Case Study 2: Clinical trials show that the novel cytotoxic drug eribulin prolongs survival in women with heavily pre-treated metastatic breast cancer
Submitting Institution
University of LeedsUnit of Assessment
Clinical MedicineSummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Public Health and Health Services
Summary of the impact
Clinical trials designed and led by Professor Chris Twelves (University
of Leeds) showed eribulin to
be the first single agent cytotoxic to prolong survival in women with
heavily pre-treated metastatic
breast cancer (MBC).
Eribulin has been approved by European, U.S. and other regulatory
authorities since 2010. Cancer
treatment guidelines in the U.S., Europe and elsewhere now recommend
eribulin. Sales of eribulin
generated many millions of pounds in the first full year following
approval. Already tens of
thousands of women have been treated with eribulin, who collectively have
gained up to ten
thousand added life years. The U.S. regulatory authorities have advocated
the EMBRACE trial
design for future trials.
Underpinning research
The survival of women with early breast cancer has improved at least in
part as a result of trials
such as NEAT/BR9601 (Twelves, co-CI; University of Leeds, Professor
of Clinical Cancer
Pharmacology and Oncology since 2003), to which Leeds contributed (Perren,
University of
Leeds, Senior Lecturer in Medical Oncology to 2002 and Professor of
Women's Cancers and
Oncology since 2013). (1). The treatment of women with MBC remains,
however, palliative. Since
2000 only 8 new cytotoxic or targeted agents have been approved by the FDA
in women with
MBC; Twelves was closely involved with the development of two of
them, capecitabine (2) and
more recently eribulin, both of which prolong survival for women with MBC.
As Chair of the EORTC New Drug Development Group from 2002 to 2004, Twelves
had
previously worked with Dr Jantien Wanders in early drug development (2).
Dr Wanders moved (as
Executive Director, Oncology) to the Japanese pharmaceutical company Eisai
that developed
eribulin. This is a novel cytotoxic and synthetic analogue of a product
derived from a marine
sponge; eribulin inhibits mitosis through action on microtubules, but acts
at a binding site different
to that of other cytotoxics. Whilst in Leeds, Twelves worked with
Dr Wanders and her colleagues
at Eisai preparing their November 2005 submission to the European
Committee for Medicinal
Products for Human Use (CHMP) of initial phase II results with eribulin
and participating in the
meeting with the CHMP at which they requested three further studies.
Between 2006 and 2012, Twelves was played a key role, with Eisai
and international co-investigators,
in the design, planning, conduct and analysis of these three studies.
The first was a larger, confirmatory phase II study with eribulin (Dr
Vahdat, Spain, Chief
Investigator; Twelves, Co-Investigator and Perren) that
substantiated the activity of eribulin in
women with heavily pre-treated MBC (4).
EMBRACE was the second study and the definitive global phase III trial (Twelves,
Co-Chief
Investigator with Dr Cortes, Spain) that led to the adoption of eribulin
in clinical practice. There
being no currently approved standard treatment in heavily pre-treated
patients, this was the first
pivotal study to incorporate `treatment of physician's choice' (TPC) as
the `control' arm. We also
challenged the dogma that it was over-ambitious to seek improved overall
survival in patients with
such advanced disease, using survival as the "make or break" primary
endpoint rather than a
surrogate marker such as progression-free survival. EMBRACE recruited 756
women with heavily
pre-treated MBC at over 100 centres worldwide (including Leeds, Perren)
between 2006 and
2008. Survival was significantly longer, by 2.5 months, in women who
received eribulin compared
to TPC; other efficacy outcomes also favoured eribulin. Toxicities were
comparable between
treatment arms (5).
Finally, the Study 301 phase III trial (Twelves, Co-Chief
Investigator with Dr Kaufman, USA)
recruited between 2006 and 2009 and compared eribulin with capecitabine in
over a thousand
women with less heavily pre-treated MBC. There was a trend for improved
survival in the eribulin
arm, but this did not reach statistical significance; sub-group analyses
suggest that women with
specific molecular sub-types of MBC (especially "triple negative" cancers)
may gain particular
benefit from eribulin. These data were presented at the 2012 San Antonio
Breast Cancer
Symposium.
References to the research
1. Earl HM, Hiller L, Dunn JA, Vallier AL, Bowden SJ, Jordan SD, Blows F,
Munro A, Bathers S,
Grieve R, Spooner DA, Agrawal R, Fernando I, Brunt AM, O'Reilly SM,
Crawford SM, Rea DW,
Simmonds P, Mansi JL, Stanley A, McAdam K, Foster L, Leonard RC, Twelves
CJ, Cameron D,
Bartlett JM, Pharoah P, Provenzano E, Caldas C, Poole CJ; NEAT
Investigators and the SCTBG.
