Control of Epidemics in the aquaculture industry of England and Wales
Submitting Institution
University of LiverpoolUnit of Assessment
Mathematical SciencesSummary Impact Type
EnvironmentalResearch Subject Area(s)
Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences: Fisheries Sciences
Summary of the impact
In July 2011, a fish disease simulator developed in the Department of
Mathematical Sciences at
the University of Liverpool was installed on computers at the Centre for
Environment, Fisheries &
Aquaculture Science (Cefas), an executive agency of the UK government
Department for
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra).
Since this date, the simulator has significantly improved the capability
available to Cefas for
understanding the likely spread of infectious diseases in the aquaculture
industry of England and
Wales, and enabled the optimisation of methods for the prevention and
control of outbreaks.
Specifically, a user-friendly interface enables Cefas to focus on
particular diseases of concern,
understand their specific pattern of spread and optimise methods for their
control. The simulator is
currently being used to develop contingency planning for outbreaks.
Underpinning research
In 1998, it was estimated (Giorgetti, 1998) that the single notifiable
aquatic disease Viral
Haemorrhagic Septicaemia Virus (VHS) costs the Western European
aquaculture industry US$ 60
million annually. Iversen et al 2005 assessed the general cost of disease
to the Norwegian fish
farming industry to be US$150 million annually. The UK has so far been
lucky in excluding major
infectious diseases such as VHS, Gyrodactylus salaries (GS) and
Infectious Haematopoietic
Necrosis (IHN) virus among others. Our collaborators at Cefas state that
the economic impact of
one of these diseases becoming endemic in the UK "could easily amount
to millions of pounds per
year with significant impact on the economic viability of large sections
of the aquaculture industry."
The underpinning research carried out at the University of Liverpool was
conducted between April
2004 and August 2010 in collaboration with Cefas. This work was partly
funded by Defra grant
FC1153 with Prof Kenton Morgan, of the Veterinary school at the University
of Liverpool, as PI.
The core mathematical modelling research was initiated by Prof Roger
Bowers of the Department
of Mathematical Sciences at the University of Liverpool and by Dr Kieran
Sharkey (at this time a
post-doc in this department, April 2004-September 2007). The work was
continued by Dr Sharkey
when he returned to the submitting unit as a lecturer, between September
2009 and publication of
the results in September 2010. Dr Sharkey was primarily responsible for
design of the model and
for coordinating the project across all project partners. Dr Sharkey and
Dr Jonkers (the latter time-
split between the University of Liverpool and the University of Munster,
Germany) collaborated on
producing the computer simulator.
The research generated the first detailed stochastic simulation model of
the British aquaculture
system, integrating detailed transportation and river networks in addition
to control measures [3.2].
It involved a particularly detailed assessment of the issues surrounding
water-borne spread of
pathogens, incorporating information about river speeds and fish farm
locations. The transportation
networks were built up using confidential data collected by Cefas via
recorded "live fish
movements"—i.e. commercial transportation of live fish. By law, each live
fish movement must be
recorded and this represents the most serious route of contamination. This
enabled them to obtain
a network structure for disease spread with unprecedented detail in terms
of epidemic modelling.
During the development of the work, regular meetings were held with Cefas
in addition to
communication by telephone and email to ensure that the research was
directly relevant to them.
The potential control measures depend on the type of infection,
particularly because many aquatic
diseases can be asymptomatic for long periods, requiring a shift towards
more preventative rather
than reactive strategies. Hybrid strategies combining preventative
measures and reactive
measures were therefore considered. General quantitative guidelines for
preventing and controlling
future infection outbreaks were published [3.2] based on the simulation
model.
The research enabled a unified modelling of several mechanisms of
transmission, generating a
complex system with emergent properties which could not be investigated by
looking at each mode
of transmission separately. Methods of control anticipating these complex
interactions could also
be implemented for the first time.
The stochastic simulation model was designed with a user-friendly
interface and incorporates
sufficient tuneable parameters to be adaptable to many specific infectious
diseases which threaten
the aquaculture industry of England and Wales. This model is currently
installed on computers at
Cefas.
References:
Giorgetti, The cost of disease, FAO EastFish Mag., 1 (1998), pp. 40-41
Iversen et al. Stress responses in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.)
smolts during commercial well
boat transports, and effects on survival after transfer to sea
Aquaculture, 243 (1-4) (2005), pp.
