European codes of practice for civil engineering structures
Submitting Institution
University of WarwickUnit of Assessment
General EngineeringSummary Impact Type
PoliticalResearch Subject Area(s)
Engineering: Civil Engineering
Built Environment and Design: Building
Summary of the impact
Research led by two members of the University of Warwick's School of
Engineering strongly influenced the planning, drafting and technical
content of nearly all of Eurocode 4, one of ten European civil engineering
standards. Eurocode 4 covers composite structures made of steel and
concrete. Since 2010 this standard has been in force in all countries of
the European Union (EU) and the European Free Trade Area (EFTA). The
Eurocodes are the only set of design rules for publicly-funded structures
on land that satisfy national building regulations throughout the EU and
EFTA. Their impact on structural engineering is wide-ranging and growing,
the principles and methodology contained within these Eurocode 4 will be
the basis of engineering design teaching for Chartered Engineers
throughout the EU.
Underpinning research
The rules of the EU and EFTA require that barriers to trade among member
countries are removed, so it was necessary for the European Commission
(EC) to generate a set of principles and rules for the design and
construction of composite steel and concrete structures that would be
accepted by each country and would satisfy their diverse national
standards. To achieve this, research was needed to resolve differences in
the meanings of units, symbols and so on and in the legal status of
standards between nations. The new standards (Eurocodes) were based on the
best available scientific evidence with uniform and consistent margins of
safety and are designed to protect workers and the public and to save
construction costs.
In 1972, Professor Roger Johnson of Warwick's School of Engineering was
invited to work on the new EU standards, initially as a member of the
European Joint Committee for Composite Structures. He chaired the
Composite Structures Sub-committee of CEN, the European Committee of
Standardisation (1990-99), and led the project teams that prepared the
relevant preliminary codes, ENV 1994-1-1 (1983-93) and ENV 1994-1-2
(1993-97) and also that for EN 1994-2 (Bridges, 1999-2005). His colleague,
Professor David Anderson, led the EU project team that completed EN
1994-1-1 (Buildings, 1993-2004). Both are now Emeritus Professors at
Warwick (Johnson, 1998, Anderson, 2003).
The rules of Eurocode 4 were strongly influenced by research led by
Johnson and Anderson. As conveners of the EU project teams they were
actively engaged in all the technical aspects. This involved studying
competing methods for design of composite structures (typically based on
current national practice), calculations for evaluation and calibration
[1], devising compromises and making proposals (often based on their own
published research) that were adopted. The research was funded by various
stakeholders (examples in Section 3). Their publications (examples in
Section 3) had international impact and include the following:
- ductility is required in composite joints to enable redistribution of
moment which may be provided through yielding of the slab reinforcement
and slip of the shear connection. As the reinforcement may eventually
fracture, a calculation method is needed to determine the rotation
corresponding to this failure mode. This research developed such a
method and comparisons with test results show good agreement. The
proposed model can also be used to predict rotation capacity limited by
slip due to partial shear connection [2].
- methods for analysis and design for distortional lateral buckling of
beams, shear connection and bending resistance in composite slabs [3],
partial shear connection in beams, tension stiffening in cracked
concrete [4], and interaction between bending and shear in beams;
- the resistance to longitudinal shear by stud shear connectors depends
on over 20 parameters. This research developed improved methods of
testing and provided validated mechanical models of stud shear
connectors; statistical analyses of results [1]; and
- how to use the English language with a precision that was accepted by
experts in all countries involved, and could be widely translated
without ambiguity [5].
- Shear connectors and transverse shear in composite beams and slabs;
- Connections in composite frames;
- Redistribution of moments in continuous composite beams;
- Vertical shear in composite beams; and
- Biaxial bending of composite columns
References to the research
The outcome is in the codes themselves and the published Designers'
Guides [6, 7] which refer to over 70 publications by authors from the
School of Engineering, a selection provided below. All parts of Eurocode 4
were completed and published as British Standards by 2005 and were used in
parallel with National Standards until the latter became unavailable for
new public works projects in 2010.
