Discovery and development of thalidomide analogues for treatment of myeloma and other cancers
Submitting Institution
St George's, University of LondonUnit of Assessment
Clinical MedicineSummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Summary of the impact
Dalgleish proposed a programme to develop thalidomide analogues for their
immunomodulatory and anti-neoplastic actions. Working with a small
start-up company, Celgene, several analogues including lenalidomide and
pomalidomide were developed and entered clinical trials. Both drugs
significantly prolong patient survival in myeloma and myelodysplasia and
have received FDA and NICE approval for these purposes. Celgene has grown
into a large multi-national company with over 5000 employees. Lenalidomide
sales were $3.8 billion in 2012.
Underpinning research
Following the serendipitous observation of improvement in leprosy in a
patient taking Thalidomide in 1965, a number of clinicians reported
beneficial effects of this drug on certain steroid-resistant diseases
including graft-versus-host disease following organ transplantation. This
prompted Dalgleish and colleagues working at St George's University of
London to postulate that thalidomide had immunomodulatory actions in
addition to its well-recognised sedative action. They conducted a clinical
trial of thalidomide in HIV-positive patients in 1997 [1]. Although there
was substantial dropout in both treatment and placebo limbs of the 24 week
trial, it was evident that there were potentially important
immunomodulatory effects of Thalidomide. However it was clear that its
widespread use was likely to be impaired by its association with birth
defects, significant neuropathy in some patients, and its tendency to
induce somnolence.
Dalgleish therefore proposed a programme to develop a Thalidomide
analogue, on the basis that a related drug that lacked these toxic actions
could be developed. He entered into discussions with Celgene, a small
start-up company, which synthesised a series of Thalidomide analogues that
were tested by Dalgleish for in vitro anti-tumour necrosis factor
activity [2]. Subsequently they screened these molecules for immunological
and anti-cancer activities, and several groups of effective agents were
identified [3] and patented jointly by Dalgleish and Celgene [4,5].
Amongst these, CC5013 / lenalidomide (Revlimid) and CC4047 / pomalidomide
(Pomalyst) were the two analogues that had significant immuno-modulatory
and immune stimulatory functions and anti-angiogenic activity [6], which
led to these analogues going forward into the clinic.
Dalgleish administered lenalidomide to the first human subject and
conducted the first phase I study in solid tumours [7]. A key observation
they made at this time was that lenalidomide and pomalidomide appeared to
be immunostimulatory, in addition to their anti-inflammatory properties
[8]. This activity was confirmed in a pre-clinical model, where
pre-treatment with these analogues greatly enhanced the effect of
vaccines. This was subsequently confirmed in humans in 2010 when myeloma
patients on these drugs were reported as responding preferentially to
pneumococcal vaccines. It is now apparent that Lenalidomide is 50,000
times more potent than thalidomide in inhibiting tumor necrosis
factor-alpha, and has less severe adverse drug reactions. This led to the
development of lenalidomide as an oral adjuvant for therapeutic vaccines
in HIV and cancer.
A second key insight was that the anti-inflammatory, co-stimulatory and
anti-angiogenic activities of lenalidomide made it an ideal agent for
combining with other classical therapies, such as Gemcitabine and
Docetaxol, leading to clinical studies with these combinations in myeloma
[9].
References to the research
1. Marriott JB, Cookson S, Carlin E, Youle M, Hawkins DA, Nelson M,
Pearson M, Vaughan AN, Gazzard M, Dalgleish AG. A Double-Blind
Placebo-Controlled Phase II Trial of Thalidomide in Asymptomatic
HIV-Positive patients: clinical Tolerance and Effect on Activation Markers
and Cytokines. Aids Research and Human Retroviruses. 1997; 13: 1325-31. No
DOI available.
2. Marriott, J.B., Clarke, I.A., Dredge, K., Muller, G., Stirling D &
Dalgleish, A.G. Thalidomide and its Analogues Have Distinct and
Opposing Effects on TNF-alpha and TNFR2 during Co-Stimulation of Both
CD4(+) and CD8(+) T Cells. Clin Exp Immunol. 2002: 130, 75-84. DOI:
10.1046/j.1365-2249.2002.01954.x
3. Marriott JB, Clarke IA, Czajka A, Dredge K, Childs K, Man HW, Schafer
P, Grovinda S, Muller GW, Stirling DI, Dalgleish AG. A novel
subclass of thalidomide analogue with anti-solid tumor activity which
caspase-dependent apoptosis is associated with altered expression Bcl-2
family proteins. Cancer Res. 2003:1:63(3):593-9. No DOI available.
