Impact Case Study 3: Teaching the Role of Character in Artistic Creation and Appreciation.
Submitting Institution
University of LeedsUnit of Assessment
PhilosophySummary Impact Type
CulturalResearch Subject Area(s)
Psychology and Cognitive Sciences: Psychology
Philosophy and Religious Studies: Philosophy
Summary of the impact
    Matthew Kieran's research focuses on the role that individual
      motivations, skills and settled dispositions (i.e. someone's character)
      actively play in artistic appreciation and creation. In particular, it
      shows the significant role that character should play in guiding artistic
      creativity and evaluation. He has worked extensively outside higher
      education—using small group sessions with the public, contributions to
      creators' conferences, high-profile media work, policy inputs, a
      prime-time TV documentary and widely disseminated web materials— to enrich
      the public understanding of artistic values based on this approach and to
      help skill people up in developing their artistic creativity and art
      appreciation.
    Underpinning research
    Kieran`s work focuses on the roles that our character (i.e. one's
      motivations, skills, moral and non-moral dispositions) should play in
      artistic creation and appreciation. Kieran (6) argued that a
      judgment of a work to be obscene by an appreciator involves both aversion
      and attraction as an upshot of character: aversion in going against the
      appreciator's moral norms or dispositions and attraction in speaking to
      other personal drives (such as certain sexual desires). Judging a work to
      be obscene is thus in large part a function of how the work interacts with
      an appreciator's moral and non-moral character. Kieran (5) then
      went on to argue that an even wider range of works can be judged to be
      morally problematic in ways that make them good as art. In particular an
      appreciator's character can be challenged by morally problematic art in
      ways that lead to insight through active appreciation (5). This
      led to an invitation to write the monograph Revealing Art (4),
      where Kieran argued that challenging works can be successful partly
      because they get us to endorse or suspend attitudes in ways we are not
      willing to in real life. Hence, whilst we may not admire Marat, be
      sympathetic to certain forms of Christianity or endorse honour codes, in
      actively appreciating David's Death of Marat, the Roettgen
        Pietà or the Iliad we may have much to learn about
      ourselves. Indeed, Kieran (4) argues, this can be just as true of
      pornographic art, which uses artistic techniques to arouse sexual
      instincts and desires. Kieran (2) further expanded the account
      regarding the role our emotions play in resisting, appreciating and
      valuing morally troubling art. Emotionally troubling art, Kieran (2)
      argues, often requires the appreciator to suspend judgement in exploring
      what is taken to be morally problematic. Art that successfully gets good
      appreciators to do this will often yield insight to people about
      themselves or the world.
    Whilst arguing that art may teach us about ourselves and the world (2,
        4 and 5), Kieran (4) also argues for the claim that
      art appreciation involves learning from art in a distinctive way, namely
      through the cultivation of visual skills and mental capacities. Moreover,
      Kieran (3) argues that part of what we should value about many art
      works is a function of the imaginativeness, skill and creative character
      of the artist. Most recently Kieran (1) has argued that good
      appreciation and aesthetic creativity has to be driven by the right kind
      of motivations to be most appropriate, reliable and rewarding. Where
      someone is motivated by external goods such as money or social status,
      appreciative activity (and often artistic judgement) will tend to be
      impoverished (1). We should, rightly, be sceptical of appreciators
      with a snobbish character and, just as importantly, look out for signs of
      snobbishness in ourselves. Kieran's arguments here amount to the
      development of a virtue approach to artistic appreciation and creativity -
      putting character centre stage in the understanding of human engagement
      with the arts.
    Key Researcher:
      Matthew Kieran (University of Leeds; Professor, 2009 - present;
      Senior Lecturer, 2004 - 2009; Junior Lecturer, 1996 - 2004; Teaching
      Fellow, 1994 - 1996)
    References to the research
    
(1). Kieran, Matthew, "The Vice of Snobbery: Aesthetic Knowledge,
      Justification and Virtue in Art Appreciation", Philosophical Quarterly,
      60(239) (2010): 243-263, 2010. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2009.615.x. Included
        in REF2..
     
(2). Kieran, Matthew, `Art, Emotions and Immorality', in Peter Goldie
      (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of the Emotions (Oxford:
      Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 681-704. Included in REF 2.
     
(3). Kieran, Matthew, "Artistic Character, Creativity and the Appraisal
      of Conceptual Art", in Peter Goldie and Elisabeth Schellekens (eds.), Philosophy
        and Conceptual Art (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007), pp. 197-215. Included
        in RAE 2008.
     
