Transforming corporate boards: influencing national policy
Submitting Institution
Cranfield UniversityUnit of Assessment
Business and Management StudiesSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services: Business and Management
Psychology and Cognitive Sciences: Psychology
Summary of the impact
Research by the International Centre for Women Leaders (ICWL) at
Cranfield School of Management has influenced recruitment for board-level
appointments of publicly listed UK companies and has changed the
composition of corporate boards in UK FTSE-350 companies.
Since 2011, the ICWL's annual benchmarking reports have stimulated a
doubling of female appointments to boards, leading to a sharp decline in
the number of all-male boards, from 21 to six for FTSE-100 companies, and
by over 30% for FTSE-250 companies.
These changes in board composition and the practices of 36 leading
executive search firms owe much to the Davies Report (2011), a UK
Government sponsored review of women on corporate boards which drew
extensively on the ICWL's 2010 "Female-FTSE Report".
Underpinning research
The focus of ICWL's research since the late 1990s has been to investigate
first the structural barriers that have prevented a natural balancing of
the demographic composition of boards and second the impact that the
composition of a board has on its functioning. Following the financial
crisis this has focused in particular on adherence to good governance.
ICWL conducted the first study into the composition of boards of UK
FTSE-100 companies in 1999 [R1]. Initially, this involved
analysing annual reports for data on board composition. Today lists of
company directors are more readily available from a licensed database
(BoardEx). At an organisational level, the research ranks companies
according to their percentage of women on boards, including analysis of
executive and non-executive directors. This survey has been repeated
annually and published in a Female FTSE Report, permitting the monitoring
of year-on-year increases in the percentages of women on boards. Since
1999 the number of women on boards increased, but extremely slowly
reaching 12.5% (on average for FTSE-100 companies) by 2010 (up from 7% in
1999).
Over time the scope of these surveys has increased to include the
composition of both boards and executive committees / senior management
teams of all listed PLCs in the UK (c. 1700 companies). Simultaneously,
Cranfield's analysis of the FTSE-350 companies has become more detailed.
It considers demographic factors of individual directors such as gender,
age, nationality, tenure in organisation, tenure on board, sector and
functional role.
Additional research has augmented the census data in these annual
benchmarking reports over the last nine years. For example, ICWL has
conducted:
- An examination of the human capital of all new directors (2004);
- a qualitative study of boardroom cultures in Science, Engineering
& Technology companies (2007);
- interviews and survey of more than 200 female members of executive
committees about their ambitions (2008);
- comparative studies of Norway and Spain (2009);
- interviews with FTSE Chairmen about their involvement in the board
appointments (2010).
Cranfield's Female FTSE Reports were initially sponsored by the
Government Equalities Office — GEO — (and its precursor the Women and
Equality Unit), Business Innovation & Skills (and its precursor the
Department of Trade & Industry) and leading companies (e.g. Shell,
PWC, HSBC, J Sainsbury, KPMG, Aviva, Barclays). Initial sponsorship
amounts were multiples of circa £10,000 from each of these organisations.
Since 2011 Barclays has been the lead sponsor, giving £100,000 per year
for the research.
Key researchers: Professor Susan Vinnicombe OBE — Director
(1999-present); Dr. Val Singh — Reader (1999-2008); Siri Terjesen — PhD
student (2003-6); Dr. Ruth Sealy — Deputy Director (2007-2013); Elena
Doldor — PhD student (2006-11).
References to the research
[R1]. Vinnicombe, S., Johnson, P. and Singh, V. "Women Directors
on Top UK Boards" (2001) Corporate Governance: An International Review, 9
(3) 206-216.
[R2]. Singh V. and Vinnicombe S. "Why So Few Women Directors in
Top UK Boardrooms? Evidence and Theoretical Explanations" (2004).
Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12 (4) 479-488.
[R3]. Terjesen, S. and Singh, V. "Female Presence on Corporate
Boards: A Multi-Country Study of Environmental Context", (2008). The
Journal of Business Ethics, 83 (1) 55-63.
