Case study 4 - Informing policy on working age carers
Submitting Institution
University of LeedsUnit of Assessment
Social Work and Social PolicySummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration
Summary of the impact
Research led by Professor Sue Yeandle at Leeds on working age
carers has focused policymakers' attention on carers' contributions to
society, their role in the health and social care system, and the issues
they confront in reconciling paid work with unpaid care. The research
findings have: (a) provided a vital evidence base, shaping policy work of
the national charity, Carers UK, (b) influenced Government policy
formation and evaluation, including playing a direct role in shaping the
Government's National Care Strategy in 2008, and (c) informed wider policy
and parliamentary debate supporting carers of working age.
Underpinning research
In the early 2000s, knowledge of the numbers, characteristics and
employment circumstances of carers of working age was limited. However, a
new question on unpaid care of older, sick or disabled people in the 2001
Census, and a European Commission decision to recognise carers' labour
market disadvantage, provided an opportunity to address this knowledge
gap. Subsequent research was undertaken by Yeandle (University of
Leeds, 2006-present) and her research team, positioning them as the
leading experts in this field. While the origins of this expertise lie in
previous work by Yeandle at Sheffield Hallam University, the
research examined here, from 2006 onwards, was led by Yeandle and
the Centre for International Research on Care, Labour & Equalities
(CIRCLE).
The Carers, Employment and Services (CES) study (2006-7),
resourced through £790,000 of European Social Fund funding through the Action
for Carers and Employment award to the charity Carers UK, remains
the most comprehensive investigation of the circumstances of carers of
working age yet undertaken [1,2].
CES comprised multi-method empirical research: a purposive sample
survey of c2,000 carers of working age, via an innovative employer-focused
participant recruitment strategy; qualitative interviews, conducted by
University of Leeds' researchers Fry, Harris, Price and Rodney
with a sub-sample of survey participants, exploring attitudes, experiences
and aspirations re care, employment and support services; and stakeholder
interviews / desk research in ten UK local authority districts to map
developments in carer support, undertaken by Fry and Bennett
(University of Leeds, Senior Research Fellow 2006-2010). In parallel,
extensive statistical analysis of the Census 2001, including Census SARs
and other datasets was undertaken by Buckner (University of Leeds,
Senior Research Fellow from 2006, Lecturer from 2011).
The research findings were published by Carers UK in a `report series' of
14 policy-oriented outputs designed to maximise impact. The overarching
policy-oriented report on the CES study [1] set out key
principles and strategies for a modern caring society (referred to as a new
Social Contract for Care). This was underpinned by the study
findings on: incidence and geographical distribution of caring among
people of working age; household, employment, and health circumstances;
experiences of employment and public services; extent of social exclusion;
and occupational and industrial distribution. These identified support,
services and technology carers may need; training needs of paid care
workers; impact of caring arrangements on those who receive care; and
issues employers/managers encounter when workers have care
responsibilities. Examples of findings included:
-
Over 40% of `new' carers supported someone whose needs had not been
assessed, with no support from any service; this identified
`hidden' carers (people who care for sick/disabled family members
without support) and GPs' and hospitals' roles in supporting carers and
developing new services to improve carers' access to information
-
Flexibility at work was crucial, but inadequate; however inflexible
and unresponsive services were the key barrier to combining work and
care; this identified the potential benefits of extending the
legal right to request flexible working to carers of adults and
identified working carers as a target for local authorities' allocations
of their DH `carers' grant'.
-
66% of male and 32% of female carers of working age held FT jobs
and many such carers struggled to cope; this identified the need
for extending carer support to male, working age and ethnic minority
carers.
Following the CES study, the research team received 15 further
research awards, totalling over £3.25 million, to pursue additional
research on carers of working age, caring and employment and support and
services for carers. The CES findings were disseminated via 15
high-profile events in the UK and presentations in five other European
states.
Also of note, in addition to CES, Yeandle and CIRCLE
evaluated two Department of Health (DH) programmes, `Caring with
Confidence' [3] and the `Carers Strategy Demonstrator
Sites' [4], which were part of the implementation of the
2008 National Carers Strategy, which set out a 10-year programme and
vision for the Government. With international policy debate about work and
care previously focused on childcare, the findings also informed UK
contributions to further research on international experiences of working
age carers, and the changing welfare and labour policies shaping lives of
working carers in Finland, Sweden, Australia, Japan, Taiwan and the UK [5].
References to the research
1. Yeandle, S. and Buckner, L. (2007) Carers, Employment and
Services: time for a new social contract? London: Carers UK, pp. 61,
CES No.6, ISBN 1-873747-42-X.
