CS7 Sustainable Agriculture: influencing policy-making and industrial practice for food security
Submitting Institution
University of LeedsUnit of Assessment
Biological SciencesSummary Impact Type
PoliticalResearch Subject Area(s)
Environmental Sciences: Ecological Applications, Environmental Science and Management
Summary of the impact
Food security and the sustainable production of food for the human
population is a critical issue
politically and economically. Benton, Cornell &
colleagues have developed and validated a
conceptual framework to underpin sustainable agriculture, recognising that
land can be specialised
to producing food or "ecology" and does not need do both equally
everywhere. This challenges
current approaches to land management and is influencing the development
of new policies for
sustainable agriculture (UK, EU, G-20), the food industry's approach to,
and public perceptions of,
sustainable agriculture. The profile of this work directly contributed to
Benton being appointed as
the cross-government "Champion" for Global Food Security.
Underpinning research
This research explored the conceptual framework for sustainable
agriculture: in particular how
what is seen as "sustainable" at the scale of the farm may not, when
scaled up to a larger spatial
area, create "sustainable landscapes". Cornell developed a
mathematical landscape model that
balanced land management attributes of food production, with the
ecological factors for
biodiversity, and published this with a team of ecologists in Cambridge
(Green, R.E., Cornell, S.J.,
et al. (2005) Farming and the Fate of Wild Nature. Science
307(5709):550-555 DOI:
10.1126/science.1106049), completing this work following his move to
Leeds.
With funding from BBSRC-ESRC-NERC (Rural Ecology and Land Use Programme
project
SCALES (RES-227-25-0006)), Benton, Kunin and Sait
(Leeds) examined different farming
systems in the UK (intensive=conventional vs extensive=organic) to
investigate how "sustainability"
at a landscape scale is related to conventional ideas of sustainability at
the farm/field scale in
developed world agriculture in Europe (1-3). This study was the
most rigorous study to date in
comparing farming systems: over a year was spent in randomly selecting
comparable farms,
paired on 32 variables, differing only in farming practice. Fieldwork,
over three years, assessed
biodiversity more comprehensively than previous studies. The statistical
analysis and modelling
was cutting edge and allowed detailed dissection of the factors
influencing biodiversity. Further
studies with Cornell and Hamer (Leeds), examined the
models of sustainable agriculture in the
developing world (SE Asia: 4).
This empirical work, especially references (1-3), provided the
first rigorous tests of the conceptual
model, and being focussed on EU agriculture are most informative to
sustainable agricultural
policies in the developed world. The principal conclusions are (a) what
appears sustainable
practice depends on the spatial scale at which it is viewed, (b) at a
landscape scale, it is possible
to produce more food, and more wildlife, by farming intensively in some
places and managing land
specifically for wildlife in others, rather than by farming in a way
typically seen as "sustainable"
across the landscape. These results arise because intensive farming is
typically higher yielding
than extensive farming, and thereby requires less land to produce the same
amount of food.
Reduced land pressure allows ecological benefits if the "spared" land is
managed well. In
extensive systems, as they are lower yielding, they require more land to
produce the required food,
reducing the land available for wildlife. Finally, the work shows (c) that
an intervention can have
very different impacts depending on the place (and the way the neighbours
farm). Overall,
therefore, sustainable agriculture requires landscape-level approaches
sensitive to place.
Results from Europe are consistent with work in the developing world
(e.g. Phalan et al., Science
333, 1289, 2011) that shows that intensive agriculture reduces
the pressure on converting new
land to agriculture; and that at a large scale, a mixture of unconverted
land, managed for nature,
and intensive farming, provides more yield and more wildlife, than a
larger area of extensive land
management with the associated greater land conversion (1-4).
These conclusions are clearly at
odds with previous decades of thinking about sustainable agriculture, and,
given the rising global
demand for food, imply that policy (public and e.g. supermarket
sustainable purchasing) should
concentrate (a) on managing landscapes and (b) that where food is produced
is perhaps as
important for sustainability as how it is produced.
Co-PIs at School of Biology, Leeds: Benton, TG (Professor
2005-present; 2011-present UK
Global Food Security Champion); Cornell, S (University Research
Fellow 2004; Reader, 2008-13);
Hamer, KC (Senior Lecturer, 2002-2004, Reader 2004-2013, Professor
2013-present); Kunin, WE
(Lecturer, 1996-2006; Reader, 2006-2009; Professor 2009-present); Sait,
SM (University of Leeds
Research Fellowship, 2002-2007; Reader 2007-present).
References to the research
1. Gabriel D, Sait SM, Hodgson JA, Schmutz U, Kunin WE, and Benton TG.
(2010) Scale
matters: the impact of organic farming on biodiversity at different
spatial scales. Ecology
Letters, 13:858-869. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01481.x
[Scopus citations to 30/08/2013:
64]
2. Hodgson JA, Kunin WE, Thomas CD, Benton TG, and Gabriel D. (2010)
Comparing organic
farming and land sparing: optimizing yield and butterfly populations at a
landscape scale.
