The Professional Development of Theatre Sound
Submitting Institution
Royal Central School of Speech & DramaUnit of Assessment
Music, Drama, Dance and Performing ArtsSummary Impact Type
CulturalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Creative Arts and Writing: Film, Television and Digital Media, Performing Arts and Creative Writing
Language, Communication and Culture: Cultural Studies
Summary of the impact
Ross Brown's research has been instrumental in shaping theatre sound into
a specialist discipline in its own right. It has influenced the practices,
organisation and status of sound within professional theatre. Constructing
a dialogue with a potentially hostile theatre industry over two decades,
Brown's central formulation of a `dramaturgy of sound' has changed
the ways in which theatre professionals, independent artists, academics
and specialist students think about and work with sound. In doing so it
has helped make sound design a more central artistic consideration of
theatre production and thus raised its profile in the industry.
Underpinning research
Brown began as lecturer in sound design at Central in 1994 and his
research has three main phases. Phase 1, 1998-2001, saw research
done as creative practice in professional settings. Noting the impact of
emerging technologies in the early 90s it explored the potential erasure
of category distinctions between music and sound effect. Conceiving of
theatre sound as composition, Brown sought to establish the terms on which
the auditory experience of theatre may be modelled as a coherent designed
whole, as in scenography. This was noted in Susannah Clapp's Observer
review of an early piece of his creative practice as research: `One of the
distinctive features of I Am Yours [at the Royal Court Upstairs]
... is the creation of a scenery of noise' (output 1). This led to
the formulation of the concept of a `dramaturgy of sound'. In order for
this to make a difference to industry practice it had to be comprehensible
by that industry, so it was initially tested in specifically
industry-based contexts and publications: presentations for
Tonmeister Association conference (Germany 1998), professional sound
seminar at the Theatre Academy of Finland (Helsinki and Stockholm 1998)
and publications in trade journals. This testing in industry settings was
to continue.
Phase 2, 2001-2006, began with a colloquium which drew industry
professionals together with academics. It saw a concentration on the
research's theoretical implications, with more dissemination in
specifically academic contexts. Drawing on discourses from dramaturgy,
musicology and aural phenomenology (outputs 1 and 2), the concept of
`dramaturgy of sound' questioned both the dominance of visuality in design
and the compartmentalising of sound as purely `technical' practice. At the
same time there was focus on shaping the appropriate mode of articulating
and documenting the concept. Brown was one of the earliest academics to
develop new forms of artefact-based reflective documentation. These were
described by the RAE 2001 report as `a model for practice for the unit of
assessment'. From here research experiments in documentation of
process were aligned with the industry's interest in presenting
artefacts of sound design within the format of the design exhibition. The
results were offered for commentary in 2005 at the academic PARIP
conference (Leeds) (output 3) and the industry-run World Stage Design
Exhibition (Toronto), where Brown's documentary artefact won a bronze
medal. This work of documentation was collected by the British Library's
Sheffield Theatre Archive project and paved the way for sound's arrival as
a scenographic element on equal terms with the visual, a moment formally
marked when Brown was invited to contribute to the Reader in
Scenography (2010) (output 4).
In Phase 3, 2006-2013, Brown applied his insights to wider areas
of social practice, offering sonic operations of theatre as models for
analysis, with an AHRC-funded research project on silence and
aurality in public life (output 5). From this widening of focus
emerged his historically-grounded large-scale modelling of theatrical
sound in the 2009 monograph Sound (output 6). The book is the
first and, to date, only work to attempt this. In doing so it has enhanced
understandings in theatre studies while also establishing links to study
of sensory culture and social science-based sound studies. And it has
changed industry practice.
References to the research
All materials, unless otherwise stated, are available both electronically
(except 6) and on paper on request.
[1] Brown, R. (composer) 1998 I Am Yours: Shared Experience at
the Royal Court. Practice as Research Artefact: British Library, National
Sound Archive recording, cat no.1CDR0035120. Composition, output type J.