2. Yeandle, S., Bennett, C., Buckner, L., Fry, G. and Price, C. (2007) Managing
Caring and Employment London: Carers UK, pp. 34, CES No.2, ISBN
1-873747-38-1.
3. Yeandle, S. and Wigfield, A. (eds.) (2012) Training and Supporting
Carers: the National Evaluation of the Caring with Confidence programme.
CIRCLE, University of Leeds, pp.98, ISBN 978-0-9570900-2-6.
4. Yeandle, S. and Wigfield, A. (eds.) (2011) New Approaches to
Supporting Carers' Health and Well-being: evidence from the National
Carers Strategy Demonstrator Sites programme CIRCLE, University of
Leeds, pp. 135, ISBN 978-0-9570900-0-2.
5. Kroger, T. and Yeandle, S. (eds.) (2013) Combining Paid Work and
Family Care: policies and experiences in international perspective,
Bristol: Policy Press. (included in REF2).
Details of the impact
The research led care commissioners and policymakers to re-focus
priorities in supporting carers. This is evidenced by subsequent policy
direction, which relied on the research for evidence, and parliamentary
debate, which used the research to recommend and influence service and
policy re-design. As well as being used by Carers UK to form vital
evidence for their own lobbying, the findings directly influenced and
engaged several government departments, such as the Department of Health
(DH) and Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), and local authorities
across the UK. It also helped shape developments in the European
Commission and Parliament.
Impact on national charity, Carers UK
Carers UK, a leading national charity campaigning to improve carer's
rights, has made consistent use of the research, which has offered an
evidence base to stimulate debate and provided a substantial framework to
shape strategies about providing better support for carers in the future.
Evidence of its impact on Carers UK includes the use of research findings
directly in its policy work, advice to and lobbying of parliamentarians in
both Houses of Parliament, and in its annual publications and events
linked to Carers' Rights Day (December) and Carers Week (June). Carers
UK's Head of Innovation directly credits Yeandle and CIRCLE as
enabling the charity to then `carry a credible case supporting carers in
employment or returning to employment, not only in the UK but across
Europe and beyond internationally.' [A].
Impact on Government policy
CES shaped the Government's National Carers Strategy (NCS) in
2008, influencing its emphasis on carers and employment, and subsequently,
carers of working age were targeted in many service improvements. This
impact is evidenced through Yeandle's appointment to the
Government's Task Force (TF) on Employment, as part of its
preparation for the NCS, with the aim of giving the TF access to the
detailed study findings.
The research [1,2] is extensively cited in the Employment
TF report [B]. For example, it highlights the CES finding
that 55% of 751 carers not in work wished to re-enter employment. The
research provided an evidential base and rationale for the TF's
recommendations for additional DWP support for carers, which were
subsequently implemented. CES evidence also supported the
recommendations of the separate NCS TF reports on Income and on Equalities
[B]. The DH later commissioned further work from Yeandle
and Buckner for its Policy Impact Assessment of the 2008 NCS,
helping to secure cross-departmental support for the strategy.
The Government's commitments in the NCS 2008 also included other
measures, including new DWP financial support for carers returning to work
and new Jobcentre Plus `Care Partnership Mangers', and as a result of the
research establishing Yeandle and CIRCLE as experts in this field,
the DWP commissioned the team in 2009 to deliver policy workshops to guide
implementation of these measures. The DH also commissioned research from Yeandle
to guide regional planning for carer support and inform health and social
care policy implementation.
In 2010, the research again proved vital; this time for the Coalition
Government, which used the research in its policy on supporting people to
combine work and care, citing the importance of CIRCLE's research and
evaluations for DH policy in `The evidence base for supporting carers
in work' [C]. Specifically, Yeandle's research was
used to identify the impact of working carers on employers, and how
supportive employers can play a key role in mitigating these issues.
Yeandle et al.'s evaluation of two DH programmes [3,4]
also produced evidence used in 2011 by the Department of Health, as
corroborated by the then Minister for Care Services, who stated: `This
report on the work undertaken in the Department's Demonstrator Sites
programme provides information which should inform and guide
decision-making at every level. The findings...will be carefully studied
to ensure the learning from this important work feeds into the
Department's autumn 2011 engagement exercise on the Future of Care and
Support and informs the White Paper on Care and Support.' [D].
A Carers in Employment Task and Finish Group was established in
2012 by the Minister for Care Services to develop further evidence on the
social and economic case for supporting carers. Co-chaired by the DH and
the industry group Employers for Carers, the Task and Finish
Group specifically recruited Yeandle so that she could
supply research intelligence from her team's work to inform its report on
workforce measures and opportunities for job creation in care services,
which set out the roles of government, employers and relevant
non-governmental agencies in helping carers combine work and care [E].
