needs are taught to
read and develop their broader oral language and literacy skills. Their
work influenced national
programmes in England on early reading, dyslexia and spoken language
(National Literacy
Strategy and National Curriculum) and speech, language and communication
needs (the Better
Communication Research Programme). Their findings provided educational
professionals and
speech and language therapists with the conceptual understanding that
underpins good practice,
and helped equip teachers to identify difficulties and intervene.
Underpinning research
IOE context: Stuart and Dockrell's work sits within a rich field
of IOE research and teaching. This
enables a strong synergy between high quality research and practice.
Research areas include
children and young people with dyslexia, deafness, speech and language
impairment (SLI),
classroom talk and handwriting. The European Centre for Reading Recovery
trains teachers in this
successful method of bringing the lowest achievers at age six up to the
standard of their peers.
The Special Educational Needs Joint Initiative for Training (Senjit), a
not-for-profit organisation at
the IOE, offers specialist training for teachers of children with specific
oral language and literacy
difficulties.
Early Literacy: Stuart's influential work highlighted the
importance of phonic knowledge to
successful early reading.
Lessons from the Inner-city: An intervention study carried
out in Tower Hamlets during the 1990s
showed that after 12 weeks of systematic phonics teaching, Reception
children made significant
and long-lasting gains in word reading and spelling (see research
reference R1). 112 five-year-olds,
mainly English Language Learners (ELL), were tested before and after
intervention, with 101
re-tested at age seven. Although word-reading gains persisted at that
stage, a 2004 follow-up
showed that the children's reading comprehension was only equivalent to
that of the control group.
Building on their earlier work demonstrating that good spoken language is
important for reading
comprehension, Stuart and Dockrell developed an evidence-informed
programme, `Talking Time'
(R2). A quasi-experimental study showed this improved children's
vocabulary, ability to understand
and draw inferences from speech and to recount an incident.
Printed Word Database: Stuart's experimental study (G2),
showing that beginner readers need
many more exposures to printed words than they typically received before
they can reliably read
them in and out of context, challenged `real books' methods of teaching
reading current since the
1970s. This led to development of the Children's Printed Word Database (R4),
now an interactive
web-based word frequency count based on books young children read in
school. It enables
teachers to discover which words children need to know in order to read at
a given level, and is
used by researchers in designing studies. Research teams from
1993-2010 were led by Stuart
(who moved to the IOE from Birkbeck in 1995) and Professor Jackie
Masterson (who joined the
IOE from Essex University in 2007).
Simple View: With colleagues, Stuart scrutinised the
research on how children learn to read, and
argued that an evidence-informed framework, the Simple View of Reading
(SV) (R3), should
replace the National Literacy Strategy's `Searchlights' approach. SV
highlights two interacting
dimensions of skilled reading: word recognition and language
comprehension.
Speech and language difficulties: Dockrell's research over several
decades documented the
nature and effects of Speech, Language and Communication Needs (SLCN). It
highlighted the
specific ways in which language-learning difficulties damage children's
literacy development and
scholastic attainment, and also affect their behaviour and well-being. The
work demonstrated the
challenges teachers and other professionals face in mapping these
children's needs and providing
effective interventions. It also pinpointed `what works'.
Language and communication needs: For study R6
(2001), researchers interviewed teachers of 69
children with specific language difficulties (SLD) and combined teachers'
perspectives with
objective assessments of individual children's needs. They found the
teachers had inadequate
training and support and were unaware of developmental links between poor
language and
problems with literacy or behaviour. Similarly, Dockrell's studies for the
2008 Bercow Review of
Services for Children and Young People (0-19) with Speech, Language and
Communication Needs
(SLCN) (2008, see impact source S3) showed that provision
was patchy and inadequate and that
teachers were typically unaware of SLCN and its repercussions.
Better communication: Dockrell was a lead researcher on the
Government's 2012 £1.5m Better
Communication Research Programme (BCRP), which published 19 reports. She
led one of its four
strands, analysing children's needs in relation to available provision (R5).
A particularly significant
finding was that resources were allocated according to children's SEN
categories — but these did
not identify their language learning needs. By contrast, each child's
needs depended on their
individual characteristics, but differentiation to meet them was not
evident in the classrooms.
Researchers called for individual learning programmes set within a
three-tiered system of service
provision: universal, targeted (about 20% of children) and specialist
(some 2-3%). Programme:
BCRP (2009-12). Director: Professor Geoff Lindsay (Warwick);
Co-directors: Dockrell, Professors
James Law (Newcastle) and Sue Roulstone (West of England). Further IOE
expertise came from
Professor Tony Charman, director, Centre for Research in Autism Education
2009-12 and
economist Professor Anna Vignoles (IOE 2003-12, now a visiting professor).
References to the research
R1: Stuart, M. (1999) Getting Ready for Reading: Early phoneme awareness
and phonics teaching
improves reading and spelling in inner-city second language learners, British
Journal of
Educational Psychology, 69(4), 587-605.
R2: Dockrell, J.E., Stuart, M. and King, D. (2010), Supporting Early Oral
Language Skills for
English Language Learners in Inner City Preschool Provision, British
Journal of Educational
Psychology, 80(4), 497-516.
