Submitting Institution
University of CambridgeUnit of Assessment
General EngineeringSummary Impact Type
TechnologicalResearch Subject Area(s)
Information and Computing Sciences: Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing, Information Systems
Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services: Business and Management
Summary of the impact
Research undertaken at the University of Cambridge Department of
Engineering (DoEng) since 1998 on strategic technology management resulted
in a principled and generalised method of creating roadmaps for technology
and innovation management. This research was developed into a complete
toolkit through case studies and consulting by the DoEng's wholly-owned
subsidiary Institute for Manufacturing Education and Consulting Services
Ltd (IfM ECS). Organisations in 26 countries commissioned over 115
consulting projects during 2008-13, benefiting through improved business
performance and practices, the adoption of new technologies or processes
and the better alignment of technology strategies with policy and
commercial imperatives. IfM ECS's revenue from consulting, publications
and events based on the research findings was GBP 3,479,758 in the period.
Underpinning research
David Probert (Lecturer, University of Cambridge Department of
Engineering (DoEng), 1994-2000, Senior Lecturer to 2004, then Reader in
Technology Management) led the underpinning research throughout, supported
by a small team from 1998, when he appointed Dr Robert Phaal and Clare
Farrukh as Senior Research Associates. Phaal became a Principal Research
Associate with full PrincipaI Investigator (PI) status in 2010. Dr Clive
Kerr joined the team as a Research Associate in 2004.
As PI for an EPSRC grant [a] on "Strategic technology management -
linking technology resources to company objectives" (1998-2001), Probert
studied the use of technology roadmapping in industry to support strategic
planning and to help companies survive in turbulent environments. The
team's research highlighted a key gap in the existing literature - a
robust generalised process for technology roadmapping - and proposed
methods for filling this gap using innovative techniques designed in
collaboration with industry co-sponsors. [1]
Approximately GBP500k of further funding for this research was provided
by the EPSRC Innovative Manufacturing Research Centre and Cambridge
Manufacturing and Technology Centre Grants (2001-12) [b] and [c] for which
Professor Sir Mike Gregory (joined DoEng 1976, appointed Professor 1994)
was the PI and Probert was a Co-Investigator. The DoEng team's distinctive
contribution was to create robust generalised approaches and well-founded
agile and practical methods, and to explore how these could be applied to
integrated strategic technology management in industry. The key steps in
the research, and the insights and findings leading to impact, were:
- firstly, Probert and his team defined the principles by which
technology roadmapping could be configured for particular strategic
contexts - e.g. sector, technology type & maturity, firm size,
strategic decision types - and used these to derive a general-purpose
framework for roadmapping as a platform for strategic technology and
innovation management [1,2]
- secondly, they designed efficient and effective facilitation
techniques for the rapid application of roadmapping, applicable at all
scales (from SMEs to corporations and entire industrial sectors), based
around large-scale workshops with multifunctional and multi-organisation
participation [3,4]
- thirdly, they generated a deeper understanding of the nature of
technology management tools (in terms of structure, visual format and
integration), in order to support their design, configuration,
combination and application within integrated practical toolsets. [5]
Through these steps, the research elucidated how the structured graphical
representation provided by roadmaps draws together a range of theoretical
perspectives - including strategy and innovation, system and industry
dynamics, visual science (particularly for managing cognitive load in
collaborative environments), decision support and psychosocial processes -
and acts as a platform for practically integrating tools and techniques
for strategy development into a single customisable toolkit.
Using action research methodology, the team tested the theory and
underlying concepts of their generalised roadmapping approach in
applications including support for new product and service strategy
development, business and corporate strategy development, sector-level
foresight and exploitation strategies for emerging and disruptive
technologies. These activities helped to evaluate the practical
applicability of the underpinning research, and to develop pathways for
dissemination and direct impact, as described in section 4.
