Case study 1 - Changing evidenced-based policy
Submitting Institution
University of LeedsUnit of Assessment
Social Work and Social PolicySummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration
Summary of the impact
As a direct result of methodological research led by Professor Ray
Pawson at Leeds, `realist evaluation' has provided a new lens
through which to assess and develop social programmes. It has critically
changed the apparatus of evidenced-based policy and the way in which
policy research is commissioned and utilised. Through advisory work,
training package provision, partnership-research and professional
exchange, this `realist' perspective has formed a new standard in social
programme evaluation, and is used by commissioners in the UK and
internationally to frame their interventions across policy domains,
including education, environment, criminal justice, and health and social
care.
Underpinning research
Beginning in 1994, the underpinning research introduced a `theory-driven'
approach to programme evaluation. Pawson (SL, reader and
professor, University of Leeds, 1990 — present) set out to tackle one of
policy evaluation's most pressing challenges — how to research complex and
multifaceted programmes, located in complex and changing environments,
designed to tackle complex and deep-seated problems.
Realist evaluation penetrates the `black box' of interventions seeking to
understand what it is about programmes that makes them work. Social
programmes work and only work through the reasoning of their stakeholders
and subjects. The crucial task for the evaluator is thus to discover how
programme resources impact upon on the subject's reasoning. Such choices
are always constrained by a range of local and circumstantial factors
(rendering problematic any assumption that existing programmes will `work'
universally). The key issue for policy makers and practitioners is
therefore to find out how and under what conditions a given measure will
produce its impacts, and consequently, the `realist evaluation' paradigm
looked to transform the basic question of evaluation from `what works?' to
`what works for whom in what circumstances?'
This research, which originated in a book Pawson co-authored with
criminologist Tilley (then at Nottingham Trent), established not only the
theoretical and conceptual basis for `realist evaluation' but also
protocols and procedures for how to conduct it [1]. Turning the
oil-tanker of social inquiry requires perseverance. It also requires
proposing, debating, refining and consolidating new research
methodologies. Pawson thus led further inquiries in which the
method was enlarged via two further books covering research synthesis [2]
and complex policy analysis [3]. In addition there are 24 book
chapters, 41 refereed journal papers, 8 articles in professional
journals/newsletters, 10 working papers, 10 research reports and one
Festschrift, which add detail to the research strategy and provide
practical application of the method across a range of programmes and
policy domains ([4] [5] as examples). Pawson's research was
supported by external funding specifically earmarked for methodological
development on realist methods, including ESRC awards [G1-G4] and
NHS NIHR awards [G5-G6].
Methodological advances cannot be developed in a vacuum. Research
principles become honed in practice. Accordingly, Pawson carried
out a series of parallel substantive inquiries into the efficacy of a
variety of ongoing UK and Canadian programmes, positioning him as an
expert in this field. The interventions studied (between 1995 and 2013)
include: prisoner education programmes, Megan's Law, youth mentoring and
employment initiatives, urban regeneration schemes, public disclosure
(naming and shaming), public health law, NHS service modernisation and
referral management schemes. Most of these involved research contracts won
in competitive tender and through this exposure the influence of the
approach grew within the commissioning infrastructure. Income from these
projects approached £2.0m. Clients included:
- HMP Prison Service, Home Office (1990-98)
- SSHRC / Canadian Corrections Service (1993-96)
- Transport Research Laboratory (1998-99)
- Department of Environment, Transport and Regions (2000)
- Social Care Institute for Excellence (2002-03)
- The Connexions Service (2003-04)
- Guy's/St Thomas' Hospital Trust (2005-06)
- Department for Education and Skills (2006-07)
- NHS NIHR HS&DR (2012 ongoing)
Research and writing were also supported and funded by three periods as
visiting professor (University of Rome, 2005; University of Victoria,
2006; RMIT, 2007). These helped to provide an international footing for
the research. Save for these three short periods and a year on secondment
to the ESRC centre for Evidence-Based Policy and Practice, Queen Mary,
University of London, all the research was led by Pawson at the
University of Leeds.
