Submitting Institution
University of KentUnit of Assessment
Architecture, Built Environment and PlanningSummary Impact Type
CulturalResearch Subject Area(s)
Built Environment and Design: Building, Design Practice and Management
Summary of the impact
Le Petit Bayle is a house in France
that was designed by Jef Smith, a member of
Kent School of Architecture's Centre for Architecture and Sustainable
Environment, as co-designer with Victoria Thornton, completed
in 2008, and which is Smith's output JS1. The range and significance of
this impact is demonstrated through its dissemination to a broad and
international audience of architects; architecture students in general;
and architectural technicians / other building and design practitioners
through a range of media. Wide coverage of the project already
demonstrates impact on the primary dissemination media for architects. In
addition, the house has been used as an exemplar project by L'Espace Info
Énergie du Conseil d'Architecture d'Urbanisme et de l'Environnement de
Midi-Pyrénées (EIE / CAUE) in France which has included study visits and
public exhibitions, reaching a wide and international variety of readers
and viewers from those with a general interest to specialists working in
related fields. The continuing research project consists not only of the
design of the house and its execution, but also of observation,
post-occupancy assessment, and the formulation for new research and design
principles.
Le Petit Bayle has been chosen as a case study by Dr Avi Friedman of the
McGill School of Architecture to
feature in his forthcoming book Sustainable Dwellings.
Underpinning research
Jef Smith began work on `Petit Bayle' in 2006 as an architect in private
practice. In January 2007 he became an Assistant Lecturer (without
research obligation) at the Kent School
of Architecture. From this point onwards he developed his continuing
work on the house as a formal, structured research project, the essential
elements of which being those developed by Prof Bryan Lawson at the University
of Sheffield (outlined, for example, in Jeremy Till's RIBA paper `What
is Architectural Research'). He has taught here continuously
ever since, joining the permanent staff as a 0.4 fte Lecturer and ECR in
September 2012, and the design and analysis processes have been exercised
through teaching as well as through independent research. Smith played an
equal part with Victoria Thornton in the original design of the house: see
output
JS1 `Petit Bayle' [5.3].
Since 2007 Smith has continuously used Petit Bayle — its overall concept,
its details, and its post-occupancy feedback — as a basis for teaching in
order to maintain a continuous process of research into its function.
These aspects of the building were built into project briefs for students
at different levels in the school and were discussed through lectures as
well as seminars and design projects. This ongoing research continues to
play a role in the evaluation of the design for a wider audience.
Furthermore, during the design and research process Smith has been
involved with the work of the School at all levels, which included
engagement with its developing interest in sustainable environments; the
establishment of CASE, the School's research centre for sustainable
environmental design; and in practice also as a tutor to third-year
students required to work on environmental and technical solutions for
their buildings.
Petit Bayle is located in the Lot et Garonne region of South Western
France. The process of design and research was underway in 2007 and the
house was completed in 2008. The house was designed for the use of a
single family as a holiday residence; the area is 170 square metres and
the cost of the project was €290,000.
Research methodology and questions for the project are described
in detail in
the output JS1. The most significant questions were: how can
local building materials and forms be incorporated into a sustainable
building project in an isolated rural location? How can the requirements
and details of sustainable design become part of a coherent architectural
language that suits the special location of this house? How can the unique
aspects of site and orientation be expressed while meeting the demands of
sustainable design? What lessons can be drawn from the design and
occupancy of this project for architects operating in similar geographic
and climatic situations?
Methodology: Using the site and context as a generator of form,
function and materiality, the approach was to understand and explore the
various architectural possibilities offered by a steeply sloping rural
site. The location offered dramatic views of the surrounding landscape and
the fundamental aim was the design of a house that would exploit the
potential for useful passive solar gain and cooling, alongside an
exploration of locally available, affordable and sustainable materials and
building techniques. The early design processes were based on recording
site experiences and exploring its potential through a quick turnover of
ideas, without being overly precious, whilst remaining bound by some
awareness of what could be affordable and practical.