Adjuvant epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and
fluorouracil (CMF) vs CMF in
early breast cancer: Results with over 7 years median follow-up from the
randomised phase III
NEAT/BR9601 trials. Br J Cancer. 2012 Oct 9;107(8):1257-67.
Updated analysis, carried out after Twelves had moved to Leeds, of the
UK national trial (on which
Twelves was co-CI) that definitively established the benefit of
incorporating an anthracycline in
adjuvant chemotherapy.
2. O'Shaughnessy J, Miles D, Vukelja S, Moiseyenko V, Ayoub JP, Cervantes
G, Fumoleau P,
Jones S, Lui WY, Mauriac L, Twelves C, Van Hazel G, Verma S,
Leonard R. Superior survival with
capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in
anthracycline-pretreated patients with
advanced breast cancer: phase III trial results. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jun
15;20(12):2812-23.
This trial was one of the first to demonstrate superior survival with
the addition of a new agent, in
this case capecitabine, to standard therapy in the form of docetaxel as
first line chemotherapy for
MBC.
3. Ravaud A, Cerny T, Terret C, Wanders J, Bui BN, Hess D, Droz JP,
Fumoleau P, Twelves C
Phase I study and pharmacokinetic of CHS-828, a guanidino-containing
compound, administered
orally as a single dose every 3 weeks in solid tumours: an ECSG/EORTC
study. Eur J Cancer.
2005 Mar; 41(5):702-7.
One of the Phase I trial by the EORTC through which important links
were established between
Drs Twelves and Wanders.
4. Cortes J, Vahdat L, Blum JL, Twelves C, Campone M, Roche H,
Bachelot T, Awada A,
Paridaens R, Goncalves A, Shuster DE, Wanders J, Fang F, Gurnani R,
Richmond E, Cole PE,
Ashworth S, Allison MA. Phase II study of the halichondrin B analog
eribulin mesylate in patients
with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with
an anthracycline and a
taxane. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 2922-28.
This large phase II study confirmed the activity of eribulin in women
with heavily pre-treated MBC
using the dose and schedule that was definitively tested in the EMBRACE
trial and Study 301.
5. Cortes J, O'Shaughnessy J, Loesch D, Blum JL, Vahdat L, Petrakova K,
Chollet P, Manikas A,
Dieras V, Delozier T, Vladimorov V, Cardoso F, Koh H, Bougnoux P, Dutcas
C, Seegobin S, Mir D,
Meneses N, Wanders J, Twelves C. Erubulin monotherapy versus
treatment of physician's choice
in patients with metastatic breast cancer (EMBRACE): A phase 3 open-label
study. Lancet 2011;
377: 914-23.
Eribulin is the first single agent cytotoxic to improve survival in
heavily pre-treated MBC; the
benefits of eribulin compared to TPC were apparent across a wide range
of patient sub-groups.
This study has been central to the increasing use of eribulin in routine
clinical practice.
Details of the impact
Research led academically from Leeds University has demonstrated clinical
benefit from a new
drug, eribulin, for patients with metastatic breast cancer with eribulin
now approved for use, being
sold worldwide, incorporated into international treatment guidelines and
bringing benefits to
patients.
Dissemination
The key eribulin trials described here were reported in high profile, peer
reviewed publications
(4,5). The EMBRACE study (A) and Study 301 (B) both featured in the ASCO
Post, the "house
newspaper" for the American Society of Clinical Oncologists (which has
more than 30,000
oncologists as members), as highlights from the annual meeting of the
American Society of Clinical
Oncology in 2010 and San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium in 2012. The
EMBRACE trial in
particular attracted wide attention in the public media (C).
Recommendations for use: Professional bodies and guidelines
Primarily as a result of the EMBRACE results, showing a clinically and
statistically significant
increase in median overall survival of 2.49 months in women who had
exhausted other approved
therapies (5), eribulin has been included in the North American (NCCN) (D)
guidelines amongst the
"preferred drugs" for MBC and the European (ESMO) (E) guidelines as one of
the "new cytotoxic
agents" for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Eribulin was on the
Cancer Drug Fund
"approved" list in all 10 English regions; it is on the new National list
and expected to continue
under new arrangements with the Commissioning Board (F).
Changes in policy: Governmental/regulatory bodies
The EMBRACE results showed improved overall survival, an endpoint not
achieved by any of the
other four single agents approved since 1975 by the FDA for the treatment
of MBC. Eribulin
(marketed as Halaven) received regulatory approval from the United States
FDA in 2010 (G); it
was the first cytotoxic to be granted initial approval for refractory
metastatic breast cancer on the
basis of overall survival data. Subsequently, eribulin was approved in the
E.U. by the EMEA (H),
and is now approved in 81 countries world-wide.
