Childhood and Child Labour in the Industrial Revolution
Submitting Institution
University of OxfordUnit of Assessment
HistorySummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Studies In Human Society: Demography, Policy and Administration
Summary of the impact
In a contemporary world preoccupied with the protection of children, it
is profoundly shocking to learn that child labour played a key part in
Britain's industrial revolution. Indeed that this pioneer economic
transition would not have happened in the way that it did without child
labour. Jane Humphries draws this startling conclusion from a study of
more than 600 working-class autobiographies. These offer unprecedented
insights into child labour, family life, careers and schooling. Seen from
below, through the eyes of history's everyman, the costs and benefits of
industrialization acquire new edge. The impact of Humphries' work has been
to change public understanding of this momentous divide by integrating
humanity back into economic history and trauma back into the Industrial
Revolution.
Underpinning research
Humphries began her research on child labour in 2002 at Oxford, drawing
on `long-standing interests in industrialization, wellbeing, women, family
and children's work. The underpinning research, begun in 2002, uses over
600 autobiographies by working men of the 18th and 19th centuries to
provide a multifaceted account of childhood and child labour in the era of
industrialization. These exceptional sources describe family
relationships, not just the size and structure of households; and they
report life as it was lived, not as their superiors envisaged it being
lived. Autobiographical evidence, as Humphries shows, enables rare
estimates of average age at starting work, social mobility, the extent and
persistence of apprenticeship and the duration of schooling. Age-specific
participation rates suggest that 1790 -1850 saw an upsurge in child
labour. Children took on these new roles as economic partners and support
for struggling, often single, mothers in order to support large numbers of
siblings. As a result, they did not only see themselves as victims of a
harsh factory system, but as actors contributing to their families'
wellbeing and survival. While the memoirs implicate changes in production
methods, specifically mechanization, division of labour and factories in
this increase, they also show that fatherlessness and large sibling
groups, common in these turbulent and high fertility times, often cast
children as partners and supports for struggling mothers. Although life
was hard, children emerge not as mere victims but as actively striving to
make the best of things. In so doing they contributed not only to their
families but also to the momentous economic changes afoot.
While the nuclear family dominated most memoirs, families fit into
networks of wider kin and communities of friends, neighbours,
co-religionists and workmates. The Poor Law lurked in the darker moments
of many memoirs, and while harsh and conditional, it could also provide
greatly needed help. Autobiographers were among those who seized its
lifeline back to independence and respectability. Other movements and
institutions, temperance, evangelism, Chartism, cooperation, trade
unionism, self-help, schools, the law, prisons, friendly societies,
hospitals, and the armed forces, are seen afresh through the
autobiographers' eyes.
Although the causes of child labour identified are historically specific,
the model of a labour market with child labour can be generalized.
Humphries' research warns against thinking of children's work as
anachronistic, surviving only in the most backward firms and industries.
Recent news featured two small Gujarati girls sent miles away from home to
pick cotton. Shedding its shameful origins, the cotton then passed through
modern factories in a supply chain that delivered clothing to western high
streets. The Gujarati children's situation was almost identical to that of
children working in gangs in 19th century East Anglia, then the most
advanced agricultural region in Britain. Child labour persists in many
parts of the world today; understanding its history may help bring about
its demise.
References to the research
Childhood and Child Labour in the British Industrial Revolution,
CUP, 2010. Available on request.
3.1 Childhood and Child Labour in the British Industrial Revolution, CUP,
2010. Awarded the Gyorgi Ranki Biennial Prize for an outstanding book on
the economic history of Europe by the Economic History Association, 2011.
Academic reviews: "Combining narratives and statistics,
Humphries has written a compelling book that provides us with new
information on child workers and their families in the eighteenth and
nineteenth centuries. This book will be the standard reference for many
years to come." Joyce Burnette, Journal of Economic History, September
2011, pp. 794-6. A THES review (1 July 2010) wrote that "significant
findings that are eloquently presented... Humphries' accomplished
interrogation of these valuable autobiographies demonstrates, young people
were far more than bit-part players in Britain's show of industrial
greatness." Katrina Honeyman, THES, 1st July, 2010. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=412262
Popular press: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1312764/Britains-child-slaves-New-book-
says-misery-helped-forge-Britain.html#ixzz1lceuzgzi and "Child
labour was the crucial ingredient which allowed Britain's Industrial
Revolution to succeed...." The Independent, 2nd August 2010.
