The international impact of probation research from Jersey: risk/need measurement and supervision skills.
Submitting Institution
Swansea UniversityUnit of Assessment
LawSummary Impact Type
LegalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Criminology
Summary of the impact
This case study describes the international impact of research carried
out by Swansea criminologists in partnership with criminal justice
agencies in the Channel Island of Jersey. This has included work on risk
and need assessment and, in a linked study, on supervision skills used by
probation staff. This research has a documented impact with international
reach, mainly since 2008, affecting policy and practice in Jersey,
Scotland, the Irish Republic, the Isle of Man, Malta, Sweden and Denmark,
and (in relation to the skills study only) England and Wales, and has
attracted interest in the USA, Australia and Portugal. Its significance
lies mainly in the fact that the risk and need assessment study has led to
structured and evidence-based assessment of (currently) about 15,000
offenders per year, or about 45,000 to date, in jurisdictions where no
structured assessment methods were previously used. About 35,000 of these
represent impact since the start of 2008. In addition, the study of
supervision skills has contributed since 2008 to the measurement and
development of skills in offender supervision in England, Wales, Scotland
and Jersey. The research has also been used extensively by a training and
consultancy company and contributed to the establishment and growth of the
research and practice development network CREDOS (Collaboration of
Researchers for the Effective Development of Offender Supervision).
Underpinning research
The international research literature on the rehabilitation of offenders
generally agrees that evidence-based assessment methods and skilled
supervision both contribute to effective rehabilitation and the reduction
of re-offending, and these findings have been replicated and extended in
Jersey (see section 3: R3, R6). From 1996 to 2001 a series of pilot
studies carried out by Peter Raynor (Professor of Criminology and Criminal
Justice since 1996) evaluated the use by several Probation Services of a
new assessment instrument originally developed by Don Andrews and James
Bonta in Canada. This was the Level of Service Inventory - Revised
(LSI-R), which is completed by probation officers to record their
assessment of an offender's needs, and also provides a risk score which,
with appropriate calibration, can be used to estimate the probability of
reconviction. Some evaluation of the pilots was funded by the
participating probation services, of which Jersey was the first, via the
Cognitive Centre Foundation in South Wales, which awarded a grant to
Raynor to carry out the research. A further study of LSI-R in the pilot
areas in England and Wales was subsequently funded by the Home Office and
carried out by Raynor with Jocelyn Kynch (Research Assistant (RA)
1998-2000) in Swansea and with Colin Roberts and Simon Merrington of the
Probation Studies Unit in Oxford.
These studies, for which Jersey provided the most reliable and
comprehensive data, showed that probation officers could use these
methods, that LSI-R (with slight modifications and calibration) was a
reasonably reliable reconviction predictor in Britain, and that changes in
offenders' LSI-R scores were significantly related to increases and
decreases in the probability of reconviction (see R1 and R2 below). This
relationship had not previously been demonstrated in any large-scale
study. In other words, the Swansea research demonstrated the validity of
these methods for use outside North America and added significantly to the
general evidence of their efficacy.
In Jersey work continued as part of a long-term research partnership with
Swansea, which has also included research on youth justice, community
safety and policing. Work funded by the Jersey Probation Service
concentrated on the use of LSI-R in service evaluation, and reconviction
studies including LSI-R data were produced and published in 2001, 2004 and
2009 by Raynor and Dr. Helen Miles, a Jersey civil servant who obtained
her PhD from Swansea (2001-7). These studies confirmed the usefulness of
LSI-R in measuring changes during (sometimes as a result of) supervision
(see R3), and led directly to the idea of studying the supervision input
of staff and relating it to changes in risk/need assessments and behaviour
among the offenders they supervise. The resulting study has been under way
since 2007, funded by Jersey Probation Service and carried out by Raynor
together with Dr Pamela Ugwudike (then RA, lecturer since 2009) and
Professor Maurice Vanstone (Professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice,
Emeritus since 2009), with assistance from Dr Miles and from the Chief
Probation Officer of Jersey.
This study has so far involved the collection of 95 videotaped
interviews, analysis of the skills used by probation officers in them, and
analysis of changes in LSI-R assessments and offending by the supervised
offenders. Findings so far show that officers vary considerably in the
skills they use (see R4), and that offenders supervised by officers who
consistently use a wide range of skills make more progress under
supervision, with reductions in assessed risk levels and a reconviction
rate over two years which is significantly lower than that of similar
offenders supervised by less skilled staff (see R5 and R6). Three other
recent studies carried out by members of CREDOS [see below], one in
Canada, one in Australia and one in the USA, have also related individual
supervision skills to outcomes. However, Swansea's study is unique in its
use of video recording, which gives a more complete and durable record for
research, in the development of a skills assessment checklist and manual
which can be used by practitioners as well as researchers, and in the size
of the effects.
References to the research
(Swansea-based authors in bold)
R1. Raynor, P., Kynch, J., Roberts, C. and Merrington, M.