The EMBRACE trial design was unique in using `treatment of physician's
choice' as the control arm
for a registration trial, there being at the time no standard approved
therapy for this group of
patients. EMBRACE was also unusual being the first study in MBC to select
improved overall
survival as the primary endpoint and be successful. The US FDA has since
commended the use of
`treatment of physician's choice' as the control arm in EMBRACE and the
choice of overall survival
as a primary endpoint in certain situations (I). Novel aspects of the
EMBRACE trial design have
been adopted by in registration trials of NKTR-102 (the BEACON trial by
Nektar) (J) and T-DM1
(the TH3RESA trial by Roche/Genentech) (J).
Changes in practice: treatment, services and commerce
Eribulin, and subsequent use of eribulin, have generated commercial
impacts. Total sales of
eribulin across all regions of the world were £330m, including £72m in the
EU, from 2011 to
September 2013 (K). Eisai, which is based in the US but with its European
office in the UK, has
increased its EU workforce from none in 2009 to over 100 in 2013 for the
production, distribution
and marketing of eribulin both within the UK and internationally (K).
Sales of eribulin underpinned
R & D investment by Eisai which has a budget of many millions in 2012
(K).
Changes in health outcomes: patients
Sales figures from Eisai show that thousands of women with metastatic
breast cancer have been
treated with eribulin (K). It is too early to measure directly the impact
of eribulin on the survival of
women with MBC, and this would be complicated by other changes in care.
Given the 2.49 month
survival benefit shown by level 1 data from the EMBRACE study, with over
40,000 women with
MBC having received eribulin to date (K), approaching 10,000 additional
life years have been
gained from treatment with eribulin.
Sources to corroborate the impact
[A] Helwick C. Novel agent improves survival in women with heavily
pre-treated locally recurrent or
metastatic breast cancer. The ASCO Post, July 2010, vol 1, issue 2, p 14.
http://issuu.com/ascopost/docs/tap-vol-1-issue-2
Article for oncologists describing the EMBRACE trial after its
presentation at the American Society
of Clinical Oncology in May 2010.
[B] Helwick C. Primary endpoint not met for eribulin vs capecitabine in
breast cancer. The ASCO
Post, February 2013, vol 4, issue 2.
http://www.ascopost.com/issues/february-1,-2013/primary-endpoint-not-met-for-eribulin-vs-
capecitabine-in-breast-cancer
Article for oncologists describing the Study 301 results after its
presentation at the San Antonio
Breast Cancer Symposium in May 2012.
[C] Marine sponge drug extends breast cancer survival: study. The
Independent Online 7th June
2010. An example of extensive international coverage of the EMBRACE trial
in the general media.
[D] NCCN guidelines version 1.2013.
http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physicians_gls/pdf/breast.pdf.
North American guidelines for the treatment of breast cancer that
recommend the use of eribulin in
women with metastatic disease.
[E] Cardoso F, Harbeck N, Fallowfield L, Kyriakides S, Senkus E, on
behalf of the ESMO
Guidelines Working Group. Locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer:
ESMO Clinical Practice
Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2012; 23
(suppl 7): vii11-vii19.
http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/23/suppl_7/vii11.full.
European guidelines for the
treatment of breast cancer that recommend the use of eribulin in women
with metastatic disease.
[F] http://www.commissioningboard.nhs.uk/about/
[G] US Food and Drug Administration eribulin mesylate approval for
granted November 15th 2010.
http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofMedicalProductsandTobacco/CDER/ucm234
527.htm.
Documents regulatory approval of eribulin from the United States FDA in
2010 (G) and specifically
refers to the Phase II trial and to EMBRACE.
[H] European Medicines Agency approval for eribulin mesylate granted
March 23rd 2011.
http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/medicines/human/medicines/002084/human_med_001427.jsp&murl=menus/medicines/medicines.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058001d125.
As above (see G) documents approval of eribulin in this case by the
European regulators.
[I] Cortazar P, Justice R, Johnson J, Sridhara R, Keegan P, Pazdur R. US
Food and Drug
Administration approval overview in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin
Oncol. 2012; 30(14):1705-11.
Review describing FDA approvals of drugs in metastatic breast cancer,
including eribulin and the
EMBRACE trial, that also discusses the use of "treatment of physician's
choice" and the
importance of improved overall survival as an outcome measure.
[J] The BEACON Study (Breast Cancer Outcomes With NKTR-102): A Phase 3
Open-Label,
Randomized, Multicenter Study of NKTR-102 Versus Treatment of Physician's
Choice (TPC) in
Patients With Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously
Treated With an
Anthracycline, a Taxane and Capecitabine.
http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01492101?term=NKTR-102&rank=6.
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Comparison With Treatment of
Physician's Choice in
Patients With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Who Have Received at Least Two
Prior Regimens of
HER2-Directed Therapy (TH3RESA).
http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01419197?term=TH3RESA&rank=1
Important clinical trials that incorporate major novel aspects of the
EMBRACE trial design,
reflecting impact on breast cancer research worldwide.
[K] Letter from Global Medical Affairs Director (Oncology), Eisai Europe
Limited.