Influencing National and International Policy Towards Corporate Governance and Natural Capital
Submitting Institution
University of OxfordUnit of Assessment
Business and Management StudiesSummary Impact Type
EconomicResearch Subject Area(s)
Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services: Banking, Finance and Investment
Law and Legal Studies: Law
Summary of the impact
Professor Colin Mayer's research on corporate governance has had a
profound impact on
regulation, practice and policy regarding the governance of corporations
around the world, and the
measurement of corporate and national economic performance in the UK.
Through policy
engagement with the OECD, research carried out by Mayer over the past two
decades has had a
clear impact on the formulation of governance rules and codes at the
international level, including
recent discussions to modify the principles since 2012. Mayer's research
has had further influence,
since 2012, through his membership of the UK Government's Natural Capital
Committee. His
research on corporate valuation, performance and the role of business in
society has also, and
continues to change significantly the ways in which both national and
corporate accounts
incorporate natural capital.
Underpinning research
Research by Professor Mayer (Peter Moores Professor of Management Studies
at the Saïd
Business School at Oxford University since 1994) focuses on the
international comparative nature
of corporate governance and the relation of this to financial markets and
corporate performance.
Mayer's research records that there are fundamental variations in the
ownership and control of
companies across countries [Section 3: R1 and R2]. These
differences are not, as commonly
suggested, primarily associated with variations in legal systems or
regulation but are a reflection of
institutional differences which allow informal relations of trust to be
sustained.
The emphasis on the use of law and regulation to promote the development
of corporate and
financial sectors [R3] and the way in which capital markets
exercise control over companies is
quite different from conventional views. In particular, takeovers and the
market for corporate
control do not provide an effective discipline or sanction of bad
management [R4]. The main
influence of financial markets is not therefore in exercising control in a
conventional principal-agent
context but in sustaining relations of trust with different stakeholders,
including employees,
purchasers and suppliers.
In particular, Mayer's research established that firms are mechanisms for
upholding commitments
as well as exercising control and providing incentives. As a consequence,
differences in the nature
of ownership are related to the types of activities in which firms are
engaged and the design of
financial systems, including their regulation, should be tailored to the
real activities in which firms
are involved [R6]. This implies that rules regarding corporate
governance should be permissive
and enabling, allowing companies to adopt the ownership and control
structures that are best
suited to their activities and not presume that there is a single right
form. For example, the
governance needs of entrepreneurial and innovative firms are quite
different from more traditional
manufacturing sectors [R7].
This also has profound implications for the way in which performance,
assets and liabilities should
be valued. In particular, it points to the importance of including
stakeholder and social factors in
measurements of performance, especially in regard to the costs of
sustaining natural capital [R5].
References to the research
Listed below are a representative set of references demonstrating the
quality of the research:
R1] Franks, Julian & Mayer, Colin, 1997. "Corporate Ownership
And Control In The U.K.,
Germany, And France," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 9, 30-45. This
publication derived
from an ESRC grant on "Capital Markets, Corporate Governance and the
Market for Corporate
Control".
R2] Franks, Julian & Mayer, Colin, 2001, "Ownership and
Control of German Corporations,"
Review of Financial Studies, 14, 943-977.
R3] Franks, Julian, Mayer, Colin & Rossi, Stefano, 2009,
"Ownership: Evolution and Regulation,"
Review of Financial Studies, 22, 4009-4056, winner of the European
Corporate Governance
Institute/ Journal of Financial Economics Clinical Paper Competition, 2004
and the Best Paper in
the ECGI Financial Economics Series, 2005.
R4]. Franks, Julian, Mayer, Colin & Renneboog, Luc, 2001, "Who
Disciplines Management in
Poorly Performing Companies?" Journal of Financial Intermediation, 10,
209-248, winner of the
Journal of Financial Intermediation best paper prize.