[R4]. Terjesen, S., Sealy, R. and Singh, V. "Women directors on
corporate boards: A review and research agenda", (2009). Corporate
Governance: An International Review, 17 (3), 320-337.
[R5]. Sealy, R. & Vinnicombe, S. "Women and the governance of
corporate boards", in Clarke, T. & Branson, D. (Eds) (2012) Handbook
of Corporate Governance, Sage publications.
[R6]. Vinnicombe, S., Singh, V., Burke, R., Bilimoria, D, &
Huse, M. (Eds) Women on corporate boards of directors: International
research and practice, (2008) Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
Details of the impact
This case demonstrates impact on practitioners and professional
sevices through our `Pathway to Impact — No. 4 (Benchmarking
Practices)', by stimulating debate within government and challenging
and changing recruitment practices.
ICWL has worked with Government for more than a decade to stimulate
change in the gender composition of corporate boards in the UK. The most
significant impact of the research was through the Davies Report in 2011 [S1]
which drew extensively on the centre's Female FTSE report 2010. As a
consequence the proportion of female board directors on FTSE100 companies
increased to 18.9% from 11.7% in 2008.
More than a decade of research by the ICWL revealed a slow rate of
increase in the proportion of women on corporate boards in the UK,
starting from a low base. Sponsored by UK Government and industry, a
Government minister has launched these annual Female FTSE Reports which
receive extensive media coverage (the Financial Times gives a half page to
this) in the UK and beyond. Since 2010 we have over 400 mainstream media
mentions.
Moreover, the credibility and authority of the report is widely
recognized by leading companies (e.g. PriceWaterhouseCoopers, Ernst &
Young, Barclays, Lloyds Banking Group) and governments internationally
(e.g. Australia, New Zealand), and provides the data for the UK Office of
National Statistics' Women on Boards (WoB) figures.
In 2009 the Government Equalities Office (GEO) commissioned two reports
from ICWL [S5; S6]. The Rt. Hon. Harriet Harman MP, then Deputy
Prime Minister and Minister for Women, used these in her appearance before
the Treasury Select Committee in relation to the financial crisis and the
role of boards in the autumn 2009.
In 2010, the Prime Minister Gordon Brown invited Prof Vinnicombe for
discussions at 10 Downing Street. Following the 2010 election, Dr Sealy
briefed new ministerial aides on the position in relation to WoB. The
CBI's Task Force Group on WoB invited her to advise in the preparation of
a report it published in December 2010 [S7].
In 2011, Prof Vinnicombe was invited to be one of six members of the
Steering Committee for the Government Review of Women on Boards chaired by
Lord Davies of Abersoch. The Davies Report of 2011 [S1], which
drew extensively on the Female FTSE Report 2010, challenged Chairmen and
Chief Executives of UK companies on the issue of female representation on
boards. The report made 10 recommendations, suggesting targets for female
representation on boards of FTSE-350 Companies by 2015, requiring policies
for boardroom diversity and disclosure of representation and the
appointments process.
The UK Government's Department for Business, Industry and Skills and the
GEO invited ICWL to conduct the Davies Interim Reports monitoring the
response of UK Companies to the recommendations. The Prime Minister, David
Cameron, launched the first of these at Downing Street in October 2011.
Lord Davies's foreword to the Interim Report thanked Cranfield for "their
commitment over a long period to an important issue for the UK economy".
As the Davies Report (2012) [S2] said in 2012, within a year the
number of all-male boards in FTSE-100 companies had fallen from 21 to 11,
and by 19 to under 50% of FTSE-250 companies. It also reported that the
UK's Financial Reporting Council following consultation had changed the
Corporate Governance Code requiring publicly listed companies in the UK to
address gender diversity on corporate boards. In addition, the major
search firms, which conduct 80% of all FTSE 100 board appointments, had
heeded the Davies report's call for a Voluntary Code of Conduct (VCC)
regarding diversity of appointments [S8]. There are currently 36
signatories including Egon Zehnder International, Heidrick &
Struggles, Odgers Berndtson and Russell Reynolds Associates.
