Similar case studies

REF impact found 3 Case Studies

Currently displayed text from case study:

Efficient and Effective Access to Justice

Summary of the impact

The impact relates to research carried out by Professor John Peysner, and subsequently with Dr Angus Nurse, into three linked areas of access to justice: (a) the cost of litigation, in particular fixed fees, budgeting and contingency fees; (b) the financing of claims, in particular Contingency Legal Aid Funds and Third Party Financing; and (c) forms of dispute resolution and redress. Litigation is of major importance in underpinning civil society, and as a global business, and changes in the costs and financing of it will potentially impact on all practising lawyers. The research has had impact on practice developments, government policy, and statutory and procedural rules of court, particularly in connection with the influential Lord Justice Jackson's Review of Litigation Costs(2009). The impact has been at a national and international level.

Submitting Institution

University of Lincoln

Unit of Assessment

Law

Summary Impact Type

Legal

Research Subject Area(s)

Law and Legal Studies: Law

Reshaping policy and practice on citizens’ access to justice in the UK and around the world

Summary of the impact

Paths to Justice is a landmark body of survey research that has provided critical data on the public experience of the justice system and transformed understanding of and government policy on the legal needs of citizens. Its impact has been both national and international, and it has led to:

  • 22 large-scale replications of the survey in 14 jurisdictions;
  • Prioritisation of legal aid spending to meet evidence-based needs;
  • Creation of legal aid services adapted to citizens' needs;
  • Understanding of the impact of lack of access to justice on health and social well-being;
  • Implementation of public legal education (PLE) initiatives;
  • Evidence-based public discourse about the value of legal aid in times of austerity.

Submitting Institution

University College London

Unit of Assessment

Law

Summary Impact Type

Legal

Research Subject Area(s)

Law and Legal Studies: Law, Other Law and Legal Studies

Shaping the debate on cuts in Legal Aid funding

Summary of the impact

By exploring the social and economic effects of cuts in funding for legal aid, this research directly influenced legislation aimed at preserving legal aid for welfare benefit appeals. This was a major victory for campaigners who cited the research to lobby against cuts proposed by the 2011 Legal Aid Bill. The research informed a proposed House of Lords amendment to the Bill. Although the amendment was turned back by the House of Commons, welfare benefit appeals on points of law were discussed during the second reading and retained within the scope of legal aid funding.

Submitting Institution

London School of Economics & Political Science

Unit of Assessment

Anthropology and Development Studies

Summary Impact Type

Legal

Research Subject Area(s)

Law and Legal Studies: Law, Other Law and Legal Studies

Filter Impact Case Studies

Download Impact Case Studies