Mycotoxin research Impact Case Study
Submitting InstitutionHarper Adams University
Unit of AssessmentAgriculture, Veterinary and Food Science
Summary Impact TypeEconomic
Research Subject Area(s)
Biological Sciences: Genetics, Plant Biology
Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences: Crop and Pasture Production
Summary of the impact
This research (total cost £320,738) discovered which agronomic practices
influence fusarium mycotoxins contaminating wheat grain, and led directly
to a Food Standards Agency (FSA) Code of Practice aimed at reducing the
mycotoxin concentrations in wheat grain for food processing. The impact
has been to improve management practices leading to less waste. The
implementation of the code led to fewer loads of wheat, sent by farmers
for flour milling being rejected due to mycotoxin contamination above the
EU permitted limits, and less food grade wheat grain wasted. These
benefits have been independently estimated as worth £26 million in 2010.
- The key insight from the underpinning research was the identification
of the agronomic practices promoting fusarium mycotoxin contamination of
UK wheat grain. The extent of the influence was quantified to enable
clear priorities to be established for measures to reduce contamination.
- The underpinning research involved the collection of three hundred
samples of wheat per year from fields of known agronomy over a number of
seasons. These were analysed for ten trichothecene mycotoxins, including
deoxynivalenol (DON), and zearalenone. The mycotoxin concentration was
statistically modelled against the agronomic practices (e.g. variety,
cultivation and previous crop) applied to each field, to quantify the
extent of influence of each agronomic factor found to be important.
- The research was a five-year project started in 2001.
- The research was supervised by Dr (now Professor) Simon Edwards, who
was Reader in Plant Pathology at the time.
- The context for the project was that the introduction was anticipated
of European Commission (EC) legislative limits for the fusarium
mycotoxins, DON and zearalenone in cereals and cereal products. This was
the driver for the Food Standards Agency (FSA) and the Home-Grown
Cereals Authority (HGCA) to fund the work in order to be able to give
guidance to wheat growers on how to reduce the risk of mycotoxin
contamination. Legislative limits were introduced in 2006.
References to the research
b. Edwards SG (2009) Fusarium mycotoxin content of UK organic and
conventional wheat. Food Additives and Contaminants 26(4):
496-506. DOI: 10.1080/02652030802530679
Indicators of quality of the research
i. Grant awarded to Professor Simon Edwards, Harper Adams University
Grant Title: Investigation of Fusarium mycotoxins in UK wheat production
Sponsor: FSA and HGCA
Period of Grant: April 2001 for 60 months
Value of Grant: FSA: £215,217; HGCA: £56,771; Industry: £48,750 (Total
ii. As part of a review of mycotoxin and nitrate research funded by FSA,
the scientific quality and value for money of the outputs from each
project were assessed by a panel of scientific experts. The panel reported
on the HAU project that "the research performed was of a very high quality
and of a standard expected of a first rate research laboratory" and "the
work fully addressed the project aims and the objectives of the ROAME and
made a significant contribution to the outputs of the programme as a
The report is available at:
iii. The paper Edwards (2009) has had 59 citations on Google Scholar in
the four years since publication (at 20 November 2013). The HGCA Report,
Edwards (2006), has had 10 citations on Google Scholar since publication
(at 20 November 2013).
Details of the impact
A. Informed UK cereal industry on Good Agricultural Practice to reduce
Results of the research were used in the production of the Food Standards
Agency's The UK Code of Good Agricultural Practice to Reduce Fusarium
Mycotoxins in Cereals and the leaflet Code of Good Agricultural
Practice for the reduction of mycotoxins in UK cereals which was
distributed to all cereal growers in the UK. The results were also used to
develop the HGCA-Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board Guidelines
to minimise risk of Fusarium mycotoxins in cereals.
B. Provided a due diligence tool to assess risk in UK wheat crops
The HGCA Risk Assessment for Fusarium Mycotoxins was developed
based on the output from the HAU research. The Risk Assessment became a
requirement for UK cereal assurance schemes with results reported on grain
passports. The majority of UK wheat for human consumption is covered by
assurance schemes and must have a grain passport with a risk assessment
score reported for each consignment of wheat delivered to mills.
Implementation of the advice and risk assessment by UK farmers has led to
the impact that fewer loads of wheat sent by farmers for processing for
human consumption have been rejected due to mycotoxin contamination above
the EU permitted limits. This has led to less food-grade wheat grain
wasted. The main beneficiaries have been farmers, because wheat grain
downgraded from food use receives a lower price. Thus the impact is also
on the income of farmers. There is also a cost in additional sampling,
testing and haulage for the whole cereal chain.
The HGCA commissioned an independent audit of the financial benefit of
this research (DTZ, 2010). These benefits have been independently
estimated as worth £26 million to the UK farming and food industry for
2010. The HGCA Chairman wrote a letter of endorsement for Professor
Edwards in 2011 stating that `The industry owes a lot of its current good
practice to his research work...'.
C. Informed European legislation
All mycotoxin results were reported to the European Food Safety Authority
(EFSA) where they are used, in combination with all other submitted data
from Member States, to assess the European population exposure to fusarium
mycotoxins. This data is used to formulate opinions by EFSA to questions
raised by the European Commission Working Group on Agricultural
Contaminants (WGAC). Based on these opinions the WGAC determine the need
for, and set maximum legislative limits if needed.
Sources to corroborate the impact
a. DTZ (2010) Evaluating the Impact of HGCA-Funded Research.
Final Report to HGCA. (Confidential report, available for audit)
b. Tipples (2011) Letter of endorsement of Professor Edwards from HGCA
Chairman (Confidential letter, available for audit)
c. FSA (2007) The UK Code of Good Agricultural Practice to Reduce
Fusarium Mycotoxins in Cereals. York: Chemical Safety Division.
d. FSA (2007) Code of Good Agricultural Practice for the reduction of
mycotoxins in UK cereals Leaflet No. FSA/1170/0507.
e. HGCA (2010) Guidelines to minimise risk of Fusarium mycotoxins in
cereals (2nd Edition) Warwickshire: HGCA.
f. HGCA (2013) HGCA risk assessment for fusarium mycotoxins in wheat.
Topic Sheet 121.