In May 2012, Cranfield produced a report, commissioned by the Equality
& Human Rights Commission monitoring the impact of the VCC on search
firm's practices. Also in May, Dr Sealy was invited to present the UK's
approach to the issue of WoB to an EU delegation in Oslo as an input into
proposals from EU Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding for an EU directive
on increasing women's representation on boards.
In July 2013, a House of Lords enquiry invited Prof Vinnicombe and Dr
Sealy to give evidence to determine the UK government's response to the
proposed EU directive.
In November 2012, the Business Secretary, Rt Hon. Vince Cable MP launched
the second Davies Interim Report at the London Stock Exchange. The
Financial Reporting Council, the report's co- sponsors, asked Cranfield to
benchmark the early adopters of the changes to the Corporate Governance
Code [S4].
In April 2013 the Davies Report Two Years On [S3] and the Female
FTSE Report were launched at the CBI with Dr Vince Cable, Maria Miller
(Minister for Equality), Sir Roger Carr (President of the CBI), Lord
Mervyn Davies, Professor Vinnicombe and Dr Sealy. The reports also
monitored the continuing increase in figures: the number of all-male
boards in the FTSE 100 has fallen to six, while in the FTSE-250 it had
fallen to 20.4%. The headline figures for FTSE-100 WoB has risen to 18.9%:
this increase of more than 6% in the two years since the Davies report is
greater than the increase made over the entire previous decade.
Sources to corroborate the impact
Publicly available reports
[S1]. Women on Boards — Davies Report (February 2011) http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/business-law/docs/w/11-745-women-on-boards
(pages 11,12,13,14,15 report data from the 2010 report. Reports from other
years are also mentioned in the text).
[S2]. Women on Boards — Davies Report (March 2012) http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/business-law/docs/w/12-p135-women-on-boards-2012.pdf
The evidence for the reported change was derived from the Cranfield Female
FTSE report acknowledged in the Foreword and Executive Summary.
[S3]. Women on Boards — Davies Report (April 2013) https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/182602/bis-13-p135-women-on-boards-2013.pdf
(Cranfield research mentioned on page 3,8,12,13,14,21).
[S4]. Financial Reporting Council Developments in Corporate
Governance 2012, published December 2012 — see pages 13 and 18 referring
to Sealy, R. & Vinnicombe, S. Women on Boards: Benchmarking early
adopters of the Corporate Governance Code 2012 http://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Publications/Corporate-Governance/Developments-in-Corporate-Governance-in-2012.aspx
[S5]. Sealy, R., Doldor, E, & Vinnicombe, S. Increasing
diversity on public and private sector boards. Part 1 — How diverse are
boards and why? (October 2009) Government Equalities Office: London. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100610111428/http://www.equalities.gov.uk/pdf/29915
0_GEO_RSF_Cranfield_acc3.pdf
[S6]. Sealy, R., Doldor, E, & Vinnicombe, S. Increasing
diversity on public and private sector boards. Part 2 — What is being done
to improve diversity on boards and how effective is this? (November 2009)
Government Equalities Office: London. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100610111428/http://www.equalities.gov.uk/pdf/29915
0-2_CranfieldReportPt2_acc.pdf
[S7]. Room at the top: Improving gender diversity on UK corporate
boards, Confederation of British Industry, December 2010. http://www.cbi.org.uk/media/955588/2011.01-room_at_the_top.pdf
(includes extensive referencing to Cranfield research).
[S8]. Chronological evidence trail of reports on progress and
contributions of Cranfield research to the improvements in women
representation on boards, especially impact on executive search firms.
http://www.bis.gov.uk/policies/business-law/corporate-governance/women-on-boards
Individual User beneficiaries:
[S9]. Chair, Financial Reporting Council. To confirm that the
change in the FRC's Corporate Governance Code drew on Cranfield's research
and the Davies Report.
[S10]. Director, Government Equalities Office. To confirm the
commissioning of research from Cranfield and its influence on policy
discussions.