Influencing the evaluation, and enhancing the benefits, of foreign investment by private firms and government organizations
Submitting Institution
University of LeedsUnit of Assessment
Business and Management StudiesSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services: Business and Management
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration
Summary of the impact
This case demonstrates how researchby the Centre for International
Business University of Leeds (CIBUL) between 2001and 2008 has been
utilised by Nestlé - the world's largest nutrition company - to improve
its communication strategy and evaluate how its foreign investments create
value and influence economic development, innovation, environment, society
and different stakeholder groups (e.g. employees, suppliers and
governments). CIBUL's research has also (1) improved the services offered
by intermediaries such as the investment-promotion arm of the British
government (the UKTI) and the UN body for economic development (UNCTAD),
and (2) benefited the businesses thatthese bodies serve by identifying
factors that help theminternationalise and derive greater value from
international expansion.
Underpinning research
The research was led by Professors Mario Kafouros, Peter
Buckleyand Jeremy Clegg between 2001 and 2008, and focused
on three interrelated research strands: (1) the locational advantages of
nations and their impact on firms' internationalisation [1], [2], [3],(2)
mechanisms by which innovation and internationalisation by firms enhance
their performance and competitivenessin the global economy[4], [5]
and (3) the way in which multinational enterprises integrate theirglobal
strategies to create value [6]. The work that forms the scientific
underpinning of this case integrates multiple levels of analysis
(international-, country-, region- and firm-level) and has been heavily
cited.
The first research strand found that the performance benefits gained by
firms through investing in a particular location are contingent upon their
distinctive capabilities and resources. This differs significantly between
firms from emerging countries (e.g. China and India) and developed nations
(e.g. the UK and Germany). These findings suggest that the location
strategy of one firm cannot be transplanted to another. A foreign
investment location choice which is optimal for one business might not be
beneficial for another firm. In other words, the practical implication is
that the benefits any one firm receives from a given economic and
institutional environment may not be available to other businesses. These
findings challenge taken-for-granted assumptions about the location of
foreign affiliates, and have important implications for how managers
internationalise their businesses.
The second strand of research identified the way in which various factors
help firms innovate and create value by sourcing scientific talent,
knowledge and technologies that reside in different industries and
countries around the world. The findings show that a firm's ability to
access and combine globally distributed knowledge reservoirs within one
organisation is determined by (1) the manner in which their network of
affiliate firms is structured and (2) the international breadth and depth
of this network. When multinationals spread their operations across many
geographical markets, they benefit more from external knowledge than when
they concentrate their activities in few countries. This, in turn, helps
firms to co-develop innovations with international collaborators. This
research strand captures synergies within multinational firms, and deepens
understanding of how firm- and location-specific factors jointly enhance
firm performance.
The third research strand integrates the two previous strands with each
other to create the so-called "global factory" framework. The global
factory is a structure through which multinational enterprises integrate
theirglobal strategies using a combination of innovation, distribution and
production of bothgoods and services. The results of this work identify
(1) the difficulties that both developed and emerging market firms face in
the global economy and (2) strategies that firms can adopt to overcome
various challenges and generate value from their foreign operations.
These three research strands have contributed to CIBUL being viewed as
one of the world-leading international business research centres,
according to independent evaluations published in international
peer-reviewed journals by Chan et al.(2006) and Xu et al.(2008).1
They have also informed the location choices and internationalisation
behaviour of firms, and influenced the services offered by various
government organisations in the UK and abroad (discussed in Section 4).
1 Chan, K., Fung, H. and Leung, W. (2006) International
Business Research: Trends and School Ranking. International Business
Review, 15(4), 317-338.
Xu, S. Yalcinkaya, G. and Seggie, S. (2007) Prolific Authors and
Institutions in leading International Business Schools. Asia Pacific
Journal of Management, 25(2) 189-207.
References to the research
The underpinning research has received recognition in the form of (1)
papers published in high-impact-factor international journals; (2)
prestigious best-paper awards from the Academy of International Business
(AIB) and the British Academy of Management (BAM); (3) funding from
research councils (e.g. (i) and (ii)) and multinational
companies (Nestlé(iii)); and(4) uptake by government and
international organisations (e.g., UKTI (iv) and UNCTAD).
