Supporting children and young people with language and communication needs
Submitting Institution
City University, LondonUnit of Assessment
Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and PharmacySummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Clinical Sciences, Public Health and Health Services
Psychology and Cognitive Sciences: Psychology
Summary of the impact
Language and communication disorders affect about 7% of children in
countries where assessments are undertaken such as the UK and USA.
Difficulties with language and communication severely limit children's
social participation, school attainment and life chances, with
repercussions for their families and wider society. Research at City
University London has had major impacts on clinical and educational policy
and practice and the support available to children of all ages with
language and communication needs. For example:
- It has supported the planning, commissioning and delivery of services
for language-impaired school children through incorporation in the Royal
College of Speech and Language Therapists (RCSLT) Resource Manual for
Speech, Language and Communication Needs and elsewhere.
- It has been influential in supporting Government to provide training
to school staff in language therapy, resulting in enhanced educational
attainment and improved behaviour.
- It has led to improved support for children and their families,
including the development with the National Deaf Children's Society
(NDCS) of a new Family Sign Language Curriculum (FSLC).
It has led to a validated tool for school-based professionals working
with deaf children to identify, monitor and evaluate the needs of those
with poor language skills.
Underpinning research
Young children who do not develop language as expected are a major
concern for their parents and for clinical services to which they are
referred. Problems that persist vary widely: some children struggle with
words and sentences, some have social communication impairments
characteristic of children with autistic spectrum disorders (ASD) and some
have both. Early identification in deaf children is even more of a
challenge. Deaf children are known to be at risk of language delay. More
severe difficulties with language are all too readily attributed to their
hearing impairment, overlooking the possibility that they may also have a
language disorder. Secondary school presents children with new academic
and social demands posing unique challenges for those with weak or
impaired language and communication skills.
Research in Language and Communication Science has been a major strength
at City University London for over 25 years. The team of academic staff
who led the research underpinning the impacts presented here, with the
support of research staff, comprises Chiat (at City 1983—2000 and since
2006) and Roy (at City since 1983), focusing on pre-school children;
Herman (at City since 1985), Morgan (at City 1998) and Woll (at City
1995-2005), focusing on deaf children; and Joffe (at City since 2001) and
Botting (at City since 2005, in collaboration with Conti-Ramsden at the
University of Manchester, UK), focusing on secondary school children.
Chiat and Roy's original research (1996 to date)1,5 has given
rise to two new assessments of early skills, the Early Sociocognitive
Battery (ESB) and Preschool Repetition Test (PSRep), which help to address
the challenges of early diagnosis. In a follow-up study of children
referred to clinical services at two to three years of age, Chiat and Roy
found that:
- The ESB is a strong indicator of longer term problems with social
communication and risk of ASD.
- The PSRep reveals problems with speech output whose impact on language
is relatively short term unless accompanied by problems with language
comprehension.
This evidence is crucial for clinicians, demonstrating how the ESB and
PSRep help to identify children's specific needs at the earliest stage of
clinical referral and decision-making.
Pioneering research by Herman, Morgan and Woll (1993 to date)2,6
has laid the foundations for diagnosing language disorders in the deaf
population. Their work has established typical ages and stages of
development in British Sign Language (BSL) and produced theoretically and
empirically motivated assessments of early vocabulary and school-age
language in BSL and normative data on these assessments. The team have
used their assessments to identify deaf children with language impairments
and characterise the heterogeneous nature of the deficits and estimated
prevalence, which appears to be similar to that found among hearing
children. Their cumulative research has shed further light on language
acquisition in the deaf population.
The scale and repercussions of problems in secondary schools have gained
recognition from the team's work. Joffe's `Enhancing Language and
Communication in Secondary Schools' (ELCISS) project (2005 to date)3,7
and Botting's collaborative research,4, 8 detailing the
profiles, pathways and needs of language-impaired children through the
school years have exposed often hidden and unsupported language and
communication problems in secondary schools. Both projects have
demonstrated links with social, emotional and behavioural difficulties.
Materials and training appropriate to the teenage years were needed.
Joffe's two new intervention programmes targeting narrative skills and
vocabulary, developed and evaluated in a randomised controlled trial, have
filled an important gap. Together, these projects have provided a better
understanding of the needs of children during the secondary school years
at all levels from school to Government and have improved support for
vulnerable teenagers.
References to the research
Our research has been published in top clinical academic journals that
apply a rigorous peer review process, for example:
1. Chiat, S., & Roy, P. (2008). Early phonological and sociocognitive
skills as predictors of later language and social communication outcomes.
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 635-645. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01881.x
Selected for inclusion in Special Virtual Issue of Journal of Child
Psychology and Psychiatry: Speech, Language, Communication and
Adolescent Mental Health, edited by D. V. M. Bishop; http://tinyurl.com/jcpp-sl.