References to the research
*[1] Phaal, R., Farrukh, C.J.P. & Probert, D.R. (2004), `Technology
roadmapping - a planning framework for evolution and revolution',
Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 71(1-2), pp. 5-26. DOI:
10.1016/S0040-1625(03)00072-6
[2] Phaal, R., Farrukh, C.J.P. & Probert, D.R. (2004), `Customizing
roadmapping', Research Technology Management, 47(2), pp. 26-37. DOI:
10.1109/EMR.2004.25111
[3] Phaal, R., Farrukh, C.J.P. & Probert, D.R. (2007), `Strategic
roadmapping: a workshop-based approach for identifying and exploring
innovation issues and opportunities', Engineering Management
Journal, 19(1), pp. 16-24. www.asem.org
*[4] Kerr, C., Phaal, R. & Probert, D.R. (2012), `Cogitate,
articulate, communicate: the psychosocial reality of technology
roadmapping and roadmaps', R&D Management, 42(1), pp. 1-13. DOI
10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00658.x
*[5] Phaal, R., Farrukh, C.J.P. & Probert, D.R. (2006), 'Technology
management tools: concept, development and application', Technovation,
26(3), pp. 336-344. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2005.02.001
Grants:
[a] EPSRC GR/L62900, `Strategic technology management - linking
technology resources to company objectives' (1998-2001) with D. Probert as
PI: GBP272k+60k company contributions http://gow.epsrc.ac.uk/NGBOViewGrant.aspx?GrantRef=GR/L62900/01
[b] EPSRC GR/R64919/01, Cambridge Manufacturing and Technology Centre
(2001-06) with M. Gregory as PI and [c] EPSRC EP/E001769/1, Innovative
Manufacturing Research Centre (IMRC) (2006-12) with M. Gregory as PI:
relevant projects (Investigator D. Probert) `Business appraisal of
technology potentials', 2004-06, GBP250k+50k company contributions;
`Marketing technology - a process guide to making the business case',
2006-08, GBP96k+41k company contributions; `Technology-based emerging
industries - managing creation and transitions', 2009-12, GBP173k http://gow.epsrc.ac.uk/NGBOViewGrant.aspx?GrantRef=GR/R64919/01
and
http://gow.epsrc.ac.uk/NGBOViewGrant.aspx?GrantRef=EP/E001769/1
* Research outputs that best represent the quality of the research.
Details of the impact
The DoEng's wholly-owned subsidiary, IfM ECS, has been the main vehicle
for dissemination of the research results to industry, through
publication, training and consultancy. In the period from January 2008 to
July 2013, IfM ECS has used the research results to:
- undertake more than 115 consulting projects both in the UK and
in 26 countries around the world, for organisations such as: AkzoNobel,
AstraZeneca, BAE Systems, BASF, BOC Linde, BP, BT, Caterpillar, GE
Healthcare, Henkel, Mars, PPG, Proton, Rolls Royce, Royal Mail, Rexam,
Sulzer, Syngenta, Unilever, and the UK government (Department for
Transport, Ministry of Defence and Technology Strategy Board [TSB])
- run training courses for over 350 delegates from the public
and private sectors in 24 countries (all the courses being led by Phaal,
supported by other researchers)
- publish the second of two books on roadmapping techniques
(co-authored by Phaal, Farrukh and Probert), to disseminate the
research-based findings to practitioners who can then apply the
techniques within their own organisations; versions have already been
produced that are tailored for Japanese, German and Brazilian
markets.[6]
The main impact of the research, realised through these dissemination
activities, has accrued in terms of the improved business performance,
changed practices, and the adoption of new or changed technologies or
processes in the companies and public sector organisations which have
benefited directly from consultancy and training drawing on this research.