Impact on Parliamentary and policy debate
As an example of the research informing policy debate, following the
publication of the NCS, the House of Commons Work and Pensions
Committee identified weaknesses in the current system of benefits
for carers and the support the DWP provides in enabling carers to combine
work and care. The Committee appointed Yeandle as a Special
Adviser, specifically seeking her guidance on using the CES
research findings, which were relied upon in the private meetings of the
Committee as part of the inquiry into the effectiveness of the DWP's
existing approaches to carers. The research was also used in the
preparation of its questions to those giving evidence in the public
sessions of the Inquiry and cited extensively in the 2008 Inquiry Report
and statistical appendix [F], including a direct acknowledgement
of the contribution of Yeandle and CIRCLE to the work. In December
2008, the Government responded to this Inquiry Report, outlining the next
steps for carers' benefit reform, addressing some of the key
recommendations raised in the Report, which used CIRCLE's analysis of the
census to provide an evidence base [G].
In terms of contributing to and informing wider, cross-party
parliamentary debate, the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Carers
(APPGC) also took evidence from the research in 2008. The APPGC used this
in parliamentary debates and in drafting Private Member's Bills [Carers
(Identification & Support) Bill 2010 and Social Care (Local
Sufficiency) & Identification of Carers Bill 2012]. In 2012, the
Houses Joint Committee on the Draft Care and Support Bill also referenced
CIRCLE's research [4] in the official Written Evidence,
identifying the effective techniques that the Carers' Strategy
Demonstrator sites used in seeking to explore different ways of
identifying and engaging with carers [H]. This Written Evidence
was reported to both Houses in March 2013.
As an example of how research informed wider European policy debate, the
European Parliament hosted an event with the MEP Interest Group on
Carers, established following lobbying based on CES findings
by Carers UK and the supranational carers' organisation Eurocarers.
By 2013, the MEP group on carers comprised 30 MEPs in 10 member states
meeting to debate and initiate EU-level policy actions and it continues to
work closely with Carers UK and Eurocarers. The former
President of Eurocarers corroborates the role CIRCLE has played,
stating that the research `has been important in informing our work to
shape the policy agenda, particularly in a European perspective. The
research informed the 2012 report of a 10-country research project on
Company Initiatives for Workers with Care Responsibilities. At EU level
the research from CIRCLE strongly influenced the development of the work
and strategic priorities of Eurocarers, and contributed to debate in the
European Parliament.' [I].
Sources to corroborate the impact
A. Video testimonial from Head of Innovation, Carers UK,
www.circle.leeds.ac.uk/projects/completed/supporting-carers/the-carers-employment-and-services-study-ces.
B. Prime Minister's New Deal for Carers: Employment Task Force Report
(Waters, C. and Portes, J., 2008), acknowledgement on p.12. `Equalities'
and `Income' Task Force Reports also available:
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_086585
C. HM Government (2010) Recognised, Valued and Supported: next steps
for the Carers Strategy, London: DH. Research is referenced in Annex
B, `The evidence base for supporting carers in work'. The document
also references the work of CIRCLE in para.4.8,
http://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/213804/dh_122393.pdf
D. Ministerial Foreword to the Report Summary, New Approaches to
Supporting Carers' Health and Well-being: evidence from the National
Carers' Strategy Demonstrator Sites programme,
http://circle.leeds.ac.uk/files/2012/08/151111-circle-newapproaches-report-summary.pdf
E. HM Government and Carers UK (2013), "Supporting Working Carers: the
benefits to families, business and the economy", final report of the
Employers for Carers and Department of Health Task and Finish Group,
Carers UK, August 2013.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/supporting-working-carers-the-benefits-to-families-business-and-the-economy
F. House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee, `Valuing and
Supporting Carers', 4th Report of Session, Aug 2008
(citations of CES research throughout, and acknowledgement of this, p11.)
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmselect/cmworpen/485/485i.pdf
G. December 2008, Appendix: Government response, to the Fourth
Report of the Work and Pensions Select Committee on valuing and support
carers
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmworpen/105/10504.htm
H. January 2013, House of Lords and House of Commons, Joint Committee on
Draft Care and Support Bill, Draft Care and Support Bill, Written
Evidence www.parliament.uk/documents/joint-committees/Draft%20Care%20and%20Support%20Bill/Draft%20Written%20evidence%20volume%20with%20formatting.pdf.
I. Letter received from former President of Eurocarers (10 September
2013).