(2000) Risk and Need Assessment in Probation Services: an Evaluation,
Research Study 211, London: Home Office. (ISBN 1 84082 540 5, or full text
available via Home Office website. 81 citations in Google Scholar.) This
is a peer-reviewed research publication which covered the LSI-R pilots in
England and Wales and contributed substantially to the impact of the
Jersey research.
R2. Raynor, P. (2007) `Risk and need assessment in British
probation: the contribution of LSI-R', Psychology, Crime and Law
13, 2, 125-138. (DOI 10.1080/10683160500337592) (Impact factor 1.13) This
is a peer-reviewed journal article reporting and discussing findings from
England, Wales and particularly Jersey.
R3. Raynor, P. and Miles, H. (2007) `Evidence-based probation in
a microstate: the British Channel Island of Jersey', European Journal
of Criminology 4, 3, 299-313. (DOI 10.1177/1477370807077184) (Impact
factor 1.159) This is a peer-reviewed journal article reporting research
on LSI-R and the effectiveness of services in Jersey.
R4. Raynor, P., Ugwudike, P. and Vanstone, M. (2010) `Skills and
strategies in probation supervision: the Jersey study', in McNeill, F., Raynor,
P. and Trotter, C. eds. Offender Supervision: new directions in
theory, research and practice, Abingdon: Willan, pp. 113-129. (ISBN
9 781843 929369) This chapter (quality controlled by the other
editors and reputable publisher) reports on the early stages of the
supervision skills research. The book as a whole is the output of CREDOS
(see below) and sold 1771 copies by March 2013.
R5. Raynor, P. (2011) Observing Supervision Skills - the
Jersey study, Offender Engagement Research Bulletin 9, London:
Ministry of Justice. (Available from the Offender Engagement Programme
team in the Ministry of Justice, or from Swansea.) Quality controlled by
the series editor Dr. Sue Rex of the National Offender Management Service
(NOMS), this presents in deliberately accessible form the findings up to
2011, including early evidence of outcomes for offenders.
R6. Raynor, P., Ugwudike, P. and Vanstone, M. (2013) `The impact
of skills in probation work: a reconviction study', Criminology and
Criminal Justice early access online 14/7/2013. (DOI
10.1177/1748895813494869) (Impact factor 0.755) This is a peer-reviewed
article on the outcomes of the supervision skills research.
Research grants:
1996-2001, Cognitive Centre Foundation, £30,000. Dynamic risk assessment
in probation practice (principal investigator: P. Raynor).
1997-8, States of Jersey, £7,950. Development of a crime reduction
strategy (principal investigators P. Raynor and K. Haines, Swansea).
1998-2001, Home Office, £65,000. Risk and need assessment in probation
services (principal investigators P. Raynor and C. Roberts, grant held in
Swansea).
2006-2011, Jersey Probation Service, £28,000. Individual supervision
skills and their impact on offenders (principal investigator P. Raynor).
Details of the impact
The research has led to the use of effective assessment methods for
thousands of offenders in several jurisdictions, to new approaches to the
measurement and assessment of supervision skills, and to comprehensive
evaluation of service outcomes within Jersey itself.
Research on LSI-R in England and Wales and Jersey was disseminated widely
to practitioners through conferences and training events both before and
since the start of 2008. Professor Raynor gave related presentations to
eight conferences, including British (1999 and 2004), American (1999) and
European (2008) Societies of Criminology and conferences organised by the
Scottish Office (1997), the Home Office (2002, 2003) and the Jurats
(judges) of Jersey (2001), plus lectures in Cambridge (2009), Sheffield
(2003), Neuchatel (2008) and Barcelona (2009). Training events were
organised throughout Britain and in other countries by the Cognitive
Centre Foundation (CCF), a training consultancy based in South Wales which
distributes LSI-R on behalf of the copyright owners, Multi-Health Systems
of Toronto. (Neither Swansea University nor any members of its staff
receive any financial benefit from the distribution of LSI-R, in order to
preserve the independence and integrity of ongoing research.) Professor
Raynor has spoken at some CCF training events.
Advice was also given to Ministers and officials in the course of
Professor Raynor's membership of Government criminal justice Accreditation
Panels in England and Wales (1999-2009, and 2012 onwards) and Scotland
(2003-5), and of Scotland's National Advisory Body on Offender Management
(2005-9). England and Wales accepted the broad principles of risk/need
assessment but preferred to develop their own method for offender
assessment, known as the Offender Assessment System - OASys.
Typically, organisations interested in the development of risk/need
assessment became aware of the LSI-R research through publications
(including in practitioner journals), conferences or discussions in
advisory bodies and obtained further information from Swansea, together
with advice on practical implementation from Jersey where implementation
was most highly developed. If as a result they decided to use LSI-R or its
derivatives, they would then enter into a training arrangement with CCF.