Publications:
1. Johnson R.P., "Calibration of resistance of stud shear
connectors in troughs of profiled sheeting". Proc. Instn Civ. Engrs,
Struct. and Bldgs, 161(3) 117-126. (2008) DOI:
10.1680/stbu.2008.161.3.117
3. Johnson, R.P., "Prediction of shear resistance of headed
studs in troughs of profiled sheeting". In Composite
Construction in Steel and Concrete VI, ed. R.T. Leon et al, 1-13,
Amer. Soc. Civ. Engrs, New York. (2011) DOI: 10.1061/41142(396)1
4. Johnson R.P., "Control of cracking in composite bridge decks
in regions of biaxial tension". Stahlbau, 80(12) 880-884. (2011)
DOI: 10.1002/stab.201101497
5. Johnson R.P., "Eurocodes, 1970-2010: why 40 years?", Proc.
Instn Civ. Engrs, Struct. and Bldgs 162(6) 371-9. (2009) DOI:
10.1680/stbu.2009.162.6.371
6. Hendy C.R. and Johnson R.P., "Designers' Guide to EN 1994-2:
Design of composite steel and concrete structures; General rules and rules
for bridges", pp. x, 206. Thomas Telford. (2006) ISBN:
9780727731616
7. Johnson, R.P., "Designers' Guide to EN 1994-1-1: Design of
composite steel and concrete structures; General rules and rules for
buildings", 2nd ed., pp. xiii, 256. Thomas Telford, London. (2012)
ISBN: 9780727731517
Grants/awards:
Grants totalling £197,500 were received in the period 1993-1998,
including the following:
PI: R.P. Johnson; Support for work on Eurocode 4;
Steel Construction Institute; 6 awards from February 1993 to July 1996;
total £40,449.
PI: R.P. Johnson; Push Tests on Stud Shear Connectors; UK Department of
the Environment, 01- Jan-1994 to 02-Jul-1995; £27,245;
PI: R.P. Johnson; Eurocodes; EU Directorate General III; 01-Sep-1995 to
01-Mar-1998; £43,235.
PI: R.P. Johnson; Review of EC4 Part 2 - Steel/Concrete Composite Bridges; UK Department of Transport; 20-May-1995
to 28-Feb-1997; £83,825;
PI: R.P Johnson Eurocode 4 Part 2 - Composite Bridges; Railtrack;
01-Dec-1996 to30-Jun-1997; £18,000.
The election of both Johnson (1986) and Anderson (2004) to the Fellowship
of the Royal Academy of Engineering (RAE), and the award to Johnson of the
Gold medal of the Institution of Structural Engineers in 2006 provides
evidence of the quality of their research and the impact of their work on
Eurocodes. Anderson's RAE citation specifically referred to his work on
European codes for composite structures.
Details of the impact
The underpinning research and the completion of Eurocode 4 have had
significant impact through the mandatory application as policy by the EC
and all the EU member countries with changes to legislation, regulations
and guidelines. The impact from policy is also demonstrated through the
effect and benefits to practitioners and professionals in the construction
industry.
Policy:
Civil engineering structures are designed by chartered engineers working
for a client, using methods that must ensure the functionality, safety and
durability of the structure. The Eurocodes are the only set of design
rules for publicly-funded structures that satisfy national building
regulations (and similar client-based rules for structures such as road
and rail bridges) in all countries of the EU and EFTA. There are ten
Eurocodes (over 3000 pages in total). Johnson and Anderson had prime
responsibility for the drafting of Eurocode 4 (save for its section on
fire resistance). The Eurocodes are the first set of design rules
for civil engineering structures to achieve three-way harmonisation:
across types of structure (such as buildings, bridges, towers, masts,
foundations); among many nations; and across a range of structural
materials (such as steel, concrete, timber, light alloys and soils).
Reach and economic impacts on the EU:
Some of the main benefits of the Eurocodes (detailed on the EU DG
`Enterprise and Industry' website [8]) are more uniform levels of building
safety across Europe; a common understanding of the design of structures
between owners, operators, users, designers, contractors and manufacturers
of construction products; and a common and transparent basis for fair
competition in the European construction market. The EC also states [8]
four economic impacts, these include the fact that firms, particularly
SMEs, have improved access to 27 countries and 500 million consumers in
Europe. A report published by the EC also highlights the impact, providing
examples of the application of Eurocode 4 such as the high-speed rail line
in Spain [9] (this source cites work by Johnson).
The Head of Bridge Design and Technology for consultancy Atkins is
responsible for the technical leadership of their 650 bridge engineers
around the world. He comments [10] that the significant standard of the
Eurocodes has reached further than just EU public constructions:
"Eurocodes have given us a common language and common rules that we didn't
have before, covering: all our European operations (and Middle East, Hong
Kong, India); and the interface between civil engineering and
building...allowed us to develop better shared training and software,
mobility of staff...the net effect is some efficiency in delivery". This
efficiency of working and the ease of working across Europe is also
corroborated by consulting engineers Arup [11] "...even in countries where
we do not have a presence".
Examples:
The timescale of the development of Eurocodes is long (it took over 30
years to develop them). Design and construction takes several years, so
few structures designed to Eurocodes have been completed by 2013. However,
the draft Eurocodes influenced the basis of structural design of a few
international projects in the 1990s. Examples are the bridge over the
Øresund between Denmark and Sweden (2000), and a novel structure for the
Millennium Tower in Vienna (2000).