References to the research
1. Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997) Realistic Evaluation, London:
Sage ISBN-0761950087 (book still in print with 10,000+ sales and 3,000+
citations).
2. Pawson, R. (2006) Evidence Based Policy: A Realist Perspective,
London: Sage ISBN-9781412910606 (book still in print with 3,500+ sales,
700+ citations).
3. Pawson, R. (2013) The Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto,
London: Sage ISBN-9781446252437 (included in REF2).
4. Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G. and Walshe, K. (2005) Realist
review — a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy
interventions, Journal of Health Service Research & Policy,
10(3): 21-34 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/1355819054308530]
(the journal's `most cited paper' with 555 citations).
5. Pawson, R., Wong, G. and Owen, L. (2011) Known Knowns, Known Unknowns,
Unknown Unknowns: The Predicament of Evidence-Based Policy, American
Journal of Evaluation, [http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098214011403831]
(20,000 word paper in the major evaluation research outlet, included in
REF2).
Supported by ESRC fellowships and awards:
G1. 1995 — 1996, Senior Fellowship — Fellowship Programme , Principles
and Practice of Evaluation Research, awarded to Pawson, £20,780.00, Grant
no: H52427501995
G2. 2001-2002, Visiting Fellowship — Centre for Evidence-based Policy and
Practice, Queen Mary, University of London, £1,293,124.62, Grant No:
H141251005
G3. 2003-2004, Senior Fellowship — Evidence-Based Policy, Theory-Based
Synthesis, Practice-Based Reviews, awarded to Pawson, £51,481.50, Grant
No: H333250055
G4. 2010-2011, Follow-on Funding Award — Research Synthesis in Action:
Investigating the Utility of the Realist Approach in Supporting NICE's
Public Health Guidance, awarded to Pawson, £95,881.33, Grant No:
RES-189-25-0007
and NHS NIHR awards:
G5. 2003-2004, Joint CHSF/SDO project, Systematically reviewing
qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy
making in the health field, £50,000, HS&DR Project — 08/1317/058
G6. 2011-2014, Development of methodological guidance, publication
standards and training materials for realist and meta-narrative reviews,
co-investigator Pawson, £217,042, HS&DR Project — 10/1008/07
Details of the impact
Based on Pawson's foundational research, `realist evaluation'
provided a new lens through which to examine social programmes. Not only
does it provide a novel means of testing interventions but, significantly,
it does so in a manner that improves targeting and refinement of social
policy and practice. Armed with a greater awareness of how measures
produce varying impacts in different circumstances, policy makers and
practitioners benefit from a better understanding of what policies to
implement in particular conditions.
Pawson's insights have subsequently been adopted widely by major
national and international organisations charged with policy development
and service delivery improvements. Whilst the broad footprint
`methodological influence' is challenging to depict, the following key
users and beneficiaries can be used as examples to evidence the impact of
Pawson's work on research agendas, commissioning priorities and
policy guidance.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)
NICE sets the standards for healthcare by developing evidence-based
clinical guidance and advice for NHS, local authorities, charities, and
those with a responsibility for commissioning or providing healthcare,
public health or social care services. Pawson's research on
`realistic evaluation' is a key part of NICE's methods deployed in
developing public health guidance, as noted by its Director of the Centre
of Public Health Excellence:
`Firstly, "realistic evaluation" has, and will continue to, revolutionise
the field of evaluation on social and health programmes. Second, this idea
has profoundly changed, at least potentially, the way that social
scientists think about causation. Third, the work has challenged the
prevailing damaging and powerful orthodoxies, held widely in government,
about the way interventions in human affairs work' [A] (Director
of the Centre of Public Health, NICE)
NICE has also made extensive usage of Pawson's research
throughout its committee structure, with Pawson serving as a
member of its R&D Advisory Committee (2005-10) as well as serving on
the Programme Development Group (PDG), which developed guidance on
Behavioural Change Interventions (2008-9). Pawson has been called
as an expert witness for the PGD on Unintentional Injuries (2009) and for
the revisions of the Behavioural Change Guidelines (2013), as well as
providing training and workshops to the Public Health Group (2009/10). The
NICE Citizen's Council imparts a public perspective on their operations
and Pawson was recently invited to consult with them on the role
of evidence (2013). As a result of this sustained involvement and
professional exchange, realist approaches has found application in much of
NICE's guidance. [B]
A recent project, funded by [G4], provides further evidence of
the research's impact through professional exchange. This 2009-2011 ESRC
project was supported by NICE who seconded a senior analyst to the
project. She co-authored many of the research outputs and now plays an
anchor role in developing project ideas into official NICE Guidelines
Development Manuals.