Submitted for RAE 2001. (Disseminations include: Brown, R. 2001. `The Art
of Sound Design: Real and imaginary soundscapes', Theatre Design and
Technology 37(4): 38-43. Brown, R. 2002. `The Dramaturgy of Small
Sounds', in Maxis (Conference Proceedings). Sheffield: Sheffield
Hallam University Press; )
[2] Brown, R. 2005 `The Theatre Soundscape and the End of Noise', Performance
Research 10(4) `On Techne': 105-119. ISSN 13528165 Peer-reviewed
journal article, output type D. Submitted for RAE 2008.
[3] Brown, R. 2006 16 Essays on Composing for Theatre,
peer-reviewed presentation first shown at PARIP international conference
2005 (University of Leeds). Archived at British Library Sound Archive,
catalogue C1142/24 (University of Sheffield Theatre Archive Project). DVD,
Other form of assessable output, output type T. Submitted for RAE 2008.
[4] Brown, R. 2010 `Sound Design: The scenography of engagement and
distraction', in Theatre and Performance Design: A reader in
scenography, ed. J. Collins and A. Nisbett. London: Routledge. ISBN
9780415432108 Peer-reviewed chapter in book, output type C and listed in
REF 2. Submitted for REF 2014.
[5] Brown, R. (principal investigator) 2007-8 `Noise, Memory, Gesture:
The Theatre in a Minute's Silence', AHRC grant, with resulting
publications: 2009 `Noise, Memory, Gesture', in Performance,
Embodiment, and Cultural Memory, ed. C. Counsell and R. Mock.
Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. ISBN 9781443811200 Peer-reviewed
chapter in book, output type C; 2013 `The Eleventh of the Eleventh of the
Eleventh: The theatre of memorial silence', in Soundscapes of the
Urban Past: Staged sound as mediated cultural heritage, ed. K.
Bijsterveld. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. ISBN 9783837621792
Peer-reviewed chapter in book, output type C and listed in REF 2.
Submitted for REF 2014
[6] Brown, R. 2009 Sound (Palgrave Readings in Theatre Practice).
Basingstoke: Palgrave. ISBN 9780230551886 Peer-reviewed authored book,
output type A and listed in REF 2. Submitted for REF 2014.
Details of the impact
Brown's research has generated new ways of thinking and speaking about
theatre sound and changed its status as a professional creative practice.
Its impact may be seen in the practices of sound designers, their
professional organisation, the approaches of directors and
equipment manufacturers, training within industry and the
emergence of a specialist academic discipline. Evidence comes from
institutions across the world.
The steps towards these impacts began with creating formal opportunities
for industry discourse. These laid the foundation for establishing the
professional status of theatre sound. Crucially, Brown's early research
was embedded in creative practice in professional settings. This gave him
authority within the profession (a review of one show pinned over the
sound desk at the National Theatre studio). Building on his standing as
practitioner Brown convened a sound design colloquium in 2002 (sponsored
by Central, the National Theatre and the International Organization of
Scenographers, Theatre Architects and Technicians (OISTAT)), at which sound
designers and academics from 13 countries heard Brown
present his idea of `dramaturgy of sound' (source A). Inspired by the
implications of the research two designers, Steve Brown and Rick Thomas,
invited Brown to help set up a Sound Working Group (SWG) of OISTAT, as a
vehicle for promoting the new thinking about sound. They strategically
located SWG within OISTAT's Scenography Commission as `artistic' rather
than `technical' practice, achieving the first inclusion of sound design
in a scenography exhibition (Prague Quadrennial 2003), leading to
significantly increased profile at Prague 2007. The 2002 colloquium also
drew equipment manufacturers into the project of elevating sound:
d&b audiotechnik describe how they became involved in the planning of
sound design exhibits (source C1). In 2013 a second colloquium, at the
Lyttleton Theatre, was curated by emerging designer Donato Wharton, who
learnt his trade within Brown's conceptual framework.