Further examples of the direct application and impact of Eurocode 4 are
demonstrated by the company Acciona, a leader in infrastructure, who
consulted on project design for the bridges in the Spanish high speed rail
system. Acciona's Director of Steel Structures [12] (and a member of the
committee for the Spanish national standards) corroborates the
significance of Johnson's work on the Eurocodes and also how Spain
incorporated early versions of Eurocode 4 (prior to the mandatory 2010
incorporation) into many projects. He highlighted eleven, including the
construction of the Barcelona Design Centre in 2011, the refurbishment of
the National Archaelogical Museum in Madrid in 2009 and the building of
many bridges and viaducts (from 2006 to 2012). He states [12]: "Designs
were also carried out in Brazil and Sweden, for road and railway bridges,
and all of them are based on Eurocodes 4 clauses. The content of Eurocodes
4 means a guaranteed design for all of the countries in which the
composite steel and concrete construction is not developed as in European
countries".
Significance:
Emeritus Professor, former Head of the Department of Civil and
Environmental Engineering at Imperial College, who was for more than 10
years chairman of the BSI Committee responsible for BS5950 and for UK
input into EC3, is a past chairman of IABSE's technical committee
responsible for oversight of all the Association's technical activities
and a past Deputy Chairman of the Council of the Steel Construction
Institute [13] supports the importance and impact of Warwick's research.
He writes the introduction of Eurocodes "represents the largest and most
significant change ever presented to UK structural designers...The
monetary value is huge; construction typically accounts for about 10% of
GDP in developed countries. The number of engineers affected is huge; the
UK has tens of thousands of engineers engaged on structural works...There
is no doubt that in the specific area of composite construction the
contribution by Warwick at both the fundamental level of providing the
essential understanding of behaviour and in then translating that into
workable design procedures (a task that I regard as every bit as
intellectually challenging as conducting the original research) is the
single most substantial of all the contributing parties".
Professional and practitioner impacts:
Early impacts on the mandatory adoption of Eurocodes affected the
software industry; the training of engineers by the leading structural
consultants, the publishers of explanatory material [1, 6], and experts
worldwide tasked with revising their national codes. In response to the
demand for understanding the application, the British Standards
Institution (BSI) set up `Eurocodes Plus' a software/interactive tool
utilised by consultants and structural engineers [14]. The BSI also
provides courses and training to support the UK industry.
The use of Eurocodes also involves radical changes in the methods of
analysis and design used for major projects by structural engineers, who
needed new software. The company Bestech, a leading UK supplier of
software for the design and code verification of bridges, has incorporated
all of the Eurocodes into their products. Its Director specifically quotes
the significance of research at Warwick's School of Engineering and the
role of Johnson and Anderson in disseminating this research to
practitioners and software developers supporting the industry [15].The
Eurocodes are influencing national standards/codes in many countries.
During the REF period Johnson and Anderson have been invited to run
courses on Eurocode 4 for research staff and consultants in Australia,
South Africa, Canada, Malaysia, Singapore, Iceland, Israel, Qatar and the
USA. They have also run lectures and been invited to give conference
presentations in other countries. Australia, South Africa and Canada are
studying the Eurocodes as the potential basis for revision of their
national codes. Many smaller countries that use British Standards are now
adopting the Eurocodes.
Sources to corroborate the impact
- EU DG `Enterprise and Industry' website: http://eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu/home.php
- EU Report `Bridge Design to Eurocodes' providing examples of the
application of Eurocode 4 such as the high-speed rail line in Spain [9]
(this source cites work by Johnson p 128, 173). http://eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu/doc/1110_WS_EC2/report/Bridge_Design-Eurocodes-Worked_examples-main_only.pdf
- Letter from the Head of Bridge Design and Technology, Highways and
Transportation, Atkins.
- Letter from an Associate Director at Arup, consulting engineers, and
Chair of the relevant committee of BSI (B/525/4).
- Letter from the Director, Steel Structures Department, ACCIONA
Infraestructuras, S.A. (Corporation)
- Letter from Emeritus Professor, former Head of the Department of Civil
and Environmental Engineering at Imperial College, who was for more than
10 years chairman of the BSI Committee responsible for BS5950 and for UK
input into EC3, is a past chairman of IABSE's technical committee
responsible for oversight of all the Association's technical activities
and a past Deputy Chairman of the Council of the Steel Construction
Institute
- BSI `Eurocodes Plus' software/interactive tool http://shop.bsigroup.com/eurocodes-plus/
- Letter from the Director of Bestech Systems Limited.