The key research insights for the project take the form of the
eventual architectural solution which has been widely published and
continues to be analysed. Smith has defined his areas of enquiry as
follows:
i) what are the pragmatic and poetic possibilities of a site in a
context-based design response?
ii) what is the importance of understanding the opportunities and limits
offered by the working practices and technologies of a particular place?
iii) how does a visceral, haptic experience function as an antidote to
the increasingly virtual world of contemporary existence?
iv) how do the development of simple, low tech and robust sustainability
strategies function as integral parts of the design process, becoming key
generators of form and choice of materials rather than the outcome of
simple pragmatic and technological developments?
Although these are questions without quantifiable answers, close
observation of the house during the latter and current stages of the
project has demonstrated some valuable responses. There has been
continuous monitoring at a practical level, observing which elements need
replacement/ repair; and comparing anticipated robustness (or otherwise)
of materials and finishes. Specifically, the strategies to combat-over
heating over the summer have been monitored, with better than expected
results, although it should be noted that the performance of the house
during the unoccupied winter months in terms of energy usage and cost have
not yet been methodically tested or monitored. The use of spaces by
residents and visitors (including) design professionals has however been
monitored and discussed, in particular where this has varied from what was
anticipated. Occupation of the project has prolonged the ability to
experience and contemplate the building's engagement with the landscape
throughout the day, night and the summer months, and to draw conclusions
from it.
The design for this house forms part of a continuum of research
undertaken by Smith, as an independent architect, as a collaborator, and
as the lead design architect in earlier employment: all these projects
share common ground with the following aspects of the research design
process: engagement with context as being the key generator of form by
careful consideration of the approach up and into the building;
orchestration of routes through the building; and the controlling of views
and manipulation of light.
References to the research
3.2 http://www.meldarchitecture.com/projects/residential/petit-bayle
Details of the impact
The research project behind `Petit Bayle' consists not only of the
original design for it, but also the construction and continuing
experience and use of it. This case study is based mainly on the claim
that the widespread reporting of the project to a professional and public
audience and, specifically, the international recognition of it in the
form of the publication of its original detailing in architecture
handbooks or visits to it by sustainable design professionals, are
evidence of continuing impact in the following respects:
REACH: impact on creativity, culture and society: the production
of this cultural artefact has enhanced cultural understanding of
phenomena; informed public and professional attitudes and values; has been
widely shared with general / professional readers on sustainable house
design
REACH: Economic, commercial, organisational impacts: the artefact
demonstrates the development of new or improved materials, products or
processes, as described in output
JS1
SIGNIFICANCE: impact on the environment: the research process and
the artefact are impacting on environmental or architectural design
standards or general practice, and influencing professional practice, as
evidenced by the publication of details in a textbook
SIGNIFICANCE: impact on practitioners and professional services:
the artefact influence on professional standards; development of resources
to enhance professional practice; use of research findings in the conduct
of professional work or practice; professional practice has been informed
or stimulated by research findings; research has challenged conventional
wisdom, stimulating debate among stakeholders.
SIGNIFICANCE: the construction of the project has had some local
economic impact
1 REACH — details of impact
Articles on Petit Bayle reached a very large number of general and
professional readers through its publication in a variety of different
forms of dissemination. The output
JS1 reproduces the articles. Circulation numbers [c], print
run [p], and typical monthly website page impressions [i] are given here
according to the most recent figures available from the source itself,
where available:
A Professional readership
Journals:
Architectural Review, January 2009, pp 74-77: 12,078 [c]
;
Architect's Journal 15 January 2009, pp. 22-23: 7,415 [c]
; RIBA
Journal, August 2008, p. 10: 28,544 [c]; website: 57,000 [i].
Educational textbook:
Detail in Contemporary Residential Architecture,
by Virginia Macleod, May 2007, ISBN: 978-1856694827, pp. 34, 56, 69, 196,
237, 334 [pr] 5,000
UK;
4,000
US; 2,000
France; 3,000
Turkey.
B General readership
Magazines: Grand Designs, September 2009: 30,820 [c]; Arper
[no figures available]. Book: The New Natural Home, Dominic Bradbury, 3/
2011, ISBN 978-0500515617, pp. 239-245: [pr] 4,500.