4. Bartlett JB, Muller GW, Schafer PH, Galustian C, Dalgleish AG,
Meyer B: Immunological uses of immunomodulatory compounds for vaccine and
anti-infectious disease therapy. March 2007: US 20070048327
5. Bartlett JB, Muller GW, Schafer PH, Galustian C, Dalgleish AG,
Meyer B: Immunological uses of immunomodulatory compounds for vaccine and
anti-infectious disease therapy. July 2012: US 20120190110
6. Bartlett JB, Michael A, Clarke IA, Dredge K, Nicholson S, Kristeleit
H, Polychronis A, Pandha H, Muller GW, Stirling DI, Zeldis J, Dalgleish
AG. Phase I study to determine the safety, tolerability and
immunostimulatory activity of thalidomide analogue CC-5013 in patients
with metastatic malignant melanoma and other advanced cancers. Br J
Cancer. 2004 March 8; 90(5): 955-961. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601579.
7. Schey SA, Fields P, Bartlett JB, Clarke IA, Ashan G, Knight RD,
Streetly M, Dalgleish AG. A Phase I Study of an Immunomodulatory
Thalidomide Analog, CC-4047, in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma. J
Clin Oncol. 2004 Aug. (22) 3269-76. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.10.052
8. Dredge, K., Marriott, J.B., Todryk, S.M., Muller, G.W., Chen, R.,
Stirling, D.I. & Dalgleish, AG Protective antitumour immunity
induced by a Costimulatory Thalidomide Analog in Conjunction with Whole
Tumour Cell Vaccination is Mediated by Increased Th1-type Immunity. J
Immunol. 2002: 168: 4914-9. No DOI available.
9. Liu WM, Nizar S, Dalgleish AG. Gemcitabine and lenalidomide
combination in a patient with metastatic pancreatic cancer: a case study.
Med Oncol. 2010;27:430-3. doi: 10.1007/s12032-009-9228-6.
Details of the impact
Multiple myeloma is a relatively common haematological malignancy
accounting for ~2% of all cancer deaths. Several large-scale clinical
trials demonstrated the efficacy of lenalidomide in treating myeloma.
Prior to the advent of thalidomide analogues the median one- and five-year
survival figures for myeloma were 60% and 20% respectively, and treatment
required use of toxic chemotherapeutic agents such as melphalan. With
thalidomide or lenalidomide the one- and five-year survival figures
increased to 70% and 37% respectively. The use of lenalidomide for this
indication in the USA was approved by the FDA in 2006 [A]. Its use in the
UK was delayed largely by concerns over treatment costs. However, NICE
developed a novel cost-sharing scheme with the manufacturer Celgene and
approved the drug for use in myeloma patients who had received two or more
prior therapies in 2010 [B,C]. The development of this cost-sharing scheme
and the highly influential role of patient representatives in this
agreement was explored in a BBC documentary by Adam Wishart on drug
rationing in the NHS [D].
Whilst the immediate beneficiaries of lenalidomide have been patients who
suffered from myeloma or myelodysplasia [E], this drug is now being found
to be effective in chronic leukaemias and lymphomas. Pomalidomide, the
second analogue originally developed by Dalgleish in conjunction with
Celgene has a more potent immune co-stimulatory action than lenalidomide
and received approval by the FDA in February 2013 for relapsed multiple
myeloma [F]. It is now being trialled for use in other tumours .
Impact on economy and commerce
The development of lenalidomide has had a major impact on the growth of
Celgene. From being a small non-clinical research organisation when the
collaboration with Dalgleish started in 1993 it is now a worldwide
corporation based in New Jersey, USA, employing over 5,700 employees [G].
Many of these employees are in Europe and the U.K. in particular, and this
has led to the funding of many other research groups and clinical trials
throughout the U.K. The excellent future investment prospects for Celgene
were discussed in several for a including [H] Lenalidomide sales worldwide
generated $3.8 billion USD in 2012 and U.S sales have increased 16% this
year and international sales 8% [I].
Sources to corroborate the impact
A http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofMedicalProductsandTobacco/CDER/ucm095626.htm
B www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/TA171
C http://publications.nice.org.uk/lenalidomide-for-the-treatment-of-multiple-myeloma-in-people-who-have-received-at-least-one-prior-ta171
D. http://www.adamwishart.info/2009/06/the-price-of-life-bbc-documentary.html
E http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/druginfo/fda-lenalidomide
F http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/InformationOnDrugs/ApprovedDrugs/ucm339286.htm
G http://ir.celgene.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=111960&p=irol-irhome
H 2012 — Morning Star article Revlimid-1.pdf
I http://newsroom.celgene.com/press-release/corporate/celgene-reports-strong-third-quarter-2013-operating-and-financial-results