R3: Stuart, M., Stainthorp, R. & Snowling, M. (2008), Literacy as a
complex activity: deconstructing
the Simple view of Reading, Literacy, 42(2), 59-66.
R4: Masterson, J., Stuart, M., Dixon, M. & Lovejoy, S. (2010).
Children's Printed Word Database:
Continuities and changes over time in children's early reading vocabulary,
British Journal of
Psychology, 101(2) 221-242.
R5: Dockrell, J.E., Ricketts, J. and Lindsay, G. (2012). Understanding
speech language and
communication needs: Profiles of needs and provision. London: DfE.
R6: Dockrell, J.E. and Lindsay, G. (2001), Children with Specific Speech
and Language Difficulties - the
teachers' perspective, Oxford Review of Education, 27(3),
369-394.
Indicative grants: G1: Getting Ready for Reading and follow up
studies: (1996) London
Docklands Development Corporation and funding partners, £27,000; (1999)
ESRC, £7,556; (1999)
London Borough of Tower Hamlets, £40,000. Grantholder: Stuart.
G2: Development of Printed Word Recognition and Production in Early
Primary Education (1993-6),
£52,286, ESRC. Grant holder: Stuart.
G3: Better Communication Research Programme: Speech, Language and
Communication Needs
(2009-12), £196,253, DCSF. Grantholder: Dockrell
Indicators of quality:
IQ1: R1 was cited in US National Reading Panel Report (2000) and was part
of the impetus to re-introduce
phonics in both countries. It is cited in academic papers from four
continents.
IQ2: ESRC grants were rated as outstanding by end-of-grant reviewers.
IQ3: An international academic consultants' report on the BCRP (S2)
praises its four thematic
reports, including R5, stating: "In conclusion we applaud the
government for its vision in
commissioning this project and the investigators who carried it out in
such a thorough and
thoughtful manner". It highlights the international implications for
Dockrell and colleagues'
findings.
IQ4: R3 was one of Literacy's 10 most downloaded papers
in 2009, 2011 and 2012, receiving 3558
downloads from the start of 2009 to the end of 2012. It was also reprinted
as a chapter in an
Open University textbook.
Details of the impact
Principal beneficiaries: Stuart's work benefits all children
learning to read in English schools.
Dockrell's work benefits the 7-10% of children in England who have speech
and language
difficulties, their teachers and parents, policy-makers and commissioners
of services for such
children. Together, their work benefits children whose language
development lags behind their
peers at the start of school.
Dates of impact: Impact was at its height in 2008-9, influencing
changes to the National Literacy
Strategy (NLS), and 2013, with the BCRP roll-out and the 2014 National
Curriculum's publication.
Reach and significance: IOE research on language and literacy has
improved educational policy
and practice, enhancing all three waves of provision: universal, targeted
and specialist, as
demonstrated below. This body of work has had instrumental impact1
— underpinning national
guidelines and advice, and commercial tests and schemes; conceptual
impact — changing
accepted ideas about the nature of language learning needs; and capacity-building
impact —
informing ITE requirements and CPD core content. It is helping to close
the learning gap in areas
of high social deprivation, where more than half of children start
nursery with delayed language.
Literacy — impact on policy and practice: Since the 1970s, the
place of phonics in the teaching
of early reading has been hotly contested. Stuart has played a significant
role in establishing a
research-informed approach to phonics teaching for all children in
England. The `simple view of
reading', which she espoused (R3), is embedded in the curriculum,
teacher education and Ofsted
guidance. She has written and influenced many official, commercial and
third-sector teaching and
teacher training materials, as exemplified below. Sir Jim Rose calls
Stuart an `unsung heroine of
literacy' (S1).
Rose report: Following her Tower Hamlets intervention
studies (R1), Stuart was asked to give oral
evidence to the Select Committee inquiry on early reading (2005), and to
advise on Jim Rose's
early reading review (2006). She led in drafting an appendix that proposed
replacing the
Searchlights model with the `Simple View' (discussed in R3; also
see S1). The Government
accepted all the Review's recommendations. The National Literacy Strategy
(NLS) introduced the
`Simple View' to schools in 2007-8; it was also incorporated into ITE and
CPD courses. Stuart
helped develop resources and training, including:
-
Letters and Sounds (DCSF 2007), a phonics teaching programme
distributed free to all primary
schools in England and still widely used;
- Training for Primary National Strategy (PNS) literacy consultants on
language and reading
development. These sessions, filmed and distributed throughout England
as a set of training
DVDs (2007), are also still used (e.g. S8).
2014 Curriculum: Stuart helped ensure that the `Simple
View' formed the framework for the
teaching of reading in the final draft on 31 July 2013 (p4). The DfE's
policy lead for English
confirms Stuart's essential role as expert consultant (S7): "The
papers she submitted to officials to
support her commentary were invaluable in creating a robust rationale for
the reading curriculum,
and in developing officials' knowledge of the reading process, which in
turn informed advice to
Ministers. Her work is highly respected and admired". She played a key
role in:
- Influencing the precise approach to systematic phonics;
- Extending the `Simple View' to writing;
- Influencing content on spoken language, vocabulary and spelling.
