Women activists' place in Britain's history and heritage
Submitting Institution
Sheffield Hallam UniversityUnit of Assessment
HistorySummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Language, Communication and Culture: Cultural Studies
History and Archaeology: Historical Studies
Philosophy and Religious Studies: Religion and Religious Studies
Summary of the impact
This case study presents the impact of research undertaken by Professor
Clare Midgley that places nineteenth-century British women's activism
within its imperial and global contexts. Impact has been achieved through
advisory roles and public engagement activities with two community groups
involved in projects to commemorate women, and a consultancy role with
English Heritage. As a result, Midgley's research has both played a
crucial role in initiating and shaping local projects to commemorate
pioneering British feminists and abolitionists of local, national and
global significance, whilst also influencing national policy on preserving
and presenting historic sites associated with women's history.
Underpinning research
Midgley was appointed Research Professor in History at Sheffield Hallam
University in March 2006. Since then she has produced outputs that,
developing on her earlier pioneering study of British women's roles in the
anti-slavery movement, underpin the impacts discussed here.
Midgley's monograph Feminism and Empire (published November 2007)
(Reference 1) provides the first detailed study of the interconnections
between the development of modern western feminism and Britain's global
expansion as an imperial power between the 1790s and the 1860s. While
previous scholarship on the links between feminism and imperialism
focussed on the period following the emergence of an organised women's
movement in the mid 1860s, Midgley's study traces the relationship between
feminism and empire back to the period of the publication of Mary
Wollstonecraft's foundational feminist text, A Vindication of the
Rights of Woman in 1792, at the height of the first major public
campaign against the transatlantic slave trade. The specific sections of
the book which underpin impact are: Chapter 1, which clarifies the
evolving relationship between debate on the `woman question' and the
shaping of colonial discourse in the work of Wollstonecraft and other
writers; Chapter 2, which highlights the intertwining of `domestic' and
`political' spheres in the nineteenth century through exploring women's
leadership of the consumer boycott of slave- grown sugar; and Chapter 4,
which demonstrates the vital role of female missionary memoirs as forms of
commemorative practice which gave early public recognition to women's role
as missionaries.
Midgley's subsequent research further illuminates women's involvement in
transatlantic and broader transnational networks of anti-slavery, feminism
and social reform. Research underpinning impact includes new comparative
insights into relationships between the abolitionist and feminist
movements in Britain and the USA (Reference 2). This research is
innovative in bringing scholarship on transatlantic reform into dialogue
with scholarship on the British empire, resulting in new insights into the
distinctive use of the woman-slave analogy in Britain compared to the US.
Through analysing female anti-slavery as a form of early feminism, it also
lays a new emphasis on the British rather than American origins of an
organised transatlantic feminist movement, and shows how the articulation
of racial difference as racial inequality was inherent in the development
of modern western feminism. Other recent research underpinning impact
highlights the links between individual women's trajectories of
anti-slavery activism and their religious journeys between different
dissenting traditions, especially Rational Dissent and Quakerism
(Reference 4), and draws out the distinctive influences that specific
national and transnational religious cultures had on a broader spectrum of
female reformers in Britain (Reference 3).
Midgley is currently engaged in a major new research project that
reinterprets Indian, British and American debates on the `woman question'
in the nineteenth-century age of empire through examining an influential
cross-cultural network of activists who promoted liberal religion and
social reform. This project pushes forward the agenda of transnational
history through exploring an informal and voluntary network that operated
both within and beyond the borders of empire and linked transatlantic to
imperial circuits of reform. It challenges standard interpretations of the
nineteenth-century world through drawing attention to a long history of
collaboration and cultural interchange between activists belonging to
groups which, in dominant western colonial discourse, were unequally
positioned as coloniser/colonised, white/black, western/eastern and
Christian/Hindu, and whose relations have usually been seen as
characterised by cultural conflict and contests for authority and power.
Specific research underpinning impact encompasses Midgley's new
interpretation of leading English Unitarian activist Mary Carpenter as a
transnational social reformer (Reference 5), and her demonstration of
British women's key roles in sustaining cultures of commemoration
connecting transnational communities of social activists across religious
and geopolitical divides (Reference 6).
References to the research
1.Feminism and Empire. Women Activists in Imperial Britain, 1790-1865
(London, Routledge, 2007). This research monograph `makes a compelling
case for historians of gender and imperialism to pay closer attention to
the years between the late eighteenth century and the mid- nineteenth
century. It confirms and extends the contention that race and empire were
constituent rather than peripheral to the making of British feminism'
(Adele Perry, review in Women's History Review, 19:5, 809-811).
2. `British abolition and feminism in transatlantic perspective' in K.K.