Peer-reviewed journal articles
[1]Buckley, P. J., Clegg, J., & Wang, C. (2002). The
Impact of Inward FDI on the Performance of Chinese Manufacturing Firms. Journal
of International Business Studies, 33(4),
637-655.doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491037
[2]Buckley, P. J., Clegg, J., & Wang, C. (2007). Is
the Relationship Between Inward FDI and Spillover Effects Linear? An
empirical examination of the case of China. Journal of International
Business Studies, 38(3), 447-459. .
doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400274
[3]Buckley, P. J., Clegg, J., Cross, A., Zheng,
P., Voss H., Liu, X. (2007). The Determinants of Chinese OoutwardForeign
Direct Investment. Journal of International Business Studies,
38(4), 499-518. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400277
[4]Kafouros, M. I., Buckley, P. J., Sharp J., & Wang,
C. (2008). The Role of Internationalization in Explaining Innovation
Performance. Technovation, 28 (1-2),
63-74.doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.009
[5]Kafouros, M. I. &Buckley, P. J. (2008).Under What
Conditions do Firms Benefit from the Research Efforts of Other
Organizations? Research Policy, 37(2),
225-239.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.11.005
[6]Buckley P.J. (2009). The Impact of the Global Factory on
Economic Development. Journal of World Business, 44(2), 131-143.
doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2008.05.003
Research grants
(i) ESRC Fellowship,(2005). Title: R&D, Knowledge Spillovers
and Productivity Growth. M. Kafouros, £32,601
(ii) Project Funded by the EPSRC: Knowledge, Skills and
Productivity in Retailing. J Clegg (co-I), I. Grugulis
(PI), Dr D.A. Higon, A.M. Williams. £206,650
(iii) Project funded by Nestlé (2008): Value Creation and Sharing
by Nestlé: Economic View and Measurement. P. Buckley (PI), N.
Forsans, M. Kafouros and H. Voss. £65,750
(iv) Project funded by UK Trade and Investment (UKTI), (2009):
Impact of the Current Recession on where British Firms Should be Looking
to Trade and Invest Overseas.P. Buckley (PI), A. Cross, M.
Kafouros, and H. Voss. £17,670
Details of the impact
Multinational Enterprises: Nestlé
The findings of the first and third strand of CIBUL's researchregarding
the effects of foreign investment and the locational strategy of
multinational firms are used globally by Nestlé - the world's leading
nutrition company which employs 280,000 individuals and has operations in
over 200 countries. Nestlé has employed CIBUL's research, and more
specifically a conceptual framework developed by CIBUL,to assess the
impacts of its international operations, develop its value creation
strategy, and improve its corporate communication plans.Nestlé has made
extensive use of the research to measure how its actions and investments
both create value and benefit societies in the countries where it operates
(both in home and host countries) - for example, the construction of its Nespressofactory
in Avenches (Switzerland) and its milk district operations in Pakistan. [A,
B]
Nestlé has incorporated a conceptual framework developed by CIBUL in its
annual reports and global websites - this is now part of Nestlé's toolkit
for evaluating its overall economic, innovation and social impacts on
different stakeholder groups in various countries around the world [A,
B]. According to Nestlé itself, the research has helped to "measure
the company's overall net impact on its stakeholder groups" [A].
Put differently, the framework has enabled the company to improve its
corporate communication strategy, more effectively conveying the different
facets of itseconomic, innovation, social and environmental contributions
to various groups including consumers, suppliers, industry, employees and
governments. This research is useful to companies such as Nestlé because
it also identifies the channels and mechanisms through which the foreign
investment of multinational enterprises can be more successful. To enhance
this impact further, Nestlé commissioned a report from CIBUL.
The research of CIBUL has also been used as a basis for discussion,
analysis and decision making in the Seoul G20 Business Summit. More
specifically, in November 2010, the Chairman of Nestlé and Convenor of the
Seoul G20 Business Summit Group on Foreign Direct Investment(FDI)
emphasised in his foreword that CIBUL's research findings not only
benefited the company's senior managers but also "...stimulated a
systematic debate on and analysis of the impacts of FDI... and served as
an important input towards the work of the G20 FDI Working Group [which
included CEOs from several leading multinationals]". He further
emphasised the role of this research by saying that "For companies,
policy makers and the wider public, it is important to understand where
and how business and more specifically FDI can have a positive impact on
stakeholders and society at large". [C]
International policy agenda: United Nations
CIBUL's research has shaped the policy agenda of the United Nations
Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), particularly in theWorld
Investment Report (WIR). The WIR is the world's most
authoritative analysis of international businessandisextensively used by
the UN, policy units, statistical offices and government institutions. The
`Global Factory' theory and findings from CIBUL's research on optimal
location, innovation and foreign investmentare a key part of the WIR
2011, for which Buckleywasprincipal consultant, devising its
conceptual structure.
