Enhancing public understanding and professional practices at Weald and Downland Open Air Museum
Submitting Institution
University of ReadingUnit of Assessment
HistorySummary Impact Type
CulturalResearch Subject Area(s)
History and Archaeology: Historical Studies
Philosophy and Religious Studies: Religion and Religious Studies
Summary of the impact
Research carried out by Dr Margaret Yates at the University of Reading
has enhanced understanding of the social and economic history of the late
medieval and early modern periods and the standards of living of those of
middling or low social status. In particular, the findings and methodology
of her work on the houses of these classes has been of major benefit to
the Weald and Downland Open Air Museum (WDOAM), which specialises in the
preservation of historic vernacular buildings. Through an innovative
Knowledge Transfer Partnership with the University, the WDOAM has used
Yates' ground-breaking research to explore the history of the houses in
their care and to present the past to the public in engaging, enjoyable,
informative and interactive ways. As a result, the visitor experience
offered by WDOAM has been greatly enhanced and visitor numbers increased
at a time of competitive pressures in the regional heritage industry.
Underpinning research
Yates is one of a growing number of historians who are interested in
changes in the standards of living of the majority of the population who
are of low or middling social status, and vernacular houses (that is,
those houses generally built from locally available materials and
reflecting custom and tradition) are a physical expression of the living
conditions, and often aspirations, of this group. In particular, as
reflected in her publications, Yates' research and teaching focus on the
social and economic history of the late medieval and early modern periods.
Her methodological approach is innovative in its ability to identify and
exploit diverse sources of evidence that were never intended for this
purpose, but have the potential to inform us about the lives of ordinary
people in the past and the places in which they lived. These include
documentary sources, such as the records of the manor, of national
government (i.e. taxation returns and Royal surveys) and of the Church;
visual resources, such as maps, plans, drawings and paintings; standing
buildings, including houses; archaeological artefacts; and excavation
reports.
The success of Yates' approach can be illustrated in her book Town
and countryside in western Berkshire, c.1327-c.1600. Social and economic
change, where she explores what life was like for the people living
in the villages and towns in this area during this period. These were
momentous centuries characterised by economic change and social upheavals,
including the rebellions of 1381 and 1450; disease and the high mortality
of the Black Death; foreign and civil wars; political and religious
upheavals; and a `golden age' of the English peasantry and artisans, some
of whose houses survive from this period. Many of these events resulted in
changes that are seen as laying the foundations for the modern economy and
society.
There are further and diverse applications to Yates' methodological
approach, as can be seen in her article on the early Protestant Henry
Brinklow and the writings of other evangelicals which assesses the
validity of their polemical tracts on rapacious landlords, rack rents and
agricultural change by comparison with contemporary data. As demonstrated
through her work on Berkshire, Yates employs these detailed local case
studies as the lens to answer big questions about the nature of historical
change, including: how autonomous were the economic lives of peasants?;
how influential was the entrepreneur in bringing about change?; what was
the impact of national events such as the Reformation on the locality?;
why were there marked regional differences in the experiences of the
population? There are also applications here for local history and as
Vice-President of the Berkshire Local History Association Yates is active
in promoting, and helping others to undertake, quality research into the
history of their localities.
References to the research
M. Yates, Town and countryside in western Berkshire, c.1327-c.1600.
Social and economic change (Woodbridge, 2007). Available upon
request
M. Yates, `Between fact and fiction: Brinklow's `Complaynt' against
rapacious landlords', Agricultural History Review 54 (2006), pp.
22-42; URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40276052
M. Yates, 'Change and continuities in rural society from the later Middle
Ages to the sixteenth century: The contribution of West Berkshire.' Economic
History Review LII (1999), pp. 617-37; DOI: 10.1111/1468-0289.00140
J. Whittle and M. Yates, ''Pays Réel or Pays Légal'? Contrasting patterns
of land tenure and social structure in Eastern Norfolk and Western
Berkshire, 1450-1600.' Agricultural History Review 48.1 (2000),
pp. 1-26; URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40275611
The research has been internally peer-reviewed as being of 2* quality.
Details of the impact
Through the vehicle of the first Knowledge Transfer Partnership* in a
Department of History, Yates' research has had a major impact on the WDOAM
- a museum which was formed "to stimulate public interest in and to
encourage the preservation of buildings of architectural or historical
interest and to stimulate public interest in ancient crafts, trades and
manufactures". It is recognised as setting very high standards in the
museum sector and is designated by Government as an `Outstanding
Collection'. The WDOAM's collection of vernacular buildings ranges from
the 13th to 19th centuries and tells the stories about the buildings
themselves, the occupants and their historical context, way of life and
material culture. In 2003, the museum undertook an "Access Project" which
aimed to address a critical need to improve orientation to visitors and
facilities to enable it to retain its market position and reputation as a
quality tourist destination.