(4). Kieran, Matthew, Revealing Art, pp. vii + 280, London.,
      Routledge 2004. Included in RAE 2008. (translated into Chinese
      published by Peking University Press 2007 and Korean published 2010)
     
(5). Kieran, Matthew, "Forbidden Knowledge: The Challenge of Immoralism",
      in: Sebastian Gardner and Jose Bermudez (eds.), Art and Morality, pp.
      56-73, London, Routledge, 2003. Included in RAE 2008.
     
(6). Kieran, Matthew, "On Obscenity: The Thrill and Repulsion of the
      Morally Prohibited", Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,
      vol. LXIV, no. 1, pp. 31-55, 2002. DOI: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00141.x
      Included in RAE 2008.
     
Evidence of Research Quality.
      Kieran was a co-investigator for the AHRC large-scale research project on
      `Method in Philosophical Aesthetics', October 2009 - March 2013. Part of
      his work for that project on `Creativity as a Virtue of Character'
      (forthcoming) and the earlier work on `The Vice of Snobbery' led to the
      award of a Leverhulme Research Fellowship to develop an account of
      creative virtue. "The Vice of Snobbery" paper was discussed by Dominic
      Lopes at a plenary session of the Joint Session of the Aristotelian and
      Mind Societies, 2008, as published in the prestigious Aristotelian Society
      Supplementary volume series (Dominic McIver Lopes, "II Virtues of Art:
      Good Taste", Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, vol. 82,
      no. 1, pp. 197-211, 2008), prior to its being accepted for publication.
    Berys Gaut, in Art, Emotion and Ethics (OUP), pp. 50-64, 184-6,
      noted that Kieran's research provides the only theoretical account giving
      principled reasons when, where and why a work's morally problematic
      character can either diminish or contribute to its value as art.
    Revealing Art was translated into Chinese and published by Peking
      University Press in 2007, in a series that has published translated
      monographs by other world leaders in philosophical aesthetics ranging from
      Rudolf Arnheim's Toward A Psychology of Art and Norman Bryson's Tradition
        and Desire: From David to Delacroix to James Elkins's How to Use
        Your Eyes. It was translated and published in Korean in 2010. It was
      for Revealing Art that Kieran was nominated for THES Young
      Academic of the Year 2005. Revealing Art was well reviewed in Philosophical
        Books (vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 374-377, 2006), the Journal of
        Aesthetics and Art Criticism (vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 285-287, 2006),
      the Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (2006.02.08) and more widely
      (e.g., half page review in The Financial Times, Jan 17, p. 13,
      2005). Robert Stecker, a leading figure in the field, praised the book as
      "a fine discussion of one of the most important topics in aesthetics: the
      value of art. Its arguments and conclusions are both original and
      accessible to a broader audience." A Google Scholar search on Feb 12, 2013
      showed 43 citations for the book. Other articles also have high citations
      rates (eg. Google Scholar locates 28 for the 2003 article).
    Details of the impact
    Kieran has enriched the wider public understanding of artistic values
      with his distinctive vision of the role of art in our lives. This has
      involved engaging with and developing skills in small-group workshops with
      individuals, contributions to discussion among artists and arts
      professionals and much wider engagement with the general public that
      culminated in a prime-time documentary and widely disseminated interactive
      internet materials.
    Small-group public workshops
      Tate Britain invited Kieran to design and run a series of public afternoon
      workshops (2007 - 2008) based on his book Revealing Art (A).
      All of the events were oversubscribed, with about 50 participants in each
      session . They featured an introduction by Kieran on key concepts from his
      research followed by a workshop element in which participants were asked
      to apply these insights to particular works of art and then a general
      discussion relating the art to the lecture. Strong positive feedback led
      Tate Britain to invite Kieran to devise a further series in 2009 looking
      at art, creativity and culture in the 40 years since Kenneth Clark's Civilisation
      and in association with the Tate's Triennial exhibition curated by Nicolas
      Bourriaud (B).
    Engagement with artists and appreciators
      Kieran's research has also engaged with creative and appreciator
      communities at venues such as the International Miami - Basel art fair,
      Crunch Art Festival, Hay on Wye, (200 audience members) (C) and
      various galleries such as the National Centre for Craft and Design (D),
      the Henry Moore Institute and the Leeds City Art Gallery (typically 50
      audience members). Evidence that his engagement enriched the creative
      process includes the following blog, posted by an artist after
      participating in the Visual Thinking Symposium for textile artists at HUB
      National Centre for Craft and Design: "I particularly liked the talk
        by Matthew Kieran ... which explored the ways in which character and