The details of the construction and benefits of strategic roadmaps in
major organisations are nearly always kept confidential because such work
is inevitably commercially sensitive, but the following examples
illustrate the benefits gained by organisations and the scale of decisions
influenced:
- In 2012 the roadmapping methodologies were used to run workshops for
70 participants representing key interest groups across synthetic
biology. The roadmapping considered the entire synthetic biology
landscape, covering key trends and drivers that could affect outcomes at
various stages. Drawing upon this work, `A synthetic biology roadmap
for the UK' was published in July 2012. The Chairman of the UK
Synthetic Biology Roadmap Coordination Group, commented: "The
roadmapping workshops were valuable to us in many ways. They enabled
the effective sharing of understanding across the constituent
biological, engineering and social science disciplines, demonstrating
the value of pooling multidisciplinary expertise. They illustrated the
breadth of issues that must be addressed now to ensure the benefits to
the UK envisaged from this sector can be delivered in the short and
long term. Furthermore, they enabled us to take important first steps
in establishing an enthusiastically engaged community aligned behind a
shared vision of the future. The UK is now well placed to develop
synthetic biology towards its goal of becoming a GBP 1bn industry,
delivering important benefits in key areas such as medicine,
renewables and underpinning technologies."[7] The roadmap was
cited by Rt Hon David Willetts as the basis for government policy and
investment strategy in January 2013, when he announced a GBP160m
investment "to support implementation of key recommendations from the
UK Synthetic Biology roadmap, including establishing multidisciplinary
research centres as well as a seed fund to support start-up companies."[8]
- In 2009 IfM ECS used the strategic roadmapping approach with BAE
Systems (the global defence, aerospace & security company with
annual sales of GBP17.8bn and a UK workforce of 33,000) to support the
development of its UK-wide skills programme. Over 50 structured
interviews and an external review of the skills market fed into a
roadmapping event attended by 30 senior leaders from across the
business; the findings provided the basis of the company's `Skills 2020'
strategy, launched in 2010. Follow-up work in 2013 will include applying
the roadmapping approach to strategic workforce planning, a key element
of the Skills 2020 recommendations. The Education Director and Head of
Early Career Programmes, commented: "Skills 2020 is a co-ordinated
skills and education programme which touches every part of our UK
business and on which we spend GBP79 million annually. The findings
from IfM's strategic road mapping exercise directly informed our
strategy for attracting, developing and retaining the flexible and
customer-oriented workforce that we and other UK manufacturers need in
this critically important decade."[9]
- In 2011-12 IfM ECS used the roadmapping approach with the TSB to
support the development of its High Value Manufacturing Catapult
strategy (creating technology & innovation centres where the UK's
businesses, scientists and engineers can collaborate to generate
economic growth) through workshops with a wide range of government,
industrial and academic collaborators. The framework informed the
roll-out of the Catapult strategy which represents sustained public
funding of GBP140m over 6 years with the aim of transforming the UK's
innovation capability. The approach was also applied to a number of
sector `deep dives' (including the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical
sectors), and the terminologies and themes identified are becoming a
`common currency' across TSB, BIS and EPSRC in the building of
manufacturing strategy. The Lead Technologist at TSB commented: "The
output from the study was very significant in establishing the TSB HVM
Catapult strategy, and provides the framework for an additional
GBP25m/year investment by the TSB in economic growth through funded
innovation projects in manufacturing."[10]
- In 2009/10 IfM ECS used the technology roadmapping approach with the
Australian Cooperative Research Centre for Advanced Automotive
Technology (AutoCRC) in partnership with the Australian National
University and the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research
Organisation on behalf of the Australian Industry Ministry. Workshops,
surveys and interviews with approximately 220 individuals from 160
organisations enabled the Australian Government to develop a clearly
articulated strategy for the automotive industry, and to set investment
priorities for the AUD1.3 billion Green Car Innovation Fund. A Lecturer
at Australian National University, in his capacity as Project Manager of
Automotive Australia 2020, commented: "The Australian automotive
manufacturing industry is a significant contributor to the Australian
economy, exporting in excess of AUD3 billion in components and
vehicles, while providing more than 50,000 jobs. As the global
automotive industry evolves, Australian vehicle manufacturing must
transform to remain competitive and internationally relevant. IfM ECS
delivered the roadmapping architecture critical to defining the future
direction of this key industry, and bringing industry and research
together to realise key research objectives in lightweighting, gaseous
fuels, and electrification of vehicles. Funding has included AUD25m
from the Australian government with matching funding from industry."[11]
The research has also led directly to GBP 3,479,758 in consultancy,
training, events and publication revenue for IfM ECS in the assessment
period.[12]
Sources to corroborate the impact
[6] Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. & Probert, D.R. `Roadmapping for Strategy
and Innovation' (2010) ISBN 978-1-902546-82-7
[7] Statement received from Chairman, UK Synthetic Biology Roadmap
Coordination Group
[8] David Willetts, https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/eight-great-technologies
[9] Statement received from Education Director and Head of Early Career
Programmes, BAE Systems
[10] Statement received from Lead Technologist, Technology Strategy Board
[11] Statement received from Lecturer, Australian National University
[12] Statement received from Chief Finance and Operations Office,
Institute for Manufacturing Education & Consulting Services Ltd