Sklar and J. Brewer, Women's Rights and Transatlantic Antislavery in
the Era of Emancipation (Yale University Press, 2007), pp. 121-142.
Article developed from an invited paper to an international colloquium at
Yale University.
3. `Women, religion and reform' in Sue Morgan and Jacqueline de Vries,
eds, Women, Gender and Religious Cultures in Britain, 1800-1940
(London, Routledge, 2010), pp. 138-158. In her review of the book in English
Historical Review (Feb. 2012, pp. 203-5), Alana Harris commented
`Clare Midgley's chapter stands out as a consummate survey of female
reform activity on abolition, rescue work, and anti-slavery within a
transnational perspective'
4. `The dissenting voice of Elizabeth Heyrick: an exploration of the
links between gender, religious dissent and anti-slavery radicalism' in
Elizabeth J. Clapp and Julie Roy Jeffrey, eds, Women, Dissent and
Anti-Slavery in Britain and America (Oxford University Press, 2011),
pp. 88-110. Stemming from an invited paper to a conference at Dr Williams
Library, London.
5. `Mary Carpenter and the Brahmo Samaj of India: a transnational
perspective on social reform in the age of empire', Women's History
Review, 22, 3 (June 2013), pp. 363-385. A reader's report on this
article commented: `it is surprising that we have had to wait so long for
a thorough-going revisionist study of such a famous female reformer and
this author has to be commended for bringing to the fore the
cross-cultural pollinations and fruit of efforts by Carpenter over three
continents'.
6. `Transoceanic commemoration and connections between Bengali Brahmos
and British and American Unitarians', The Historical Journal, 54,
3 (Sept. 2011), pp. 773-796.
Outputs 1, 2 and 3 can be supplied by the HEI on request. Outputs 4, 5
and 6 and included among Midgley's research outputs in the HEI's REF
submission.
Details of the impact
Building on the research and publications detailed above, impact has been
developed in two ways. First, through pivotal roles in two community
projects, one in London and one in Edinburgh, which aim to gain national
public recognition for leading British women anti-slavery and feminist
activists. Reflecting the broader dearth of public monuments to women in
Britain, these individuals have not hitherto been commemorated by public
memorials despite their local, national and global significance to the
history of the development of progressive politics. Secondly, Midgley's
research underpins her consultancy role with English Heritage in
progressing their agenda of increasing the public visibility of the
hitherto under-represented national heritage of women through addressing
the challenges of women's continuing marginalisation in public narratives
of national history and the tendency to dismiss as insignificant women's
domestic, private and local associations with England's heritage.
`Mary on the Green' project: commemorating Mary Wollstonecraft
Midgley has played a key role in initiating a project to erect the first
public memorial to the founder of modern feminism, Mary Wollstonecraft.
Her involvement draws on research insights into the history of the
development of British feminism in the context of the anti-slavery
movement (Reference 1, Chapter 1). These explored the pioneering role in
women's entry into public life played by women like Wollstonecraft who had
strong links to cultures of rational dissent and Unitarianism (References
3 to 6), and the historical significance of memorialisation in making
visible women's public activism (Reference 1, Chapter 4). The move to
erect a memorial to Wollstonecraft was stimulated by Midgley's
co-organisation of a week-long series of public commemorative events
celebrating the 250th anniversary of Wollstonecraft's birth, held at
Newington Green Unitarian Church, London in 2009 and attracting audiences
of up to 120 people drawn from the local boroughs of Hackney and
Islington, the London Unitarian community, and London-based feminist
activists and politicians Midgley produced a booklet on `Mary
Wollstonecraft and the Dissenters of Newington Green', 800 copies of which
were distributed to the public at these events and at subsequent church
and local community events and the annual London `Open House' day (Source
1) The booklet was republished as an article in the local Islington
Archaeology and History Society Newsletter [ISSN 1369-3751] Autumn
2009, pp. 3-7. These activities led to an invitation in May 2010 to
address the AGM of Newington Green Action Group, an active community group
leading the regeneration of the area, about Wollstonecraft's local links
and her global historical significance, and a summary of Midgley's talk
was posted on their website at:
http://newingtongreen.org.uk/ngag/prof-clare-midgleys-talk-mary-wollstonecraft
The enthusiasm generated by Midgley's talk resulted in a unanimous vote by
the 50 people present to launch a fund-raising campaign to erect a local
memorial to Wollstonecraft (Source 2). The `Mary on the Green' project
committee was set up, and it has to date raised over £20,000 and is
currently beginning the process of selecting a sculptor and memorial
design. Midgley stimulated additional local interest in the project
through a talk on Wollstonecraft at International Women's Day celebrations
sponsored by Islington Council in March 2013, attended by around 100
people (Source 1).