C International publications
CAUE (French, professional readership http://www.caue-mp.fr/base-documentaire/bibliographie-maison-ecologique-conception.html;
further reports at http://www.ladepeche.fr/article/2012/07/15/1400530-saint-amans-de-pellagal-le-caue-a-organise-une-visite-de-maison-de-vacances.html;
Eco Maison Bois, Sept / Oct 2013, pp. 52-57: 58,000 [c]; Living
& Design (Taiwan,
general readership) estimated monthly circulation 10,000-15,000.
D Internet publications
ArchDaily 07.07.09: 183,403 page impressions for this page as at
November 2012 (latest figure available — see [5.4])
http://www.archdaily.com/27675/petit-bayle-meld-architecture/
Archidose 29.12.2008: 6,000 page impressions for this page
as at November 2012 (latest figure available — see [5.5])
http://www.archidose.org/Dec08/29/dose.html
World Architecture News [no date]: 1,300,000 [i];
http://www.worldarchitecturenews.com/index.php?fuseaction=wanappln.projectview&upload_id=10
494
DeZona (Bulgaria),
20.07.09 [no figures available].
2 SIGNIFICANCE — details of impact
The primary claim made for this impact is that the prominence of the
building in the professional press has contributed to the current
professional debate around the architectural language of sustainable
design, whilst providing clear visual images and architectural solutions
for many current design questions.
Significance to professionals: Significance to professionals is
demonstrated by the prominence of the project in three of the major
British professional journals, the Architectural Review, the Architect's
Journal, and the RIBA Journal, and several heavily visited
international websites, making it unmissable at a time when the elements,
details and language of sustainable architecture and environmental design
are constantly being discussed. Equally, the building has started to host
visits by professionals. On 10 July 2012 a group of 20 sustainable
architecture professionals visited the house in an event organised by
Espace Info Energie de Tarn-et-Garonne (part of CAUE, conseil
d'architecture, d'urbanisme et de l'environnement) and further organised
visits are planned [5.1]. The house featured as an exemplary achievement
project in CAUE's 30th Anniversary exhibition. In the words of the visit
organiser, CAUE's sustainability design expert Karine Ourceval: `un très
grand merci pour la visite. . . j'ai été ravie de decouvrir et faire
decouvrir votre projet. Comme l'ensemble des participants, j'ai été
conquise. Votre travail m'a beaucoup touché' [very many thanks for the
visit...I was delighted to descover your project and introduce it to
others. Like all the participants, I was enthralled. Your work greatly
touched me'] [5.2].
The appearance of details of the house in the international textbook Detail
in Contemporary Residential Architecture enables their embedding
into future practice, especially for example by the many architecture and
building students who use the book.
Significance to the general public: The house was featured in Grand
Designs magazine which has a substantial regular readership in
particular among those intending to carry out domestic building influenced
by cutting edge sustainable design, as well as in The New Natural Home.
It has been chosen by Dr Avi Friedman of the McGill School of Architecture
to feature in his forthcoming book Sustainable Dwellings, to be
published by the mass market art and design publisher Rizzoli (New
York), because, in Friedman's words, of its `unique urban solution,
outstanding architectural design, environmental concerns, and for being
exemplary in [its] innovation and detailing' [5.1]. The house has also
featured over six pages in the French magazine Eco Maison Bois
(circ. 58,000).
Economic significance: the construction of the house demonstrated
an investment of €290,000 in the local economy for the building process
alone, mainly, it being in the nature of the project, in the form of local
labour and local materials.
Sources to corroborate the impact
5.1 Detailed letter from Dr Avi Friedman, McGill School of Architecture,
Montreal, to explain the significance of the project to general and
professional readership;
5.2 Message from CAUE (L'Espace Info Énergie du Conseil d'Architecture
d'Urbanisme et d'Environnement) to refer to the value of the house for
sustainable design experts and their visit;
5.3 Vicky Thornton, to confirm Smith's role as co-designer. Written
Statements:
5.4 confirms over 180,000 webpage hits for ArchDaily (at November
2012);
5.5 confirms 6,000 hits for ArchiDose (at November 2012).