R5] Mayer, Colin, 2013, "Firm Commitment: Why the Corporation is
Failing Us and How to Restore
Trust in It", Oxford: Oxford University Press.
R6] Carlin, Wendy & Mayer, Colin, 2003, "Finance, Investment,
and Growth," Journal of Financial
Economics, 69, 191-226.
R7] Mayer, Colin, 2002, "Financing the new economy: financial
institutions and corporate governance",
Information Economics and Policy, 14, 311-326. Reprinted in Financial
Systems, Corporate, Investment
in Innovation, and Venture Capital (A. Bartzokas and S. Mani eds).
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
Details of the impact
The body of research by Mayer (described in section 2) led to a series of
policy recommendations
for diversity, avoidance of the imposition of regulations that impose
homogeneity on the activities
and financing of firms, enabling legislation that promotes the breadth of
choice available to firms,
and measurement of performance that reflects stakeholder and social as
well as shareholder
benefits. The impact of Mayer's research is most fundamentally reflected
in the way in which the
OECD has altered its policies towards the governance of firms. He was not
only involved in
informing the original principles for governance devised by the OECD, but
has subsequently
engaged in discussions to revise these principles. Furthermore, most
recently, Mayer's research
has specifically informed the derivation of rules for incorporating
natural capital in national and
company accounts in the UK.
Mayer's involvement with the OECD began in 1996. His research had
particular impact through
two papers, which the OECD commissioned Mayer to write during the late
1990s [Mayer, 1996,
and Mayer, 1999]. They played a key role in the initial development of the
OECD corporate
governance principles that are now applied around the world in national
corporate governance
codes. These reports were informed by Mayer's findings that competition
between financial and
governance systems is desirable and that corporate governance codes should
be permissive
rather than restrictive [R1]. Building on this original engagement
with OECD, over the last two
decades, Mayer has acted as an advisor to the OECD and participated in
conferences and
discussions, led by the OECD, about the formulation of their governance
principles.
In 2012, the OECD decided that it should revise and update their
corporate governance principles,
in light of new thinking about the role of corporate governance in
promoting economic activity. As a
consequence, building on his previous interaction, the OECD again
approached Mayer, and asked
him to advise them specifically on how best to update these principles. As
a direct consequence of
his research on corporate governance [as exemplified by R7], Mayer
was invited, along with a
number of other researchers, to participate in a conference in Istanbul
organized by the OECD, at
which initial ideas were gathered about the way in which the OECD should
take forward its work on
corporate governance in the future. Mayer's presentation at the
conference, based on his findings
on the requirements for diversity across systems and the relation between
governance, innovation
and investment [R2, R3, R4 and R6], is included in the OECD
publication from that conference,
Mayer 2012 [Section 5: C1]. His presentation argues that the
traditional focus of corporate
governance on shareholder value is incorrect, that instead it should
establish an appropriate
balance between corporate commitment and control [R5] and that the
OECD has a key role to play
in promoting appropriate national institutional, legal and regulatory
systems to facilitate this.
Further impact of Mayer's research occurred in meetings and discussions
with the Head of
Corporate Affairs at the OECD, the outcome of which was that in April 2013
Mayer was asked to
advise the OECD on "the direction and content of a 2 year OECD programme"
that revisits the link
between finance and business to establish how principles of corporate
governance should evolve
over the next few years. The impact of Mayer's research is described by
the Head of Corporate
Affairs at the OECD who says that: "The decision to engage Professor Colin
Mayer in our ongoing
work is greatly based on his past contributions to OECD's work, which has
had an important
impact on the direction and content of international rulemaking. The
objective of this project is very
much inspired by the policy conclusions that follow from Professor Mayer's
academic work on the
nature of corporate governance and the link to financial markets. By
possessing an exquisite
combination of academic rigour and an understanding of the public policy
process, Professor
Mayer is not only a highly valuable advisor but also an effective
originator of change." [C2]
In September 2012, Mayer's research on valuation and performance [R5]
also led to his
appointment by the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural
Affairs (Defra) to the UK
Government's Natural Capital Committee (NCC), chaired by Professor Dieter
Helm (Oxford) and
made up of a small number of both academics and practitioners. Mayer
serves on this Committee
for an initial period of three years until 2015 and has thus far met with
other members of the
committee on approximately six occasions to advise the UK Government on
how natural assets
should be protected and used in a sustainable fashion. It is the first
committee of its kind in the
world, and as such provides path-breaking policy advice that will set the
foundations for similar
initiatives by governments around the world and by international agencies,
such as the World
Bank. The Deputy Director in Environmental Economics at Defra testifies
Mayer was appointed to
provide advice based on his research and knowledge of accounting, finance
and business on the
procedures by which natural capital should be valued for company and
national accounting
purposes, and how businesses should be engaged in protecting and promoting
natural capital
[C3].