The worldwide reach of the impact is made evident by the fact that more
than 115,000 people from 160 countries (including around 1,000
policy-makers) have downloaded the report [D] [E]. The Director of
UNCTAD's Investment and Enterprise Division, reported that the WIR
and its forum offered `unique opportunities for cross-fertilisation and
networking between a wide range of investment stakeholders, allowing the
initiation of concrete investment projects and policy initiatives. The
success of the Forum is very much owed to you [Buckley].
Your contribution helped elevate the Forum to the highest standard, and
helped establish it as the new centre of gravity for new international
investment and policy formulation'. [F].
British business communityand intermediaries
CIBUL's research has led to service innovations in the advisory sector
via intermediaries such as the UK Trade & Investment (UKTI) and the
China-Britain Business Council (CBBC).More specifically, the UKTI funded
CIBUL to conduct two research projects, and the findings were used to
writethe Chinese Regional Cities report. This research report, which is
the outcome of collaboration between CIBUL and CBBC,has benefited British
businesses by identifying which locations and marketsoffer superior
business opportunities following the global financial crisis [G].
Therefore, CIBUL's first two research strands have benefited these bodies
by enabling their advisors to articulate and integratein written reports
and in the various workshops described below (1) how particular locations
fit with firms' strategic goals and capabilities, (2) the factors that UK
firms should consider when sourcing scientific talent, knowledge and
technologies from abroad and (3) how firms can derive greater value from
investment locations in China.
When the Chinese Premier (Wen Jiabao) visited the UK in 2009, he and
then-Prime Minister Gordon Brown discussed the findings of the Chinese
Regional Cities report at 10 Downing Street. The two leaders agreed to
promote UK trade and investment in China's Regional Cities, and following
the meeting, thePrime Minister said that "...the agreements, which
include a memorandum of understanding on the promotion of UK trade in
regional cities in China, would help double the UK's exports to the
country to £10 billion by 2010" [H].This view was reinforced
by the UKTIwhich announced that "Britain and China signed a Memorandum
of Understanding (MoU) committing both countries to work together to
highlight opportunities for UK business outside the traditional centres
... The agreement follows on from a report on Chinese Regional Cities"
[G].
Since 2009, the research has been used in 17 workshops in the UK and
China run by the UKTI, the British Consulates-General in China and CBBC.
Nearly 1,000 companies,over 200 in China,attended the workshops. British
firms took part in business trips to the cities on the location shortlist
drawn up by the research[I], and the international press recognised
the importance of the findings [J]. A CIBUL-CBBC study found that
nearly 50% of the participating investors indicated the study had an
impact on their thinking towards investing in China.2The CBBC
has presented this research at fora in the UK and China (CBBC Regional
Cities Roadshow). As a result, CIBUL's research catalysed numerous city
missions, leading to businesses-seeking opportunities.
2 An all-day HEIF 4-funded UK-China Small and Medium-Sized
Enterprise (SME) Forum held at the University of Leeds, organised by CIBUL
and the CBBC.
Sources to corroborate the impact
A. Nestlé Creating Shared Value Report 2009, p.4 shows the
conceptual framework developed by CIBUL.
B. This website confirms that the conceptual framework developed by CIBUL
was also included in the global website ofNestlé: www.nestle.com/CSV
(the content of which has now changed but a record has been kept,
available upon request)
C. Seoul G20 FDI working group foreword from the Chairman ofNestlé.
This foreword is included on p.2 of the report.
D. Letter of testimony from Chief, Investment Research Issues, UNCTAD
E. UNCTAD download statistics report - January 2012
F. Letter of testimony from Director, Division on Investment and
Enterprise, UNCTAD
G. Announcements from the CBBC and the UKTI referring to the impact of
the research [downloaded 13/10/2013 and 03/02/09 respectively]:
http://www.cbbc.org/guide/chinese_regional_cities/chinese_regional_cities
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20081211180257/newsroom.uktradeinvest.gov.uk/content/asia-pacific/pm-gordon-brown-calls-for-rapid-growth-in-uk-china.ashx
H. UK-China Summit: Government webpages outlining the key outcomes 2009
[downloaded 14/02/09]:
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20090210005941/http://www.number10.gov.uk/Page18213
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20090210005941/http://www.number10.gov.uk/Page18214
I. Britain in 2010 (annual magazine of the ESRC), `New Business
Opportunities in China's Regions', pp. 76-77
J. Financial Times "UK companies neglect regional deals in China"
August 18th 2008; Financial Times "Partners Surface on Redrawn
Map of the World" 12 February 2010