3.2 Tawney Lecture: "Child Labour and the British Industrial Revolution"
Keynote Plenary Lecture delivered at the Economic History Society Annual
Conference, Durham 2010. Podcast: http://www.ehs.org.uk/ehs/podcasts/tawney2010.asp.
An article length version of the text is forthcoming in the Economic
History Review (peer-reviewed journal).
ESRC Professorial Fellowship, `Memories of Industriousness: The
Industrial Revolution and the Household Economy in Britain 1700-1878',
2009-2011 (£248,058.48) In recognition of her work, Humphries was made a
Fellow of the British Academy in 2012.
Details of the impact
Humphries work was published as an academic monograph which attracted a
wide audience and became the basis for an award-winning BBC documentary,
seen by a broad and international audience [5.i]. It stimulated a general
public to engage actively with family history and uncover new sources on
child labour during the industrial revolution. The documentary inspired
members of the public to research their own family histories. It
influenced other film-makers seeking to bring history to a wider public.
It also drew attention to the fundamental part played by child labour in
industrialising countries today.
Public understanding of history:
By combining accounts of everyday life in working peoples' own words with
a panoramic view of momentous economic change, Childhood and Child Labour
made the economic history of Britain accessible to an audience outside
academia. This is unusual because the public's huge appetite for history
rarely extends to economic history, given that it is unfairly thought dry
and technical. It provided a stimulus to discussion of past and present
problems and policies relating to children and their families. Reviews
appeared in the Daily Mail, BBC History Magazine, and The
Independent (see above).
Subsequently, Childhood and Child Labour was selected by BBC History
Magazine as one of the first offerings in its new Book Club. The
discussion of Childhood and Child Labour appeared in Historyextra.com,
the official website of BBC History Magazine [5.ii].
The research reached its largest audience and had its widest impact
through its distinct and material contribution to the documentary The
Children Who Built Victorian Britain, (BBC4) directed by Julian Carey and
produced by Christina Macaulay, which Humphries co-wrote and presented.
Humphries' research for Childhood and Child Labour, extended to include
accounts by working women and girls, underpinned the programme [5.i]. The
documentary dramatizes the events of the industrial revolution through the
eyes of child workers, depicting them not just as victims of poverty and
neglect but as active agents for improvement and progress. A key component
of the documentary is the use of animation to dramatise the testimonies,
illustrate the nature of children's jobs and document family lives. The
animation involved engagement with students from the International Film
School in Newport who contributed to the film. A second pre-screening took
place at the International Film School in Newport, November 22nd 2010,
where the animators, the director and Humphries, discussed the
collaboration and the way in which the animations brought the historical
testimony to life. The Radio Times, 29th January-4th February
2011, p. 83 and 86, and Time Out provided positive advance
reviews. Humphries was interviewed on Woman's Hour on 31st January
2011. Widespread interest in working-class memoirs and in child labour
created by the book and the documentary in symbiosis led to several radio
interviews and other public engagement: Analysis, Radio 4, 20th September
2010; In Our Time, 30th December 2010; Nightwaves, 14th
March 2013; Nightwaves, 10th April 2013. [5.iii]
Transmitted twice on 1/01/2011, the BBC documentary attracted respectable
viewing figures (over 300,000) on each transmission and was shown again on
1/08/2011 [1]. The documentary continues to be viewed and discussed on
YouTube as well as via blog, email and postal correspondence. For example,
the version accessible via http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87eVOpbcoVo
has been viewed 49,076 times as of April 17th 2013 [5.iv]. The
documentary has been used to inform and transform children and young
people's ideas of childhood in the past and of the economic history of our
country by schoolteachers and in higher education. For example, a teacher
from Australia wrote "I am currently presenting a 90 minute workshop to
gifted children aged 9 - 12 years, on the topic of the role of children
during Britain's Industrial Revolution. I've made extensive use of your
book on this subject and also of the very excellent BBC 4 documentary
which I accessed via YouTube. The overall response from children who have
attended my program - numbering around 500 - has been overwhelmingly
positive. They are fascinated by the animated accounts from people of
their own age that are scattered throughout the documentary, and have
taken on a real understanding of the reality of their lives and the
genealogical connections that exist for many of their own families today"
[2].