Ecology Letters 13:1358-1367. DOI:
10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01528.x [Scopus citations to
30/08/2013: 24]
3. Gabriel D, Sait SM, Kunin WE, and Benton, TG. (2013) Food production
vs biodiversity:
comparing organic and conventional agriculture. Journal of Applied
Ecology 50:355-364.
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12035
4. Edwards DP, Hodgson JA, Hamer KC, Mitchell SL, Ahmad AH, Cornell SJ,
Wilcove DS (2010)
Wildlife-friendly oil palm plantations fail to protect biodiversity
effectively. Conservation Letters
3:236-242. DOI:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00107.x [Scopus citations
to 30/08/2013: 35]
Grants: BBSRC/NERC/ESRC RELU grant: An integrated analysis of
scale effects in alternative
agricultural systems (S Stagl, Sussex, PI). £849,944 (£395k through Leeds
Biology: "Ecology Work
Package" led by Benton, with Kunin and Sait), 2006-2010.
Details of the impact
Context: The global food industry is the world's largest industry
(the UK sector alone is worth
£189bn), land- and water-user and polluter. Demand for food is increasing
rapidly and there is little
ability, globally, to use more land or water. At the same time there is
growing recognition that any
increase in production needs to conserve ecological function. Thus, across
the world, the policy
focus on "sustainable intensification" is intense: how can we grow more on
the same land whilst
reducing environmental harm? Our work is viewed as a "thought leader",
influencing thinking in
policy, industry and public, by indicating that allowing land to
specialise appropriately in producing
food or ecosystem services can produce more of both than a "one size fits
all" approach of
managing everywhere to produce both simultaneously, and that concentration
should be on
delivering sustainable landscapes rather than sustainable agriculture per
se.
Appointment to high profile position: Benton has prosecuted the
translation of the scientific
advances (section 2) to policy-makers in government (UK, EU, G-20), to the
public and to decision-
makers throughout the food industry. The translation of this work to
society arose, originally, from
strategic investment of his time supported by Leeds specifically to
promote the impact of this body
of work (refs 1-3). The profile generated was contributory to the
appointment of Benton to the post
of UK Global Food Security Champion in 2011 (0.8 fte for 5 years) [A].
This post involves the
coordination of research spend in food security across the UK's public
funders, the provision of
evidence to government, and the translation of the evidence to wider
society (industry and the
public).
Dissemination strategy: A deliberative dissemination strategy has
helped generate impact
beyond academia. An original press release was followed by publications in
a range of
stakeholder-facing outlets including journals (Benton et
al. World Agriculture 2: 14-21 2011),
magazines (Benton TG (2012) Sustainable intensification and
the UK. In Food Ethics Council
magazine special edition on "Sustainable intensification:
unravelling the rhetoric", Jul 12 2012) and
blogs (e.g. Seeds, feed, food Jan 2012; Plantwise:
Mar 2012 GFS: on the meaning of
sustainability: June 2012; Landscapes for people, food and
nature: Resilient landscapes June
2013). These pieces have raised the work's profile and led to invitations
to speak or advise as
detailed below.
Influence on UK government: Parliamentary impact has been
delivered within select
committees, within government departments (e.g. DEFRA) and through Benton's
appointment as
the Global Food Security Champion by the UK government [A].
- In the House of Commons Select Committee report — Environmental, Food
& Rural Affairs
Committee: Greening the common agricultural policy [B], there
are references to oral (pages
Ev11-Ev15) and written submissions (pages Ev90-Ev94) from Benton,
and to discussion of
the issues raised by Benton (paragraph 26, page 14; paragraph
64, page 24).
- In July 2012, DEFRA published its Green Food Project, which acts as a
framework for
developing agri-environment policy up to mid-century. Benton was
invited onto the
"Synthesis Group" for his expertise on sustainable landscape management
(1-3), and
paragraphs 4.37-4.41 of the report discuss the need for landscape-level
approaches and
stem from appreciation of this work [C]. A commitment from the
Green Food Project is to
invest in Farm Platforms to allow investigation of the landscape-level
responses around the
UK (a direct outcome from the corpus of work represented here). DEFRA
has announced an
initial £4.5m of funding to support this (and Benton has
contributed to the design of the call).
Influence on UK Food Industry: Benton has informed stakeholder
groups in the agricultural
sector of the scientific evidence for redefining sustainable food
production in the UK. This has been
through discussion with high-level industry groups, and the publication of
articles widely read by
trade, plenary addresses at trade conferences [D, E] and detailed
consultancy work the output of
which was published [F].
- Influence on farmers. Benton presented to the National
Farmers' Union and many other
farming conferences and meetings, and has subsequently contributed to a
range of
debates in public and press. The work by Benton has been
favourably received by the
NFU and the NGO "Linking environment and farming". Following publication
of the original
research, Benton was recruited to advise the Soil Association's
Duchy Original's Future
Farming programme aiming to improve organic farming methodologies and
this includes
providing printed advice on conducting experiments to 50,000 UK farmers
as a poster
supplied with the NFU's British Farmer and Grower [D].