Co-incidentally, and at the same time, Yates approached the then
director, Richard Harris, to suggest a collaborative project. The result
was a KTP between the museum and the University of Reading (2005-2009),
with Yates as Lead Academic,1 to help the WDOAM in its efforts
to improve the visitor experience. The design of the KTP was predicated on
Yates' research interests and experience, and 10 houses were selected for
investigation as representative of the WDOAM's collection. Danae Tankard
was appointed by the University in 2005 to work on the project and applied
Yates' methodology to investigate the social and economic history of the
10 houses and to present the past to the public in deeply engaging,
enjoyable, informative and interactive ways. This work included the
development of new visitor displays, webpages devoted to individual
buildings, presentations and a training programme for staff and
volunteers. Additionally, the project provided the museum with the
capability to conduct this type of historical investigation for itself,
providing an ongoing benefit for future development. Yates remained the
Lead Academic throughout the KTP, sharing her research methodologies in
throwing light on `everyday folk' in their localities, and brought it to a
successful conclusion in 2009. The project produced excellent historical
information on the occupants of the buildings and their diverse contexts.2,3
As a result, the WDOAM has been able to convey to the public a deeper
understanding of the history of the houses, their inhabitants and the
economic and cultural contexts in which they lived, thus enhancing their
enjoyment of the museum. Richard Harris commented: "We are regarded as
setting and maintaining high standards which people notice... Danae's
research has played and is playing an important part in how we achieve
this level of excellence." The current director, Richard Pailthorpe, goes
further and states that the research "has had a considerable impact in key
areas of the museum's work, in particular interpretation and education."5
The knowledge acquired through the KTP has been embedded in the WDOAM as
detailed academic research papers, deposited in the museum archives, and
provides a reference resource for members of staff. Furthermore, the
methodological approach and sources of evidence devised by Yates and
Tankard have become a resource in themselves for ongoing research at the
museum, thus enabling it to maintain its reputation for excellence.
Members of staff and volunteers continue to be trained in the new
resources and are better informed as a result. This is particularly
important for the stewards in the vernacular buildings, who are there to
tell the human story of the house and answer visitor questions.
The museum publicly recognises the impact of Yates' work. This is seen in
Richard Harris' article `Benefiting from knowledge transfer', in which he
is clear that the historian's "knowledge and experience will be of
permanent benefit to us".6 Moreover, in Building History
(pp. 61-2), it is stated that the WDOAM now has "a body of knowledge and
the means to communicate it."7 In the light of the new
research, the guidebook to the museum has been revised.
The visitor experience to the museum has also been enhanced and this has
had a direct impact on maintaining visitor numbers in the competitive
heritage market of the Chichester area. By 2011, annual visitor admissions
had already risen to 140,000, an increase of 5 per cent over 2010.
The increased momentum and profile of historical research at the WDOAM,
gained through its partnership with the University of Reading, has had a
bearing on the financial support given to the museum by the Friends of
WDOAM and underpinned several successful grant applications. For example,
a project around one of the historic properties, Tindall's Cottage,
predicated on the University's original research, was funded by the
Department for Culture, Media & Sport/Wolfson Museums & Galleries
Improvement Fund (£50,000) and The Headley Trust (£30,000).
The research has also enhanced the academic profile of the collections
and work of the WDOAM and played a role in establishing important links
between the museum and the Universities of Chichester, York and Reading.
New educational resources continue to be informed by the research and the
quality of the educational contribution made by the WDOAM was recognised
when it won the prestigious Europa Nostra Award in 2011 for the historic
building conservation training programme and was named a Grand Prix
laureate in recognition of outstanding heritage achievements.
The project has also had a significant impact on the career of the
Knowledge Transfer Associate, Danae Tankard, who is now a permanent member
of staff in both the University of Chichester, where she is senior
lecturer, and at the WDOAM, where she is employed as the museum's first
resident historian.
*A KTP is a partnership between an academic team and an external
organisation and aims to embed specific new knowledge and capability in
the organisation. Projects are part funded by government (www.ktponline.org.uk)
Sources to corroborate the impact
- A Knowledge Transfer Partnership (reference number 7423) between the
University of Reading and the Weald and Downland Open Air Museum
2005-2009. Total value of grant £260,050.
- D. Tankard, Houses of the Weald and Downland. People and houses of
south-east England c.1300-1900 (Lancaster, 2012).
-
http://www.wealddown.co.uk/Buildings/Focus-on-buildings,
where there is a list of the buildings. From here, detailed information
on each house based on the KTP research can be accessed, for example http://www.wealddown.co.uk/Buildings/Hangleton-and-its-Medieval-Village
- Director of WDOAM (2001-2010). (Contact details provided separately)
- Statement by current director WDOAM (2011-present) (Letter available
upon request)
- Richard Harris `Benefiting from knowledge transfer', Magazine of
the Weald & Downland Open Air Museum, Autumn 2009, p. 5 and
found at http://www.wealddown.co.uk/images/stories/magazines/2000s/2009%2011%20WDOAM%20Magazine.pdf
-
Building History (Chichester, 2010).