Further feedback has demonstrated that the documentary inspired people to
engage with the problem of child labour: "Just wanted to say what an
excellent programme on BBC4, last night. Felt you addressed so many issues
but above all you gave young children, working in industrial Britain, real
status — rather than the `romanticised view of child labour' even despite
the horrors of it all!" [3]; "I would like to say to you that your work in
showing how society managed children in early 19C Britain is marvellous.
Can you do more, with BBC or any other medium available? I never thought
that I would see, in so simple and direct a manner, available for
everyone, the realities which the Hammonds and Thompson put into
historical study, unfortunately available for a far smaller audience. I
know that concerns for similar patterns in today's developing countries
may not fall within your remit, but what you are doing will, without
doubt, I believe, reach people who are active on behalf of children in
those countries. Finally, while I would not make any assumptions as to
your position regarding your subject apart from the teaching of history, I
hope that such excellent work as you have produced will enjoy a life of
its own, a life I would assume to be very beneficial beyond history".
The Tawney Lecture, delivered in Durham in April 2010, appears as a
podcast on the Economic History Society website, accessible to students,
researchers and the public. The podcast was played 380 times in 2011, 522
times in 2012, and 226 times January — mid-August 2013 [4]. Along with the
other Tawney lectures and teaching podcasts, it constitutes a vital part
of the EHS's outreach activities. The project's success in making economic
history accessible to the public resulted in invitations to speak to
audiences of curators and conservators (Geffrye Museum, 18/03/2011), and
groups of amateur historians (Local and Social History Day School on Child
Labour, Oxford University, Continuing Education, 12/05/2012).
Conservation and Identification of New Historical Sources:
Viewers of the documentary sought advice on the value of family diaries
and memoirs and how to safeguard and possibly deposit such materials.
Humphries has obtained copies of three additional hitherto unknown
autobiographies from the nineteenth century and was allowed access to an
additional source which remains in family possession. These will feature
in the new work on women's autobiographies and ultimately be deposited at
the Brunel University archive of working- class autobiographies, so
providing future scholars with more primary source material. The
overriding message is that the documentary and its underlying research has
changed the way that people think about childhood, child labour and
Britain's economic past.
Impact on Historical Documentary-making:
The programme's significance was recognised at the International History
Makers festival in New York, January 2012, where it won the award for the
best history programme [5.v]. The award not only recognised the importance
and originality of The Children Who Built Victorian Britain but
will help to secure new opportunities for the production and marketing of
high quality vehicles for public education and enjoyment. The director,
Julian Carey was there to accept the award and acknowledged Humphries'
input in his acceptance speech. Since its original transmission, Humphries
has been invited to show The Children who Built Victorian Britain
on several occasions and discuss both the content and process of
transforming scholarly material into a documentary for a general audience,
for example as Keynote Address, Posthumus Conference, Antwerp, 2011.
Campaign Against Child Labour:
The documentary's claim that children were not mere victims but active
agents for change has synergies with the work of Save the Children
Canada's `Children and Work Programme' and, after seeing it, officers of
the organisation recruited Humphries to its Advisory Board, to help
develop child centred research initiatives aiming to include children's
own voices in debates about child labour, schooling and the formation of
human capital [5].
Sources to corroborate the impact
Testimony
[1] Viewing figures obtained from Executive Producer, BBC Wales Factual
and Music Department
[2] Email from teacher in Australia
[3] Email from viewer of BBC documentary
[4] Correspondence with EHS officer, Wiley
[5] Corroboration available from Child Protection Officer, Save the
Children Canada
Other evidence sources
[5.i] The Children Who Built Victorian Britain:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00dlrcn; http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00t6t3r;
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00y21v0
[5.ii] BBC History Today: http://www.historyextra.com/book-club/childhood-and-child-labour-british-industrial-revolution
[5.iii] Radio follow up: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-11351057;
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00wr9r7;
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01rr922
[5.iv] YouTube links:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87eVOpbcoVo;
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL37A7C0985535C01A;
http://britain.docuwat.ch/videos/britain-1700-1900/children-who-built-victorian-britain-
http://www.studyhistory.co.uk/Y8/factory%20conditions%20-%20'Children%20of%20the%20Revolution'%20video%20task.doc
[5.v] International History Makers award:
http://www.historymakersintl.com/includes/newsletters/mobile.php?theme=history
& id=4;
http://www.c21media.net/archives/75657