`Women on the platform' project: commemorating Scottish women
abolitionists and feminists
Midgley is expert academic advisor (with James Walvin, Emeritus Prof.,
University of York) to a women's history group in Edinburgh that is
generating public support for a permanent memorial to three local women
who played leading roles in the anti-slavery and feminist movements. She
was involved in the successful bid made by the group (part of the Adult
Learning Project at Tollcross Community Centre in Edinburgh) to the `All
Our Stories' Heritage Lottery Fund for their project (ref no: AS-12-03653
- funding for the period January to December 2013). Midgley gave a talk to
around 20 members of the group in January 2013 which highlighted the
transatlantic dimensions of links between abolitionism and feminism
(Reference 2) and the leading role of women in the boycott of slave-grown
produce (Reference 1, Chapter 2). Feedback from the group's tutor (Source
3) stated: `This fed directly into our lottery projects and was hugely
valuable to us. We now have headings, sources and further topics to fill
in the social context for our studies, and Clare could not have been more
helpful and constructive in her support for our project'. This new
knowledge and understanding fed into the group's organisation of the
public launch of the project in Edinburgh on 7th June 2013.
This included involving those who attended in painting pots with slogans
such as `sugar not made by slaves' to echo the activities of the
nineteenth- century abolitionist women described by Midgley, and to
encourage links with contemporary ethical consumer campaigns. Midgley's
public lecture `Campaigning women: abolitionists and feminists in
nineteenth-century Edinburgh' formed the central focus of this public
launch event. As well as covering some of the same ground as her earlier
talk, this drew on additional research (References 3, 4) to explain the
significance of the fact that the group of Edinburgh activists all came
from Quaker backgrounds. Around 90 people attended, including activists
from Edinburgh-based women's, migrant welfare and adult education
organisations, teachers and pupils from Edinburgh schools, interested
members of the public, and representatives from Women's History Scotland,
the National Library of Scotland, Glasgow Women's Library, the Mapping
Memorial to Women project, and the Glasgow- based Mary Barbour
commemorative project. In a feedback questionnaire (Source 3) completed by
attendees, comments on Midgley's talk included `a fascinating topic',
`excellent' and `I want to find out more', with particular interest
expressed into insights exploring relationship between Quakers and
anti-slavery, links between abolition and feminism, and men's treatment of
women at the World Anti-Slavery Convention. This event also began to
generate ideas from the public for the forms that memorialising the women
might take; Midgley's involvement in the project is on-going.
English Heritage: under-represented groups and the historic
environment
In May 2012 Midgley was an invited academic expert participant in a
one-day seminar on `Women in England', part of a series of seminars
through which English Heritage (EH) consulted about the significance of
the historic environment for groups currently under-represented in its
work. This consultation was part of EH's National Heritage Protection Plan
(NHPP), an initiative to determine how to manage a prioritised programme
to identify and protect England's heritage. The seminar brought together
Midgley and seven other academic, community and museum experts with seven
senior members of EH staff. Midgley's contributions drew on her range of
recent research into the history of English women's involvement in public
life and activism (References 1 to 5) to suggest the need for EH to take
account of women's distinctive, but often invisible, relationship with
both private and public spaces when protecting and presenting heritage
sites (Appendix 5.5.7). It also drew on her research into transnational
networks of reformers (References 5, 6) to stress the importance of giving
public recognition to England's international links and to the, at times,
transient heritage associated with visiting activists. Her recorded
suggestions (anonymised but with the identifier [W1]) were included in the
report Responses from the Consultation on Under- Represented
Heritages, which collated responses from the 80 expert participants
in the series of consultative seminars. This report was presented to the
NHPP Implementation Board in October 2012 and published on the EH website,
with EH's official response published on the website as A Response to
the BOP Consulting Report from English Heritage (Source 5).
Midgley's input contributed to the recognition in the report of the need
to consider smaller sites, common places and whole areas or linked sites,
the need to make more available information on the huge range of sites
reflecting the history on non-elite groups, and the importance of
documenting the heritage of transient communities. EH is currently
developing further detailed practical action plans to address the
implications of the consultation. As a result of her participation in this
consultation, Midgley has been placed on EH's advisory list of experts,
and participated in the annual consultation survey on the NHPP (February
2013) (Source 4).
Sources to corroborate the impact
Corroborating contacts:
- The Minister, Newington Green Church, London
- Chair, Newington Green Action Group, London
- Tutor, DRB Scottish Women's History Group, Edinburgh
- Social Inclusion and Diversity Adviser, Government Advice, English
Heritage
Other sources:
- BOP Consultation report and of English Heritage response available in
the `Professional' section of the website (Heritage Protection: National
Heritage Protection Plan: Consultation):
<http://www.english-heritage.org.uk>