This research has helped change the ideas and practice of five
groups of people. Among professional sound designers leading
designer Paul Arditti notes that `Ross's academic research can be
provocative' (source C2), which Finnish designer Kristian Ekholm expands
on: `The contexts in which sound designers have to work [are] rapidly
changing... This means sound designers have to ... be able to think
laterally and in an innovative way, and not be constrained by orthodox
approaches. Brown's book provides ... strategies for thinking outside
the box. There is very little other published theory ... on the
aesthetics and the ways in which sound works in relation to dramaturgy
and the specific live contexts of conceptual theatre sound design, and
his holistic view of theatre sound has made a huge impact on me'
(source C3).
Among directors Nancy Meckler and Jonathan Holloway both learnt
new approaches to sound. Holloway says: `This research undoubtedly
changed the ways in which I worked with sound and music, and was of
influence to sound designers and composers with whom I have subsequently
worked' (source C4). Most recently the artists' group Platform-7
took inspiration from Brown's work in staging their remembrance event, Silent
Cacophony, on London's Underground network (source B).
Equipment manufacturers d&b audiotechnik state that their own
practice was taken forward by Brown's research: `dialogue with ... Brown,
as a researcher in the field, in relation to our research and development
agenda ... provides us with useful stimulus.' This then had impact on
relations of industry and HE: `Our subsequent involvement on many industry
projects together bears testament to the advantage of academic and
industry co-operation' (source C1).
Among industry trainers the Royal Court's Head of Sound, David
McSeveney, uses Brown's book in training all his new staff. One such is
Helen Skiera: `chapters and subjects were revealed that began informing
my practice. [I]n reading the work, I became aware of other sound
designers and theatre practitioners describing their own work in
conceptual terms, rather than purely practical; and really for me, this
is the first time that I was aware that this really existed' (source
C5).
Finally, sound design teachers and students across the world are
being influenced by Brown. Sound is a standard text on dramaturgy
of sound in UK universities and used heavily outside the UK: `almost every
MA-thesis in our department contains at least one citation from your book'
(Jari Kauppinen, Theatre Academy of Finland, source C6). Professor Rick
Thomas, Purdue University, says: `I consider ... Sound to be one
of the most significant contributions to the field of theatre sound
design and composition.... It is required reading in the Graduate MFA
program in theatre sound at Purdue University, as it is at several other
prominent theatre sound programs in the United States' (source C7).
At Carnegie Mellon academic and professional designer Joe Pino says Sound's
impact on him was equal to that of Cage's Silence: it `has been
pivotal in providing a much needed matrix with which to analyze,
evaluate and understand the Art of sound design' (source C8).
Sources to corroborate the impact
A. Theatre Sound Colloquium 2002 file, comprising delegate pack,
schedule of events, list of delegates in attendance, and distributed
material (available in hard copy on request). Copies of keynote and other
hand-outs on Dramaturgy of Sound available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=THEATRE-SOUND&X=40E46E200E4C00E6B9&Y=r.brown%40cssd.ac.uk
B. Silent Cacophony file, comprising website of the Silent
Cacophony project,
http://www.silentcacophony.co.uk,
together with a note explaining how the piece was inspired by Ross Brown's
research, including an email from John McKiernan, the project's director,
to Brown (24.03.13) headed `Remembrance 2013: Silent Cacophony & your
idea' (available electronically or on paper, on request).
C. Testimony sources
These are available on request either electronically or on paper.
- Managing Director, d&b audiotechnik GB
-
Paul Arditti, Sound Designer
-
Kristian Ekholm, Sound Designer
-
Jonathan Holloway, Artistic Director, Red Shift Theatre Company
- Trainee Sound Designer, Royal Court Theatre
- MA course leader, Theatre Academy of Finland
-
Prof Richard K. Thomas, Purdue University
-
Prof Joe Pino, Carnegie Mellon University