NHS NIHR HS&DR
The NHS NIHR is the UK's largest funder of research into health service
delivery, organisation and management. Methods of evaluation and synthesis
are at the core of its commissions and the impact of the realist strategy
is evidenced in the current projects portfolio, which include a growing
number of realist inquiries [C]. Reciprocal support has been
provided by HS&DR, through [G6], a project producing
methodological advice, publication standards and training resources for
future users seeking to apply the realist and/or meta-narrative approach
to systematic review. The corroboration statement [D] from the
Associate Director and Chair of the NHS HS&DR Board notes that `the
impact of [Pawson's] work can be seen in the research proposals that come
before our commissioning board and in the debate at board meetings ...
which tend to make more explicit and intelligent use of theory-driven
approaches than would have been the case a few years ago'.
Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek — en Documentatiecentrum (WODC),
Netherlands.
As an example of the international reach of `realist evaluation' methods,
WODC produces recommendations on matters related to all aspects of
criminal justice policy in the Netherlands, and is also responsible for
research and evaluation regarding legislation and regulations in general
for national security and migration. The Director of WODC notes that its
advice `carries the Pawson "fingerprints"' and that Pawson's
work forms `citation "classics" that are used often when my organization
designs evaluations to be commissioned to outside research organizations
or are carried out in-house by researchers.' [E].
As a former President of the European Evaluation Society, which aims to
stimulate and promote theory, practice and utilisation of high quality
evaluation, the Director of WODC also notes that Pawson's work has
had a `profound effect on research utilization and policy formation across
Europe', bringing a level of `sophistication to the understanding of how
interventions work.' [E].
Institute of Health Improvement (IHI), Harvard.
The IHI is a leading innovator in health care improvement worldwide. It
offers a wide range of resources and teaching tools to help health care
professionals enhance service and clinical outcomes and realist strategies
are now a key part of that portfolio. Pawson (April 2008) was
invited to give a lecture of realist applications in healthcare at the IHI
followed by a two-day workshop at Dartmouth University. Training was
continued in a week-long IHI `summer camp' (Vermont, July 2009) in which
senior practitioners met to discuss the evaluation of their own
interventions (infection control, early response teams, etc.). Research
designs were put into place to be implemented over the following years and
this work is evidenced in a number of publications (notably JAMA, impact
factor 30) that have already emerged from the early consultations. [F,G,H]
Sources to corroborate the impact
A. Letter from Director of the Centre of Public Health Excellence at
NICE, received 13 June 2013.
B. Killoran, A. and Kelly, M.P. (2009) Evidence-based Public Health:
Effectiveness and efficiency. Oxford: Oxford University Press
ISBN-13: 9780199563623. A major publication from the NICE public health
directorate including commendations and a chapter on realist approaches.
C. NHS NIHR HS&DR, Catalogue of current projects including realist
inquiries:
http://www.netscc.ac.uk/hsdr/projlisting.php?cat=inprogress
D. Letter from Associate Director and Chair of the NHS HS&DR Board,
received 19 August 2013.
E. Letter from Director of Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek — en
Documentatiecentrum, Netherlands, available on request.
F. IHI publications advocating realist approach: Berwick, D. (2008) The
Science of Improvement JAMA 299(10):1182-1184 http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=181589
G. IHI publications advocating realist approach: Davidoff F (2009) Heterogeneity
is Not Always Noise: Lessons from Improvement JAMA 302(23) 2580-2586
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=185078
H. IHI publications advocating realist approach: Ogrinc, G. and
Batalden,P. (2009). Realist evaluation as a framework for the
assessment of teaching about the improvement of care. The
Journal of Nursing Education, 48(12):661-667, http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/20000246