Professor Mayer is specifically responsible for advising the NCC on the
inclusion of natural capital
in national accounts and the adoption of natural capital accounting by
corporations and
landowners. Early evidence of the impact of Mayer's research can be found
in the minutes of these
meetings. The July 2013 minutes of the Committee, for example, report
"Colin to produce a
concept note defining corporate natural capital accounting in time for the
September landowners
meeting" [C4] and the September 2013 minutes note that "Plans for
a 11th November
`International Seminar on Valuation for Accounting' hosted by Defra and
ONS in association with
the NCC were discussed. Colin and Giles [Atkinson] have significant roles
and it was agreed that
the event has the potential to make a significant contribution to the
debate."
This is potentially one of the most significant areas of public policy
research at the interface of
environmental, corporate, governance and regulatory issues. It draws on
Mayer's research on
valuation (Kay and Mayer (1986) and Edwards, Kay and Mayer (1987)), which
he has extended to
a stakeholder and social context in his book [R5]. In particular,
Mayer's research assists the NCC
in the formulation of rules regarding the valuation of natural capital in
national and company
accounts, the way in which the costs of sustaining natural capital should
be determined, how
measurement should be translated into policy for promoting protection of
natural capital and the
governance required at the corporate level to achieve this [C4].
The Committee relies heavily on
the advice provided by Mayer on the formulation of natural capital
accounting [C3].
Mayer was also invited to sit on the ONS natural capital accounting
steering board overseeing the
incorporation of natural capital into UK national accounts. One of the
Deputy Directors in
Environmental Economics at Defra, says: "Colin's work (through the NCC) on
natural capital
accounting is proving instrumental in helping the Government implement its
aim of getting natural
capital properly accounted for within the British economy. He has and
continues to not only help
shape the work of incorporating natural capital into the national
accounts, but is also leading the
work to get companies to properly account for the impacts they have on
natural capital" [C3].
In this way, through his involvement with the OECD and the NCC, Mayer's
research on corporate
governance has had substantial impact on thinking and decision making
processes of a number of
governmental bodies in both the UK and international arena.
Sources to corroborate the impact
C1] Mayer, Colin, 2012, "Regulating for Value Creation: What is
the Link between Market
Confidence and Contractual Freedom?" in OECD, "Corporate Governance, Value
Creation and
Growth: The Bridge between Finance and Enterprise"
http://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/corporategovernanceprinciples/50242938.pdf
C2] Email from the Head of Corporate Affairs at the OECD (held on
file) corroborates Mayer's
contribution to OECD corporate governance policy formulation.
C3] Email from the Deputy Director in Environmental Economics at
Defra (held on file)
corroborates Professor Mayer's contribution to the work of the Natural
Capital Committee and the
Office for National Statistics on natural capital accounting for national
and corporate accounts.
C4] Minutes of Meetings of the Natural Capital Committee, e.g.
http://www.defra.gov.uk/naturalcapitalcommittee/files/NCC-minutes-16th-July-2013.pdf