The Children's Printed Word Database (R4) was used
in developing national curricula and
assessments in England including: a) the 2007 NLS framework, b) the
spelling appendix for the
2014 English Curriculum and c) the DFE's Year 1 Phonics Screening Check
introduced in 2012.
Stuart helped design the check and, with Professor Rhona Stainthorp of
Reading University,
developed a training DVD for teachers. In the commercial world, she helped
design a reading test
making use of the database, published by GL Assessment in 2012. The first
normative test
diagnosing different types of word reading problem, it garnered more than
£40,000 in sales by July
31, 2013. Stuart ran training sessions on its use with Ark and University
of Chester Academies.
Dyslexia: Stuart was an expert adviser on Rose's 2008
Dyslexia investigation. Her annex on the
roles, responsibilities and training of specialist dyslexia teachers
helped Rose persuade the
Government to commission new dyslexia training materials for the National
Strategies (S1). Stuart
and Rea Reason of the University of Manchester provided the content of the
resulting DfE training
resource (2011, S4), which situated dyslexia along the continuum
of normal development and
embedded the `Simple View' in a whole-school approach.
Better communication — impact on policy and practice: Dockrell's
work has had a well-recognised
and "highly significant" impact on policy and practice (S9),
influencing views and
attitudes across the speech, language and communication needs landscape
and promoting the
role of research in best practice (S5). Her findings on the
damaging effect of speech and language
difficulties on children's achievement and the lack of support they and
their teachers received (e.g.
R6) helped to persuade the Government to commission the influential
Bercow Review and
informed its findings and recommendations (2008, S3, e.g. p32), as
National Communication
Champion Jean Gross — appointed in the wake of Bercow — attests. She also
played a personal
role in triggering the review, which was commissioned in the wake of a
meeting between Dockrell,
Afasic's CEO, a parent and Ed Balls, then Economic Secretary to the
Treasury (S5).
The Government's response to Bercow was an action plan in 2008, which
launched the Better
Communication Research Programme (BCRP) (G4).
Dockrell's research helped underpin all its
recommendations — published in 2012 and accepted by the Government — but
most explicitly those
calling for changes to the way children are categorised and for
individualised provision for each
child built around family needs (R5). Education Minister Edward
Timpson, highlighting the BCRP,
told the Commons (Hansard 19/06/13) that the 2013 Children and
Families Bill would replace the
current system of School Action and School Action Plus with new guidance
for schools to "ensure
that they identify children with SEN more accurately". Another important
output of BCRP was the
Communication Supporting Classrooms Observation Tool. Dockrell led
in developing this research-informed
web resource to help schools ensure they have classrooms which support the
development of language and communication skills (S6). In Lewisham,
where the tool was piloted,
the Speech and Language Therapy (SLT) team used it to train teachers. They
found it offered a
useful conceptual framework for considering the classroom environment. It
is hosted on the
Communication Trust website, along with the BCRP What Works
database, on which Dockrell
advises. The database was developed as a direct result of Dockrell's BCRP
study examining
commonly used interventions to support children's language (R5),
and had 22,700 visitors between
April and 31 July 2013 (S10). The 19 BCRP research papers,
published on a bespoke DfE website
in December 2012, clocked up 17,125 downloads in four months, including
3,492 for Dockrell's
thematic report.
Talking Time: Dockrell and Stuart helped shape, design and
disseminate the high-impact Every
Child a Talker (ECAT) programme (2008) and teaching materials for early
years, adopted in all 152
LAs in England (S9). Informed by their `Talking Time' resource and
research, (R2), it "led to very
large reductions in the number of children with language delay in the
settings which took part",
Gross confirms. She adds: "The ECAT programme provided a model of how to
make change
happen on a large scale". Talking Time itself is one of only five
universal interventions included on
the BCRP What Works database. The Database, Talking Time and the Tool all
had a direct
influence on the Communication Trust's Talk of the Town programme to help
children and young
people with SLCN in disadvantaged areas (S10).
Sources to corroborate the impact
S1: Testimonial from Sir Jim Rose (available)
S2: Weismer, S.E. and Tomblin, J.B. (2013) An International
Perspective on the BCRP: Final
Report of International Consultants (available)
S3: DCSF (2008) The Bercow Report http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/8405/1/7771-dcsf-bercow.pdf
S4: http://www.idponline.org.uk
S5: Testimonial from Linda Lascelles, CEO, Afasic (available)
S6: http://www.thecommunicationtrust.org.uk/resources/resources/resources-for-practitioners/communication-supporting-classroom-observation-tool.aspx
S7: Testimonial from Jane Hough, former DfE policy lead for English
(available)
S8: http://www.childrenscentres.org.uk/eyfs_resources.asp
S9: Testimonial from Jean Gross, National Communication Champion
(available)
S10: Testimonial from Anne Fox, Director, Communication Trust (available)
1 Using Evidence: How Research can Inform Public Services (Nutley, S., Walter, I., Davis, H. 2007)
2 All web links accessed 04/11/13