2. Mason, K. et al. (2010). Identifying specific language
impairment in deaf children acquiring British Sign Language: implications
for theory and practice. British Journal of Developmental Psychology,
28, 33-49 10.1348/026151009X484190
3. Joffe, V., & Black, E. (2012). Social, Emotional, and Behavioral
Functioning of Secondary School Students With Low Academic and Language
Performance: Perspectives From Students, Teachers, and Parents. Language,
Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 43, 461-473 10.1044/0161-1461(2012/11-0088)
4. Botting, N. & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2008). The role of language,
social cognition, and social skill in the functional social outcomes of
young adolescents with and without a history of SLI. British Journal
of Developmental Psychology, 26, 281-300 10.1348/026151007X235891
The research has been supported by grants from the leading funding bodies
in the field (three from the ESRC, four from the Nuffield Foundation), and
voluntary sector and local authority funds, for example:
5. Chiat (Primary Investigator [PI]) & Roy. Very early processing
skills as predictors of later language disorders. ESRC (R000-23-0019),
2002—2006, £174,221.
6. Herman (PI) & Woll (then at City). £35,000 from NHS Research and
Development Fund for development of materials to assess BSL Development,
1995.
7. Joffe (PI). Enhancing language and communication in secondary school
children with specific language impairment through two intervention
programmes: narrative and vocabulary enrichment. The Nuffield Foundation,
2006—2009, £321,085; Redbridge Local Authority, 2010—2013, £95,000;
Barking and Dagenham Local Authority, 2010-2013, £75,000.
8. Botting (PI). Specific language impairment (SLI): cognitive, narrative
and linguistic development. ESRC Postdoctoral Fellowship (RES-000-27-003),
2003—2006, £149,000.
Details of the impact
Concerns about developmental language and communication problems and
repercussions for children's education, well-being and future
employability have received increasing attention since the Government
commissioned the Rt. Hon. John Bercow MP to review services for children
with speech, language and communication needs (SLCN). Bercow's 2008 report
and subsequent reports of the Government-funded Better Communication
Research Project and the All Party Parliamentary Group on Speech and
Language Difficulties (established in response to the Bercow review), have
drawn attention to issues at the heart of our research: the importance of
early identification particularly in at-risk groups and the scale and
impact of SLCN in secondary schools. Government, professional and
voluntary sector bodies have drawn on our research for policy
documents and practice guidelines. Botting's collaborative research
features in the RCSLT Resource Manual for Commissioning and Planning
Services for SLCN (published 2009, still current) and in the online SLCN
commissioning tools (published 2011, still current)9 of the
Communication Trust (a coalition of nearly 50 voluntary and community SLCN
organisations set up in 2007 by Afasic, British Telecom, the Council for
Disabled Children, and I CAN, the lead voluntary sector organisation in
children's communication). Both resources support the planning,
commissioning and delivery of services in line with Government and local
priorities to deliver the best return for a given investment over time.
The research also features in a 2008 I CAN report examining issues for
children with SLCN in primary schools and forms part of I CAN's online
resources for practitioners10.
Outcomes of Joffe's research have been influential in Government
promotion of support for language and communication in secondary schools.
In a speech at the House of Commons launch of the Children's Communication
Coalition (an alliance of national organisations, experts and service
users representing children in contact with youth justice services), MP
and Communication Ambassador Adrian Bailey `praised the work of SLTs in
this field, and paid particular reference to City's Enhancing Language and
Communication in Secondary Schools (ELCISS) research programme'11.
He went on to promote the programme in the House of Commons: `I was
privileged to see at first hand the work of the ELCISS-enhancing language
and communication in secondary schools project in Dagenham schools, where
speech and language therapy is provided and training given to school
staff, resulting in enhanced educational attainment and improved
behaviour. Will my Right Hon. Friend assure me that the outcome of that
project will be examined, so that it can be rolled out in other areas?'12.
Joffe's work also features in the Government-funded Better Communication
Research Programme reports published by the Department of Education in
2012 as part of its high-quality evidence base to inform policy
development and delivery. Through her research and dissemination, Joffe
has attained national recognition as an expert adviser: she was invited to
address a meeting of the All Party Parliamentary Group on SLCN in 2009;
has served on the Advisory Board of the Communication Trust since its
inception; and has played key roles in the professional body (RCSLT), as
Adviser and Chair of the national clinical excellence network for SLCN
issues in older children and young people since 2009, and as research and
development councillor and trustee since September 2011.
As well as influencing policy, our evidence-based guidelines, assessments
and intervention materials have led to improved support for children
and their families. Herman, Morgan and Woll worked with the NDCS to
develop and evaluate a new resource for families, the FSLC13.