Reports from Scotland, Ireland and the CCF make it clear that the research
findings were a critical factor in deciding to use this particular
approach to assessment: for example, the Chief Executive of the Scottish
Risk Management Authority (see section 5) states that `the work of
Peter Raynor has been used in all the LSI-R training in Scotland from
the late 1990s to the present time', `this research has had a
very practical impact, and also influence on policy', and `this
set of studies has great impact in the UK where such systematic and
sustained effort is rare'. An Assistant Principal Probation Officer
of the Irish Probation Service states that `without the availability
of this research we would have been floundering in the dark' and `no
other development since 1975 has been as significant in terms of impact
and outcomes'.
The Director of the CCF writes `the Raynor studies were instrumental
in providing evidence of [the LSI-R's] validity in a UK context
and paved the way for continued applicability in many UK areas'.
Impacts since 2008 are in some cases continuations of earlier impacts: in
Scotland training was completed in 2011 covering about 1,200 social
workers, and in the Republic of Ireland implementation began in 2006 and
was completed during 2008, with about 23,000 offenders assessed since July
2008. The LSI-R has also been adopted in Malta in 2010 following advice
from Ireland. According to the CCF, the National Board for Forensic
Medicine in Sweden has sought and received training in LSI-R in 2009 as a
direct result of assessing the Swansea research, staff of the Ministry of
Justice in Denmark received training in 2013, and other countries
including Portugal may do so. Correspondence from the Director of CCF
indicates that the economic impact on the work of the CCF itself has also
been substantial, with a large part of their work being LSI-related from
1996 to the present, resulting also in royalty payments to the copyright
holders in Canada.
Dissemination of the supervision skills study has also been through
publications and conferences, and particularly through the annual
conferences of CREDOS. This was founded in 2007, following discussions at
the European Society of Criminology in Tübingen in 2006 where a paper by
Professor Raynor on research in Jersey led to meetings between researchers
interested in direct research on individual supervision practice. CREDOS
now brings together researchers and practitioners from ten countries and
has produced the recent book Offender Supervision. Other practical
impacts of the skills study to date include a presentation by the Chief
Probation Officer of the Jersey Probation and After Care Service at the
2010 conference of CREDOS in Melbourne, training workshops by Dr Ugwudike
at the Scottish Risk Management Authority conference in March 2011, and
consequent enquiries about use of the Jersey Supervision Skills Checklist
developed in the study. Following presentations of material from the study
in Professor Raynor's 2011 Bill McWilliams Memorial Lecture at the
Cambridge Institute of Criminology and at two invited Ministry of Justice
(MoJ) Offender Management Seminars in 2011 and 2013, all attended by
officials, managers and practitioners, eight Probation Trusts in England
and Wales have also approached Jersey about possible use of the skills
checklist in staff development. In addition the Jersey study is one of the
influences on the SEED project (Skills for Effective Engagement and
Development) being implemented since 2010 by the MoJ in eight Probation
Trusts, and a short report on the study was published by the MoJ as Offender
Engagement Research Bulletin 9 in 2011. Professor Raynor is a member
of the Academic Reference Group for the Offender Engagement Programme
(which includes SEED) and provided detailed advice to the SEED manager.
The impact of this advice is evident, for example, in the use made in SEED
of direct observation of interviews, structured feedback and research
findings from Jersey.
Within Jersey itself, information from the Chief Probation Officer
indicates that the LSI-R based research has enabled his Service to become
one of very few public services in Jersey able to demonstrate ongoing
evaluation of the impact of their work. The research has been `key to
internal monitoring and planning processes' and has been used to `influence
policy-makers and the allocation of resources'. The Minister
responsible for the Crown Dependencies wrote to the Chief Probation
Officer on 22/7/10 to commend the research on LSI-R and to report that he
was sending it on to officials in the Ministry of Justice: `I should
like to congratulate you and your colleagues at the Jersey Probation and
After-Care Service . . . and also Dr Miles, Professor Raynor and Ms
Coster (research assistant in Jersey) on producing an
interesting, encouraging and significant report.' In addition,
material produced in the skills study is being applied to staff
development in a carefully monitored exercise which will help to inform
developments elsewhere, and the Chief Probation Officer reports that
information from the study has been provided to `10 other probation
organisations in the British Isles, Australia and the USA'.
Sources to corroborate the impact
The quotations in the previous section are taken from reports provided by
highly placed users and beneficiaries of Swansea's Jersey research. The
Chief Executive of the Scottish Risk Management Authority (dated
13/9/2011) describes impact in Scotland, the Assistant Principal Probation
Officer of the Probation Service in the Republic of Ireland (27/9/2011)
describes impact there, the Director of the Cognitive Centre Foundation
(26/9/2011 and 1/6/2013) reports on the impact in other European countries
as well as on the work of the CCF itself, and the Chief Probation Officer
of the Jersey Probation Service (1/12/2011) covers a range of impacts on
Jersey and on his international contacts. The influence of the skills
study on SEED can be confirmed, if required, by the SEED manager.