        motivation are crucial to artistic creativity. He presented really well
        . . . I'd really like to see him talk again, so I can get to grips with
        and start to question his thinking, and explore the subject further."
      (E)
    Contributions to policy making and public debate
      Impact on public debate and artistic programming include Kieran speaking
      in December 2009 at the Henry Moore Institute on art and character for
      Pavilion's Arts Council Turning Point programme for Visual Arts
      Organisations 2006 - 2011. Pavilion's Director said: "Professor
        Kieran's outstanding presentation on the values of art brought a vital
        dimension to the discussion, opening up a meaningful debate amongst
        artists and arts professionals active in the region. This event
        (including Professor Kieran's invaluable contribution) will help inform
        the development of the Turning Point strategy as well as Pavilion's
        curatorial thinking and artistic programme for the coming year." (F)
    In 2010 Kieran was on the advisory panel of, and was an author for, the
      Commission for Architecture and Built Environment public policy project
      that measured the public's responses to beauty in the natural and built
      environment and looked at the implications for planning. This generated
      wider public debate and professional discussion including a Royal
      Institute for Architecture conference involving architects, politicians
      and policy makers. An essay commissioned from Kieran by the project, which
      stressed the importance of beauty in everyday life and its connection to
      practical motivations, was discussed in, for example, a Royal Society of
      Arts commentary (http://www.thersa.org/fellowship/journal/archive/autumn-2010/features/on-beauty)
      and the Planning Resource blog (http://planningblog.planningresource.co.uk/2010/11/15/defining-beauty/).
      (G)
    Media coverage, Channel 4 documentary and Internet engagement
      Kieran's work has had widespread impact, including interviews for the
      BBC/OU Ethics Bites podcast on his work on "Art, Censorship and Morality",
      April 2008, and for national and international media, such as the Sunday
        Times extended feature piece on `Censors and Sensibility' October 4th,
      2009 and a feature piece in Le Monde, `L'Art Pervers' May 4th,
      2013. He also talked on the Today programme, Radio 4, 13th April,
      2012, on emotional transgression in Munch's Scream and has
      published art criticism for The Philosopher's Magazine.
    Such interviews helped establish a media presence and in 2011 - 2012
      Kieran acted as the art consultant developing Channel 4's Hidden Talent
      programme. Kieran's focus on the centrality of appreciators' skills and
      capacities was reflected in the programme. He helped advise on
      administering the Meier art test to over 1000 members of the public, which
      led to the selection of the subject of the programme—Lee Yenson, a tractor
      factory worker who had left school at 15. Kieran worked closely with
      Yenson to develop his art appreciation skills, helped to devise the
      relevant tests Lee had to overcome and explain to the audience what helps
      to distinguish good from not so good or bad art. The impact on Yenson, who
      had never entered an art gallery, was profound but the programme also
      allowed Kieran's ideas to reach an audience of just under 2 million
      viewers on 1st May, 2012. The programme attracted widespread
      national and local media coverage. Kieran advised on YouTube videos
      offering further advice to members of the public and helped design a
      shortened version of the Meier test to go online to test the public's
      artistic appreciation skills. The series producer said Kieran's thorough
      approach and accessible style had "encouraged many viewers to
        participate in the online testing and explore art in a hugely accessible
        arena." (H)
    Sources to corroborate the impact 
    A. Letter from Head of Adult Programmes Department, Tate Britain
      (2005 - 2011), (dated 04/01/13)
    B. Letter from Assistant Curator, Adult Programmes, Tate Britain,
      (2007 - 2010), (dated 03/12/12)
    C. Communication with Organiser, Crunch Arts Festival, Hay on Wye,
      Institute of Art and Ideas, (emails dated 05/10/10; 29/11/10;16/12/10)
    D. Communication from Exhibitions Officer, National Centre for
      Craft and Design (2009 - 2010), (dated 24/06/13)
    E. Web blog, Sampler - Culture Clash blog : http://sampler-cultureclash.blogspot.com/2010_04_01_archive.html
      (accessed 24/09/13)
    F. Letter from Director, Pavilion, Leeds, and copy of previous
      email correspondence from 18/02/10.
    G. Communication from Senior Research Advisor, Commission for
      Architecture and the Built Environment (until 2010), (dated 30/05/13)
    H. Communication from Series Producer, Hidden Talent Channel 4
      Documentary series, Silver River TV. The website address for 4OnDemand,
      which carries the programme, is:
      http://www.channel4.com/info/press/programme-information/hidden-talent
    The Facebook art appreciation test for the public is still available:
      https://apps.facebook.com/hiddentalentshow/fb/tests/art
      (accessed 24/09/13)