373-382
References to the research
[3.1] Sharkey KJ, Fernandez C, Morgan KL, Peeler E, Thrush M, Turnbull
JF, Bowers RG, Pair-
level approximations to the spatio-temporal dynamics of epidemics on
asymmetric contact
networks J Math Biol vol 53 pp 61-85 (2006) doi:10.1007/s00285-006-0377-3
(peer reviewed
journal, impact factor 2.4).
[3.2] Jonkers ART, Sharkey KJ, Thrush MA, Turnbull JF, Morgan KL,
Epidemics and control
strategies for diseases of farmed salmonids: a parameter study, Epidemics
vol. 2 pp 195-206
(2010). doi:10.1016/j.epidem.2010.08.001 (peer reviewed journal, impact
factor 2.3).
Research grants:
Part of this work was supported by a grant awarded to. Prof. Kenton
Morgan (PI): Stochastic
spatially explicit models of the likely spread of IHN, VHS and G. salaris
in farmed and wild UK fish
populations; DEFRA (grant code: FC1153); £205,741
Details of the impact
Since July 2011, our stochastic infectious disease simulator has been
installed on computers at
Cefas, with a user-friendly interface. Since then, Cefas have used this
simulator to model potential
epidemics in the aquaculture industry of England and Wales, and develop
contingency planning to
control them.
By using simulations of infectious disease outbreaks, Cefas have gained a
much better
understanding of the dynamics of such diseases in the aquaculture system
and are able to
determine the efficacy of potential control strategies. This very detailed
quantitative analysis was
not previously available to them and has had an impact on their practice
by significantly increasing
their analytic capacity and capability. Our collaborators at Cefas
state[5.1]: "This research has
enabled us to better understand the potential impact of exotic disease
introduction to the salmonid
aquaculture industry in England and Wales." and: "The information
obtained provides support for
our methods of control and, in conjunction with other qualitative and
quantitative inputs, provides
evidence to underpin contingency plans for combatting infectious
diseases in the UK. The
simulator is currently being used in further development of contingency
planning contributing to the
drafting of disease-specific annexes which inform government policy on
the control of infectious
diseases in the aquaculture industry."
Indeed, a primary extension of analytic capacity available to Cefas
provided by the simulator lies in
its ability to study specific infectious diseases. Cefas say that "This
(the simulator) has significantly
impacted on our capacity to tailor our analysis towards specific
diseases as opposed to more
generic measures of control. Our use of the simulator has so far focused
on the infectious diseases
that are likely to cause the most damaging outbreaks in the UK including
IHN, VHS and Gs."
Another key advantage brought by the simulator is a much greater degree
of confidence in
understanding the dynamics of the system than can be gained from a
qualitative analysis alone.
Cefas say that "By unifying all of the major routes of transmission
into a single assimilated model,
we have a better understanding of the scenarios we would face given an
outbreak. The level of
detail incorporated within the model has also increased our confidence
in measures to control
infectious diseases in the aquaculture industry. "
Combining the complexities of several modes of transmission together with
the impact of
interventions was not previously possible in a quantitative way. Increased
understanding of the
pattern of spread is also vital, as well as highlighting the most
important generic aspects for
targeting which are found to be time to detection, laboratory testing
capacity during an outbreak,
delays in implementing control measures on infected sites and the time
until fish-farm restocking
should be allowed.
Another major impact is the increase in capability for Cefas to
investigate different control
strategies including proactive and reactive strategies. This is
particularly important as many fish
diseases can spread without obvious symptoms, complicating control
efforts.
The cost of an outbreak of a notifiable infectious disease becoming
endemic is potentially millions
of pounds per year (see section 2, first paragraph), and so the impact of
any percentage increase
in the chance of successfully controlling outbreaks can measured on this
scale. Reducing the
impact of these notifiable diseases is central to the viability of many
aquaculture businesses in a
global market environment, with some diseases inevitably leading to
unsustainable losses for fish
farmers. Additionally it should be noted that the export market to any
country which does not have
these notifiable diseases will immediately disappear until the infectious
disease is demonstrably no
longer present.
Sources to corroborate the impact
[5.1] Group Manager, Aquatic Pests and Pathogens (Cefas) has provided a
letter of support to
corroborate the critical impact of our fish disease simulator upon the
capacity of CEFAS to analyse
and control fish disease.
[5.2] Pages from the Cefas
website showing the role of our modelling within Cefas statutory
remit.
[5.3] DEFRA
Policy planning document. Page 3 indicates the role of the modelling
work in
informing UK "development of contingency plans for disease outbreaks and
biosecurity" Aquatic
Animal Health Evidence Plan. Policy portfolio: Animal Health: Global trade
and aquaculture health.
Policy area within portfolio: Aquaculture Health. (DEFRA 2013)