Morgan has been involved in training deaf and hearing professionals to
deliver this curriculum to parents throughout the UK, and as a continuing
professional development course at City, running training sessions for
20-25 participants one day per month over the last three years. Training
is oversubscribed, with bookings up to 2015. The direct involvement of
researchers in the training has maximised the translation of the research
findings for stakeholders, as has the delivery of the training in BSL
rather than through interpreters. This was possible since the researchers
are bilingual and many of the NDCS trainers were deaf. In 2011 Botting,
Herman, Woll and Morgan carried out an evaluation of the effects of the
FSLC on deaf children's language development, showing significant gains
for children whose parents were on the course versus those with parents
who did not opt in. Our deafness research has thus influenced the content
and provision of a training package that has led to demonstrable increases
in the skills of parents with deaf children and is highly sought after and
highly valued.
As the only norm-referenced and published tests of any sign language in
the world, Herman's two language assessments in BSL14,15 have
enabled a breakthrough in services for deaf children and their families.
For the first time, school-based professionals working with deaf children
have a validated tool to identify those with poor language skills, monitor
their language development and evaluate outcomes of interventions. The
uniqueness of these BSL tests is evidenced by the translation of both into
other sign languages (American, German, Spanish and Danish), benefiting
professionals working in these sign language communities and the children
and families they support. Likewise, Chiat and Roy's assessments are the
first to enable a rigorous evaluation of early processing skills in
clinically referred two- to three-year-olds. These assessments (one
published by Pearson Assessment16, the other available on our
research website17) grew out of a close collaboration with
clinicians, combining informal clinical insights with research evidence to
create precise and informative clinical measures. These help professionals
to identify children who need support, the nature of their problems and
the type of support they need. The impact of the assessments is
demonstrated by requests for presentations and training sessions in the UK
and beyond (including London, Dublin, North Wales, Warsaw and Copenhagen)
and their increasing use in research evaluating intervention, which is
essential for evidence-based practice.
Joffe's ELCISS intervention programmes18 for secondary school
children have filled a key gap in resources to support young people
struggling with language and communication and promote the language skills
needed for school and future employment. Information on ELCISS is
available on a dedicated website19, which has received over
16,500 visits from, for example, the UK, Europe, the Philippines, the USA,
Australia, India and Pakistan. The ELCISS programmes are used across the
UK: 1,330 copies have been sold to schools and therapy departments since
their publication in 2011. The impact of these programmes is evidenced by
many reports and comments from clinical managers, local authorities, head
teachers, special education officers and the young people who have
benefited from them. For example, a Group Manager for Inclusion and
Special Educational Needs in Barking and Dagenham says, `The Local
Authority has been involved in the above, very innovative, project
[ELCISS], which is currently in 90% of our schools. Feedback from the
schools, parents and young people has been extremely encouraging. Parents
have seen positive progress. Staff have reported that training and
materials are of high quality and have enabled them to be effective in
supporting individual pupils through developing their skills and
understanding of speech, language and communication needs. The Local
Authority has valued the project because of its high engagement of
schools, the positive progress of children and young people with
communication needs and the promotion of inclusive practice. The project
has contributed to The Director of Children's Services' focus on the
Empowered Voice.'20 Comments from 12-year-olds typify feedback
from participants: `I really liked the story telling best, it helps me
with my talking,' `I used to feel nervous but now I can express
myself much more.'
Our research has had significant impacts on support for children with
language and communication needs, demonstrated by the extensive use of our
evidence in high-profile policy documents and statements; the
wide-reaching take-up of our research-based assessments and intervention
programmes by leading international publishers in the field; requests for
training sessions and use of these materials across the UK and
internationally; and positive feedback from professionals in the
voluntary, clinical and educational sectors. Through these impacts, our
research has benefited professionals, children and their families.
Sources to corroborate the impact
- RCSLT Resource Manual for Commissioning and Planning Services for SLCN
(2009).
http://www.rcslt.org/speech_and_language_therapy/commissioning/aac_plus_intro
- Speech, Language and Communication Needs and Primary School-aged
Children (2008).
www.ican.org.uk/en/What_is_the_issue/I%20CAN%20Evidence.aspx.
- RCSLT Bulletin, February 2010, issue 694, p. 7.
- www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmhansrd/cm100125/debtext/100125-0002.htm
-
http://www.familysignlanguage.org.uk/.
-
http://www.ncb.org.uk/early-support/resources/developmental-journals/monitoring-protocol-for-deaf-babies-and-children/.
- Herman, R., Holmes, S., & Woll, B. (1999). Assessing British
Sign Language Development: Receptive Skills Test. Coleford: Forest
Books.
- Seeff-Gabriel, B., Chiat, S., & Roy, P. (2008). The Early
Repetition Battery. London: Pearson Assessment.
-
www.city.ac.uk/health/research/research-areas/lcs/veps-very-early-processing-skills/.
- Joffe, V. (2011). Narrative Intervention Programme and Vocabulary
Enrichment Intervention Programme. Milton Keynes: Speechmark.
-
www.elciss.com/.
- Letter dated 17 October 2008 from Group Manager, Inclusion — Special
Education Needs, School Improvement Service, London Borough of Barking
& Dagenham.