-
Benton presented to the Food and Drink Federation alongside the
Secretary of State for
the Environment in May 2012. Subsequently he was invited to discuss
sustainability with
the Institute of Grocery Distributors' "Sustainability Group" (Dec 2012
and March 2013), and
their Chief Executives' Group (2013). The Institute of Grocery
Distributors comprises the
30 leading food supply and retail companies in the UK. This work has led
to re-assessment
of the food industry's sustainability strategies e.g. Mack Multiples
(£200m turnover fresh
produce supplier) is "greatly benefitting" from Benton's input
in its developing sustainability
strategy and has subsequently employed a Benton group postdoc on
a 6 month contract to
operationalise the work [E].
- Consultancy work for the US-based RESOLVE (US based organisation
specialising in
informing public policy, funded by Mars Inc and charitable foundations),
which
commissioned a review of the efficacy of certification schemes in
driving sustainability
benefits. This review is acknowledged in their final report (see note on
pA-125) and the
review was subsequently published as a working paper of the National
Resource Institute
with a quote from Forum for the Future on its insights [F].
International Influence: Benton has sought to influence the global
sustainability agenda through
both public and private policy fora:
- Common Agricultural Policy. The Common Agricultural Policy
(responsible for 30-40% of
the EU's budget) is currently undergoing reform, and is being finalised
for the next 7 year
spending cycle in summer 2013. Benton was asked to provide
advice on "sustainability" in
the following ways: (a) invited presentation at the Directorate-General
Environment (to the
Deputy Head of Agriculture, Forests and Soils, and team) (Dec 2010), (b)
presentation in
the EU Parliament (Dec 2010) to a mixture of MEPs and industry, (c)
subsequently, the
Chair of the EU's Agriculture Committee invited Benton to write
a policy paper published in
a journal edited by him, published in 2012 [G].
- As Champion for the UK's Global Food Security programme, Benton
is frequently invited to
fora where he can advise on the sustainability and production agendas.
For example he
presented at a side meeting at the Rio+20 conference in June 2012 on
assessing
sustainability; he led the official UK delegation to a G20 meeting of
agricultural chief
scientists in Mexico, Sept 2012, and attended G8 meetings on data
sharing for sustainable
agriculture. The impact he made at the G8 meeting was to move the
arguments on from
sharing genetic data to sharing environmental data to allow
landscape-level optimisation,
as exemplified by ref (3) [H].
Influencing public choices
Benton has delivered many public lectures on sustainability,
written blogs, contributed to panel
events and has advised the author of the book "A greedy man in a hungry
world" (Spring 2013).
The author recently said publically, and this is echoed in the
acknowledgements in his book, that
Benton's work on sustainability completely reshaped his views and
his book [I].
Sources to corroborate the impact
[A] Global Food Security Champion appointment.
[B] House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Committee, Greening the Common
Agricultural Policy. (2012-13 HC170)
[C] DEFRA Green Food project final report.
[D] Email from LEAF; Presentation to NFU conference (see
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nfupics/6774033222/in/photostream/);
influence on farming
community through media releases — e.g. Farmers' Weekly: 6th
Mar 2012, 16th April 2012, 10th Sept
2012. Also presentation at Centre of Excellence for UK Farming,
Birmingham, Jan 2013 on
assessing sustainability and reported in the farming press. The
advisory group for the Duchy
Originals Future Farming is online. The poster on "Carrying out your
own trial" was published April
2013 in the NFU magazine British Farmer and Grower.
[E] Report of presentation to Food and Drink Federation;
Letter from Director of Sustainability,
Mack Multiples; Emails from chair of the IGD sustainability group about
input to IGD Industry
Sustainability Group.
[F] We wrote a review of the efficacy of certification schemes in
driving sustainability benefits for
RESOLVE (US based organisation specialising in informing public policy).
This review is
acknowledged in the report (see note on pA-125) and the review was
subsequently published as a
working paper of the National Resource Institute. The Director of
Forum for the Future,
commented that it contained "some really important insights" and
forwarded it, with a strong
endorsement, to the companies he advises, including Marks and Spencer and
Unilever.
[G] Letter of corroboration from Deputy Head of Agriculture,
Forests and Soils, at DG
Environment) (Dec 2010);presentation in the EU Parliament (Dec 2010) to a
mixture of MEPs and
industry (see p12 in www.hucpa.hu/files/20378_ed_october2010_january2011.doc
);letter from
Chair of the EU's Agriculture Committee; policy paper published
following personal invitation from
chair of the EU Agriculture and Rural Development committee.
[H] Rio+20 conference presentation e.g. see http://www.irinnews.org/Report/95670/RIO-20-The-
landscape-approach); invitation letter and final communiqué of G20
MACS (Meeting of Agricultural
Chief Scientists); invitation letters to G8 open data meetings from USDA.
[I] Public lectures and panels, for example a report on Benton's
public lecture in Norwich, Oct
2012, and involvement in the City Food Lecture in the Guildhall,
London. The book "A greedy man
in a hungry world" was published May 23rd 2013. The author
acknowledges Benton's input in the
book and online in an interview.